1 of 2 pages |
Series 1 : Docket Case Files
Access Information
Scope and Content Note
Arrangement
SUBSERIES 1.1: Civil Liberties Docket, 1953-1969
I. Freedom Of Expression And Association
Additional Note
Freedom Of Speech, Press, Assembly
Licensing
-Of Meetings
11. General
--Of Parades
16. General
16.c Brown v Rayfield
16.1 Hurwitt v Oakland
16.7 Chicago Peace Council v McDonough
Administration Restrictions
-On Students and Professors
24. General (4 folders)
24.Ala.1 St. John Dixon v Alabama State Bd of Educ
24.Ariz.2 Jones v Bd of Regents (Univ of Arizona)
24.Ala.4 Dickerson v Alabama State Bd of Educ
24.Cal. General
24.Cal. Beecher
24.Cal.a Mandel v Municipal Court
24.Cal.2 Lessin v UC Regents
24.Cal.5 Finot v Pasedena Bd of Educ
24.Cal.6 Kline v Myerson
24.Cal.7a Aptheker, Stein, Jacobs
24.Cal.7b Atthowe v Univ of Calif, Eisen v Univ of Calif
24.Cal.8 Stanton v Dumke, State Bd of Trustees (San Jose)
24.Cal.15 Athos v Bd of Educ (Fremont)
24.Cal.16 Myers v Bd of Educ (Arcata)
24.Cal.19 McGlone v Bd of Educ (Mt Diablo)
24.Cal.19a Joslyn v Claremont Graduate School
24.Cal.20 Perlman v Bd of Trustees (Shasta Joint Jr College Dist)
24.Cal.23 Sellers v Bd of Regents (Univ of Calif)
24.Cal.25 Scarborough v Bd of Educ (San Francisco)
24.Cal.26 Smiley v Thompson (Soquel High School)
24.Cal.27 Purcell v Manning [In Cater et al.] (SF State)
24.Cal.30 Oloff v East Side Union High School Dist (San Jose)
24.Cal.31 Allen v Oakland Unified School Dist
24.Cal.33 Modesto v San Jacinto Unified School Dist
24.Cal.34 SF State strike arrest cases (clippings)
SF State chronology and background (clippings)
SF State criminal - students
SF Sate criminal - teachers
SF State teachers, administrative
SF State Administrative, student cases
SF State strike
California v Stoloff
24.Cal.34a Wong v Hayakawa
24.Cal.36 Siegel v UC Regents (7 folders)
24.Cal.40 California v Queen, Martinet
24.Cal.41a Averett v Bd of Educ (Los Angeles)
24.Cal.42 California v Mallory, Wilson
24.Cal.44 Brennan v Bd of Educ (Nicasio)
24.Cal.45 Strickland v San Francisco Bd of Educ
24.Cal.46 Rowe v Campbell Union High School Dist
24.Cal.49 Smith v Jackson
24.Cal.51 Bekiaris v Modesto Bd of Educ
24.Cal.52 Sellers v UC Regents
24.Cal.53 Compton v McNelis
24.Cal.55 Montalvo v Madera Unified School Dist, Bd of Educ
24.Cal.56 Poxon v Bd of Educ, San Juan Unified School Dist
24.Cal.57 Kurzweil v Dumke et al.
24.Cal.58 Ishimatsu v UC Regents
24.Cal.59 Wong v UC Regents
24.Cal.60 Mitford v Bunzel
24.Cal.66 Livermore Valley Joint Unified School Dist (Alameda & Contra Costa Counties) v Feinberg
24.Cal.72 So. San Francisco Unifies School Dist v Natwick
24.Cal.73 Comings v State Bd of Educ
24.Cal.75 McGill v University of San Francisco
24.Cal.77 St. Ledger v Deering
24.Colo.2 Jones v Hopper
24.Conn.2 Roach v Connecticut
24.Conn.3 Crossen v Fatsi
24.Conn.4 Healy v James
24.DC.2 Healey v Keppel
24.DC.3 US National Student Assn v Finch
24.Fla 2 Demon v Vadakir
24.Ida.1 Orwick v State Bd of Educ, Idaho
24.Ill.1 Koch v Board of Trustees, Univ of Illinois
24.Ill.2 Pickering v Township High School Dist 205, Will Co, Ill.
24.Ill.8 Rabinowitz et al. v Board of Junior College Dist No 508
24.Ind.1 Bright v Isenbarger
24.Ky.2 Attorney General's Opinion (Kentucky)
24.Ky.4 Hetrick v Martin
24.Me.2 Farrell v Smith et al.
24.Mass. Miscellaneous
24.Mass.4 Massachusetts v Harvard demonstrators
24.Mass.5 Fenton v Boston School Committee
24.Mass.7 Mallioux v Kiley
24.Mass.8 Hasson v Boothby
24.Mich. General
24.Mich.a Zarighny v Michigan
24.Mich.2 Helmkay v Bd of Educ, City of Flint
24.Mich.3 Wolfson v Wayne State University
24.Mich.7 Cholmakjian v Board of Trustees, Michigan State Univ
24.Mich.8 Vought v Van Buren Public Schools
24.NY.5 Egan v Moore et al.
24.NY.7 Council v Donovan
24.NY.10 Hodes v Garrison
24.NY.14 Rosenberg v Allen
24.NY.15 Columbia University 1968
24.NY.15a Hayes v Hogan (Columbia)
24.NY.15b New York v Sargent, Ziegellaub (Columbia)
24.NY.15c Halliwell v Criminal Court
24.NY.15d Grossner v Brd of Trustees, Columbia Univ
24.NY.15g Cole v Brd of Trustees, Columbia University
24.NY.16 Trustees of Columbia Univ. v Students for a Democratic Society
24.NY.21 Powe et al. v Miles
24.NY.22 Zucker v Panitz
24.NY.26 Cornell University v Starobin
24.NY.27 Overton v Rieger
24.NY.28 Caplin v Oak
24.NY.29 Presidents Council, Dist 25 v Community School Board
24.NY.33 Grafton v Brooklyn Law School (2 folders)
24.NY.34 Smirti v Trustees of New York University
24.NC UNCC
24.NC.2 Casey v Henry
24.NC.4 Bateman v Trustees of Beaufort Co. Technical Institute
24.Ohio.1 Schwartz et al. v Bd ofTrustees, Ohio State Univ
24.Okla.2 Bullock v Kamm
24.Okla.3 Norman Gay Alliance for Sexual Freedom v Bd of Regents of Univ of Oklahoma
24.Pa. General
24.Pa.2 Harris v School Dist of Haverford Township
24.Pa.3 Cirker v Yohe
24.Pa.4 Lawrence v Carroll (School Dist of Philadelphia)
24.Pa.5 Merriken v Cressman
24. Tenn.3 Norton v Discipline Committee of East Tenn. State Univ
24.Tenn.4 Jackson v Dorrier
24.Tenn.5 Caldwell v Craighead
24.Tenn.6 Jones v Tennessee Bd of Educ
24.Tenn.7 Melton v Young
24.Tex.5 Sterzing v Ft Bend Independent School District (2 folders)
24.Tex.9 Bd of Regents of the Univ of Texas v New Left Edu Project
24.Tex.10 Bayless v Martine
24.Tex.11 Sullivan v Houston Independent School District
24.Tex.12 Lansdale et al. v Jenkins
24.Tex.13 Shanley v Northeast Independent School District
24.Tex.15 Wardlaw v Austin Independent School District
24.Utah.1 Freeman v Flake et al v Bd of Educ of Hobbs Municipal School District
24.Utah.2 Smith v Losee
24.Va.2 Sword v Fox
24.Wash.3 Belk v Washington University
24.WVa.1 Barker v Hardway (Bluefield State College)
24.Wisc.2 Lee v Bd of Regents of State Colleges
24.Wisc.3 Soglin v Kauffman
24.Wisc.4 Breen v Kahl
24.Wisc.5 Buck v Carter
24.Wisc.6 Straus v Bd of Regents of the Univ of Wisconsin
-On Miscellaneous Activities
25.15 Sokol v Public Utilities of the State of California
25.1ba Huntley v Public Utilities Commission of California
25.18 Bagley v Washington Township
25.35 Oliver v Southern California Rapid Transit Distric
25.36 Friends Meeting v US
25.37 111 Wines & Liquors, Murphy's Tavern, Val's Bar v Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control
25.38 Kohl v Resor
25.46 Doyle v Koelbl
25.47 Williams v Regents of UC
25.48 Schneider v Laird
25.49 Commission for Prisoner Justice & Humanity v Craven
25.50 US ex rel Manicone v Curso
25.51 Noland v Desobry
25.52 Mississippi Gay Alliance v Goudelock
25.54 Staats v ACLU
25.56 Greer v Spock
25.57 Straus v F.C.C.
25.58 In the Matter of the Hearing of the Charges Against Joseph Mazzola
Economic Restrictions
30. Barbour v Sheet Metal Workers Associated Press v US
30.1 Independent Productions Corp. v Loew's Incorporated
30.7 Young v Motion Picture Assn of America, Inc
30.9 Mitchell v International Assn of Machinists
30.12 Allure Shoe Corp; Local 885 of Retail, Wholesale, and Dept. Store Union, AFL-CIO
30.13 Fort v Civil Service Comm of Alameda County
30.15 Weaver v Jordan
30.16 NAACP v Overstreet
30.17 Smith v SNCC
30.18 Hurwitz, Bobker, Braverman v Directors Guild of America
30.20 Lenske v US (Portland, Oregon)
30.24 Frampton v Davis
30.25 Brunnenkant v Richardson
30.26 Schott v American Metal Climax, Inc
30.29 Cedar-Sinai Medical Center Hearing before NLRB
30.30 Linmark Associates v Willingboro
35 General
Criminal Sanctions
-Against Disorderly Conduct and Similar Offenses
51.Cal.24 Hoffman v Municipal Court of Oakland
51.Cal.26 California v Macias
51.Cal.32 English et al. v Ferndon Schools
51.Colo.1 Williams v City and Co. of Denver
51.Colo.2 City of Denver v Perdew et al
51.Conn.3 Turner v LaBelle
51.DC.4 Williams v Dist of Columbia
51.DC.5 Mailer v US
51.Ga.8a Stokley Charmichael, SNCC v Allen et al.
51.Ga.9 Atlanta v Ricks
51.Ga.10 Hunter v Allen
51.Haw.2 Hawaii v Butler, Sarant
51.Ill.6 Terminiello v Chicago
51.Ind.1 Indiana v DeFields
51.Ken.3 Colton v Kentucky
51.La.b Lombard v Louisiana
51.La.2b Rev. Cox v Louisiana
51.Minn.1 Minnesota v Johnson
51.Miss.g Poole v Gov. Barnett
51.Miss.2 Mississipi v Stoner
51.Miss.4 Guyot v Pierce, Strother v Thompson
51. NY.10a New York v Prinz
51.NY.12 New York v Martin
51.NY.20 New York v Penn
51.NY.21 New York v Jones, Liebert
51.NY.24 New York v Jones, Weil, Smith
51.NY.37 New York v Shapiro
51.NY.42 New York v Archer
51.Ohio.1 Cleveland v Russell
51.Ohio.2 Norwell v Cincinatti
51.Pa.1 Chester v Anderson
51.Pa.2 Pennsylvania v Dortort
51.Tenn.3 Tennessee v Gustafson
51.Tenn.8 Tennessee v Tigner
51.Va.3 Virginia v Rev. Harris
-Against Obscenity
52. General
52.Cal.4 US v Aday
52.Cal.19 California v Thompson
52.Cal.27 Miller v California
52.Cal.29 Hicks v Miranda
-Against Sedition, Anarchy, Syndicalism, and Riots
54. General and clippings (3 folders)
54. Ex Parte Communications and Administrative Decisions
54.a Herndon v Lowry, Sheriff
54.b Distortion of history- The Moyer, Haywood Case
54.1 US v Powell (2 folders)
54.1 US v Powell
54.4 Louisiana v Zellner
54.6 Georgia v Perdew
54.7b Georgia v Wells, Harris
54.9 People of New York v Epton (3 folders)
54.11 Mississippi v Lewis
54.14 California v Harris
54.14a Younger v Harris
54.20 H. Rap Brown, SNCC v Clark
54.20a US v H. Rap Brown
54.28 Brooks v Briley (Nashville)
54.29 Fernandez v Mackell
54.32 US v Dellinger (Chicago 8 Conspiracy) (4 folders)
54.34 Brandenberg v People of the State of Ohio
54.37 US v Marshall (2 folders)
54.38 Carter v US
54.39 Hess v Indiana
54.40 Rogers v US
54.45 US v Giese
54.46 Colon v US
-Against Picketing, Leafleting, Demonstrating
55 General and Selma 1965 (3 folders)
55.Ala.8 Forman v Montgomery
55.Ala.17 Birdie Mae Davis v Mobile Co. Bd of School Commrs
55.Ala.18 Baines v Birmingham
55.Ala.19 American Radio Assn. v Mobile Steamship Assn
55.Ariz.1 Arizona v Horn
55.Cal.6 Montgomery Ward and Co. v CORE
55.Cal.6a Barnes v CORE
55.Cal.13 Gould v California
66.Cal.16 California v Havens
55.Cal.19 In re Berry
55.Cal.21 Kuszynski v Oakland
55.Cal.23 United Farm Workers v Superior Court, Kern County
55.Cal.30 Connor v California
55.Cal.31 California v Ridenour
55.Cal.32a California v Yank, Lustis
55.Cal.32b Halvonik v Reagan
55.Cal.32 Berkeley, People's Park (2 folders)
55.Cal.33 California v Glass, Barkley
55.Cal.34 Jelinic v Sun Valley Shopping Center
55.Cal.35 Breen v Greyhound
55.Cal.36 Barber v Municipal Court
55.Cal.37 California v Diablo Canyon Demonstrators
55.Colo.1 Perdew et al. v Denver
55.Colo. Rocky Flats Action Group v Ofte
55.Colo.2 US v Best (Rocky Flats)
55.Colo.2a Colorado v Ginsberg (Rocky Flats)
55.Conn.a United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers v Baldwin
55.DC Code on not harrassing Foreign Representatives
55.DC.4 Scott v Dist. of Columbia
55.DC.5 Dist. of Columbia v 7 Defendants (White House Sit-in)
55.DC.6 Freedom v Dist. of Columbia
55.DC.8 Int'l Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers v NLRB
55.DC.10 United Steel Workers of America v NLRB
55.DC.11 Roberts v Wilson
55.DC. Jackalone v Andrus
55.DC. Townsend v Carmel
55.DC.12 Huff v Sec'y of the Navy
55.Fla.1 Young v Davis
55.Ga.34 US v Anderson
59.31 US v Hensley, Stacy, Turner, Engle
59.32 City of Colunmus v Miqdadi
55 Ga.39 Kunney v Holt
55.Ga.41 Barnum v Chandliss
55.Ga.43a Americus v 32 Demonstrators
55.Ill. Carey v Brow
55.Ill. Citizen's for a Better Environment v Schaumberg
55.Ill.a City of Champaign v Campbell
55.Ill.8 Chicago v Hendershot
55.Ill.10 Sutherland v Illinois
55.Ind.2 United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America,CIO v Gates, Governor
55.Ky.2 Goldsmith v Sutherland
55.Mass.4 LeClair v O'Neil
55.Minn.3 Minnesota v Fuchs
55.Miss.11 Collins v City of Jackson
55.Miss.a Mississippi v Pestana
55.Miss.2 Crawford v Mississippi
55.Miss.3a Brown v City of Meridian
55.Miss.5a Peacock v City of Greenwood
55.Miss.7 Cameron v Johnson
55.Miss.9a Hartfield v Mississippi
55.Miss.27 Johnson v Mississippi
55.Mo.3 US v Mechanic
55.Mo.5 US v Mitchell
55.NH.1 New Hampshire v Harvey
55.NJ New Jersey v Schmid
55.NJ.a Kovacs v Cooper
55.NJ.5 New Jersey v Mears
55.NJ.6 New Jersey v Carroll
55.NY.3 New York v Donegan
55.NY.4 New York v Penn
55.NY.4a New York v Galamison
55.NY.6 Turner v New York
55.NY.16 People of New York v Katz
55.NY.19 Street v New York
55.NY.25 New York v 381 Disarmament Protestors
55.Va.7 Virginia v Berrigan
55.NC.5 US v Bradley
55.NCc.6 US v Davis
55.Ohio.a City of Steubenville v Kilburn
55.Ohio.3 Cleveland v Mechanic
55.Okla.a Wood v Oklahoma
55.Okla.1 Oklahoma v Green
55.Okla.2 Anderson et al. v Trimble et al.
