| 1 of 2 pages |
Administrative
1. ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION. 1921, 1923, 1949-1957.
Scope and Content Note
2. SECRETARY'S CORRESPONDENCE (Incoming and Outgoing). 1958-1961.
Scope and Content Note
3. P.U.C. CORRESPONDENCE - SUBJECT FILE (Incoming and Outgoing). 1955, 1957-1960.
Scope and Content Note
3a. SUBJECT FILES - TRACKAGE AGREEMENTS. 1912-1941.
Scope and Content Note
4. BUDGETS. 1948, 1949.
Scope and Content Note
5. FORMAL COMPLAINTS. 1908-1932.
Scope and Content Note
Reports
Scope and Content Note
Legal Documents
Scope and Content Note
Commissioner's Notes
Scope and Content Note
Memoranda
Scope and Content Note
Evidence Collected by C.R.C.
Scope and Content Note
Correspondence
Scope and Content Note
Transcripts
Scope and Content Note
Exhibits
Scope and Content Note
C.R.C. Engineer's Valuation
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 101 BRIDGEFORD-CUNNINGHAM VS. MCCLOUD RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided July 14, 1908.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 102 IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGED DISCRIMINATIONS BY SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY BETWEEN SHIPPERS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FREIGHT RATES AND TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES. Decided January 12, 1909.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 103 IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION BY THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY BETWEEN SHIPPERS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FREIGHT RATES AND TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES. Decided January 12, 1909.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 104 IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION BY THE SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY BETWEEN SHIPPERS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN FREIGHT RATES AND TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES. Decided January 12, 1909.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 105 106 DUNAHAR-CAMPBELL MILL AND LUMBER COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 106 DUNAHAR-CAMPBELL MILL AND LUMBER COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 14, 1910.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 107 108 L. ERNEST PHILLIPS VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 108 L. ERNEST PHILLIPS VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided (107) February 8, 1910, (108) August 19, 1909.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 109 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE M. COOLEY ET. AL. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 110 ASSOCIATED JOBBERS OF LOS ANGELES VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 20, 1910.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 111 IN THE MATTER OF REGULATING RATES FOR CARRYING FREIGHT WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, BY THE SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD, AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 10, 1910.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 112 BRAY BROTHERS VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 113 E. H. LOVELAND VS. ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 114 CHARLES PAFF VS. NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 115 BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS OF LOS ANGELES VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided October 4, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 116 TRAFFIC BUREAU OF THE MERCHANT'S EXCHANGE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY AND THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, DEFENDANTS, AND ASSOCIATED JOBBERS AND MANUFACTURERS ASSN., INTERVENORS. (Also called San Joaquin Valley Rate Case) Decided March 18, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 117 GEORGE A. LEGG VS. NEVADA COUNTY NARROW GAUGE RAILROAD COMPANY AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 12, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 118 IN THE MATTER OF THE SCHEDULES OR TARIFFS SHOWN IN THE PACIFIC FREIGHT TARIFF BUREAU 44-A TO AND FROM ALTURAS. Decided May 10, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 119 HENRY C. CUTTING VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Dismissed April 18, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 121 M. S. CURRIER VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY. Decided May 10, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 122 279 307 312 IN THE MATTER OF SCHEDULES OR TARIFFS OF RATES OF CHARGES OF WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY; Case 279 MERCHANTS AND MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY AND AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY; Case 307 CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CREAMERIES VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY; and Case 312 THE COUNTY OF ORANGE VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY. Decided August 1, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 123 IN THE MATTER OF THE RATES AND CHARGES OF THE GLOBE EXPRESS COMPANY. Dismissed January 15, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 125 KERN COUNTY MERCHANT'S ASSOCIATION VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC, ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD, SUNSET RAILROAD, SUNSET WESTERN RAILROAD, THE MCKITRICK BRANCH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, AND THE NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-ORGEGON RAILROAD COMPANIES. Decided July 11, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 126 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE OAKLAND AND ANTIOCH RAILWAY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A THROUGH ROUTE AND JOINT RATES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided August 8, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 127 GEORGE A. LONG, ET. AL., VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, INTER-CALIFORNIA RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE HOLTON INTER-URBAN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Also called the Imperial Valley Case.) Decided May 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 128 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. Decided October 24, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 131 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE LOS ANGELES AND SAN DIEGO RAILWAY WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 144 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PENNINSULAR RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 145 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETALUMA AND SANTA ROSA RAILROAD. Decided May 5, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 148 IN THE MATTER OF THE VALUATION OF THE VENTURA COUNTY RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided April 4, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 150 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE AMADOR CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 7, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 165 IN THE MATTER OF THE VALUATION OF THE BUCKSPORT AND ELK RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 167 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE CALIFORNIA WESTERN RAILROAD AND STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY. Decided