Jump to Content

Collection Guide
Collection Title:
Collection Number:
Get Items:
Finding Aid for the China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives, 1989-1993
View entire collection guide What's This?
Search this collection
Collection Details
Table of contents What's This?
  • Descriptive Summary
  • Administrative Information
  • Biography / Administrative History
  • Scope and Content of Collection
  • Arrangement

  • Descriptive Summary

    Title: China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives
    Date (inclusive): 1989-1993
    Collection number: 1821
    Creator: Center for Chinese Studies and the Center for Pacific Rim Studies, UCLA
    Extent: 22 boxes (11 linear ft.) 1 oversize box.
    Abstract: The present finding aid represents the fruits of a multiyear collaborative effort, undertaken at the initiative of then UCLA Chancellor Charles Young, to collect, collate, classify, and annotate available materials relating to the China Democracy Movement and tiananmen crisis of 1989. These materials---including, inter alia, thousands of documents, transcribed radio broadcasts, local newspaper and journal articles, wall posters, electronic communications, and assorted ephemeral sources, some in Chinese and some in English---provide a wealth of information for scholars, present and future, who wish to gain a better understanding of the complex, swirling forces that surrounded the extraordinary "Beijing Spring" of 1989 and its tragic denouement. The scholarly community is indebted to those who have collected and arranged this archive of materials about the China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives.
    Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Chinese
    Repository: University of California, Los Angeles. Library Special Collections.
    Los Angeles, California 90095-1575
    Physical location: Stored off-site at SRLF. Advance notice is required for access to the collection. Please contact the UCLA Library Special Collections Reference Desk for paging information.

    Administrative Information

    Restrictions on Access

    COLLECTION STORED OFF-SITE AT SRLF: Open for research. Advance notice required for access. Contact the UCLA Library Special Collections Reference Desk for paging information.

    Restrictions on Use and Reproduction

    Property rights to the physical object belong to the UCLA Library Special Collections. Literary rights, including copyright, are retained by the creators and their heirs. It is the responsibility of the researcher to determine who holds the copyright and pursue the copyright owner or his or her heir for permission to publish where The UC Regents do not hold the copyright.

    Preferred Citation

    [Identification of item], China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives (Collection 1821). UCLA Library Special Collections, Charles E. Young Research Library.

    UCLA Catalog Record ID

    UCLA Catalog Record ID: 6671829 

    Biography / Administrative History

    For seven extraordinary weeks in the spring of 1989, China came alive. Emboldened by the example set by university students in Beijing, millions of ordinary Chinese citizens began to express themselves openly and spontaneously in ways never before witnessed in the forty-year history of the People's Republic of China. In massive demonstrations held in hundreds of Chinese cities, ordinary people complained of rampant corruption and nepotism in government; others called for augmented freedom of speech and assembly; still others savagely lampooned the country's aging, authoritarian Communist Party leaders, calling on Deng Xiaoping and Li Peng to resign for the sake of the country's best interests, for the sake of the people. For China's habitually stoic, long-silent millions, it was an exhilarating experience; it was the best of times.
    Exhilaration soon turned to horror, however, as China's insecure, chaosaverse senior leadership, fearful of losing political control, made a fateful decision on June 3, 1989, to use deadly force to clear demonstrating students and their nonstudent supporters from Tiananmen Square—Mecca of the 1989 people's movement. With the military assault on Tiananmen, the best of times quickly became the worst of times.
    No one knows just how many people were killed or wounded in the machinegun fire that echoed throughout the streets of central Beijing on the evening of June 3-4. A few estimates place the number of civilian dead as high as 2,600; most estimates are more conservative, within the range of 300-1,000 killed. Whatever the true casualty count, the "Tiananmen massacre" represented a national trauma of the first magnitude.
    While historical memory of the "Beijing Spring" of 1989 has inevitably begun to fade with the passage of time, a few highly evocative, stereotyped images continue to provide a potent, if shadowy, reminder of what transpired. The solitary figure of a young Chinese civilian, captured on film calmly facing down a column of tanks, resonates powerfully today in annual U.S. congressional debates on the renewal of China's most favored nation status, in widening U.S. public support for Tibetan independence, and in the appearance of an entirely new epithet in the English lexicon: "The Butchers of Beijing." The currency of these various resonances and reverberations reminds us of the critical importance of preserving, as accurately as possible, historical memory. It is to the furtherance of this task of preservation that the present volume is dedicated.
    Contrary to widespread belief, relatively few students—probably fewer than fifty—died in the military assault. Nor was there a wanton massacre of students in Tiananmen Square itself. Most of the killing took place on or near Beijing's major east-west thoroughfare, Chang'an Boulevard, well to the west of Tiananmen, where ordinary citizens had massed in an effort to block the army's access to the square. A careful attempt to weigh varying estimates of civilian and military casualties appears in Timothy Brook, Quelling the People: The Military Suppression of the Beijing Democracy Movement (Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 164-169. See also Richard Baum, Burying Mao: Chinese Politics in the Age of Deng Xiaoping (Princeton University Press, 1994), chap. 12.