55.Okla.3 Floyd v US
55.Ore.1 Lloyd Corp. v Tanner
55.Pa.4 Penn v Haugh
55.Pa.5 Grausam v Murphey
55.Pa.7 Farber v Rizzo
55.SC.6 Abernathy v Conroy
55.Tx.2 Flower v US
55.US Brown v Glines
55.Va.1 Baines v City of Danville
55.Wa.2 Spencer v State of Washington
-Against and Concerning Minors
56. General
56.a Gans v Ohio
56.1 So. Carolina v Carter
56.14 Florence v Myers
56.27 Vachon v New Hampshire
56.28 Bykofsky v Borough of Middletown
-Against Vagrancy and Loitering
57. General
57. New York City v Young
57.8 Zellner v Thetford
57.10 Harris v City of Albany
57.13 New York v Miller
57.14 Hicks v Dist. of Colimbia
57.15 City of Flint v Baldwin
57.20 Minneapolis v Hadley
57.24 Detroit v Wedlow
57.25 Hirshhorn v New York
57.29 City of Carmel v Parr
-Against Tresspassing
58.NY.2 New York v Collins
58.NY.4 New York v Lawson
58.NC.4 Williams v North Carolina
58.Ohio.1 Cinnicinnati v Mitchell et al.
58.Pa.1 West Chester State College v D'Antonio
58.SC.1 Peterson v City of Greenville
58.Va.8 Wood v Virginia
58.Va.10 Johnson v Virginia
58.Va.11 Lusby v Virginia
58.Wash.1 Washington v Fox
-Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities
59. General
59.a Cole v Arkansas
59.b US v Congress of Industrial Organizations
59.e Michigan v Brothman
59.8 International Association of Machinists v Street
59.22 North Carolina v Crowder, Mallory
59.27 Clarksdale, Mississippi v Henry
59.30 Alabama vMills
59.33 Louisiana v Rev. J.W. Davis
59.39 New York v Fawcett
59.42 Harvey v Mississippi
59.48 City of Newton v Temple
59.70 Detroit v Bowden
59.75 Kirkland v Wallace
59.98 Cleveland v Anderson
59.108 Watts v US
59.113 Cortez v Schroering
59.114 US v Tinjerina
59.115 Honey v Goodman
59.121 Parker v Morgan
59.123 US v Kangas
59.124 Local 807 v US
59.125 Connell Construction Co. v Plumbing & Steamfitters Local Union 100
59.126 Iannelli v US
59.127 US v Moore
Civil Sanctions
-Against Defamation, Libel and Slander
61. General (3 folders)
61.b Larrick v Gilloon
61.c Salzhandler v Caputo
61.1 Farmers Educational and Coop Union v WDAY, Inc
61.9 New York Times v Sullivan
61.186 Pauling v News Syndicate Co., Inc.
61.21 Moore v P.W. Publishing Co.
61.22 Normile v American Medical Association
61.23 Henry v Collins
61.27 Smoot v League of Women Voters
61.30 Frick v Stevens
61.33 Baer v Rosenblatt
61.40 Minsky v Stroden
61.45 Peet v Tocsin, Inc.
61.49 Carroll v Princess Ann Co.
61.56 Carey v Hume, Anderson
61.57 Bridges v Benson
61.58 Shankroff v LaGuardia
61.59 Miami Herald v Tornillo
61.60 Old Dominion v Austin
61.64 Littell v Buckley
61.66 Time v Firestone
-By Injunction in Labor Disputes
62. General
-By Injunction in Racial Situations
63. Injunctions to Protect Civil Liberties
63.2 Alabama v Gray (ex rel Gallion)
63.3 Fair Share Organization v Mitnik
63.3a Fair Share Organization v Nagdeman and Sons, Inc.
63.3b Fair Share Organization v Kroger Co.
63.4 Band B Cash Grocery Stores Inc. v Young Adults for Progressive Action
63.10 Alabama ex. rel. Flowers v Gray
63.11 Town of Clinton v CORE
63.15 US v City of Winona, Partridge
63.21 San Diego Gas & Electric v CORE
63.22a California v Brown
63.23 Curtis, Grand v Boeger
63.28.b US v Clark
63.29 C.O.F.O. v Local Officials (McComb)
63.30 NAACP v Safeway Trails, Inc.
63.31 Hicks v Knight
63.32 Dilworth v Riner
63.36 Griffin v Ryan
63.37.a Mississippi v Bass, Klein, Wilcox
63.43 Tracy v Robbins
63.46 NAACP (Chester Branch) v Chester, Pa.
63.53 Chinn v Johnson
63.56 Baker v Bindner
63.89 NAACP v Thompson
-Against Miscellaneous Activities
64. Laws on Congress' Activities
64.13 Chronicle Publishing v Gain
64.16 Hornstein v NAACP
64.17 Alameda Co. v Regents of the University of California
64.18 Gallagher v Mission Tenants Union
64.20a Feldman v Los Angeles Free Press
64.29 Sutherland v Illinois
70. Procedural Pitfalls in Civil Liberties Cases
71. Marchel, Sogolofsky v Los Angeles Sheriff's Department
71.2 Boryszewski v Brydges
72. General
73. General
73.Fla.1 Eubanks v Florida
73.Mich.4 Michigan v Altman
73.Mich.5 Michigan v Murray
73.Miss. Hancock et al v Mississippi
73.Miss.11 Jackson v Sumrall
73.Miss.25 Rutledge v Jackson
73.Miss.g Lefton v City of Hattiesburg
73.Miss.j Mississippi v Hartfield, Anderson (Hattiesburg)
73.Va.a Baines v Danville, McGhee v Danville
73.NY.2 New York v Hutchinson
Freedom Of Religion
-In Public Places
119.48 Bennett v Secretary of Defense
-Conscientious Objection to War
120. General (3 folders)
120. Naill v Alexander et al.
120. Graves v Commissioner of Internal Revenue
120. Anthony v Commissioner of Internal Revenue
120. Purris v Commissioner of Internal Revenue
120. Herby v Commissioner of Internal Revenue
120. Miscellaneous (2 folders)
121.418 US v Casella
121.419 US v Jenkins
121.907 US v Efaw
122. US v Cool
123.90 Serfass v US
123.207 Davis v US
123.657 US v Armistead
123.658 US v Robideau
123.808 US v Donahue
126. General (non-case) War Crimes in Vietnam
126.31 Campen v Nixon
127.13 Oestereich v Selective Service System, Wyoming
127.22 US v Scouler
128. General-Vietnam Day
128. General-Pamphlets
128. Peace Candidates, incl Scheer Campaign
128. My Lai (pre June 1970)
128 My Lai (post June 1970)
128.1 In re Tax Protestors
128.5 Prosecutions of War Resistors
128.9 Atlee v Laird
128.11 Harper v Commissioner of Internal Revenue
128.12 Kent v US (2 folders)
128.13 Mitchell v Nixon
128.14 US v Simpson
129. Miscellaneous- Conscientious Objection to War
129. ACLU model memo re qualifications of C.O.s for citizenship
130 Denial of Tax Exemptions to Institutions-General
Restrictions on Free Exercise
In Prisons
151.21 Putney v Fowlie
Freedom Of Association: Affecting The Organization
Organizational Privleges Challenged
200.-204. Miscellaneous
-As to NLRB Certification
203. Civil Liberties and the NLRB., speech
203.a Farmer v International Fur & Leather Workers of US & Canada
203.b Farmer v United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America (UE), et al.
203.c Herzog v American Communications Association
203.d National Maritime Union v Herzog et al.
203.2 Meat Cutters v NLRB
203.3 R. Dennis v US (2 folders)
203.5 International Tel & Tel v IBEW Local 134
-Privacy in Organizational Work
205.19 Briggs v Goodwin
Compulsory Registration
210 General
-Under 1950 Internal Security (McCarran) Act
211. McCarran Act and SACB (2 folders)
211.a NLG Brief on the Unconstitutionality of the Mundt-Nixon Bill (H.R. 5852)
211. US v Communist Party
SACB, Kennedy v Lima
211.1 Communist Party of the US v SACB (3 folders)
211.1 Communist Party of the US v SACB (3 folders)
211.1.a Communist Party of the US v US
211.2 Jefferson School of Social Sciences v SACB
211.3 SACB v Labor Youth League
211.3 Extracts of testimony by Labor Youth League witnesses
211.9 American Committee for the Protection of the Foreign Born v SACB
211.13 Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v SACB (3 ff)
211.14 Weinstock v SACB
211.16 Katzenbach v W.E.B. DuBois Clubs of America
211.16a W.E.B. Du Bois Clubs of America v Clark
211.17 Boorda v SACB
211.18 Kennedy v Healey
-Under 1954 Communist Control Act
212 General
212.a United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America v Brownell
-Under State Laws
213 Communist Registration Ordinances
213.a Albertson v Millard
-Under Foreign Agents Registration Act
214 General
214.a Rabinowitz, Boudin v Kennedy
Listing and Investigating
220 General
-By Attorney General of the United States
221 General
221.1 NLG v Brownell
221.a Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v McGrath
221.7 Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v Attorney General
221.8 American Servicemen's Union v Mitchell
220 General, misc (3 folders)
-By Congressional Committees
222.1 Wheeldin v Wheeler
222.3 Sloat v Walter
222.4 Sloat v Wheeler, Water
-By State Authorities
223.a Brandhove v Tenney
223.3 Elfbrandt v Russell
223.5 Black Unity League of Kentucky v Miller
Freedom Of Association: Affecting The Members
Criminal Penalties for Membership
240 General (Smith Act, precursor to Mundt-Nixon Bill, also Ohio Bartunik Bill)
-Under the Smith Act: for Conspiracy
241 General (Smith Act, misc)
241.a Dennis et al., v US (see also 99/280 cz National Lawyers Guild, George Crockett Papers, Smith Act Trial, Wm. Z. Foster et al and 242.9. (3 folders)
241.a Smith Act cases (incl US v Dennis) (2 folders)
Mr. Isserman's argument in US v Dennis
241.a US v Eugene Dennis (4 folders)
241.b US v Frankfeld (Baltimore Smith Act case)
241.c Flynn v US
241.1 Yates et al. v US (6 folders)
241.1 Yates et al v US, Trial transcripts (bound volumes 1-26)
241.1 Yates et al v US, Briefs (4 folders)
241.1 Yates et al v US, misc trial documents
241.2 Mesarosh v US
241.5 US v Huff
241.9 US v Brandt
-Under Smith Act: for Membership Only
242.a US v Richmond, Connelly (Calif Smith Act case)
242.1 Lightfoot v US
242.2 Scales v US (2 folders)
242.3 US v Frankfeld, US v Blumberg
242.9 CP, Foster, Hall v McGrath, SACB
244.1 US v Archie Brown
-Under State Laws
245. General (State Communist Registration and Criminal Membership Statutes and Ordinances)
245. Ohio Bartunek Bill
245. Callahan Bill
245. Hood v Fingold, Cronin
245. California v Steinberg
245.a Shaw v Oklahoma
245.b Berenson v City of Detroit
245.c California v McCormick
245.d Shub v Simpson
245.e Auerbach v California
245.g Coleman, Schusterman v Perdew
245.h Hall v City of Birmingham
245.i Lancaster v Hammond
245.j Thompson v Wallin (2 folders)
245.k Trainor v Cannon
245.2 Massachusetts v Hood (2 folders)
245.3 Massachusetts v Struik
245.6 Pennsylvania v Nelson (2 folders)
245.6 Pennsylvania v Nelson (2 folders)
245.9 Braden v Kentucky
245.13 Highlander Folk School v Tennessee ex rel. Stone
245.15 Indiana v Levitt
245.16a Dombrowski v Louisiana State Police
245.16b Dombrowski and Southern Conference Educational Fund v Eastland (see also 245.16c)
245.16d Dombrowski v Pfister (2 folders)