December 31, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 169 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE DIAMOND AND CALDOR RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided July 2, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 174 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE LAKE TAHOE RAILWAY AND TRANSPORT COMPANY. Decided May 6, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 175 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE MCCLOUD RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 176 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE MILL VALLEY AND MT. TAMALPIAS SCENIC RAILWAY. Decided February 27, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 177 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 178 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE NEVADA CITY NARROW GAUGE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided March 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 179 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 180 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE OCEAN SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 29, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 181 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILWAY. Decided May 6, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 182 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE PAJARO VALLEY CONSOLIDATED RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 7, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 183 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE CAMINO, PLACERVILLE AND LAKE TAHOE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided Jan. 15, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 184 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE PORTERVILLE AND NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 185 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE QUINCY WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided October 3, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 186 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE RICHMOND BELT RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 187 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY AND EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided September 30, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 188 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SAN DIEGO AND ARIZONA RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided April 4, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 189 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SAN DIEGO AND SOUTHEASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided March 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 191 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES, AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 192 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SIERRA AND MOHAWK RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 193 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SIERRA RAILWAY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA. Decided December 27, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 194 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BELT RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 22, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 196 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY LINE, FORMALLY CALLED MOJAVE TO OWENJO RAILROAD. Decided December 1915, further decision April 4, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 200 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided April 4, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 202 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SAN FRANCISCO AND NAPA RAILWAY COMPANY. Dismissed December 15, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 204 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (EL CENTRO TO SEELY LINE). Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 205 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (PACIFIC LINE). Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 206 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE STOCKTON TERMINAL AND EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided April 30, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 207 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SUGAR PINE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 2, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 210 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE TONAPAH AND TIDEWATER RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided July 29, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 212 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE YOSEMITE VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 213 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE YREKA RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 21, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 214 IN THE MATTER OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO LONG AND SHORT HAULS AND THROUGH RATES EXCEEDING AGGREGATE INTERMEDIATE RATES. Decided June 19, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 217 IN THE MATTER OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF NUT MEATS AND NUT KERNALS, SHIPPED IN SACKS. Decided November 23, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 219 IN THE MATTER OF THE RATES OF THE PULLMAN COMPANY FOR SEAT PASSENGERS BETWEEN SAN FRANCISCO AND LOS ANGELES. Decided November 15, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 220 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD TO DISCONTINUE THE PRACTICE OF ABSORBING SWITCHING CHARGES EXACTED BY THE STATE BELT RAILROAD ON SHIPMENTS PASSING OVER THE WHARVES SERVED BY THE TRACKS OF THE STATE BELT RAILROAD. Decided November 11, 1911.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 222 SCOTT, WAGNER AND MILLER VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 29, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 225 B. J. McCULLOUGH VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 29, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 226 F. CAMES AND COMPANY, ET. AL. VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 29, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 227 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THROUGH ROUTE AND JOINT RATES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF FREIGHT BETWEEN POINTS SERVED BY THE NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE WESTERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided February 17, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 228 229 SCOTT, WAGNER AND COMPANY, ET. AL. VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 229 L.C. SHELDON VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided February 27, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 230 GRAYSON-OWENS COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 29, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 232 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE COWELL PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY AND BAY POINT AND CLAYTON RAILROAD COMPANY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A THROUGH ROUTE AND FRUIT RATES IN CONNECTION WITH ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided October 25, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 233 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE COWELL PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY AND BAY POINT AND CLAYTON RAILROAD COMPANY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A THROUGH ROUTE AND JOINT RATES IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided October 25, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 234 ROSENWALD AND KAHN VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 6, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 235 MODESTO AND EMPIRE TRACTION COMPANY VS. ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No 242 IN THE MATTER OF UNIFORM RULES FOR DEMURRAGE AND RECIPROCAL DEMURRAGE FOR STANDARD GAUGE RAILROADS. Decided February 16, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 243 IN THE MATTER OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE RETURN OF SHIPMENTS, DAMAGED IN TRANSIT OR REFUSED BY CONSIGNEE AT DESTINATION, TO ORIGINAL SHIPPERS AND ORIGINAL POINTS OF SHIPMENTS. Decided March 4, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 244 IN THE MATTER OF RECEIVING EVIDENCE AS TO WHETHER CARRIERS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO DISCONTINUE THE ISSUANCE OF BILLS OF LADING COVERING SHIPMENTS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN CHECKED BY EMPLOYEES OF THE RAILROAD AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. Decided May 5, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 245 PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. Decided May 9, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 247 CLAYBURGH AND GEORGE, ET. AL., VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided July 29, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 248 GRAYSON-OWENS COMPANY, ET. AL., VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 250 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA TRACTION COMPANY VS. ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 252 NOBLE ELECTRIC STEEL COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 20, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 253 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, AND PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY TO CANCEL WHARFAGE AND HANDLING CHARGES. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 254 CLARK AND HENRY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 26, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 255 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE MOHAWK RAILWAY COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO INCREASE PASSENGER RATES WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided June 26, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 256 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY (COAST LINE); BOCA AND LOYALTON RAILROAD COMPANY; SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY; SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (PACIFIC SYSTEM); TONAPAH AND TIDEWATER RAILROAD COMPANY; WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; TO AMEND LOCAL INTER-DIVISION AND JOINT TARIFF NO. 1, C.R.C. NO. 1, COVERING BAGGAGE RULES, RATES AND CHARGES BY LIMITING THE SIZE OF BAGGAGE WHICH WILL BE HANDLED FREE. Decided April 4, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 258 IN THE MATTER OF THE ABSORBTION OF STORAGE CHARGES AT STOCKTON AND SACRAMENTO ON SHIPMENTS OF POTATOES, BEANS, ONIONS, ASPARAGUS, AND OTHER COMMODITIES. Decided October 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 259 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CARRIER PARTIES TO PACIFIC FREIGHT TARIFF BUREAU EXCEPTOR SHEET NO. 1-B, C.R.C. NO. 52, TO AMEND SECTION TO PROVIDE THAT ON SHIPMENTS OF HAY, STRAW - INCLUDING BEAN STRAW - CACTUS LEAVES, CLASS RATES WILL APPLY ONLY WHERE COMMODITY RATES ARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED. ALSO APPLICATION BY SAME CARRIERS TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM WEIGHT ON HAY IN CARLOADS TO 24,000 POUNDS WHEN LOADED IN CARS OVER 40 FEET IN LENGTH TO AND INCLUDING 50 FEET IN LENGTH, INSIDE MEASUREMENT. Decided April 1, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 263 CITIZENS OF FAIRFIELD VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided March 12, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 264 266 270 SAN MATEO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 266 PALO ALTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; and Case 270 W. E. BEAN VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided October 28, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 265 FRANK WILLIAMS, JOHN W. HANNEY AND THOMAS LOVETT VS. LOS ANGELES AND SAN DIEGO BEACH RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 266 See Case No. 264.
Case No. 267 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF CERTAIN SHIPPERS FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE SWITCHING CHARGES ON FREIGHT FROM INDUSTRY TRACKS AND PRIVATE SIDINGS TO TRANSFER TRACKS AND PRIVATE SIDINGS, AS ORIGINALLY SHOWN ON PAGE 21, IN ITEMS 68 AND 69 OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S TERMINAL TARIFF 230-G, C.R.C., 1260. Decided December 15, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 268 MT. WHITNEY POWER AND ELECTRIC COMPANY VS. TULARE COUNTY POWER COMPANY AND SAN JOAQUIN LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY. Decided July 11, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 269 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY VS. GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY. Decided June 18, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 270 W. E. BEAN VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided October 28, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 273 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF CHARLES PAFF, C. A. BURKE AND JOHN ROSS VS. NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided July 11, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 276 HUNT BROTHERS COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided March 18, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 279 MERCHANTS AND MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION FOR LOS ANGELES VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY EXPRESS. Decided August 1, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 281 LONG BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided March 29, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 282 CITY OF BERKELEY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided September 11, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 284 PERCY G. BETTS VS. PEOPLES WATER COMPANY. Decided August 16, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 285 289 292 PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY VS. SIERRA AND SAN FRANCISCO POWER COMPANY; Case 289 PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY VS. COAST COUNTIES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 292 PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY VS. GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY. Decided December 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 287 STEPHEN A. D. CLARK, E. C. AWGHMOODY, JOHN JORDAN, JOSEPH L. HALE, R. W. WRIGHT, AND LAVINDA YENDES VS. HERMOSA BEACH WATER COMPANY AND QUINTIN J. RAWLEY. Decided February 4, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 288 CITY OF PALO ALTO VS. PALO ALTO GAS COMPANY. Decided March 12, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 289 See Case No. 285.