    The Tiananmen Crisis: Origins and Development

    The Chinese student demonstrations of spring 1989 represented the culmination of a remarkable decade of economic reform and social change. With the death of Mao Zedong in 1976 and the rise to power of Deng Xiaoping two years later, China's new leaders recognized the urgent need to jump-start their country's stagnant, centrally controlled economy and to restore the badly flagging confidence of the Chinese people in the wisdom, virtue, and beneficence of the Communist Party.
    As China threw open its doors to the outside world and began to move, fitfully at first, toward a more decentralized and market-centered economy, demand for political reform also grew. Initially inclined to respond positively to calls for a more vibrant "socialist democracy," Deng Xiaoping grew more cautious in the aftermath of the spiraling 1980-1981 Polish Solidarity crisis. In Poland, each new liberalizing reform measure granted by the government had served to fuel popular demands for even greater political and economic concessions, culminating in the regime's infamous 1981 declaration of martial law. With this "Polish nightmare" available as a negative example of the effects of unfettered political liberalization, Deng decided that political reform would have to wait until after the fruits of economic reform had been realized.
    As a result of the growing disjunction between economic liberalization and political conservatism in the 1980s, pressures began to build. Denied a legitimate political outlet for their mounting frustration, thousandsof Chinese students took to the streets, initially in the winter of 1986-1987, demanding better treatment for themselves, more open and democratic political institutions for their country, and a more equitable distribution of the costs and benefits of economic reform. Angered by Communist Party General-Secretary Hu Yaobang's passive acquiescence in the face of rising student "provocations," a group of elderly CCP conservatives denounced the student demonstrations and accused Hu of supporting "bourgeois liberalization." With Deng Xiaoping's consent, Hu was removed from office in January 1987. With his removal, China's students lost their most powerful patron.
    The sudden, unexpected death of Hu Yaobang on April 15, 1989, the result of a massive coronary failure, set in motion the events that culminated in the "Tiananmen massacre." Angered at the regime's shabby treatment of their late hero, students at Beijing University gathered to march from their campus on the outskirts of the city to Tiananmen Square, several miles away. At first demanding only an official rehabilitation of their fallen hero's good name and reputation, the students were offended by the government's unwillingness to respond—or even to engage in open dialogue. Following Hu's public funeral ceremony on April 22, thousands of students staged a sit-in at Tiananmen Square, refusing to move until the government agreed to open a dialogue.
    The government's conspicuous silence was met by new, larger demonstrations. In the days following Hu Yaobang's funeral, students conducted daily marches to Tiananmen Square, drawing increasingly larger audiences of sympathetic bystanders from among the ordinary citizens of Beijing. Once again, as in the winter of 1986-1987, conservative party elders responded to the students' mounting defiance by issuing a public denunciation of the "turmoil" ( baoluan) ostensibly being instigated by "unpatriotic" student leaders and other rebellious elements. Far from damping down student unrest, however, the party's accusations, contained in an infamous People's Daily editorial of April 26, served to further incense and outrage the student protesters. Literally overnight, the daily student marches to Tiananmen Square doubled in size, then doubled again. Now the students were joined by large numbers of non-student sympathizers. Now, too, party leaders began seriously to worry about the situation getting out of hand.
    Fueled by widespread popular concerns over inflationary price rises, over rampant nepotism and corruption by officials, and over the government's display of blatant contempt for the Beijing students, demonstrations soon spread to major cities throughout the country. Wherever there were college students, there were demonstrations. Throughout the first three weeks of May, demonstrations in hundreds of cities grew in size and frequency, attracting large numbers of nonstudent participants.
    China's Communist Party leadership found itself divided over how to deal with the "threat" of escalating antigovernment demonstrations. Elderly conservatives generally favored a hard-line approach, while younger reformers—included Hu Yaobang's successor, General-Secretary Zhao Ziyang— urged an open dialogue with the students, even going so far as to acknowledge that the students had legitimate grievances. Far from calming student emotions, however, the revelation of a deep split within the party and government leadership emboldened the more radical elements among the student leadership to increase their pressure on the regime. With the initiation of a widely publicized student hunger strike in Tiananmen Square in mid-May, the situation became further polarized. When a last-ditch attempt was made by associates of Zhao Ziyang to persuade the students to terminate their strike in exchange for a government promise to open a dialogue, intransigent student leaders refused to compromise. Despite the existence of a strong student majority in favor of ending the confrontation, a vocal minority carried the day. The hunger strike continued. The die was now cast.

