Ethnological documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, 1875-1958

Collection context

Summary

Title:
Ethnological documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley
Dates:
1875-1958
Abstract:
The Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, is composed of 216 separate collections of varying size, spanning the period 1875 to 1958, with the exception of a QuichƩ Maya manuscript leaf, dating from the 17th Century. The collection is comprised of manuscripts, field notes, and other linguistic, ethnographic and ethnobotanical documents, including card files, newsclippings, genealogical tables, charts, maps, drawings, photographs, as well as some original microfilm. Some of the data was gathered by Berkeley anthropology graduate students for the Culture Element Distribution Survey, under the direction of Alfred L. Kroeber. Many of the manuscripts contain notations in Kroeber's hand. The documents were transferred from the Robert H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology (now the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology) to The Bancroft Library in 1970.
Extent:
Microfilm: 139 reels Number of containers: 93 boxes, 14 oversize folders Linear feet: 36
Language:
Collection materials are in English
Preferred citation:

[Identification of item], Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, BANC FILM 2216, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley., BANC FILM 2216, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley

Background

Scope and content:

The Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, is composed of 216 separate collections of varying size, spanning the period 1875 to 1958, with the exception of a QuichƩ Maya manuscript leaf, dating from the 17th Century. The collection is comprised of manuscripts, field notes, and other linguistic, ethnographic and ethnobotanical documents, including card files, newsclippings, genealogical tables, charts, maps, drawings, photographs, as well as some original microfilm. Some of the data was gathered by Berkeley anthropology graduate students for the Culture Element Distribution Survey, under the direction of Alfred L. Kroeber. Many of the manuscripts contain notations in Kroeber's hand. The documents were transferred from the Robert H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology (now the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology) to The Bancroft Library in 1970.

As originally described in Dale Valory's 1971 Guide to Ethnological Documents (1-203) of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California Berkeley, the collection is particularly rich in cultural and linguistic information about California Indians. Noteworthy documents include Pliny E. Goddard's notes and manuscripts on California Athabaskan (Na DenƩ) languages, as well as Edward Sapir's celebrated work with Ishi, the last speaker of Yahi, and on other Yanan languages. The work of Thomas T. Waterman on the Yurok, DiegueƱo and Yana languages is well represented, as is that of Paul L. Faye on the CupeƱo and Philip S. Sparkman on the LuiseƱo languages. There is a substantial quantity of Edward W. Gifford's much sought-after field notes and manuscripts concerning linguistic groups from throughout California. Documentation of several Paiute languages and cultures figures prominently in the notebooks compiled by Frederick S. Hulse and Frank J. Essene, which are unusual in that Native Americans were sometimes employed to record as well as to supply information. Also worth noting are Abraham M. Halpern's Pomo-Patwin field notes, and the myths, tales and vocabulary collected by Waterman, Charles F. Voegelin and Erminie Wheeler-Voegelin from Tubatulabal informants. There are many smaller yet still significant collections, including information on Nisenan and other Maidu languages, recorded during the brief anthropological career of Hugh W. Littlejohn.

In addition to California languages, the Ethnological Documents Collection also contains linguistic and cultural information from other parts of the country, as well as from abroad. Examples include the seminal work on the Tohono O'Odham language of Arizona by Juan Dolores and Kroeber; Halpern's detailed Yuma linguistic and Papago ethnographic notes; William W. Elmendorf's lengthy Twana and Skokomish field notes; Ronald L. Olson's papers on the Kwakiutl and Tlingit; and Waterman's research on the tribes of the Puget Sound region. From further afield come John Garvan's manuscripts on linguistics and ethnology from the Philippine Islands, as well as documentation of Gifford's work in Oceania.