245.17 Stanford v Texas
-Under 1050 Internal Security (McCarran) Act
246 McCarran Act (Internal Security Act) material (2 folders)
246.1 US v Robel
246.2 Bick v Mitchell
248 General (Internal Security Act of 1969)
Civil Disabilities for Membership: Federal
250 General
-In Federal Employment
251 General
251.a Rothrock v Miller
251.11 Kutcher v US
251.16 In the Matter of Barney Hilburn
251.52 Garrott v US
251.57 Soltar v Postmaster General of US
251.58 Margetich v Civil Service Commission
251.62 Cummings v Hampton
251.63 Shaw v Hoover
251.64 Kruger v Legal Services Corp.
-As to Passport Application and Right to Travel
252 Right to travel
252.20 Robeson v Dulles
252.21 Kent v Dulles
252.22 Briehl v Dulles
252.27 Worthy v Herter
252.27a US v Worthy
252.34 Aptheker v Secretary of State
252.35 Zemel v Rusk, Kennedy
252.36 Mc Ewan v Rusk, Kennedy
252.52 Reynolds v US
252.56 Mayer v Rusk
252.58 US v Travis
252.59 US v Laub
252.62 US v Anton
252.67 Lynd v Rusk, Secretary of State
252.68 Gregory v Secretary of State
252.69 Mitchell v Mandel
252.70 Lamont v Rogers
-As to Military Acceptability, Discharges
253.6 Abramowitz v Bruckner
-As to Social Security Benefits
255.6 Hiss v Hampton (2 folders)
-Through Deportation Proceedings
258.0 Harisiades v Shaughnessy (2 folders)
258.a In re Sciortino
258.b Quattrone v Nicolls
258.c In re Tora Upstead Rystead
258.d In re Krishna Chandra
258.e In re Arpad Stancek
258.f US ex rel Schlossberg or Daly v Ault
258.g US v Steuben
258.i-j US v Mackie, US v MacKay
258.k US v Carlisle
258.1 Rowoldt v Perfetto
258.4 Bonetti v Rogers
258.6 Niukkanen v McAlexander
258.7 Wolf v Boyd
258.9 Gastelum-Quinones v Kennedy
258.11 Firestone v Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)
258.12 Scythes v Webb
258.15 Sherman v Immigration and Naturalization Service (In re Joseph Sherman)
258.18 Woodby v INS
258.19 Dymytryshyn v Esperdy
258.21 INS v Sanders
258.22 Massignani v INS
-Through Denaturalization and Naturalization Proceedings
259 General
259 Harry Bridges-Wiretap
259.a US v Schneiderman (3 folders)
259.a US v Schneiderman (12 folders) Mar. 25-July 18, 1952 (see also 241.1 - Yates v US)
259.d In re Myer Klig
259.1 Nowak v US
259.4 Polites v US
259.5 Chaunt v US
259.6 US v Richmond
259.8 US v Bimba
259.54 INS v Nomland
259.55 Weitzman v US
259.57 In re Liebermann
Civil Disabilities for Membership: State, Local and Private
260 General (2 folders)
260.1 Socialist Workers 1974 National Campaign Committee et al v Jennings
-In State, Local, Government Employment
261 Loyalty oath
261.a-b Parker v LA County, Steiner v LA County
261.a Parker v LA County, briefs
261.c Local No. 201 American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees v City of Muskegon
261.12 Wilson v Los Angeles
261.18 Rosenfield v Malcolm
261.24 Partlow v LA Civil Service Commission
261.25 Vogel v County of Los Angeles
-In Teaching
262 General
262 In re Joyce Adler
262.a Dworken v Cleveland Bd of Educ
262.c In re Teachers Union, 555 (UPW) v Bd of Educ
262.11 Johnson v Bd of Educ of Halifax Co.
262.12 Eglash v Detroit Institute of Technology
262.13 Johnston v Bd of Educ of the Township of Wayne
262.24 Karst v Regents of the University of California (Angela Davis intervenor)
262.26 Trister et al. v University of Mississippi
-As to State Unemployment Insurance Benefits
263.a Dworken v Collopy
263.b Ekins v Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
263.1 Syrek v Calif. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
263.6 Laswell v Industrial Commission of Missouri
-As to State License Applications
264.1 Torcaso v Watkins
-In Proceedings Against Attorneys and Bar Applicants
265. State Rules for Admission to the Bar (3 folders)
Michael Tigar and the Clerk Appointment
Freedom of Advocacy
Threats to the Independence of the Bar
265.a Memo to NY Comm on Character and Fitness (NY Bar Admissions)
265.b Re Leitson and Dean
265.h-i In re Sacher and Isserman, Re Isserman
265.h-i US v Sacher, Gladstein, Crockett, McCabe, Isserman,
265.j Brooks v State Bar of California
265.4 In re Schlesinger, Esq.
265.20 Schware v New Mexico
265.21 Konigsberg v State Bar of California
265.23 In re George Anastaplo (2 folders)
265.30 In re Terence Hallinan
265.36 Cantor v Pennsylvania
265.38 Yablonski v United Mine Workers of America
-Through Deprivation of Right to Tax Exemption
266.1 Speiser v Randall
266.5 US v Kaiser
-In Private Employment: Teaching
267 Miscellaneous
267.1 Lynd v Bd of Governors
-In Private Employment: Defense Establishment
268 Miscellaneous
268.1 Parker v Lester
268.12 Greene v McElroy
268.14 Cafeteria and Restaurant Workers v McElroy
268.20 McBride v Roland
268.22 Schneider v Smith
268.23 Shoultz v Laird
-In Private Employment: Other
269 Miscellaneous
269.a Black v Cutter Labratories
269.1 Faulk v Aware, Inc.
Trial transcripts in Faulk v Aware
Examination of Vincent W. Hartnett v. 1-4, 1958
Examination of Vincent W. Hartnett v. 5-6, 1959
Cross-examination Hartnett, 1962
Examination before trial of Plaintiff, John H. Faulk, 1961
Examination before trial of Defendant, L. A. Johnson, 1960 (2 volumes)
Examination of Paul R. Milton, 1960 (2 volumes)
269.12 Bridgewood v UAW Local 707
269.15 ILGWU v Quality Mfg Co.
269.16 Linden Lumber Division v NLRB
269.17 NRLB v Weingarten
269.18 Sakala v Young
269.13 Stevens & Co. n NLRB
Criminal Penalties for Nondisclosure
270 General
-Before Congressional Committees
271 General, Anti-HUAC
In re Allen, Esterman
National Committee to Abolish the HUAC (NCAHUAC)
No. Calif, East Bay Committee newsletters and notices
Meeting notes and memoranda
East Bay Community Forum (2 folders)
First Amendment and HUAC
271. Correspondence
Activities by HUAC against teachers (Sloat v Wheeler)
US Army
Reports, speeches
Publications, newsletters, leaflets, pamphlets (4 folders)
Clippings (3 folders)
Miscellaneous
271. Anti-HUAC materials, Committee to Abolish HUAC
Abolish HUAC clippings
Documentation of the Red Stars in Hollywood, Fagan, M. 1950
Red Treason in Hollywood, Fagan, Myron C., 1949
"Brief of Alexander Meiklejohn, of Cultural Workers in Motion Pictures and Other Arts, and as Members of the Professions, as Amici Curiae", 1949 US Supreme Court
271.a1 Notes on HUAC Hearings in San Francisco, May 1960 and Memoirs of a Picket
271.a2 Students for Civil Liberties, UC Berkeley, 1960
Bay Area Student Committee for Abolition of HUAC, 1960
271.a3 East Bay Community Forum, 1960
Documentary film prospectus
271.a Josephson v US
271.b Eisler v US
271.c Lawson v US, Trumbo, v US (Hollywood Ten) (2 ff)
271.d Dennis v US
271.f Marshall v US
271.g US v Fleishman
271.h US v Bryan
271.i Morford v US
271.j In re Leonard Mins
271.k HUAC Public Hearing, Lionel Stander, NY, 1953
Report on Blacklisting In Movies by Cogley, John 1956
271.l US v Kamin
271.1 US v Lamont
271.11 Sacher v US
271.27 Material for Hartman Case
271.5 Horace Chandler Davis v US
271.7 Barenblatt v US (3 folders)
271.9 US v Russell
271.10 Deutch v US
271.11 Sacher v US
271.12 Gojack v US
271.14 Watkins v US
271.15 Shelton v US
271.16 Whitman v U
271.23 US v Sullivan
271.25 US v Seeger
271.27 Hartman vUS
271.31 Wilkinson v US
271.32 Braden v US
271.34 US v Lehrer
271.41 US v Rozenkrant(s)z
271.43 US v Wheeldin
271.49 US v Nixon, Wilson, Allen
271.50 Stamler v Willis
Stamler and Hall v Willis
271.50 Research on HUAC witnesses
271.52
Krebs v Ashbrook
(Related case files and briefs in Krebs v Ashbrook, see also BANC MSS 99/280cz National Lawyers Guild, Papers of Jeremiah Gutman)
271.53 Davis v Willis
271.54 Young v Willis
271.56 Sanders v McClellan
-Before State Committees
272 State Un-American Activities Committees
The fight against the Broyles Bills, Indiana, 1953 (compiled by Courtney B. Cazden. 110 pages removed from 3-ring binder)
Miscellaneous
272.a In re Charles Hendley; Teachers Union of the City of NY v Joint Legis Comm to Investigate the Educational System of NY
272.b Jones v Massachusetts
272.c New York v Schappes
272.d In re Pappas
272.e Nelson v Wyman
272.1 Sweezy v New Hampshire
272.2 Uphaus v Wyman (2 folders)
272.7 Scull v Virginia
272.9 Gibson v Florida Legislative Investigative Committee
272.10 Braden, Southern Conference Educational Fund re Gibson
272.11 Graham v FLIC
272.12 Jordan v Hutchinson
272.13 Committee on Offenses Against the Admin. of Justice v Harris
272.14 Fuentes, McRae, Birnbaum v Fishel
-Before Legal and Administrative Tribunals
273.5 Kentucky v Rhine
-For Refusal to Produce Records
274.a Green v US
274.b US v Field
274.c Patterson v US
274.e Application of NAACP
274.1 Flaxer v US
274.3 McPhaul v US
Civil Penalties for Nondisclosure
280 Miscellaneous
-By Teachers
281. Academic Freedom
281. League of Women Voters, Freedom Agenda material, 1953-56
281.a Bradley v New York University
281.b Miller v Wheeler
281.c Tolman v Underhill
281.d Philadelphia Bd of Educ v August
281.h Steinmetz v Calif State Bd of Edu (CSEA)
281.1 Nostrand v Little
281.1a Baggett v Bullitt
281.3 Hughes v Bd of Higher Edu of City of NY
281.5 Bd of Educ (NYC) v Allen
281.5c In re Henry Adler
281.15 Cramp v Bd of Pblic Instruction of Orange Co., Florida
281.16 Macks v State Bd of Educ of Calif
281.18 Bd of Educ, Philadelphia v Solder
281.19 Dulgov v Bd of Educ, Tucson
281.20 Starbuck v Trustees, Univ of Buffalo
281.20a Keyishhian v Bd of Regents of Univ of NY, et al.