    Martial Law

    Martial law was declared in Beijing on the evening of May 19; that same day, Zhao Ziyang was stripped of his post as general-secretary of the CCP. The next day, thousands of regular army troops were ordered to proceed into the capital to augment public security. However, their progress into the city was impeded by tens of thousands of outraged civilians, who physically blockaded major access roads, in many cases lecturing encircled troops on the army's duty to "love the people." After a tense thirty-six-hour standoff, the troops were ordered to withdraw.
    The standing down of PLA units in Beijing on May 22 triggered an extraordinary outburst of public jubilation. Antigovernment demonstrations now reached their zenith in Beijing, with hundreds of thousands of people— including local units of the Communist Youth League, the Foreign Ministry, and other official party and government organs—marching alongside the students and their supporters. In big and medium-sized cities up and down the coast of China, news of the "victory" of the Beijing students was greeted with popular exhilaration.
    There followed a week of ominous silence from party and government authorities in Beijing, as Deng Xiaoping and other senior officials retired to their bunkers to prepare their response. A good deal of jaw-boning was done by Deng himself to persuade wavering military commanders of the necessity of bringing a quick, decisive end to the "counterrevolutionary turmoil" that had engulfed the nation's capital. Meanwhile, the ardor of the students in Tiananmen Square began to wane, as early summer heat, winds, and ennui combined to dampen their enthusiasm.
    On May 29, the students' flagging morale was boosted by the appearance in Tiananmen Square of the "Goddess of Democracy," a thirty-foot plaster, wire mesh, and papier-mâché statue designed by students at the Beijing Arts Institute. The construction of the Goddess brought renewed media attention to the students' cause, reenergizing their movement and drawing tens of thousands of people to the square to see for themseives this famously defiant icon of democracy.
    In the event, the excitement occasioned by the appearance of the Goddess of Democracy was anticlimactic. A decision had already been made at the highest levels—personally approved by Deng Xiaoping—to forcibly clear Tiananmen Square. Party leaders were waiting only for the troops to get into position for the final, massive assault.
    That assault came on June 3, in the form of a pincer movement of more than 100,000 infantry troops and armored corps, converging on Tiananmen from several directions. Unlike the army's earlier, failed attempt to reach the square on May 20, this time the PLA troops were in full battle dress, with their weapons locked and loaded. The rest, as they say, is history.
    The crackdown continued long after June 4, as the Chinese government relentlessly pursued those deemed to have played a significant role in fanning the flames of popular unrest or perpetrating acts of violence against the government or the army. Sporadic incidents of violence were widely reported in several Chinese cities, including Shanghai, Xi'an, and Changsha, both before and after the June 3-4 massacre. On the whole, however, the overwhelming, deadly force brought to bear on civilian protesters by government troops in Beijing served as a sobering reminder of the extremely high cost of civil disobedience in China. Thenceforth, there was to be no repetition of the Beijing students' fateful decision to challenge governmental authority.