Since the appearance of Valory's Guide in 1971, the Ethnological Documents Collection has doubled in size. Recent additions to the collection include over 100 field notebooks, containing interviews with Pomo, Wailaki, Nomlaki, Konkow, Yuki, Maidu, Paiute, and Lone Pine Shoshoni informants, which were conducted under the auspices of the United States Works Projects Administration and the California State Employment Relief Administration during the 1930s. Some of these notebooks are remarkable for the level of detail of the information. More recently, multiple drafts of The Sparkman Grammar of LuiseƱo have been transferred from the Albert L. Kroeber Papers (BANC MSS C-B 925) and added to Sparkman's extensive documentation of the grammar and vocabulary of the LuiseƱo. Manuscripts on the culture and language of the Yurok and the DiegueƱo also have been transferred to the Ethnological Documents Collection from the Kroeber Papers. Two late additions to the collection are Arden R. King's field notes on the Mountain (Northeast) Maidu and Gifford's notes on the Karok. The collection's expanded size has been caused in part by careful conservation work and improved housing of documents, including the mylar encapsulation of fragile documents, and the creation of custom-sized acid-free boxes for fragile items.

The final part of the finding aid consists of four indices, three of which were provided by Valory. The Index of Authors [and Compilers] (I) has been updated to reflect recent additions to the collection. Further expanding and enriching access to the holdings of the Ethnological Documents Collection is a newly-created Index of Informants (II), with over 2,200 names. This new index augments Dale Valory's original Author-Persons Index, which had excluded the names of Native American consultants. The Index of Linguistic and Tribal Names (III) has been modernized to show current as well as historic names. The Subject Index (IV) has been left as Valory created it. The finding aid concludes with Valory's bibliography of works cited.

Biographical / historical:

This Guide represents the culmination of some five years' work by the compiler which was initiated in December, 1965. In excess of 50,000 pages of manuscripts and field notes, and thousands of plates and photographs, were sorted, researched, indexed and archived in a decimal system. In 1957-1958, A. L. Kroeber had compiled the first catalog of Museum manuscripts, then numbering but thirty-nine. Beside these relatively few items remained an enormous quantity of collections stored then in the mezzanine of the Anthropology Library of Kroeber Hall. In 1967, Kroeber's list was augmented and edited by the writer, and was then published (Kroeber and Valory 1967) to initiate knowledge of the collection's existence in the academic community at large.

In 1969, a joint committee of Department of Anthropology faculty and Lowie Museum staff met and decided to accept an offer by the University Archives to absorb the collections. By this time, in excess of 150 of the collections had been archived, and their value was becoming known to scholars throughout the United States; numerous scholars came to Berkeley thereafter to examine and utilize the mainly unpublished sources. The lack of adequate facilities to store and use the collections, however, severely hampered this activity, and the Department/Museum "Archives" had merely unofficial status.

The accumulation of these collections began as early as the Department of Anthropology itself (1901), and the Guide, together with the important endnotes, is in itself a meandering history of both the Department and of the course and development of ethnology in California. The collections are significant mainly for their relevance to North American Indian--and California Indian in particular--studies, although there are as well significant Pacific collections. Notable among the archival items are the collections of works by P. E. Goddard, E. W. Gifford, to some extent those of A. L. Kroeber and T. T. Waterman. The private correspondence and scientific papers of A. L. Kroeber and R. H. Lowie are not a part of this collection and are now located in The Bancroft Library. Department and Museum official correspondence to 1958 was also shifted to the University Archives in 1969.

The ethnological documents of the Department and Museum are now available for use to serious scholars, and individuals interested in them should contact the University Archivist, for rules respecting the examination and reproduction of the contents. As a courtesy, permission for citation or publication, in part or in whole, of the collections should be secured, in writing, in advance from the authors where living. In many cases, living authors' addresses can be obtained from either the Lowie Museum files or from the Department of Anthropology in Kroeber Hall; authorization for the use of the collections per se is not necessary on the part of the Museum or Department, however. The University Archivist has sole authority in this matter.