Case No. 290 CITY OF PASADENA VS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. Decided October 21, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 292 See Case No. 285.
Case No. 293 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VARIOUS PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR PERMISSION TO CHARGE LESS THAN PUBLISHED SCHEDULES OF RATES IN CERTAIN CLASSES OF CASES. Decided January 24, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 294 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, CITY OF SAN LEANDRO VS. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided October 17, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 297 TOWN OF WILLITS VS. WILLITS WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided December 31, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 298 CITY OF PASADENA VS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. Decided October 21, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 299 MERCED COLONY IMPROVEMENT CLUB VS. CROCKER-HUFFMAN LAND AND WATER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 300 MAMMOTH COPPER MINING COMPANY OF MAINE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 20, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 301 GEORGE A. LONG VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided November 13, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 305 IN THE MATTER OF THE SERVICE OF THE NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILWAY COMPANY AT FRESNO, CALIFORNIA. Decided January 8, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 307 CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CREAMERIES VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY. Decided August 1, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 308 IN THE MATTER OF THE RATES AND SERVICES OF THE SAN GORGONIO WATER COMPANY AND THE BEAUMONT LAND AND WATER COMPANY. Decided April 25, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 312 See Case No. 122.
Case No. 314 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE ELECTRIC RAILROAD CORPORATION WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (the Fresno Traction Company). Decided July 18, 1918.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 315 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE MONTEREY AND PACIFIC GROVE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided April 27, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 317 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE NEVADA COUNTY TRACTION COMPANY.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 321 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided May 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 322 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTAINING THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE SAN FRANCISCO, NAPA, AND CALISTOGA RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 7, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 328 C. A. SMITH LUMBER COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 12, 1920.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 330 E. F. JORDAN VS. OCEAN SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 3, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 331 ASSOCIATED JOBBERS OF LOS ANGELES VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided April 19, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 333 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION ON ITS OWN INITIATIVE INTO THE ONE-WAY FARES OF THE NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF PASSENGERS BETWEEN SAN FRANCISCO AND SAN RAFAEL. Decided May 14, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 334 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ESCONDIDO LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO ISSUE AND SELL AT PAR 49,500 SHARES OF THE CAPITOL STOCK, THE PROCEEDS DERIVED FROM THE SALE OF SUCH STOCK TO BE USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PLANT OR SYSTEM; AND FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY. Decided April 28, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 335 PACIFIC LUMBER COMPANY, ET. AL., VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 12, 1930.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 337 CITY OF INGLEWOOD VS. LOS ANGELES RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 338 CHARLES A. SMITH LUMBER COMPANY, THE CHARLES NELSON COMPANY, E. K. WOOD LUMBER COMPANY, AND THE PACIFIC LUMBER COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 12, 1930.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 340 CRESSEY COLONY COMPANY AND JOSEPH D. JONES, ET. AL. VS. CROCKER-HUFFMAN LAND AND WATER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 341 C. A. SMITH LUMBER COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY; AND NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 12, 1930.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 342 GEORGE W. ASKEW AND ROBERT MORRISON VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 18, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 343 FELLOWS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY. Dismissed July 29, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 345 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF SACRAMENTO AND WOODLAND RAILROAD COMPANY FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO RECONSTRUCT THE CONNECTING TRACK BETWEEN THE RAILROADS OF SAID COMPANIES AT MEKON, YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided February 10, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 346 D AND B PUMP AND SUPPLY COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY; AND SUNSET RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided April 15, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 347 SEE SERIES ENTRY 6, FORMAL APPLICATIONS, 1912-1928, APPLICATION NO. 324.