    The China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives

    This archive represents the fruits of a multiyear collaborative effort, undertaken at the initiative of then UCLA Chancellor Charles Young, to collect, collate, classify, and annotate available materials relating to the China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen crisis of 1989. These materials—including, inter alia, thousands of documents, transcribed radio broadcasts, local newspaper and journal articles, wall posters, electronic communications, and assorted ephemeral sources, some in Chinese and some in English—provide a wealth of information for scholars, present and future, who wish to gain a better understanding of the complex, swirling forces that surrounded the extraordinary "Beijing Spring" of 1989 and its tragic denouement.

    Scope and Content of Collection


    By Leslie Evans

    Establishment of the China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archival Project

    Beginning the morning after the tanks rumbled into Tiananmen Square on the night of June 3, 1989, hundreds of exchange students and scholars from China studying at UCLA began to demand that the university make some response to the crushing of the Democracy Movement. They were quickly joined by Chinese faculty and staff members. Within a few days the university also received a suggestion from then Lieutenant Governor of California Leo McCarthy that UCLA undertake either an archival project or a pictorial exhibit on the recent events in China. On July 5 a meeting was held at the invitation of UCLA Chancellor Charles Young. Seven persons attended: Chancellor Young; Assistant Chancellor John Sandbrook; Vice-Chancellor for International Affairs Elwin Svenson; Assistant Vice-Chancellor Michael McManus; Lucie Cheng, the director of the university's Center for Pacific Rim Studies and a professor in the Department of Sociology; Maxwell Epstein, executive director of the Office of International Students and Scholars; and John Hawkins, director of the office of International Studies and Overseas Programs (ISOP) and a professor of Education. This group adopted a proposal by Chancellor Young to create the China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archival Project. A faculty and staff advisory committee was established to carry out this work. It held its first meeting on July 26, 1989. Ultimately the university invested upwards of $50,000 in this project, which created a unique record of the China Spring of 1989 and its aftermath.
    Essentially, Chancellor Young proposed that the university compile a central listing of its existing holdings, from all viewpoints and in all media formats, of material on the China Democracy Movement and the military suppression in Tiananmen Square. The committee entrusted to carry out this assignment was chaired by Lucie Cheng. Its other members included: Richard Baum, professor, Political Science; Elaine Yee-man Chan, graduate student, Sociology; James Cheng, head of the university's Oriental Library (later renamed the Richard C. Rudolph East Asian Library); Sue W. Fan, administrator of the Center for Pacific Rim Studies and coordinator of the China Exchange Program; John Hawkins, director (later dean) of ISOP; Steve Lin, East Asian bibliographer for the University Research Library; Steven Ricci, manager of the Film and Television Archive's Archive Research and Study Center; and Robert Rosen, director of the Film and Television Archive.
    The initial plan was that the Film and Television Archive's Archive Research and Study Center, which had made extensive video tapes of the news coverage of the Chinese events, would compile an indexed, computerized database of its holdings, while the Center for Pacific Rim Studies would make a listing of books, periodicals, and microfiche and microfilm of major newspapers in the various university libraries, as well as listing its own—at that time rather small—holdings of photocopied or faxed documents and flyers.
    In the event, the first part of the project went as planned, while the second, the Center for Pacific Rim Studies segment, grew over time into a wholly new project, which took nine years to complete, and of which the present volume is the record.
    The Archive Research and Study Center, located in UCLA's Powell Library, in 1990 produced a 115-page Research Guide No. 4: North American News Coverage, People's Republic of China, May 1-June 30, 1989. This volume indexed 388 television news and commentary stories broadcast by ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN during those two months. The indexed video tapes are part of the News and Public Affairs Collection housed at Powell Library.