It is hoped that in years to come, the collections now in the University Archives will be utilized to their capacity, as fresh field sources and opportunities for research on traditional cultures of North American Indian societies are swiftly drying up, and the domain of historical Indian civilizations is slipping into the realm of paleoanthropology, and the traditional American Indian is disappearing. As this phenomenon increasingly becomes the general rule, scholars will turn ever increasingly in kind to library and archival sources for new insight and data, and such collections as those in the Archives will gain new and deeper significance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The writer is grateful to many individuals who responded to queries during the researching of the collections. I would like to especially acknowledge the assistance of the following persons: Mr. Robert Pfeiffer, Anthropology Librarian; Dr. V. K. Golla of George Washington University; Dr. John Rowe, Dr. Robert Heizer, Dr. J. N. Anderson, the late Dr. T. D. McCown, Dr. N. H. H. Graburn, and Dr. Alan Dundes of the University of California, Berkeley; Dr. William Bright and Dr. Harry Hoijer of the University of California, Los Angeles, Dr. Cora Du Bois of Harvard University; Dr. Catherine McClellan of the University of Wisconsin; Dr. T. S. Kauffman of the University of Pittsburg; Dr. Frank J. Essene of the University of Kentucky; Dr. F. S. Hulse of the University of Arizona; Mrs. Delila Gifford; Mrs. Theodora Kroeber-Quinn; Dr. A. B. Elsasser, Mr. Frank Norick, Mr. Gene Prince, and Miss S. R. Gudmundsen of the R. H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology; Dr. W. W. Elmendorf, Dr. J. H. Steward, Dr. Reo Fortune, Dr. C. D. Forde, Dr. Isabel T. Kelly, Dr. Julius Moshinsky, Dr. Shirley Silver, Mr. J. R. K. Kantor of the University Archives; and Dr. Margaret Mead of the American Museum of Natural History.

Berkeley, California
October 1971
[Dale Valory
Archeological Research Facility
Department of Anthropology
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, California]

Acquisition information:
The Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, were transferred to The Bancroft Library from the Robert H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology (now the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology) in 1970. No additions are expected.
Processing information:

The collection was processed by Claora Styron, Brian C. Pierini, and Lauren Lassleben.

Arrangement:
Arrangement and Description Note to the 1997 Microfilm Edition

The Ethnological Documents are composed of 216 discrete smaller collections of varying length. In this finding aid, the collections are referred to as "items." The collection as a whole conforms to the order imposed by Dale Valory and described by him in his 1971 Guide to Ethnological Documents (1-203) of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California Berkeley. Since this is the arrangement in which the collection has been used and cited since 1971, the original order has been maintained in the microfilm edition. Unfortunately, at times this may entail some inconvenience to the researcher. For example, the papers of Edward Sapir are listed as Items 67, 71, 129, and 197, the order in which the items were listed in the 1971 Guide. As a result, Sapir's papers will appear on more than one microfilm reel, as the filming sequence follows the numerical order of the items. For more information, please consult the Note on Microfilm, with Key to the Arrangement of the Collection on Reels.

The finding aid has been edited for clarity and consistency. Misspelled words, errata, obscure and incomplete sentences, and bibliographical inconsistencies have been corrected whenever possible. Researchers who wish to review its evolution can refer to the earlier versions ("Ethnological Manuscripts in the Robert H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology," by A. L. Kroeber and D. Valory, in The Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, #37, 1967; and the Guide to the Ethnological Documents (1-203) of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, which is cited above).

The finding aid has been edited so that the Container Listing matches as closely as possible the actual contents of the folders. A number of items have been re-arranged over time, and in some cases it is no longer possible to determine the original order, or to reconstruct it. Other items were incomplete due to loss. For instance, Item 159 now lacks W. L. Marsden's Notebook II, which was present in the collection in 1971. In the case where new materials have been added to the collection, a summary of their contents and source have been noted in the item description.

Significant format modifications have been made in the 1997 version of the finding aid. Numerical reel notations have been entered in the lefthand column to signal the start of each reel. New editorial notes have been entered in square brackets, while Dale Valory's original notes in parentheses have been retained. Throughout the collection, Valory's original page count has been retained, even though it may have changed since 1971. In exceptional cases, where the page count of items has changed substantially, usually due to major additions to the item, the new count is placed in square brackets beside the former count. Variations in some page counts can be explained by Valory's inclusion of blank notebook pages in the count, whereas the count for the microfilm edition includes only surfaces with text and graphic information.

Note on Microfilm, with Key to the Arrangement of the Collection on Reels

The Ethnological Documents Collection has been microfilmed in order to preserve fragile paper documents and to make the collection more widely available for research. The preservation of this unique collection on microfilm ensures its continued availability to researchers.