281.21 Georgia Conference of the American Assoc of Univ Professors v Bd of Regents of the Univ System of Georgia
281.23 Whitehill v Elkins
281.24 Spangler v Bd of Regents of the Univ of Nebraska
281.27 Aronson v Regents of the Univ of Calif
281.29 Thalberg v Bd of Trustees, Univ of Illinois, Krehbiel v Bd of Educ, Morgan co., Illinois
281.31 Haskett v Washington et al.
281.34 Gilmore v Texas
281.35 Hartman v Romney
281.36 Connell v Higginbotham
281.37 MacKay v Rafferty
281.38 Grossman v NY City Bd of Education
-By Others
282.a Gerende v Bd of Supervisors of Elections of Baltimore
282.16 In re Walter Marvin, Jr.
282.17 Coxe v Osser
282.18 In re Josephine Belmont
282.19 Driscoll v International Union of Operating Engineers
282.20 US v Nixon
282.21 Attorney General v Covington & Burling
282.22 Oboler v Hampton
282.23 Lefkowitz v Cunningham
Penalties for False Disclosure
-Under Taft-Hartley Oath
291. Inland Steel Co. v NLRB and United Steelworkers of America v NLRB
291.1 Jencks v US
291.2 Gold v US (3 folders)
291.3 US v Bryson
291.4 Travis v US
291.7 Haug et al. V US
-On Government Security Questions
292.5 Marzani v US
-In Miscellaneous Cases
293. Memorial for Ethel and Julius Rosenberg
293.a
US v Hiss, clippings and articles (2 folders)
The Honorable Mr. Nixon and the Alger Hiss Case by Reuben, William
293.c Ohio v Hamilton
293.e US v Lattimore
293.2 Hucks v US (2 folders)
293.3 Los Angeles Board of Education v Sloat
295.18 Casey v Collectors Publications, Ltd
295.26 Mindel v US Civil Service Commission
295.35 Stark v Shultz
295.37 Weaver v Musick
295.100 General- Birth Control and Abortion
295.108 California v Belous
295.109 Jessin v Shasta Co.
295.111 California v Gurner, Maginnis
295.115 Doe v Bolton
295.118 Alice v State Dep't of Social Welfare
295.100 Constitutional Aspects of the Right to Limit Childbearing
295.120 Women's Abortion Coalition v Younger
295.200 Women-General
II. Due Process And Related Rights
Additional Note
Searches and Seizures
-By Electronic Eavesdropping
301. General
301.23 Berger v New York
301.27 New York v Siefert, Burkard, Habel
301.33 Taglianetti v US
301.38 Hoffa et al. v USA, Dranow v US
301.39 Hoffa v US
301.40 Dellinger v Mitchell
301.44 New York v Gibson
301.46 Giordano v US
301.52 US v Sinclair
301.52a US v US Dist. Ct. Eastern Dist. of Michigan, Keith
301.53 US v Smith
301.54 US v Berrigan et al.
301.55 US v Hilliard
301.56 US v Jaffe, Donghi
301.57 Maryland v Turco
301.58 US v John Doe, Idella Marx, Appellant
301.59 Russo v Byrne
301.59a Ellsberg, Russo v Mitchell (Pentagon Papers Trial)
301.60 US v Ayers (Weatherman Case)
301.61 US v Whitaker
301.62 US v Calandra
301.70 Halperin v Kissinger
301.76 Berlin Democratic Club v Schlesinger
301.84 Chandler v Helms
301.85 Goldstein v US
301.86 Goldman v US
301.87 California v Masio
301.88 California v Siegel
301.94 US v Cofer
-National Security Cases
301.540 Forsyth v Kleindienst
301.541 Humphrey v US
301.544 In re Halkin
-In Other Federal Cases
302. General
302.1 Hinton v Eastland
302.15 Lester v US
302.27 US v Kahn
302.33 US v Robinson
302.41 US v Brignoni-Ponce
302.41 Bowen v US
302.43 US v Peletier
-In Other Criminal Cases
303.47 Camara v Municipal Court of San Francisco
303.67 Cunningham v Heinze
303.69 California v Van Meter, Alexander
303.86 In re Donaldson
303.106 California v Krivda
303.135 Buttram, etal. v City of Pomoma
-Suits for False Arrest, Police Practices, Police Review Board
304. DeLancie v McDonald
304. Law and Disorder Reports, 1970-72
No. California Police Practices Project
Police Misconduct Survey
Course Material for Police Misconduct Litigation, 1975
Police Misconduct Litigation-Plaintiff's Remedies from American Jurisprudence, vol 15, 1968
Assembly Select Committee on the Administration of Justice Hearings, Relations Between the Police and Mexican Americans, 1972
Bibliographies: Police Review Board, Prisoner Release
Reports (3 folders)
Newsletters
Catalogs
Manuals
Academic Papers (2 folders)
304. Law Review articles
Civil Rights and Civil Wrongs, photojournal, 1964
Case studies
Lynching Northern Style
Exhibit materials on police conduct
Clippings
Miscellaneous
304. Publications
Standards Relating to the Urban Police Function, American Bar Association, 1972
Police Use of Deadly Force, Catherine H. Milton, 1977
Law Enforcement: The Matter of Redress, Institute of Modern Legal Thought, 1969
Special Analysis, Crime and Law Enforcement, American Enterprise Instititute, 1965
The Police and the Community: The Dynamics of Their Relationship in a Changing Society, Regents of the University of California, 1966
304. Hearing- appeal of Officer Douglas L. Butler
304. List of successful suits against agents of justice under 42 USCS 1983 since 1950
304.Ala General
304.Ala.a US ex rel Gassaway v Norville
304.Ala.2 Nesmith v Alford
304.Ala.3 Zellner v Lingo, Painter
304.Ala.9 Houser v Hill
304.Ariz.2 Arizona Civil Liberties Union v Garmire
304.Ariz.3 Thompson v City of Tucson (4 folders)
304.Ark.3 Townsend v Ross
304.Ark.4 Russ v Ratliff (same case as NAACP v Levi) (2 folders)
304.Cal. General (2 folders)
Final Report: Prevention and Control of Crime and Delinquency for State of California
304.Cal. Neither Law nor Order, The People's Park and the People's Police
304.Cal.a Cohen v Cahill
304.Cal.13 White v Bonnanno
304.Cal.17 Hinton v Smith
304.Cal.18 Morgan v Yuba Co.
304.Cal.23 Whitten, Hanna v US Secret Service
304.Cal.28 Smith v Cahill
304.Cal.33 Marlow v Coakley
304.Cal.34 Figueroa v Mackey
304.Cal.35 San Francisco v Kuelz
304.Cal.36 Bechtler v City of Hawthorne
304.Cal.49 Moore v San Francisco
304.Cal.51 Renteria v DiGiorgio Corp.
304.Cal.54 Stokes v Cahill
304.Cal.60 Linthcome v San Francisco, Roberts
304.Cal.62 Smith v Solano Co.
304.Cal.63 Stribling v Malliard
302.Cal.67 Murray v Madigan
304.Cal.67a Kessel v Madigan
304.Cal.69 Anderson v Los Angeles
304.Cal.70 Konell v Los Ang. Chief of Police; Bass v City of Los Angeles
304.Cal.72 Figueroa v Krupp (2 folders)
304.Cal.73 Floyd v Los Angeles
304.Cal.75 Rodgers v Los Angeles
304.Cal.78 Roinson v Los Angeles Police Dept.
304.Cal.79a California v O'Brien, Baskett v O'Brien
304.Cal.80 Taliaferro v Cahill
304.Cal.81 Busse v Palo Alto Red Squad
304.Cal.83 Rutherford v James
304.Cal.84 Barrio Defense Committee v Younger
304.Cal.84 Barrio Defense Committee v Younger
304.Cal.85 Wheeler v Gain
304.Cal.86 Hoaglen v Tuso
304.Cal.87 Larimore v Eterovich
304.Cal.88 Andrews v Gunn
304.Cal.94 Brodrice v Ramsay
304.Cal.95 Herling v Emporium-Capwell Co.
304.Cal.100a Shepherd v Superior Court of California
304.Cal.102 Beck v Los Angeles
304.Cal.104 Loya v INS
304.Cal.105 US v Martinez-Fuerte
304.Cal.106 Henderson v Kihara
304.Cal.106a City of Berkeley v Henderson
304.Cal.108 Berkeley Police Assn v City of Berkeley
304.Cal.109 California v Miller
304.Cal.110 California v Baird
304.Cal.111 Perry v Stiltz
304.Cal.112 Valdez v County of Riverside
304.Conn.1 Harris v Lee
304.Conn.2 Smolen v Connecticut
304.Conn.3 Burns v DeGrand
304.Conn.4 Martin v Consiglio et al.
304.Conn.5 Nakonechny v City of West Haven
304.Conn.6 Smith v Dilieto et al.
304.Conn.7 Carr v Celentano
304.Conn.8 Delvecchio v Dana et al.
304.Del.1 Fletcher v Peterson
304.DC Miscellaneous
304.DC.3 Garrett v Berrier
304.DC.5 Tatum v Morton
304.DC.8 District of Columbia v Carter
304.DC.9 Graves v District of Columbia
304.DC.12 [no title]
304.Fla.2 Gordon v Florida State Trooper
304.Ga Miscellaneous
304.Ga.4 Terrell v Pritchett
304.Ga.7 Scott v Cribb, et al.
304.Ga.9 Sims v Adams et al.
304.Ga.10 Steele v Brock et al.
304.Id.2 Lockard v Baltz & John Doe I-X
304.Ill Miscellaneous
304.Ill.a Illinois v Ray
304.Ill.5 Monroe v Pape
304.Ill.7a Duble v Brown, Chicago
304.Ill.9 Hardwick v Hurley
304.Ill.10 Gonzales v General Investigations, Inc.
304.Ill.12 Richichi v City of Chicago
304.Ill.17 Gause v Chicago
304.Ill.18 Mock v City of Chicago
304.Ill.22 Fox v Chicago & Price
304.Ill.23 Kincy v Wilson
304.Ill.23a Kincy v Land, Pappas et al.
304.Ill.24 Kerr v Chicago
304.Ill.26 Illinois v Alcantar
304.Ill.29 Ries v Daley
304.Ill.30 Peck v Daley
304.Ill.31 Schnell v Chicago
304.Ill.32 Joseph v Rowlen
304.Ill.38 Frazier v Guswiler et al.
304.Ill.39 Calvin v Conlisk
304.Ill.42 Mutic's Estate v Chicago Police
304.Ind.2 US v Nipple & Leuth
304.Iowa.1 Quad-City Community News Service v Jabens
304.La Miscellaneous
304.La.a Thomas v Capaci
304.La.1 Jones v Teasley
304.La.8 Aronson v Giarruso
304.Md.3 Lankford v Gelston
304.Md.5 Richardson v Snow
304.Mass General
304.Mass.2 Yaffe v Powers
304.Mass.4 US v Chadwick
304.Mich General
304.Mich Ann Arbor Newsmen and Students v Detroit Police
304.Mich.a Fitzpatrick v Hart
304.Mich.1 Green v Azzam
304.Mich 2 Michigan v Thomas
304.Mich.3 Elijah Mohammed v Sommers
304.Mich.3a Nation of Islam v Industrial Mutual Assn (IMA)
304.Mich.4 Payne v Smith, Merrill
304.Mich.5 Stanzione v Hubbard
304.Mich.6a Agreement between Michigan Civil Rights Commission and Detroit Police Department
304.Mich.7 Walker v Edwards
304.Mich.8 Brown v Braver
304.Mich. In re petition of Garlene Boone Bernard
304.Mich.10 Low v Detroit
304.Mich.11 Delude v Koch
304.Mich.12 Michigan v August
304.Mich.13 Blanding v US
304.Mich.15 Rosario v Detroit Police Department
304.Mich.16 Leverette v Gilmore
304.Mich.17 Wilson v Detroit
304.Mich.18 Lockaby v Wayne County
304.Mich.19 Clore v City of Detroit
304.Mich.20 Aguinaga v Austin
304.Mich.23 Buck v Gribbs
304.Mich.24 Delude v Raasakka, Porn
304.Minn.3 Blake v Cich
304.Miss. General
304.Miss.1 Pierson v Ray
304.Miss.2 US v Partridge
304.Miss.5 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v City of Jackson
304.Miss.12 Anderson v Noser
304.Miss.17 Jackson v Martin
304.Miss.26 Burton et al v Williams et al. (3 ff)
304.Miss.27 Washington v Noble
304.Mo.2 Koen v Long
304.Mo.3 Jackson v Miller
304.Mo.4 Mattis v Schnarr, Marek
304.NJ. General
304.NJ Sea Alliance v New Jersey
304.NJ.3 Adams v Hughes
304.NJ.4 Kidd v Addonizio et al
304.NJ.5 Oberbehr v Kauffman
304.NJ.6 Smith v Spina
304.NJ.6a Smith v Newark
304.NJ.7 Anderson v Sills
304.NJ.8 Black Panther Party v Police Dep't Of Jersey City
304.NJ.9 Lewis v Kugler
304.NM.1 Valdez v Black
304.NY.12 Re Thomas Gilligan
304.NY.22 Locust Club v City of Rochester
304.NY.26 NY v Leary
304.NY.27 Martinelli v NY
304.NY.28 Johnson v New York City
304.NY.29 Burmeister v New York City Police Dep't
304.NY.31 New York v Dorak
304.NY.33 Jaekel v US
304.NY.35 Fink v Leary
304.NY.36 Handschu v Special Services Division of NY City Police Dept.
304.NY.37 Lutz v Sullivan
304.NY.39 Baskerville v Oswald
304.NY.40 Restivo v Gray
304.NY.41 Marhiney v New York
304.NC.2 Summers v Horton
304.Ohio 3 Gilligan v Morgan
304.Ohio.5 Spaeth v Miller
304.Ohio.6 Scheuer v Rhodes, Kraus v Rhodes (Kent State)
304.Ore.1 Ford v Schrunk
304.Ore.2 Dexter v Schrunk (2 folders)
304.PA General (Pittsburg v Bryant)
304.PA.a Schomer v McKendry
304.PA.3 Harrington v Tate
304.PA.7 Council of Organizations on Philadelphia Police Accountability and Responsibility v Tate
304.PA.8 Freedom Press v Rizzo
304.PA.15 Hess v Nober, Doe, and Northampton Township
304.PA.16 Rizzo v Goode
304.PA.19 Washington v Chester
304.RI.1 General Quince v Rhode Island
304.Tenn General
304.Tenn.2 Gatson v Gibson
304.Tex.3 Medrano v Allee
304.Tex.5 Little v Schafer
304.Tex.7 Whirl v Kern
304.Tex.15 Texas Farmers Union v McAllen
304.US.12 US v Watson
304.VT.1 Aldrich et al. v City of St. Albans et al.