    Assembling the Archives

    Sue W. Fan, the Center for Pacific Rim Studies administrator, assembled the team that created the present Archives. To head the project she selected Jian Ding, a graduate student in library science (he received his master's degree in this field from UCLA in 1990) and then president of the UCLA chapter of the Chinese Students and Scholars Association. Ding essentially designed the coding system of the Archives, developed its initial categories, and began first to sort the existing documents that had come in to the Center's offices, then to collect more. The other person principally responsible for compiling the Archives is Elaine Yee-man Chan, who was then a doctoral student in sociology at UCLA.
    The index section of the research guide, prepared by Jian Ding, a staff researcher for the Center for Pacific Rim Studies, provides a name, subject, and place list for each story. The story listing in the main section of the guide provides brief summaries along with the broadcast source, time aired, and the cassette number where the story is stored. In many cases starting and ending footage are also noted to simplify access. This media archive is available for study by interested scholars both within and outside the University of California system. The research guide, however, is not available for public sale and can only be consulted on site, and there is a two-day lead time for ordering specific cassettes for viewing. For further information please contact the Archive Research and Study Center, Film and Television Archive, 46 Powell Library, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1517. Fax: 1-310-206-5392.
    Ding and Chan quickly went beyond the initial materials in the Center's holdings. In the summer and fall of 1989 a flood of faxes came out of China— copies of flyers, individual letters of protest, manifestoes printed in work unit shops before the suppression, articles clipped from the daily newspapers. This material ranges from copies of the handbills dropped by government helicopters above Tiananmen Square and Beijing University to an open letter to students from an old soldier [chinese characters] "Yi wei lao junren zhi xuesheng de gongkai xin," item AC 1014), in which a retired military officer makes sugestions to the students on how to block the army from entering Beijing. Some are abstract, like a list of sixteen definitions and requirement for human rights in China, while others are extremely personal—a physically disabled writer who spent two weeks in the square discussing the problems of exclusion of the disabled from recognition as citizens, or an account in the form a legal brief by a law student who was beaten by police in front of the People's Supreme Court when he tried to protest the beating of another civilian [chinese characters] "Yi wei wugu beida Fada ren de kongsu," item AC 1035).
    Chinese students in the United States recorded and transcribed telephone conversations with relatives in China. An e-mail network began to take shape around the old mainframe BITNET system, leading to a regular fullfledged e-mail magazine, the China News Digest, founded in Canada but eventually headquartered at Kent State University in Kent, Ohio, and Indiana University in Bloomington.
    A dozen news magazines in Hong Kong—principally [chinese characters] Ming bao, [chinese characters] Xin bao, [chinese characters] Jingji ribao, [chinese characters] Jiushi niandai (The Nineties), [chinese characters] Zhengming (Contention), [chinese characters] Wenhui bao, [chinese characters] Shiyue pinglun (October Review), and [chinese characters] Dangdai (Contemporary)— filled each issue with reports on the postsuppression arrests, continuing protests, shakeups in the Communist Party and army hierarchy, tales of daring escapes from prison, and border crossings at night into Soviet territory or flights to Hong Kong and Macao. A literature of political and philosophical debate emerged in the Chinese exile community, much of it produced and published by former professional editors, reporters, or professors from the People's Republic. Some appeared in new exile publications, such as Minyun maibo ( [chinese characters] [Pulse of the Democracy Movement]), published in Hong Kong; Laiyin tongxin ( [chinese characters] ): Zeitung für Chinesische Wissenschaftler und Studenten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Correspondence along the Rhine: Newspaper for Chinese Scholars and Students in the Federal Republic of Germany), published in Darmstadt; the Press Freedom Herald ([chinese characters] , Xinwen ziyou daobao), published by exiled PRC news professionals in Alhambra, California; and the Human Rights Tribune: A Bi-monthly Journal of Opinions about Rights in China, published in English in New York City (item BE 1030).