While microfilm is currently the preservation medium of choice, it is not without limitations. Since it is a black and white medium, it does not convey information shown in color on maps or charts, for example. Other kinds of documents where legibility may be compromised on microfilm are notebooks with colored pencil, photostatic copies, carbon copies, and photographs.

The goal in filming is to capture completely and legibly all surfaces with text or other information. In some instances, varying levels of reflectance on a single document necessitated a retake of that page at different levels of exposure. Some documents required two or three retakes in order to ensure their complete legibility. In other cases, the weak contrast of pencil script on embrittled and darkening paper in field notes may be enhanced on film. The valuable field notes in the Ethnological Documents Collection have been filmed to show the structure of the physical object itself, thus providing a surrogate of the original. The size of a document influences the way in which it was filmed. Oversized documents, such as charts, genealogical tables and maps, are usually filmed in overlapping segments, after an initial establishing shot has been taken. The photographs in this collection have been filmed as reference images only.

Although most of the Ethnological Documents Collection is paper-based, a few items originated in the collection on microfilm only. These original films have item numbers ending with the letter m for microfilm (such as Item 12.8m). These early films have been copied onto a contemporary polyester base, and reels may be ordered for patron use in the same manner in which other reels are requested. Some of the film had deteriorated completely and was discarded. Wherever possible, the description in the Container Listing and in the Key to the Arrangement of the Collection on Reels contains notes about where to locate the information that was on the discarded reel.

As regards the arrangement of the items on reels, it would have been simpler to film one item on one reel. But since some items consist of only a few pages, this would not have been economical. The collection has been filmed at an average of 550 images per reel. The reels have been programmed in three different ways: one item occupying one reel; several smaller items fitting on one reel; and one large item requiring multiple reels.

To illustrate:

1) One item on a single reel: Item 11 fits on one reel that is called Reel 11; Item 27 fits on one reel that is called Reel 27.

2) Several small items on one reel: Items 2-10 fit on one reel that is called Reel 2-10; Items 73-77 fit on one reel that is called Reel 73-77.

3) One item on multiple reels: Item 1 fits on two reels that are called Reel 1 (1) and Reel 1 (2); Item 82 fits on eleven reels that are called Reel 82 (1), Reel 82 (2), Reel 82 (3), and so forth.

Special care is recommended when ordering an item that is on several reels. First locate the description of the item in the Container Listing and note the items of interest. Then turn to the Key to the Arrangement of the Collection on Reels and match the item number to the reel number. For example, after selecting Item 12.11 (Kato linguistic miscellany) in the Container Listing, go to the Key to Arrangement, and locate the item in the column marked Item Number. There you will find Item 12.11-12.14.1 listed directly across from Reel 12 (5) in the Reel Number column.