304.VA General
304.Wash.2 Williams v Clinton
304.Wash.5 Fox v Klundt
304.Wisc.1 Thorton v Bookmann
304.Wisc.2 Mueller v Dyke
304.Wisc.3 Mackenzie v O'Neill et al.
304.Wisc.5 Sillars v Ryan et al.
304.Wisc.6 Davis v Murphy & City of Milwaukee
304.Wisc.8 Malone v Emery
304.Wisc.9 Mifflin Street Community Coop v Emery
304.Wisc.11 Rosenberg v Hebard
Indictments/ Informations
General
310. "Just a Few Easy Questions-A Look at Federal Grand Juries"
310.2 California v Hee
310.3 Branner v Superior Ct of Calif.
-Challenge to Grand Jury Composition
311.i California v Superior Court
311.3 New York v Shakur (Panther 21)
Panther 21 Trial News, Sept. 1970-May 1971
311.6 California v Gibson, Justice
311.10 California v Bingham et al (San Quentin Six)(3 folders)
311.11 California v Peraza, Navarette
311.12 California v Castro et al. (2 folders)
-Attacks on Character of Evidence
312.27 California v Billings and Mooney
312.43 Bacon v US
312.48 California v Kline
312.100.1 Johnson v San Joaquin Co Superior Court
312.100.2 California v Persons
-Charge of Entrapment
313.4 Benson v Pitchess
313.101 US v Anderson
-Charge of Conspiracy
314.8 California v Schnepf
314.11 California v Bardacke (Oakland 7)
314.13 US v Gwyther, Morgan
314.19 California v Zamora
-Inspection of Pretrial Statements of Government Witnesses (Jencks Act)
315. "Pre-trial Discovery by Defendants in Criminal Cases" by Mitchel J.Ezer
315.a Cope v City of Contra Costa
-Other Discovery
317.1 Riuz v California
317.2 California v Cabrellis
Double Jeopardy
-In State Cases
322.16 California v Escobedo
322.19 In re Anonymous Prisoner
322.25 Breed v Jones
Self incrimination: Criminal Sanctions for Exercising Privilege
-Before Congressional Committees
331.c Fagerhaugh v US
-Grants of Immunity, Federal
334 General (Grants of Immunity: Federal, in due process)
334.b Ullman v US
334.4 Piemonte v US
334.10 District Court (ND Calif) v Carter, Crawford, Shead
334.11 In re Jaques Egan
334.12 In re Grand Jury Testimony of Joanne Kinoy
334.16 Bauer et al. v McLaren
334.18 In re Carol Vericker
-Miscellaneous
337.1 California v Abrams
Self incrimination: Civil sanctions for exercising privilege
-Effect on Employment: Public School Teachers
342.a Faxon v School Committee of Boston
342.1 Slochower v Bd of Higher Educ of the City of New York
342.2` In the matter of the appl. of Mary I. Daniman v NY Bd of Educ
342.2b Austin v the Bd of Higher Educ of the City of New York
342.9 Board of Education v Beilan
342.11 Bd of Educ, Philadelphia v Intille
-Effect on Employment:Other Public Officers
343.2 Hancock v Burns
343.3 Nelson v Los Angeles County
348.8 In the matter of Boikess v Aspland
-Effect on Employment-Private
344. Miscellaneous
344.12 In re American Federation of Technical Engineers Local 241 and RadioCorporation of America
344.13 Zelman v Bethelem Steel Co., United Steelwrks of Am.
-Effect on Attorneys
345. General (US v The Progressive, Inc.)
345.a Sheiner v Florida
345.1 Cohen v Hurley
Due process
-In Arraignment
351.b In re Henderson Harris
-In Grand Jury Procedures
352. Are You Now or Have You Ever... A Look at Federal Grand Juries Investigating Movement Activities and the Political and Legal Responses to Them
352.b California v Moschetti, Sismour
352.8 In re Grand Jury Witnesses Berg, Craven, Rosenberg
-In Obtaining Confessions
353. General
353.q Anderson v US
353.40 California v Stewart
353.73 Smart v Wilson
353.74 California v Menektos
-In Press Releases and Newspaper Coverage
354.24 California v Jackson, Cluchette, Drumgo (Soledad Brothers)
354.24 People v George Jackson et al.
354.25 Pell v Procunier
354.32 California v Remiro, Little
354.36 People v Pinell
-In Admitting Perjured Testimony
355.c In the matter of Harry Renton Bridges
Bridges, Schmidt, Robertson v US
355.c Bridges v US
355.c Harry Renton Bridges v US, US Court of Appeals No. 12597, Transcript of trial, 17 volumes
Bridges, Misc. related publications, 3 vols. of reports
355.c Bridges testimony in the China trade
Habaes corpus, misc pamphlets
355.4 Rosenberg, Sobell v US, Supreme Court, 1951
Transcript of Record v I, part 1-4
Transcript of Record v II, part 1-4
Rosenberg v US, 1952
In the matter of the application of guardianship of Michael Allen Rosenberg
Excerpts from the petition of Ethel Rosenberg for Executive Clemency to the President of the United States
Rosenberg, Sobell v US
Fact sheets, articles, memoranda, opinion excerpts
FBI Files obtained under the Freedom of Information Act
The Kaufmann Papers, US gov't documents from the FBI
concerning the trial judge in the Rosenberg Case
Fund for Information and Accountability, Inc.
Action re FBI file destruction program
355.4 National Committee to Re-open the Rosenberg Case
Bay Area Committee to Re-open the Rosenberg Case, 1976-77
Re David Greenglass scientific evidence in the Rosenberg case
Clippings 1976-83
Rosenberg, Sobell v US
Committee to Secure Justice for Morton Sobell, 1956-66
East Bay Sobell Committee, 1957-58
Committee to Free Morton Sobell, 1966-68
Sobell v US (3 folders) (See also BANC MSS 99/280 National Lawyers Guild, Papers of Morton Dreyfus)
Sobell v US (3 folders)
US v Sobell (4 folders)
355.4a Meeropol v Nizer, Doubleday Inc., Fawcett Inc.
355.11 US ex.rel. Miller v Pate
355.13 In re Application of Paul Kern Imbler
355.101 In re Alger Hiss
-In Courts Martial, Military Administrative Decisions, Habeas Corpus Proceedings
356.301 Marron v Chaffee
-In Naturalization Proceedings
357.7 Astrup v INS
357.9 Petition for Naturalization of Yoa Quinn Lee
357.11 Noel v Chapman
-In Expatriation, Denaturalization, Deportation
358. American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born
358. General
358.i Barber v Gonzales
358.l Trop v Dulles
358.n Chandler v US
358.o US ex rel Dente v Ault
358.p US ex rel Kwong Hai Chew v Colding
358.v Hyun v Landon
358.8 Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez
358.9 Matles v US
358.17 Rusk v Cort
358.23 Schneider v Rusk
358.25 Giova v Rosenberg
358.51 Heikkila v US (3 folders clippings)
Heikkila v Barber
358.51 Heikkila v Barber (2 folders)
358.59 US ex rel Marks v Esperdy
358.61 Sherman v Hamilton
358.63 Afroyim v Rusk
358.68 Chew v Immigration and Naturalization Service
358.69 Immigration and Naturalization Service v Stanisic
358.70 Grondahl v Brownell
358.71 US ex rel Crasov v Foley
358.72 Ramirez-Salse v Brownell
358.73 Ault v Holmes
358.74 Rucker v Saxbe
358.76 Shannon vUS
-In Loyalty Hearings
359. General-Due process in rape cases
359.2 Scott v Macy
360 General- Marital rape
360.1 California v Hunt
360.1 California v Garcia
360.2 Coker v Georgia
-In Bar Proceedings re Lawyers
361.a In re Vincent Hallinan
361.2 Powell v Commission on Admissions and Grievances
361.3 Swanson v Florida Bar et al.
361.6 In re Siegel
361.9 Taylor v Hayes
361.15 Maness v Meyers
361.16 Belli v State Bar of California (6 folders)
-In Government Employment (including teaching)