    To balance the collection, Jian Ding and Elaine Chan approached the Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles and carried away bundles of official statements, pam phlets, press releases, and texts of government declarations, adding these to the growing stack.
    In a short time organizations of the exiles took shape, most notably the Chinese Students and Scholars Association (CSSA) and the Independent Federation of Chinese Students and Scholars (IFCSS) with its Canadian counterpart, the Federation of Chinese Students and Scholars in Canada (FCSSC). The last two concerned themselves heavily with lobbying in Washington and Ottawa to extend the visas of PRC nationals who did not wish to return to China when their schooling was finished.
    Where, at the outset, the story to be collected concerned the writings and ideas of the China Democracy Movement of April and May 1989 and the government crackdown in June, as time went on this became supplemented with the life of an exile community of prodemocracy dissenters scattered from Hong Kong to Chicago and from Paris to Darmstadt, as well as the Beijing government's ongoing reactions to the dissenters at home and abroad.
    Occasionally, large additions were made to the collection. For example, on a trip to Hong Kong, UCLA Political Science Professor James Tong secured hundreds of pages of 11×17 inch photocopies of much of the regional press in China, from Hainan to Gansu, for the period April to June 1989 (see Section V, Articles from Commercial Magazines and Newspapers—In Chinese). An unknown source contributed some 840 pages of transcripts in Chinese by a Taiwan intelligence agency of provincial radio broadcasts from China for the same period (item number BC 1001). Both of these acquisitions added considerably to the presentation of the government's viewpoint, particularly the public outlook of regional governments.
    Jian Ding, apart from his work with the Film and Television Archive, worked on the paper Archives proper from January through October 1990. Elaine Chan remained four months longer, until the end of February 1991. The great majority of material in the Archives is contained within the span from April 1989 to February 1991. This extended some twenty months after the formal end of the student Democracy Movement under the treads of the tanks on Chang'an Boulevard. In those twenty months leaders rose and fell in the exile community, policy debates were waged, and on the mainland new arrests were made, secondary party and government leaders deposed, underground groups discovered, and finally, around the first anniversary of June 4, many of the political prisoners were released, while the core leaders began to be tried in camera and sentenced to long prison terms, with the trials dragging on into the beginning of 1991.
    Of three of the most prominent student leaders, Wu'er Kaixi arrived first in the West, and was soon denounced for his lavish lifestyle, a tale that finally was splashed across the pages of Esquire magazine in a four-part series headed "Better Fed than Red." In the end he joined the crew of the ill-fated "radio ship" Goddess of Democracy, a Taiwan-financed effort to initiate sea-based broad-casts into the PRC. At the last minute Taiwan backed down in face of threats from Beijing and refused to install the transmitters, and the Goddess of Democracy and Wu'er Kaixi faded from public view.
    In April of 1990 Chai Ling and her husband escaped to Europe after living in hiding in China for ten months. She quickly became an international heroine of the exileadissident movement, making a national tour in the United States, meeting with U.S. Vice-President Dan Quayle, and even inspiring "Famous Taiwanese Dancer Joy Fan to Perform 'Chai Ling,'" as one e-mail transmission reports.
    Wang Dan, the best known of the student leaders, did not go on trial until January 1991, when he was sentenced to four years in prison. Wang was released in 1993, but was detained again in 1995. After being held without charges for seventeen months, the Chinese government formally arrested him in October 1996. He was then convicted of attempting to subvert China's government and was sentenced to eleven years in prison. On April 19, 1998, Chinese authorities released Wang Dan from prison and placed him on a plane to the United States.