Key to the Arrangement of the Collection on Reels

Item Number Reel Number
Item 1.1-1.4 Reel 1 (1)
Item 1.5-1.8 Reel 1 (2)
Item 2-10 Reel 2-10
Item 11
[For the researcher's convenience, Item 17 has
been filmed on this reel as well as on Reel 16-17.]
Reel 11
Item 12.1-12.5 Reel 12 (1)
Item 12.6-12.7.3 Reel 12 (2)
Item 12.8m Reel 12 (3)
Item 12.9.1-12.10.2 Reel 12 (4)
Item 12.11-12.14.1 Reel 12 (5)
Item 12.14.2-12.15 Reel 12 (6)
Item 13-15 Reel 13-15
Item 16-17 Reel 16-17
Item 18-19 Reel 18-19
Item 20-21 Reel 20-21
Item 22-25.5.4 Reel 22-25
Item 26.1.1-26.1.7c Reel 26 (1)
Item 26.1.8-26.2.2b Reel 26 (2)
Item 27.1.1-27.3.2 Reel 27
Item 28.1.1-28.2.2 Reel 28
Item 29.1.1-29.2.2 Reel 29 (1)
Item 29.3.1-29.3.5 Reel 29 (2)
Item 29.4.1-29.4.4 Reel 29 (3)
Item 29.4.5-29.4.7 Reel 29 (4)
Item 29.5.1-29.5.6 Reel 29 (5)
Item 29.5.7-29.5.12b Reel 29 (6)
Item 29.5.13-29.6 Reel 29 (7)
Item 29.7.1-29.7.6 Reel 29 (8)
Item 29.8.1-29.8.4 Reel 29 (9)
Item 29.8.5-29.8.7 Reel 29 (10)
Item 29.9.1-29.9.6; 30 Reel 29 (11)-30
Item 31-36.5 Reel 31-36
Item 37.1-45.4 Reel 37-45
Item 46-51 Reel 46-51
Item 52m Reel 52m
Item 53.1-53.4 Reel 53
Item 54m Reel 54m (1)
Reel 54m (2)
Item 55-59 Reel 55-59
Item 60-61 Reel 60-61
Item 62-64 Reel 62-64
Item 65.1-65.5 Reel 65 (1)
Item 65.6-65.10 Reel 65 (2)
Item 66m
[This reel was defective and was discarded in 1996.
For a copy of the contents, see Reel 113-117.]
Item 67-69.5 Reel 67-69
Item 70-72 Reel 70-72
Item 73-77 Reel 73-77
Item 78.1 Reel 78 (1)
Item 78.2-80 Reel 78 (2)-80
Item 81.1-81.8 Reel 81
Item 82.1-82.3.2 Reel 82 (1)
Item 82.4 Reel 82 (2)
Item 82.5.1 Reel 82 (3)
Item 82.5.2 Reel 82 (4)
Item 82.6.1 Reel 82 (5)
Item 82.6.2 Reel 82 (6)
Item 82.6.3 Reel 82 (7)
Item 82.6.4 Reel 82 (8)
Item 82.7-82.11 Reel 82 (9)
Item 82.12.1-82.12.13 Reel 82 (10)
Item 82.13.1-82.14. Reel 82 (11)
Item 83 Reel 83
Item 84 Reel 84
Item 85.1-85.6 Reel 85
Item 86.1-87.3 Reel 86-87
Item 88-91.1 Reel 88-91
Item 92.1-98 Reel 92-98
Item 99.1-99.4.5 Reel 99 (1)
Item 99.4.6-99.4.16 Reel 99 (2)
Item 99.4.17-103.2 Reel 99 (3)-103
Item 104.1-106 Reel 104-106
Item 107.1-112 Reel 107-112
Item 113.1-117 Reel 113-117
Item 118.1-118.6 Reel 118 (1)
Item 118.7-118.11.3 Reel 118 (2)
Item 118.11.4-121 Reel 118 (3)-121
Item 122.1.1-122.3 Reel 122 (1)
Item 122.4.1-122.7 Reel 122 (2)
Item 123-127 Reel 123-127
Item 128.1-128.20 Reel 128 (1)
Item 128.21-128.28 Reel 128 (2)
Item 128.29-128.38 Reel 128 (3)
Item 129.1.1 Reel 129 (1)
Item 129.1.2 Reel 129 (2)
Item 129.2.1 Reel 129 (3)
Item 129.2.2 Reel 129 (4)
Item 129.3.1 Reel 129 (5)
Item 129.3.2 Reel 129 (6)
Item 129.3.3 Reel 129 (7)
Item 130.1-130.5 Reel 130 (1)
Item 130.6-130.13 Reel 130 (2)
Item 131-133 Reel 131-133
Item 134.1 (Folder 1)-134.1 (Folder 8) Reel 134 (1)
Item 134.1 (Folder 9)-134.1 (Folder 15), 134.2m
[This reel contains everything except 134.2m,
which deteriorated and was discarded in 1978.]
Reel 134 (2)
Item 134.3-134.7.3 Reel 134 (3)
Item 134.8.1-134.9 Reel 134 (4)
Item 134.10-135 Reel 134 (5)-135
Item 136m
[This reel was defective and was discarded in 1996.
For a copy of the original, see Reel 31-36.]
Item 137m Reel 137m
Item 138m Reel 138m
Item 139-143.1
[This reel contains only a record of Items 139-142,
which were returned to the owner in 1970-1971.
Most of this reel is Item 143.1.]
Reel 139-143 (1)
Item 143.2-143.8 Reel 143 (2)
Item 144.1.1 Reel 144 (1)
Item 144.1.2-144.1.4 Reel 144 (2)
Item 144.1.5-145m
[This reel contains only a record of Item 145m,
which was returned to the owner in 1974.
Most of the reel is 144.1.5-144.2.4.]
Reel 144 (3)-145m
Item 146.1.1-146.1.8 Reel 146 (1)
Item 146.2.1-146.2.9 Reel 146 (2)
Item 147.1-147.2 Reel 147 (1)
Item 147.3-147.5.15 Reel 147 (2)
Item 148.1-148.9 Reel 148
Item 149-152.4 Reel 149-152
Item 153.1-155 Reel 153-155
Item 156.1-156.2.7 Reel 156 (1)
Item 156.3.1 Reel 156 (2)
Item 156.3.2 Reel 156 (3)
Item 156.3.3 Reel 156 (4)
Item 156.3.4 Reel 156 (5)
Item 156.3.5 Reel 156 (6)
Item 157-160 Reel 157-160
Item 161-163 Reel 161-163
Item 164 Reel 164
Item 165-168 Reel 165-168
Item 169 Reel 169
Item 170-172 Reel 170-172
Item 173-174 Reel 173-174
Item 175-181 Reel 175-181
Item 182-186.5 Reel 182-186
Item 187-203 Reel 187-203
Item 204.1-204.11 Reel 204 (1)
Item 204.12-204.24 Reel 204 (2)
Item 204.25-204.36.1 Reel 204 (3)
Item 204.37-204.47 Reel 204 (4)
Item 205.1-206.7 Reel 205-206
Item 207.1-207.6 Reel 207
Item 208.1-208.9 Reel 208
Item 209.1-209.10 Reel 209
Item 210.1-210.7 Reel 210
Item 211.1-211.4 Reel 211
Item 212.1-212.11 Reel 212
Item 213.1-213.5 Reel 213
Item 214-216 Reel 214-216
Physical location:
Many of the Bancroft Library collections are stored offsite and advance notice may be required for use. For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog.
Rules or conventions:
Finding Aid prepared using Describing Archives: a Content Standard
Bibliography:

Baer, Karl Ernst von and Gr. von Helmersen. 1839. <em>Beitraege zur Kenntnis des russischen Reiches und der aufgraenzenden Laender Asiens</em>. 1:80-96.<br>

Ballard, Arthur C.. 1929. Mythology of Southern Puget Sound. <em>University of Washington Publications in Anthropology</em>. 3:31-150.<br>

Barton, Roy Franklin. 1949. <em>The Kalingas: Their Institutions and Custom Law</em>. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.<br>

Baumhoff, Martin A.. 1958. California Athapaskan Groups. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 16:157-237.<br>

Bright, William. 1968. A LuiseƱo Dictionary. <em>University of California Publications in Linguistics</em>. 51.<br>

Dixon, Roland Burrage. 1905. The Northern Maidu. <em>Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History</em>. 17:119-346.<br>

________. 1910. The Chimariko Indians and Language. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology</em>. 5:295-380.<br>

Dixon, Roland Burrage, and A. L. Kroeber. 1913. New Linguistic Families in California. <em>American Anthropologist</em>. 15:647-655.<br>

Dolores, Juan. 1913. Papago Verb Stems. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology</em>. 10:241-263.<br>

________. 1923. Papago Nominal Stems. <em>Ibid.</em> 20:19-31.<br>

DuBois, Constance Goddard. 1905. Religious Ceremonies and Myths of the Mission Indians. <em> American Anthropologist</em>. 7:620-629.<br>

________. 1908. The Religion of the LuiseƱo Indians. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology</em>. 8:69-186.<br>

Elmendorf, William Welcome. 1960. The Structure of Twana Culture. <em>Washington State University Research Studies</em>, Monographic Supplement 2.<br>

Forde, Cyril Daryll. 1931. Ethnography of the Yuma Indians. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology</em>. 28:83-278.<br>