363. Miscellaneous (Jean Fields Case)
363.2 Donald v Federal Aviation Administration
363.3 Fair v Kirk
363.4 Bueter v Duck
363.5 Sherar v Harless
363.27 Alpert, Altman et al v City and County of San Francisco
363.28 Nader v Bork
363.30 Meroze v Bd of Educ of Essex County Vocational School
363.32 Ong v Tovey
363.33 Passini v Robinson
363.34 O'Shea v Blatchford
364. General
364.1 Aikens v Abel, Barbero v Abel
364.2 Millar v Sweno
364.3 Irby v District Lodge 720(IAM)
Right to counsel /Access to courts
-General
370. General- Right to Counsel and Appeal (3 folders)
-In Federal Cases
371. General
371.a Del'Marmol v Chappell
371.b Neiswenter v Chappell
371.5 Jamison v Chappell
371.6 Johnson v US
371.7 Pate v Wilson
371.11 In the matter of Leopold Frankel
-In State Cases
372.i Riser v Warden, Folsom State Prison
372.46 Bowie v Wilson
372.69 Gilmore v Lynch, Gilmore v Younger (2 ff)
372.87 Re H.T. Harrell
372.89 California ex rel Major v Superior Ct of San Francisco
372.102 In re Alvarez
372.103 In re Jordan
372.105 Drumgo v Superier Ct. Of Calif, Marin Co.
372.113 California v Tillotson
372.144 Fall v Hurley
372.145 Calif. v Norris
372.149 Faretta v California
-Restrictions on Attorneys and Judges
373. General- Lawyer Discipline (4 folders)
373.b Cammer v US
373.2 In re Harriet B. Sawyer
373.4 US v Shibley (2 folders)
373.8 In re Otto Tucker
373.12 Mitchell v US
373.20 District of Columbia v Kinoy, Kinoy v Dist of Col.
373.27 Re L. Lackey Rowe Jr.
373.34 Kentucky State Bar Association v Taylor
373.35 Lathrop v Donohue
373.36 Schwartz v Defender Association of Philadelphia
373.37 Baker v Beto
373.42 Consumers Union of US v California State Bar
373.43 Kugler v Helfant
373.44 Bates v State Bar of Arizona
373.45 In the matter of Michael Callan, Harris David, and Gerald Clark
373.46 In the matter of Martha Copleman
373.47 Turco v Monroe County Bar Association
373.48 Moses v Scruggs
-Opportunity for Appellate Review/Transcript
374.40 In re Vincemt Henderson
374.41 Anders v California
374.45 Herick v Municipal Ct of Los Angeles
374.46 Magezis v Friedman
374.50 Colbert v Eyman
374.54 People v Murphy
-Group Legal Services/ OEO Offices
375. General- Legal Services, Legal Aid for the Poor (6 folders)
375. Revised Handbook on Prepaid Legal Services, ABA, 1972
-Bias and Prejudice of Judges
377.30 Fresno Co. v Calif Dept. of Socail Welfare
378. General- Judicial Performance
378.6 US v Thompson
378.7 North v Russell
Confrontation
-In Criminal Cases
381.5 Gray v Wilson
Jury trials
-General
390. General- Jury Service
390.4 Safer v Calif. Superior Ct, Ventura Co.
390.6 California v Collins
390.7 Hudson v Holton
-Nature of Jury Trial
391. General- Jury Selection
391.b Pennsylvania ex. rel. Fletcher v Cavell
391.1 Michigan v Hunter
391.2 Michigan v Simpson
391.10 Illinois v Capoldi
391.19 Muniz v NLRB
391.20 Costarelli v Massachussetts
391.21 Herring v New York
391.22 Murphy v Florida
391.100 Miscellaneous
391.101 Colgrove v Battin
391.200 ABA Reports, Management of Jury Systems
391.201 Apodoca v Oregon
391.202 New Jersey v Ward
391.300 Report on Voir Dire
391.301 People v Crowe
391.302 Massachusetts v Kiernan
391.303 Massachusetts v Ladetto
391.304 Massachusetts v Ricard
391.305 Massachusetts v Martorano
391.306 Massachusetts v Subilosky
391.307 Massachusetts v Taylor
391.308 US v Baker (Wounded Knee Voir Dire)
391.309 US v Soliah
391.310 US v Lasky
-Waiver of Jury
392.4 Szulczewski v Jasak
-Improper Comment
393. Chapman v California
393.4 Michigan v Brocato
393.5 California v Thompson
393.6 New Jersey v LeRoi Jones
393.9 Mullaney v Wilbur
-Scrupled Jurors
394.1 Witherspoon v Illinois
394.2 Adderly et al v Wainwright
394.3 Hill v Nelson (2 folders)
394.4 In re Anderson, In re Satterfield (3 folders)
Excessive Bail: Conditions on Release
-Amount of Bail Set
401.9 Gaar, Treuhaft v Municipal Court (Oakland)
401.23a In re Goines, Levine
401.29 Brenneman et al. v Madigan (2 folders)
401.236 California v Noble
-Denial of Bail
403.19 In re Huey P. Newton
403.24 California v Minzey
-Miscellaneous Bail Problems
404.6 Gardner v Campbell
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
-In Criminal Cases
411.c California v Wolfe
411.d In re Application of Richard Gilcrease for Writ of Habeas Corpus
411.33 California v Ketchel, Sears
411.38 Jordan v Fitzharris
411.49 Wells v Madigan
411.51 Lane v Carberry
411.55 Boyle v Madigan
411.60 In re Geldern
411.62 Nolen v Fitzharris (4 folders)
411.63 California v Whiteside, Marquez
411.64 Howard v Rosendale
411.72 Holder v Procunier
411.73 In re Ortiz
411.84 Walker v Procunier
411.85 In re Sangsland
411.89 Taylor v Munson et al.
411.91 Payne v Whitmore
411.92 Burt v Zeimer
411.Cal.27 Four Folsom Inmates v Craven
411.Cal.28 Vun Cannon v Breed
411.Cal.34 Gaulden v Procunier
411.Cal.36 Charles v Patterson
411.Cal.38 Hilliard v Pope
411.Cal.40 Williams v Pope
411.Cal.41 O'Neill v Long
Due Process/ Equal Protection for the Poor
-Social Welfare Programs-Local
421.Cal.b Parrish v US Civil Service Commission
421.Cal.4 Contra Costa Co. v Calif Socila Welfare Bd, Henderson
421.Cal.10 Hercules v Dept of Social Welfare
421.Cal.12 Alameda Co. v Espinoza
421.Cal.15 Bonner v Montgomery
421.Cal.16 Brown v Hannon
421.Cal.18 Wheeler v Montgomery
421.Cal.19 Marshall v California
421.Cal.19a Burns v Montgomery
421.Cal.22 Damico v California
421.Cal.25 Morris v Williams
421.Cal.30 In re Pierce
421.Cal.31 Lara v Fair Employment Practices Commission
421.Cal.36 McCollough v Terzian
421.Cal.37 In re Raynes
421.Cal.38 Little, Ochinero v Montgomery
421.Cal.39 Ivy v Montgomery
421.Cal.41 Jamesv Montgomery
421.Cal.43 Ramos v Fare, Montgomery
421.Cal.46 Muniz v Montgomery
421.Cal.47 Loredo v Sierra View Hospital
421.Cal.48 Paulson v Finch
421.Cal.49 Lewis v Montgomery
421.Cal.50 Cal. Legis.Council for Older Americans v Weinberger
421.Cal.51 Committee for Rights of Disabled v Carleson
421.Cal.52 Committee for Rights of Disabled v Reagan
421.Cal.54 Calif. Welfare Rights v Reagan
422.5 Johnson v Arkansas Dept. of Public Welfare
422.9 Macias v Finch
422.16 Berry v Hardin
422.17 Muniz v Cohen
422.18 Hernandez v Hardin
423.Cal.2 Tyree v Pleasanton Housing Authority
423.Cal.4 Western Addition Community Organization v Weaver
423.Cal.7 Potrero Hill Community Action Comm. v SF Housing Authority
423.Cal.12 Genoeva v Rosales
423.Cal.19 Zaragoza v Skyway Realty
423.Cal.20 Silas v Smith
423.Cal.21 South of Market Residents Assn. v S F Redevelopment Agency
423.Cal.22 Simons v Dorchester Hotel
423.Cal.24 Mendoza v Gonzales
423.Cal.27 Ford v San Francisco Housing Authority
423.Cal.28 Mihans v Berkely Municipal Court
423.Cal.29 Berkeley Tenants Union v Individual Landlords
423.Cal.30 Dionio v Carberry, Bryson v Carberry
423.Cal.31 Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redv. v US Dept HUD
424.16 Van Slayke v Williams
424.24 McCallop v Unioversal Acceptance Corp
424.28 Budget Finance Plan v Franklin
424.201 Orr v San Francisco Superior Ct.
425.7 Lopez v Daly City Toyota
425.101 Nunemaker v Pacific Telephone, Wood v PG & E
426. Due Process for Parents and Families (2 folders)
427.12 Pettibone v Weinberger
427.18 Atwood Aviation v Morley
427.19 United Farm Workers Organizing Committ. v Bruno Dispoto Co.
427.22 Pitts v Reagan
428.1 Robles v Gilroy Unified School District
429. Riots - General (2 folders)
429. Riots - NYC, Plainfield, Newark, Detroit, Harlem(7 folders)
429. Civil Disturbances
429. Report of the Nat'l Advisory Comm. on Civil Disorders,1968 (2 ff)
429.2 Watts Riots- General and clippings (2 folders)
429.2e Brooks, Levine v Los Angeles Superior Court
429.4 Watkins v LA Co. Superior Ct.
-Due Process for Juveniles
430.5 Kent v US
Post Conviction Remedies
-On Prison Disciplinary Proceedings
455.Cal.5 Johnson v Duffy
455.Cal.6 Jackson, Drumgo, Cluchette v Younger
Sentencing and Clemency Procedures
-Sentencing Process
461.11 Conway v California Adult Authority
461.25 Allen v Younger
461.26 California v Griffin
461.414 Allen et al v Younger
-Applications for and Conditions of Probation
462.2 In re Peeler
462.3 In re Mannino
-Applications for and Conditions of Parole
463.6 In re Sturm
-Parole and Probation Revocation
466.5 California v Delles
466.7 In re Spells
466.8 In re Eldridge Cleaver
-Miscellaneous
469. Calif. v Cooper, Terry
Miscellaneous Due Process
490.13 Commonwealth of Mass. v Sacco,Vanzetti
490.26 Calif. v Collins
III. Equal Protection
Additional Note
Elections
-General
500. 1961 United States Commission on Civil Rights Report, v. 1-5
500. To Do Justice, Misc.
500. General (3 folders)
500. "Congressional Power to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment
Against Private Acts" Frantz, Laurent --draft and typeset copy
500. State Action
-Racial, Language Discrimination
501. General
501.Ala.31a In re Herndon
501.DC.2 Powell v McCormack
501.Ind.1 US v Krupa
501.Miss.15 US v Mississippi
501.Miss.41 Riddell v National Democratic Party, Evers v Waller
501.NM.1 Montoya v Bolack
501.NY.1 In re Jose Camacho v Inspectors of Election
501.NY.1a Camacho v Rogers
501.NY.3 In re Application of Cardona
501.NC.6 US v Pate
501.Tex.a Smith v Allwright
-Political Discrimination
502. General
502. Vietnam Ballot Petition
502. Wallace for President (1948)
502.Cal.3 Otsuka v Hite
502.Cal.5 Westbrook v Mihaly, Adams v Mihaly, Larez v Shannon
502.Cal.6 Cleaver v San Francisco
502.Cal.7 Calif ex rel Martinez v Lisher
502.Ga.a South v Peters
502.Ga.1 Bond, M.L. King, Keyes v James Sloppy" Floyd et al
502.Ind.1 Whitcomb v Communist Party of Indiana
502.Ind.2 Communist Party of Ind. v Whitcomb
502.Md.1 Auerbach v Mandel
502.Md.2 Maryland People's Party v Mandel
502.Mich. Aboliish the Poll Tax
502.Minn.1 Mitchell v Donovan
502.Miss.3 US v Marshall Co. Bd of Election Commissioners
502.Miss.4 Evers v Williams
502.NJ.1 Richardson v Caputo
502.NY.10 In re Basel
502.Ohio.a Hallinan v Brown
502.Ohio.1 Washington v Cayahoga Co. Bd of Elections
502.Ohio.2 Sweetenham et al. v Gilligan et al.
502.Ohio.4 Lehman v Shaker Heights
-Urban Discrimination
503. General (2 folders)
503.Ala.1 Sims v Frink
503.Ala.3 Amos v Sims
503.Ala.4 Reynolds v Sims
503. Colo.2 Lisco v McNichols
503.Kan.1 Harris et al v Shanahan
503.Ma.1 Maryland Comm. for Fair Representation v Tawes
503.Mich.1 Scholle v Hare
503.Miss.1 Fortner v Barnett
503.Miss.2 Connor v Johnson
503.Miss.3 Marshall v Mayor, Bd of Selectmen, City of McComb
503.NY.1 WMCA et al v Simon
503.NY.3 Honeywood v Rockefeller
503.Okla.1 Brown v Election Bd of Oklahoma
503.SC.1 McCain v Lybrand
-14th Amendment § 2 Enforcement
504. General
504.1 Denman v McCormack
504.2 Lampkin v Hodges
-Residence Requirements
505.a Hallanan v Mittlbeeler
505.b Davis v Union Dist 7, Town of Hempstead
505.2 Dreuding v Devlin
505.4 Hall v Beals
505.5 Harris v Samuels and Tuscaloosa Co. Bd of Registrars
505.6 Keane v Mihaly
505.7 Dunn et al v Blumstein
505.8 Jolicoeur et al v Mihaly
505.9 Whitcomb v Affeldt
-Miscellaneous Problems
506. General
506. 3rd Party Federal Matching
506.1 Deleware v New York
506.2 Kramer v Union Free School District
506.6 Sawyer v Healy
506.7 Bryant v Blunt
506.14 Norvell v New Mexico ex rel Apodaca and Apodaca
506.15 Brown v Chote
506.16 Assoc. Enterprises v Toltec Watershed Improvement Dist.
506.17 Gordon v Lance
506.18 Wong v KPIX-TV, KRON-TV, KGO-TV
506.19 Oregon v Mitchell
506.20 Fields v Askew
506.21 Dillenberg v Kramer
506.22 Suit to Set Aside the 1972 Presidential Election
506.24 Cassidy v Willis
506.37 Pipefitters Local Union No. 562 v US
506.39 Whitehead v Westbrook
506.40 East Parrish School Board v Marshall
506.41 Flood v Riggs
506.42 Nonnewaug Reg. School Dist.v Scott
Jury Selection: Appeals to Prejudice
-General
510 General- Jury Selection (4 folders)
510.1 California v Taylor
-Involving Racial, Nationality Discrimination
512. Jury Selection: Involving Racial Disccrimination
512.Ala General
512.Ala.a Alabama v Patterson (Scottsboro case)
512.Ala.b Coleman v Alabama
512.Ala.3 Seals v Alabama (2 folders)
512.Ala.5 Swain v Alabama
512.Ala.7 Billingsley v Clayton
512.Ala.10 White v Crook (2 folders)
512.Ala.11 Mitchell et al v Johnson
512.Ala.14 Jones v Wilson
512.Ala.15 Bokulich v Alabama (Greene Co.)
512.Ala.16a Turner and US v Spencer, et al v Curb, McNeir v Agee et al
512.Ala.17 Taylor v Alabama
512.Ala.27 US v Flowers
512.Ark.2 Stewart v Stephans
512.Cal. Blackstone Rangers, clippings
Oakland 7, clippings
512.Cal.a California v Melendez et al (The SleepyLagoonMystery)
512.Cal.b California v Gregory, Bradley, Appleman
512.Cal.c Calif v Sims
512.Cal.3 Del Valle v DeVoto
512.Cal.4 California v Craig
512.Cal.5 California v Smith
512.Cal.6 California v Newton
Minimizing Racism in Jury Trials: The Voir Dire conducted by Charles R. Garry in the People of California v Huey P. Newton. Edited by Ann Fagan Ginger
Restrictions on defense jury voir dire, Appendix a & b
Correspondence, leaflets, misc.
Clippings
Black Panthers, clippings 1967-68
512.Cal.6 Calif.v Huey P. Newton
512.Cal.7 People v Rios et al
512.Cal.8 Goodlet v Municipal Court of San Francisco
512.Cal.9 Zelchower v Younger
512.Cal.10 US v Mitchell, McRoy
512.Cal.11 Lee v California
512.Conn.2 US v Robinson
512.Ga.a Georgia v Hunter
512.Ga.b Georgia v Hall
512.Ga.c Avery v Georgia
512.Ga.5 Whitus, Davis, v Georgia
512.Ga.13 Mobley v US
512.Ga.14 Broadway, US v Culpepper
512.Ga.15 Pullum v Greene
512.Ga.24 Massey v Smith
512.Ill.1 Skolniek v Spolar
512.La.2 US ex rel Poret and Labat v Dennis and Walker
512.La.3 Labat v Bennett
512.La.12 Louisiana v Barksdale
512.La.17 Scott v Walker
512.La.26 US v McDaniels et al
512.Mich.2 Michigan v Mason, Michigan v Rogers
512.Mich.3 Michigan v Viera
512.Mich.4 Michigan v Hibbitt
512.Miss.2 Goldsby v Harpole
512.Miss.5 Mississippi v Gordon
512.Miss.6 Harper v Mississippi
512.Miss.7 Bailey v Wharton
512.Miss.8 Bass v Mississippi
512.Miss.11 Woodruff v Mississippi
512.Miss.22 Watkins v Mississippi
512.Miss.23 Davis v US
512.Miss.24 Watkins v Greene
512.NJ.2 New Jersey v Roberts
512.NY.6 Chestnut v New York
512.NY.9 New York v Hicks
512.NC.2 North Carolina v Covington
512.Ohio.1 Ohio v Evans
512.PA.3 Pennsylvania v Locke; Penn v Scott & Reid; Penn v Washington
512.SD.1 South Dakota v Nini, Concannon, Tiger, Cooper
512.SD.2 Us v Bear Runner
512.Tex.b Cassell v Texas
512.Tex.c Smith v Texas
512.Tex.2 Hernendez v Texas
512.Tex.4 Brooks v Beto
512.US.1 Test v US
512.US.4 US v Satcher
512.US.5 Ristaino v Ross
-Involving Economic Discrimination
513.a Illinois re Flanagan v McDonough
513.b US v Silverman
513.3 Bradley v Judges
513.4 Estelle v Williams
-Involving Discrimination Against Women
515. General
515.i Hoyt v Florida
515.2 Willis v US
515.5 Stubblefield v Tennessee
515.25 Edwards v Healy
515.27 National Organization for Women v Goodman
515.28 Taylor v Louisiana
-Involving Other Discrimination
516. Jury selections involving other discriminations
516.5 Abbott v County of Los Angeles
516.6 Perkins v Smith
517.2 Ross v US
517.3 Nissinoff et al v Donohue et al.
517.4 Westbrook v Ward
517.5 Mississippi v Wann
517.6 Joyce v Mississippi
517.7 Colorado in the interest of V.C., a child
517.22 General
Education
-General
520. Education, General
520. Education, General (5 folders)
520. General (5 folders)
520. "An Appeal to President John F. Kennedy for National Rededication to the Principles of the Emancipation Proclamation and for an Executive Order Prohibiting Segregation in the US" submitted by Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., 1962.