    The Archives after February 1991

    Jian Ding, the Archives' chief designer, left the project in the fall of 1990. He then became a librarian at the University Texas campus in Richardson, Texas. Later he went into private business as a computer consultant. Elaine Yee-man Chan received her Ph.D. in sociology from UCLA in 1995 and is today an Assistant Professor of Public and Social Administration at the City University of Hong Kong.
    With the departure of its initial compilers, additions to the Archives slowed considerably and became sporadic, but did continue on a low-key basis into the early spring of 1993.
    Between March and June of 1991 a recent graduate of UC Santa Barbara, Ben Tang, made some additions to the collection and did a preliminary editing of the Catalog. After that, limited funding halted work on the Archives for two years. In July 1993 another Chinese graduate student (we have been unable to contact her for permission to use her name here) began five months of cleanup on the collection, which by then had grown to nine cartons of documents, totaling more than 500 folders containing more than 11,000 pages of materials. In addition to the documents, newspapers, and magazines, a bibliography was also compiled of books and journal articles on the China Democracy Movement. This is included in this Catalog as an appendix, although it covers only the years 1989 through 1992 and does not reflect later publications in this area. Professor James Tong, who had consulted regularly with Jian Ding and Elaine Chan, undertook a first general editing of the Catalog in the summer of 1993. In November 1993 the entire collection was placed in storage pending future staff availability to complete a review of the documents and the computerized Catalog.
    It was only in the spring of 1998 that the Center for Pacific Rim Studies was in a position to allocate the additional resources needed to retrieve the collection and begin a final editing and review. Graduate student Chun-chu Lin and I, over the spring and summer, reviewed all of the Chinese titles used in the Archives, sorted the contents of each folder into chronological order, eliminated duplicate documents, and recounted each folder to recheck the page counts. By the nature of the way the Archives had to be created, item numbers were assigned to material as it came in. Often material that arrived later bore an earlier chronological date, but it was impossible to renumber the entire Archives after every new shipment. Thus the collection slowly drifted into a chaotic sequence. It was only in 1998, when nothing more was to be added, that whole collection could be sorted into correct chronological order and entirely renumbered. (Even then, as the work proceeded through the many boxes of files, the process occasionally turned up duplicate entries that had to be deleted; rather than physically renumber the files again, it was decided to leave a few gaps in the numeration.) Finally, the 3,768 pages of e-mail had never been given item numbers or summarized at all. With the aid of research assistants Raul Robles and Tricia Lam this work was completed in the summer and fall of 1998. A final check of the pinyin and Chinese translations was conducted by Meng Yue, a Fellow at the Getty Research Institute and a doctoral candidate in history at UCLA. A final round of copy editing was done over the winter of 1998-99 by Richard Gunde, assistant director of the UCLA Center for Chinese Studies.
    In its final form, the Archives run to 11,060 pages, of which 8,727 are standard sizes (8-1/2×11, A4, or 8-1/2×14 inch), and 2,333 are oversize (mostly 11×17, but some 17×22 inch or odd sizes). In editing or writing the summaries of this vast amount of material I have tried to steer a difficult course between having the summaries accurately reflect the tone of the material summarized, whether pro or anti the Chinese government, while trying to avoid any interjection of editorial opinion on the part of the compilers and the publisher. The Archives are meant to document an important, although very diffuse, movement in recent Chinese history, and the government's reactions to it, not to advocate any particular course of action for the people of China or their government. The reader should be reminded that most of this material, from the two major and many minor points of view, is highly partisan. The summaries cannot do their job without reflecting that reality. Further, just because a document in the Archives or its summary in the Catalog states something as true does not necessarily mean that it is so. A reading of the summaries alone will show that many "facts" were in dispute, and it is not uncommon for a report issued at a certain point in time to be contradicted by later information published even by the same source.
    With this caveat we believe that the Archives provide a rich body of authentic voices that flesh out the bare chronologies of those exciting months in 1989 that left so great an imprint on today's China. We are indebted to UCLA China specialist and political scientist Richard Baum for providing a Foreword that gives an overview of these events and offers a context in which the many details contained herein can be better understood.

    The Divisions of the Archives and the Coding System

    The China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives are divided into seven sections (see pages 5 and 21) plus a bibliography. In actuality there are four substantive divisions, with three of these further split between comparable materials in Chinese and in English. These are:
    • (1) Documents
    • (2) Small Circulation publications
    • (3) Commercial publications
    • (4) E-mail.
    Documents are anything produced without a binding: letters, flyers, printed or handwritten single or multipage reports, etc. Small Circulation Newsletters, Magazines, and Newspapers are generally the somewhat ephemeral publications of the opposition movement. Commercial Magazines and Newspapers include, in the Chinese section, the official press of the People's Republic as well as established magazines from Hong Kong, while in the English section are established newspapers and magazines, mostly from the United States with a few exceptions such as the South China Morning Post and the Paris-based International Herald Tribune.
    The Archives are divided into folders. Each folder is assigned a number. There are 543 item numbers (folders) in the whole collection. The size of the folders varies considerably, however. Some contain only 1 or 2 sheets of paper, while many contain 50, 100, or as many as 840 pages under a single item number. This is a consequence of the small staff available for cataloging and also reflects the fact that some materials arrived in large bundles with no special basis for breaking them up unless one were prepared to give each and every document its own folder, which was prohibitive in terms of entering the Chinese titles and writing summaries. The reader should take the summaries as a good indication of the contents of the collection and not expect every document to be mentioned by name.
    The coding system for item numbers is simple:
    • A = Documents
    • B = Small Circulation press
    • C = Commercial press
    • D = E-mail.
    The second letter of an item code is either C for Chinese language or E for English. Thus BC 1025 would be something in Chinese from a small circulation publication, while AE 1047 would be an English-language document.
    In addition to the item numbers, the designers of the Archives also devised an elaborate subject coding system, which is presented in detail on pages 22-23. (It codes for Eyewitness account/by Native Chinese, Overseas Chinese, Non-Chinese; or for Reactions Outside China/by Governments, Academics, Community groups, Human rights groups, etc.) It was originally intended to provide an index by subject code as well as the chronological summaries that appear below. This proved impractical when the Archives had to be renumbered to achieve chronological order. In addition, some items that arrived late in the collecting process were not coded, and the e-mail section was not coded at all. We have chosen to retain the codes for the large number of items for which they were assigned, as they may be of some use to the researcher in providing quick additional information beyond what is contained in the summaries.