Freeman, John F., and Murphy D. Smith, eds.. 1966. A Guide to Manuscripts Relating to the American Indian in the Library of the American Philosophical Society. <em>Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society</em>. 65.<br>

Gayton, Anna Hadwick. 1948. Northern Foothill Yokuts and Western Mono. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 10:143-302.<br>

Gifford, Edward Winslow. 1916. Dichotomous Social Organization in South Central California. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology</em>. 11:291-296.<br>

________. 1931. The Kamia of Imperial Valley. <em>Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology</em>. 97:1-88.<br>

________. 1932. The Northfork Mono. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology</em>. 31:15-65.<br>

________. 1958. Karok Confessions. MiscelÔnea Paul Rivet, OctogenÔrio Dicata. <em>Publicaciones del Instituto de Historia</em>, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Serie 1, Número 50: 245-255.<br>

________. 1967. Ethnographic Notes on the Southwestern Pomo. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 25.<br>

Goddard, Pliny Earle. 1907. Kato Texts. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaelogy and Ethnology</em>. 5:65-238.<br>

________. 1914. Chilula Texts. <em>Ibid.</em> 10:289-379.<br>

________. 1918. Myths and Tales from the San Carlos Apache. <em>Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History</em>. 24:1-86.<br>

________. 1919. San Carlos Apache Texts. <em>Ibid.</em> 24:141-367.<br>

________. 1923. Wailaki Texts. International Journal of American Linguistics. 2:77-135.<br>

________. 1928. Pitch Accent in Hupa. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 23:333-338.<br>

Halpern, Abraham Meyer. 1946. Yuma. In Osgood, Cornelius, ed., <em>Linguistic Structures of Native America</em>. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology. 6:249-288.<br>

________. 1946-7. Yuma. <em>International Journal of American Linguistics</em>. 12:25-33, 147-151, 204-212; 13:18-30, 92-107, 147-166.<br>

Harrington, John Peabody. 1942. Central California Coast. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 7:1-46.<br>

Holt, Catharine. 1946. Shasta Ethnography. <em>Ibid.</em> 3:299-349.<br>

Kroeber, A. L.. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. <em>Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution</em>, Bureau of American Ethnology. 78.<br>

________. 1929. The Valley Nisenan. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 24:252-290.<br>

________. 1967. Goddard's California Athabascan Texts. Edited by Herbert J. Landar. <em>International Journal of American Linguistics</em>. 33:269-275.<br>

Kroeber, A. L., and Edward Winslow Gifford. 1949. World Renewal: A Cult System of Native Northwest California. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 13:1-155.<br>

Kroeber, A. L., and George William Grace. 1960. The Sparkman Grammar of LuiseƱo. <em>University of California Publications in Linguistics</em>. 16.<br>

Kroeber, A. L., and Dale Valory. 1967. Ethnological Manuscripts in the Robert H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology. <em>Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers</em>. 37:1-22.<br>

Loeb, Edwin Meyer. 1926. Pomo Folkways. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 19: 149-405.<br>

Marsden, W. L.. 1923. The Northern Paiute Language of Oregon. <em>Ibid.</em> 20:175-l91.<br>

Mason, John Alden. 1916. The Mutsun Dialect of Costanoan. <em>Ibid.</em> 11:399-472.<br>

Nomland, Gladys Ayer, and A. L. Kroeber. 1936. Wiyot Towns. <em>Ibid.</em> 35:39-48.<br>

Olson, Ronald Leroy. 1936. Some Trading Customs of the Chilkat Tlingit. In Robert H. Lowie, ed., <em>Essays in Anthropology Presented to A. L. Kroeber in Celebration of his Sixtieth Birthday, June 11, 1936</em>. University of California Press. 211-214.<br>

________. 1940. The Social Organization of the Haisla. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 2:169-200.<br>

________. 1954. Social Life of the Owikeno Kwakiutl. <em>Ibid.</em> 14:213-259.<br>

________. 1955. Notes on the Bella Bella Kwakiutl. <em>Ibid.</em> 319-348.<br>

________. 1967. Social Structure and Social Life of the Tlingit in Alaska. <em>Ibid.</em> 26:1-123<br>

O'Neale, Lila Morris. 1932. Yurok-Karok Basket Weavers. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 32:1-184.<br>