520. Calif. Advisory Committee to US Commission on Civil Rights Meeting Transcript, March 19, 1976.
520. Calif. Advisory Comm./ Meeting Transcript Mar. 20, 1976
520.Cal. Berkeley School Integration
520.1 Busbee v Georgia Conference, Amer Asoc of Univ. Professors
-Challenges to Unequal Facilities
521. General (4 folders)
521.a Sweatt v Painter
521.7 Odegaard v DeFunis
521.10 Mission Coalition Organization v San Francisco Unif. Schl Dist.
521.11 Barsky v Weinberger
521.12 Geier v Blanton
-Suits to Enforce Integration
522. General (2 folders)
522. Citizens Advisory Committee on Equal Educational
522. General Desegregation-Integration (5 folders)
522. General Desegregation-Integration Clippings
522. General Desegregation-Integration Cases
522. National Congress of Colored Parents and Teachers
522. Title IV
522. Mass. Act for Elimination of Racial Imbalance in Schools
522.Calif. Berkeley Intergroup Seminar
522.Calif. Hadsell Report
522.Calif. Berkeley PTA
522.Calif. Intergroup Education Project, Berkeley (2 folders)
522.Calif School Desegregation (2 folders)
522.1 School Desegregation Clippings
522.Calif. School Integration, Berkeley and Oakland
522.Kan.a Brown v Board of Education (Topeka) (2 folders)
-Treatment of Minority Groups in School Books
525. Bibliographies
Housing- Racial, Other Discrimination
-General
530. General (2 folders)
Other Discrimination-Race, Nationality
-In Recreation Facilities
541.Fla.2 Dresner v City of Talahassee
541.ICC.4 Henderson v US
541.La.1 Adams v City of New Orleans
541.Miss.8 Mississippi v Moses
541.Va.2a Henderson v Trailway Bus Co.
541.12a Phifer, Shuttlesworth v Moore, Chief of Police
542.13 Brown v Gray
Other Sex Discrimination
-By Financial Institutions
551. General
551.Ala.2 Sawyer v Mobile
551.Cal.4 Teverbaugh v El Rey Trailer Parks, Inc.
551.Cal.5 Santa Clara Voiture 365 v American Legion Society
551.Cal.10 Morton v Los Altos Country Club
551.Cal.12 Rubin v Coast Corinthian Yacht Club
551.Fla.10 Twitty v Vogue Theater Corp.
551.Ga.12 Shields v Midtown Bowling Lanes
551.La.13 US v Slidell Youth Football Association
551.Md.3 Williams, Jones v Rescue Fire Co.
551.Md.5 Tillman v Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assoc.
551.Mich.1 Bishop v Statler Hotel
551.Mich.7 Pontiac Comm. Bowling League v Orchard Lanes Bowling Alley
551.Miss.13 Palmer v Mayor Thompson
551.Pa.2 Sullivan v Schultheis
551.Tx.5 Allen v Club Bowlero
551.Tex.7 US v Sandy Lake Pool, Inc.
551.Va.12 Sullivan v Little Hunting Park, Inc.
-In Social Security Benefits
552. General
552.Fla.6 NAACP v Webb's City, Inc.
552.Fla.7 Plummer v Brock
552.Fla.11 Bradshaw v Whigam
552.Ga.21 US v Kent
552.La.9 US v Houston Jordan et al.
552.Md.2 US v Hanley
552.Miss.5 NAACP v Primos
552.Miss.7b US v Spencer et al.
552.NY.2 Adickes v S.H. Kress Co.
552.NC.22 US v Worrells
552.Va.12 Williams v Lewis
552.Va.13 Plantiffs v Vonetes dba as Lee House Diner
552.Va.18 US v Blue Ridge Grill, Poe, Davis
552.Va.19 US v Lumpkin
-In Insurance Coverage
553. General
553.Ala. Washington v Lee
553.Cal.2 Cobbs v Rockridge Women's Club
553.Cal.5 Butler v Coach Royal Mobile Home Park
553.Fla.3 Pinkey v Meloy
553.Fla.5 Campbell v Hillcrest Memorial Gardens
553.Ga. Miscellaneous
553.Ga.2 Heart of Atlanta Motel v US
553.Mich.3 Spencer v Flint Memorial Park Associaton
553.Minn.1 Ericson v Sunset Memorial Park Assocaition
553.NJ. In re Sunshine Park
553.NJ.1a Sellers v Triolo
553.Ohio.1 Gegner v Graham
553.Pa.1 Johnson v Cafaro
553.Pa.2 Buefort v Elias
553.Pa.4 Moose Lodge No. 107 v Irvis
553.SC.1 Thomas v Orangeberg Theaters, Inc.
553.Utah.1 Cuevas v Sorales
553.Wash.1 In re Jangaba Johnson and Wheeler and the Washington
State Board Against Discrimination
553.Wisc.1 Pitts, D'Attilio v Eagles and Elks
-In Taxation
554. General
554.Fla.3 Lewter et al. v Lee Memorial Hospital
554.Ill.1 Morris v Chicago Hospital Council
554.Miss.3 Coleman v Humphreys Co. Memorial Hospital
554.NC.1 Simkins and US v Cone Memorial Hospital
554.NC.3 Hawkins v N.c. Dental Soc.
554.SC.1 Rackley v Bd. of Trustees of Orangeburg Reg Hospital
554.Va.1 Wood v Hogan
Employment
-Racial Discrimination in Hiring or Admission
571. General
571.10 Owens v Board of Education
571.12 US v Board of Education, Greene Co.
571.18 Franklin v School Board, Giles Co.
571.23 Buford v Morganton Bd of Education
571.24 Chambers v Hendersonville City Bd of Education
571.27 Missiouri Commiss. on Human Rights v Rives C-2 School Dist.
571.53 Rolfe, Peebles v Co. Board of Education, Lincoln Co.,Tn
571.72 Porcelli v Titus
571.75 Chance v Bd of Examiners
571.85 Baker v Columbus Mississippi School District
571.86 Hazelwood School v US
-Sex Discrimination
578. Bibliographies
578. Citizens Advisory Council on the Status of Women
578. Women's Bureau-US Dept of Labor
578. California Labor Code
578. Women and Employment (3 folders)
578. Women and Employment-ACLU Cases
578. Miscellaneous (5 folders)
578. Reports of Discrimination and Legal Remedies (2 folders)
578. Clippings
578. Equal Pay for Equal Work (4 folders)
578. Women's History
578. Discrimination in Employment (3 folders)
578. Discrimination in Education (2 folders)
578. Citizen's Advisory Comm. on the Status of Women,Wash. D.C.,
578. Women and Credit, Banking, and Mortgages
578. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1970-73
578. Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) (2 folders)
578. International Women's Year, 1975
578. Women in Law (2 folders)
578. Women in Government and Politics
578. Women in the Military and on the Police Force
578. Married Women's Choice of Name
578. International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women
578. McGraw-Hill Guidelines for Equal Trtmnt of Sexes in Publishing
578. "Women and the Law" 7th Regional Conference, Univ. of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, 1977 (2 ff)
578. Women in Sports
578. Pregnancy and Maternity Leave (ACLU Reports)
Civil Actions Under § 1983 and Other Civil Rights Laws
580. General- Civil Rights Law
Correspondence
Benjamin Dreyfus, Speech to Philadelphia Chapter of NLG,1963
580. Testimony of Berl I. Bernhard before Subcommittee No. 5 of the House Judiciary Committee on pending Civil Rights Legislation, May 16, 1963
580. Federal Civil Rights Act 1964
Civil Rights Act of 1966, Speeches on legislation
Clippings
580.b McGee v Williams
580.1 Tynes v Gogos
580.3 Pettus v Schult
580.6 Royal News Co. v Schultz
580.6a Royal News Co. v Olson
580.7 Council of Federated Organizations v Rainey
580.8 In re petition of Aaron Henry et al.
580.12 Bryant v Sisco v Donnell
580.14 Miller v Hall
580.15 Smith v Ladner
580.22 White v White Knights of the KKK of Mississippi
580.23 Seabrooks v Chicago
580.26 Guido v Schenectady
580.29 Jones v Hartford
580.31 Labor Defense Coalition v Gribbs
580.32 West Tennessee ACLU v Memphis
580.33 John v Johnson
580.37 De La Raza v Regents
580.36 Weathers v Ebert
580.38 Leeds v Little League, Inc.
580.39 Philadelphia Junior Chamber of Commerce v US Jaycees
580.40 Dahl v Palo Alto
580.42 Feehan v Levine
580.43 Teterud v Gillman
580.44 Leonard v City of Columbus
580.46 Smith v O'Halloren
580.47 US v Jefferson Mortgage Co.
580.49 Kelly v Johnson
580.51 Huffman v Pursue, Ltd.
580.52 ILWU, Local 6 v Handyman
580.53 Schwenk v Boy Scouts of America
580.54 Belcher v Stengel
580.55 Weatherford v Bursey
580.56 Women' s Defense Committee v Jozwiak
580.57 Wiles v Shaw
580.58 Mauck v Housden
581. Rights of Students and Teachers
581.1 Hernandez v Nichols
581.3 Murphy V Kerrigan
581.4 Zamora v Riles
581.5 Ortega v Guadalupe Joint Union School Dist.
Criminal Prosecution Under Civil Rights and Other Laws
590. Civil Rights Law- Criminal
Pamphlets and reports
State Action
Clippings
590.10 US v Rainey, Price
590.12 Alabama v Wilkins
590.13 US v Guest et al.
590.19 Alabama v Coleman
590.19b US v Bowers and DeBoxtel
590.34 US v Lester, Buccieri
590.36 US v Feise
590.43 US v Perez
590.44 US v Gerena
Suits Involving Constitutional Rights of Native American Indians
600. Native American Bibliographies, 1970-73
600. Native Americans and Poverty
600. California Rural Legal Assistance
600. Wounded Knee - AIM
600. Survival of American Indian Assocaition
Miscellaneous
Briefs
(Many have no assigned case numbers. Others have case numbers written on them but need to be integrated into existing case
folders or have case folders created if the Brief is the only existant document in the case. Check list above or consult case
finder for existing case files).
Unfiled Briefs- Aliens and Naturalization (2 folders)
Unfiled Briefs-Civil Liberties (6 folders)
Unfiled Briefs- Miscellaneous (3 folders)
Report-Thought Control in the USA, No. 1-6, 1947
Unfiled Briefs-Miscellaneous (11 folders)
Unnfiled memos and briefs (2 folders)
Table of (New) Cases (Incomplete)
Vol. 1, No. 1 1956
Vol. 2, No. 3 May 1957
Vol. 2, No. 4 July 1957
Vol. 3, No. 3 April 1958
Vol. 4, No. 3 May 1959
Vol. 5, No. 2 Feb. 1960
Vol. 7, No. 3 May, 1962
Vol. 7, No. 4 July, 1962
Vol. 8, No. 1 Nov. 1962
Vol. 8, No. 3 May 1963
Vol. 8, No. 4 Aug. 1963
Vol. 9, No. 3 April 1964
Vol. 9, No. 4 July 1964
Vol. 12, No. 1 Nov. 1966
Docket newsletter Feb. 1967
SUBSERIES 1.2: Human Rights Docket, 1979-89
I. Freedom Of Thought, Expression And Association
Additional Note
Freedom Of Speech, Press, Assembly
Licensing
-Of Meetings
Key to classification of cases and case descriptions
11. Ashford v Oakland
-Of Peddlars, Literature Tables
13. California v Barton and Josselyn
13. Unemployed Workers Organizing Committee v Batterton
13. Sun Valley v California Tax Reform Association
13. Bill Press v Pan-American Properties
13. Bill Press v Lucky Stores, Inc.
13. ACLU, Nuclear Weapons Lab Conversion Project v UC, Lawrence
Livermore Lab
13.1 Howe v Univ of Florida et al
13.11 Robins v Pruneyard
13.12 Rosen v Port of Portland
13.13 US Labor Party v Knox
-Of Parades
16. Beckerman v Tupelo
16.11 Smith v Collin
16.12 Jewish Defense League v St Louis
16.13 Collin v O'Malley
16.14 Gay Activist Alliance of New Jersey v D'Arminio
16.15 North Shore Right to Life Committee v Manhassett
-Of Mass Media
17. Freedom of Speech-Mass Media, General
17. In re Improvement Leasing
17.1 Palmetto v FCC
17.4 United Church of Christ v FCC
17.7 Red Lion Broadcasting v US FCC, US FCC v Radio and Television News Directors Association
17.9 US v FCC
17.11 Forcade v Rowley
17.12 US FCC v Midwest Video Corp.
17.13 Sanders v FCC
17.15 US FCC v New Jersey State Lottery Commission
17.16 Forcade, Sherrill v Knight
17.18 Cosmopolitan Broadcasting Corp. v FCC
17.19 NAACP v FCC
17.20 Writers Guild of America, West v FCC
17.22 Nixon v Warner Communications
17.23 Goldblum v NBC
17.24 Houchins v KQED
17.26 New Solidarity v Rochford
-Of Political Ads, TV, Radio
18.1 Garabedian v Michaelson
Administrative Restrictions
-By US Customs
21.8 DeVries v Acree
21.9 Various Articles of Obscene Merchandise, Long v US
-On Government Information and Secrecy
22.10 In re How to Read Like Donald Duck
-Freedom of Information Act: FBI and Justice Department
23.104 Hiss v US
23.105 Meeropol v US Dept of Justice
23.110 Field Enterprises v FBI
-Freedom of Information Act: CIA and State Departments
23.201 Bell v US
23.203 Halperin v National Security Council
23.208 Edwards v CIA
23.301 Nixon v Admr of General Services
-On Students and Teachers
24.Cal.79 Bradfield v UC
24.Cal.80 Ofsevit v San Francisco State University
24.Cal.81 Calif Federation of Teachers v Eu
24.Cal.83 Graves v Lawndale School Dist
24.Cal.84 Powers v Bakersfield School Dist
24.Cal.85 Terri v Fullerton Community College
24.Colo.4 Franklin v Atkins
24.Fla.3 Ferrara v Phifer
24.Ill.1 Carey v Piphus
24.Ia.3 Zoll v Eastern Allmakee Community School Dist
24.Ky Allen v Bd of Educ
24.Ky.5 Stagnolia v Harlan County Bd Of Educ
24.Ky.6 Concerned Parents v Whitley Co.