    Availability of the Archives

    As this Catalog is going to press, the completed Archives are being donated to the permanent collection of the UCLA Richard C. Rudolph East Asian Library. It is the library's intention to raise the funds to have the entire collection microfilmed. Once that is accomplished, the microfilm will be available for study or to make printouts of particular documents for interested researchers who are able to come to UCLA to work.
    We know that there are other collections of material from this period of recent Chinese history. Undoubtedly there is much overlap, as certain documents were widely circulated at the time. Nevertheless it seems certain, from its sheer size, that the UCLA China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident Archives contain a considerable amount of unique material that will well repay the time spent by specialists and researchers in examining it.
    • Center for Pacific Rim Studies
    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • February 1999


    Key to File Numbers

    The Archives are divided into four sections, each with its own alphabetic code letter. Within each section, numbering begins at 1001. Each folder in the Archives is assigned a file number using this system. The four categories are headed A-D as follows:
    • A = Documents
    • B = Articles from small circulation newsletters, magazines, and newspapers
    • C = Articles from commercial magazines and newspapers
    • D = E-mail transcripts
    • Within each of these categories the second letter indicates the language:
      • C = Chinese
      • E = English
    Thus AC = Document in Chinese; CE = Article from commercial magazine or newspaper in English, etc. Following the listing of the Archives proper, which will all be included in the microfilm master set, there is an informational bibliography of additional books and journal articles about the China Democracy Movement and Tiananmen Incident of 1989. These works are not included in the Archives, but many of them can be found at UCLA's University Research Library or its Richard C. Rudolph East Asian Library.

    Key to Subject Codes

    Most folders in the Archives, with the exception of Section VII, the e-mail transcripts, include with their summary one or more subject codes to help further identify their contents beyond the broad source coding of the item number. The subject codes run from B to E, and are prefaced by the language code used in the file number system (C = Chinese; E = English). For example, D is the code for official PRC statements, and the code D03 is assigned to statements by workers or civil organizations in the PRC. Thus the coding CD03 refers to a statement in Chinese by a worker or civil group in the PRC. Because of the sheer size of the Archives, the coding makes no claim of comprehensiveness for particular documents or subcollections but should prove of some use to users of the Catalog. The codes are as follows:
    • B. Eyewitness Accounts and Chronologies (by the origin of the eyewitness)
      • 1. Native Chinese...... In Chinese CB01... In English EB01
      • 2. Overseas Chinese...... In Chinese CB02... In English EB02
      • 3. Non-Chinese...... In Chinese CB03... In English EB03
      • 4. Chronologies...... In Chinese CB04... In English EB04
    • C. Analyses, Profiles, and Comments (by subject matter)
      • 1. General and economic, social, and cultural conditions...... In Chinese CC01... In English EC01
      • 2. Students and intellectuals...... In Chinese CC02... In English EC02
      • 3. Workers and other citizens...... In Chinese CC03... In English EC03
      • 4. Chinese government, leaders, military, and foreign relations...... In Chinese CC04... In English EC04
      • 5. Democracy, freedom, human rights, nonviolence, and other related concepts...... In Chinese CC05... In English EC05
    • D. Official PRC Documents
      • 1. Government agencies and the military...... In Chinese CD01... In English ED01
      • 2. Students and intellectual organizations...... In Chinese CD02... In English ED02
      • 3. Workers and other civil organizations...... In Chinese CD03... In English ED03
      • 4. Chinese Embassies/Consulates...... In Chinese CD04... In English ED04
    • E. Reactions Outside of China
      • 1. Governments and other official organizations...... In Chinese CE01... In English EE01
      • 2. U.S. academic institutions...... In Chinese CE02... In English EE02
      • 3. Community organizations...... In Chinese CE03... In English EE03
      • 4. Chinese student organizations...... In Chinese CE04... In English EE04
      • 5. Human rights organizations...... In Chinese CE05... In English EE05