Pearsall, Marion. 1950. Klamath Childhood and Education. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 9:339-351.<br>

Powers, Stephen. 1877. Tribes of California. <em>Contributions to North American Ethnology</em>. 3:146-195, 204-217, 491-517.<br>

Sapir, Edward. 1910. Yana Texts. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 9:1-235.<br>

________. 1923. Text Analyses of Three Yana Dialects. <em>Ibid.</em> 20:263-294.<br>

Sapir, Edward and Morris Swadesh, eds.. 1960. Yana Dictionary. <em>University of California Publications in Linguistics</em>. 22.<br>

Schenck, Sara M., and Edward Winslow Gifford. 1952. Karok Ethnobotany. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 13:377-392.<br>

Sparkman, Philip Stedman. 1908. The Culture of the LuiseƱo Indians. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 8:187-234.<br>

Steward, Julian Haynes. 1939. Some Observations on Shoshonean Distributions. <em>American Anthropologist</em>. 41:261-265.<br>

. 1941. Nevada Shoshone. <em>Anthropological Records</em>, University of California Press. 4:209-259.<br>

Stewart, Omer Call. 1939. Washo-Northern Paiute Peyotism. <em>Proceedings of the Sixth Pacific Science Congress</em>. 4:65-68.<br>

________. 1941. Washo-Northern Paiute Peyotism. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 40:63-142.<br>

Voegelin, Charles Frederick. 1935a. Tubatulabal Grammar. <em>Ibid.</em> 34:55-190.<br>

. 1935b. Tubatulabal Texts. <em>Ibid.</em> 191-246.<br>

Waterman, Thomas Talbot. 1908. DiegueƱo Identification of Color with the Cardinal Points. <em>Journal of American Folk-Lore</em>. 21:40-42.<br>

________. 1909. Analysis of the Mission Indian Creation Story. <em>American Anthropologist</em>. 11:41-55.<br>

________. 1910. The Religious Practices of the DiegueƱo Indians. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 8:271-358.<br>

________. 1911. The Phonetic Elements of the Northern Paiute Language. <em>Ibid.</em> 10:13-44.<br>

________. 1918. The Yana Indians. <em>Ibid.</em> 13:35-102.<br>

________. 1920a. Yurok Geography. <em>Ibid.</em> 16:174-314.<br>

________. 1920b. The Whaling Equipment of the Makah Indians. <em>University of Washington Publications in Anthropology</em>, Number 1.<br>

________. 1922. The Geographic Names Used by the Indians of the Pacific Coast. <em>Geographical Review</em>. 12:175-194.<br>

________. 1925. Village Sites in Tolowa and Neighboring Areas. <em>American Anthropologist</em>. 27:528-543.<br>

Waterman, Thomas Talbot, and A. L. Kroeber. 1934. Yurok Marriages. <em>University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology.</em> 35:1-14<br>

________. 1938. The Kepel Fish Dam. <em>Ibid.</em> 49-80.<br>

Wilson, Birbeck, and Caroline L. Hills, eds.. 1968. Ukiah Valley Pomo Religious Life, Supernatural Doctoring, and Beliefs; Observations of 1939-1941. <em>Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey</em>. 72.<br>

About this collection guide

Collection Guide Author:
Finding Aid written by Bancroft Library Staff, based on finding aid by Dale Valory
Date Prepared:
Ā© Ā© 2007
Date Encoded:
Machine-readable finding aid generated by GenX; markup validated by The Bancroft Library using CDL validation tools; Date of source: June 2015

Access and use

Restrictions:

Collection is available on microfilm only. Originals are not available for use.

Terms of access:

All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Public Services, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 94270-6000. Consent is given on behalf of The Bancroft Library as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner. See: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/reference/permissions.html.

Preferred citation:

[Identification of item], Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, BANC FILM 2216, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley., BANC FILM 2216, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley

Location of this collection:
University of California, Berkeley, The Bancroft Library
Berkeley, CA 94720-6000, US
Contact:
510-642-6481