24.Md.1 Maryland Public Interest v Elkins
24.Md.2 Ollman v University of Maryland
24.Miss.16 Givhan v Western Line
24.Mo.6 Ratchford v Gay Lib
24.NJ.9 Lipp v Morris
24.NY Granville v Thomas
24.NY In re Johnson
24.NY Perez v Brooklyn College
24.NY.37 Selzer v Berkowitz
24.NY.30 Kahan v Bd of Higher Education
24.NY.39 Maher v Seaford
24.Or.4 Lowell School Dist v Kerr
24.Or Henthorn v Grand Prarie School Dist
24.Pa.11 Brush v Penn State
24.Pa.12 In re application of the Trustees of the Univ of Penn
24.Pa.13 Nyden v Univ of Pittsburg
24.Tex Miller v Jim Ned Independent School Dist
24.Tex Dean v Timpson
24.Tex.16 Allaire v Rogers
24.Tex.17 Jacobs v Marshall
24.Tex.18 Sullivan v Univ Interscholastic League
24.Tex.19 Raymond v Parr
24.Utah Utah v Singer
24.5 Danis v Tenafly
24.5 Clark v Gladstone
24.5 Frasca v Andrews
24.5 Iowa v DeVey
24.5 Lowman v Davis
24.5 Reineke v Cobb Co. School Dist
24.5 Summe v Warsaw
24.5 Thomas v Bd of Educ
24.5 Dunagin v City of Oxford
-On Student Newspapers
24.500 Campus Comm Inc v Freedman et al
24.500 Williams v Spencer
24.520 Johnson v Brinson
24.521 Pliscou v Holtville Unified School Dist
24.528 Gellman v Marcase and Phil High Schl
24.530 Gambino v Fairfax County School Bd
24.522 Evans v Righetti
24.523 Kober v Unified School Dist No. 234
24.525 Pickens v Atkinson
24.526 Trachtman v Anker
24.527 Weaver v School Dist 4J
24.529 El Sol v Schilling
-On Miscellaneous Activities
25.13 Roberts v Vance
25.61 Alaska Gay Coalition v Sullivan
25.62 Bailey v US Marines
25.64 Montagne v McGuire
Economic Restrictions
30.31 Minneapolis Star & Tribune v Commr of Revenue
30.32 Kimble v McDuffy
30.34 Griffith v Bell Whitley
30.35 Irvington v Kramedjian
30.36 Beerbohm v Sonoma Co Library
31. Applegate v Brown
31. Turner v Gray
31.4 Bishop v Suggs
Contempt
-Of Federal Courts
41.a US v Crockett
41.15 In re Caldwell
41.16 In re Dellinger
41.104 Evans v Fromme
-Of State Courts
42. Segregated Courtrooms
42. In the matter of Dellinger
42. Glen v Hongisto
42.12 Holt, Dawley v Virginia
42.16 In re Tobias Simon
42.17 Hamilton v ALA
42.19 Ungar v Sarafite
42.28 N.Y. Co. Lawyers' Assn. v Dacey
42.33 In re Kenneth V. Cockrel
42.34 Bd of Edu v United Fed. of Teachers
42.35 In re Spencer
42.35 In re Ravitz
42.37 In re Lafferty
42.38 Michigan v Porter
42.39 Bell v Hongisto
42.40 In re Grossman
42.41 Gaddis v Wyman
42.42 Johnson v Mississippi
42.101 Hamilton v Berkeley Municipal Court
42.103 Rowe v Mississippi
42.104 McLucas et al. v Palmer
42.106 Oliver v Postel
42.107 Oklahoma Pub. Co. v Dist. Ct. of Oklahoma City
Criminal Sanctions
50. Vigilante in So. US: Justifiable Civil Disobedience or Privileged Self-Help
-Against Disorderly Conduct and Similar Offenses
51. General
51.Ala.c Montgomery v Davidson
51.Cal. California v Feshangi
51.Cal.4 Calif. v Meisenbach
51.Cal.18 Calif. v Castro
51.Cal.19 Pain v San Francisco Municipal Court
51.Cal.23 Calif. v Cohen
-Against Sedition, Anarchy, Syndicalism, Riots, Bombing
54. North Carolina v Wood
54. Texas v Hirschi (Moody Park Three)
54.43 Alabama v Chambliss
54.44 Alabama v Stoner
-Against Leafleting,Posting Signs, Picketing, Demonstrating
55.06 US v Ebner, et al
-Against Trespassing
58. General
58. San Francisco Sit-ins, 1964
58.Cal. Calif. v Ordona
58.Cal Calif v Rodriguez
58.Cal.8 Calif. v Sims (2 folders)
58.Cal.9 In re Nathaniel Burbridge
58.Cal.13 Calif. v Green
58.Cal.15 Calif. v Minkin
58.Cal.22 Calif. v Hutchinson
58.Cal.24a Calif. v Heinemann
58.Cal.24b USA v Bishop et al
58.Cal.28 Parrish v Municipal Court
58.Cal.35 Calif v Long
58.Cal.36 In re Cox
58.Cal.37 In re Wallace
58.Cal.40 Calif. v Schwarz
58.Cal.39 Calif v Andrew
58.Cal.139a California v Acton
-Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities
58.Fla.4 Adderly v Florida
58.Ga.14 Georgia v Rachel
58.Mass.2 Doyle v O'Brien
58.Mich.3 Folgueras v Hassle
58.NH.1 Adams v Sampson
58.NH.2 New Hampshire v Wentworth
58.Okla. Oklahoma v Bernstein
58.Or.1 Oregon v Mouer
58.Pa.2 Limerick v 14 Members
58.SC.5 So. Carolina v 250 Nuclear Demonstrators
58.US.1 US v Hartman
58.Vt.1 Vermont Yankee v Vermont Decomissioning Alliance
-Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities
59. In re Lowell Eggemeier
59.116 Hilliard v Mitchell
59.117 US v Hilliard
59. US v Ganthier
59. US v Metheny
59.128 Chavis v North Carolina (Wilmington Ten)
59.131 Pelitier v US (2 folders)
Civil Sanctions (and Contempt Charges)
63. Illinois Migrant Council v Pilliod
63.67 Claiborne Hardware v NAACP
63.67a Henry v First Natl Bank of Clarksdale
Freedom Of Association: Affecting The Organization
Organizational Privileges Challenged
-Privacy in Organizational Work
205.16 In re Search Warrant Wash DC
-In Prisons
206.01 Carter v Klein
206.2 Houchins v Fenton
Labor Unions
-Right to Organize:Federal Statutes
231.1 Eastex v NLRB
231.2 Huffstutler v Butz
231.4 Beardsley v US Postal Service
231.5 Beth Israel Hospital v NLRB
Freedom Of Association: Affecting The Members
Civil Disabilities for Membership: Federal
-Through Deportation Proceedings
258. Hill v Richmond
258. Ayoub v Hazlett
Civil Disabilities for Membership: State, Local, And Private
-In State, Local Government Employment
261.31 Council 11, AFSCME v Michigan Civil Serv Comm
-In Teaching
262.29 Reinecke v Hawaii
-In Proceedings Against Attorneys and Bar Applicants
265.39 Garden State Bar Assn v Middlesex Co
265.40 No Carolina State Bar Assn v Paul
Criminal Penalties for Nondisclosure
-For Refusal to Produce Records
274.9 McSurley v McAdams (2 folders)
Civil Penalties for Nondisclosure
-By Others
282. Socialist Workers Party v Hardy
Penalties for False Disclosure
-In Miscellaneous Cases
293. DeFrantz v US Olympic Committee
II. Due Process And Related Rights
Additional Note
Searches and Seizures
300 NYCLU & NCBL v NYC Police & FBI
-By Electronic Eavesdropping
301.5 Fonda v Gray
301.5 Weinberg v Mitchell, Hallinan v Mitchell
301.5 Kissinger v Halperin
301.64 Handschu v Special Services Division
-National Security Cases
301.514 Jabara v Kelley
301.529 Clavir v Levi
301.536 US v Gabriner
301.537 Kinoy v Mitchell
301.538 Moore v Levi
301.541 US v Truong (2 folders)
301.546 Abramovitz v Ahern
301.548 Anderson v Nixon
301.549 Birnbaum v US
301.550 Lamont v US
-In Other Federal Cases
302. INS v Hispanics
-Civil and Administrative
302.306 Rodriguez v Dahlin
302.308 LaDuke v Castillo
302.309 Cabral-Avila v INS
302.311 Marshall v Barlow's
302.312 Marshall v CF&I Steel
302.313 Ehrlichman v Solomon
-Suits for False Arrest, Police Practices, Police Review Boards
304. Operation Zebra
304.Ala.15 Peck v Kelley
304.Ca l. Alvarez, Fiske et al v Gates et al
304.Cal. Guyton v Jensen
304.Cal. Lyons v Los Angeles
304.Cal. Savala v Castillo
304.Cal. Smith, Jones, Ramirez, Williams, Ford v City and County of Los Angeles
304.Cal.121 Avelar v McDonald
304.Cal.122 Pratt v FBI
304.Cal.124 California v Rizo
304.Conn.9 Turpin v West Haven
304.DC.11 Letelier v Dina
304.Haw.15 Thompson v Andrus
304.Ill.40 Hampton v Hanrahan (3 folders)
304.Ill.41 Lenard v Melrose Park
304.Mich.28 Bergman v Kelley
304.Mich.29 Liuzzo v Kelley (2 folders)
304.NJ.11 Vasquez v McNally
304.NJ.12 Boyer v Loree
304.NJ.13 Lewis v Hyland
304.NJ.15 In the matter of LP
304.NY Handschu v Special Services Division
304.NY.42 MM v Anker
304.NY.43 Duverney v Prajka
304.NY.44 Rose v Koch
304.NY.45 Schmidt v Curasi
304.NY.46 Scott v Maloney
304.Ohio.6 Krause v Rhodes (Kent State)
304.Ohio.7 Furlan v US
304.Pa US v Philadelphia
304.Pa Pennsylvania v Porter et al
304.Pa.21 Swietlowich v Bristol
304.Pa.23 Wilkinson v District Attorney
304.Pa.24 Sherard v Woodruff
304.Pa.25 Jones v Lambert
304.Pa.27 Smith v Connor
304.PR.1 Torres v Puerto Rico (2 folders)
304.Tex Cervantez v Whitfield
304.Tex.9 Bezan v Wilson
304.Tex.11 Ramirez v Byrd
304.Tex.12 Salazar v Ramirez
304.Tex.13 Sanchez v Renya
304.Tex.14 Moreno v Park
304.Tex.16 Rocha v Gossett
304.Tex.17 Cana v Colbath
304.Tex.18 Pena v Colwell
304.US Margolis v Knight
304.US.26 Walker v US
304.Utah.1 GM Leasing v US
304.Va.3 Norton v US
304.Wash.6 Maltos v Kespohl
304.Wisc.12 Davis v Murphy
304.Wisc.13 Blair v Baumgartner
304.Wisc.14 Vietnam Veterans v Saye
-Police Line-up, Identification Procedures
305.8 Moore v Wisconsin
305.9 Ohio v Moody
Indictments/ Informations
-Charge of Conspiracy
314.22 Us v Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) (21 folders)
314.22 Us v Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) (10 folders)
Defense of Self
325.8 Washington v Wanrow
Self-Incrimination: Criminal Sanctions For Exercising Privilege
-Before Grand Juries,Courts, and Tribunals
333. In re McCracken
333.36 In re Cueto
333.37 In re Guerrero
-Grants of Immunity: Federal
334.20 US v Beradelli
334.21 US v Morales
-Grants of Immunity: State
335.17 Rysdale v Superior Court
1 of 2 pages |