Case No. 348 SEE SERIES ENTRY 6, FORMAL APPLICATIONS, 1912-1928, APPLICATION NO. 324.
Case No. 349 350 CITY OF SANTA PAULA VS. SANTA CLARA WATER AND IRRIGATING COMPANY; Case 350 CITY OF SANTA PAULA VS. INTER-URBAN LAND COMPANY. Decided July 23, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 351 GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY AND THE TOWN OF SUISUN VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY AND PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided April 10, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 352 SEE SERIES ENTRY 6, FORMAL APPLICATIONS, 1912-1928, APPLICATION NO. 324.
Case No. 353 ENNIS-BROCOR VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 6, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 354 DON P. JONES AND MRS. DON P. JONES, HIS WIFE, VS. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY. Decided February 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 356 GRAYSON-OWENS COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 17, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 357 556 KERN COUNTY MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION VS. CALIFORNIA NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SAN JOAQUIN LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY; Case No. 556 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN INITIATIVE INTO THE MATTER OF THE RATES OF THE BAKERSFIELD GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided April 25, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 358 JOSEPH S. ANDERSON VS. DE PUE WAREHOUSE COMPANY; METROPOLITAN WAREHOUSE COMPANY, PENNINSULA WAREHOUSE COMPANY, W. B. SANBORN FOR VALLEJO BONDED AND VALLEJO FREE WAREHOUSE COMPANY; SOUTH END WAREHOUSE COMPANY; HARBOR WAREHOUSE COMPANY; CONTINENTAL WAREHOUSE COMPANY, DANFORTH WAREHOUSE COMPANY; SEAWALL BONDED WAREHOUSE COMPANY; AND HYLTON WAREHOUSE COMPANY. Decided October 30, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 359 COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE AND THE CITY OF SONORA VS. SIERRA RAILWAY COMPANY; ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY; AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 13, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 360 STONE CANYON COAL COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 26, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 361 J. A. ANDREW FRANSCIONI, ET. AL., VS. SOLEDAD LAND AND WATER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 368 THE CITY OF PETALUMA VS. PETALUMA POWER AND WATER COMPANY. Dismissed November 5, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 369 WILLIAM F. BEWHER VS. SAN DIEGO ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided May 24, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 372 V. A. SOLAIR, ET. AL., VS. TUOLUMNE COUNTY RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided July 29, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 376 W. C. PENOYER VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided September 19, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 377 MAYFIELD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. PENNINSULAR RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided May 9, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 378 QUINCY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 5, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 382 CARNEGIE BRICK AND POTTERY COMPANY VS. WESTERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided February 12, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 385 SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided October 30, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 386 IN THE MATTER OF A PHYSICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE PETALUMA AND SANTA ROSA RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, EITHER AT PETALUMA, SABASTOPOL, OR SANTA ROSA, IN SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided April 9, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 387 CITY OF SAN JOSE VS. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided February 4, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No 389 J. S. MAFFITT VS. NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided July 3, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 390 D. E. BROWN, ET. AL., VS. CONSOLIDATED CANAL COMPANY. Decided March 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 393 HIGMAN LUMBER COMPANY VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES, AND SALT LAKE RAILWAY COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided July 19, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 395 PALO ALTO COMPANY VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Dismissed July 11, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 396 EAST OAKLAND PROTECTIVE LEAGUE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided October 28, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 397 L. Y. MONTGOMERY ET. AL., VS. FRESNO CANAL COMPANY. Decided July 24, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 398 FRED L. HILMER VS. THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 399 E. PERCIVAL LEWIS VS. PEOPLE'S WATER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 400 TOWN OF ANTIOCH VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided July 6, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 404 405 FRED GUNTHER COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 405 L. C. ROSS VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 25, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 406 RIVERS BROTHERS COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided March 13, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 407 App. No. 2 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE RATES, CHARGES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH ITS INTERCHANGE TELEPHONE SERVICE WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEFORE COMMISSION EN BANC, AT SAN FRANCISCO; App. 2 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH REVISED SYSTEM OF TOLL RATES THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 409 R. H. KNOX, E. R. EVERETT, FRANK DECKER, A. G. DU BURTZ, A. FOURCHY, H. J. PRAEGER, GEORGE R. GREENLEAF, J. H. BONE, W. G. GOODMAN, B. W. THAYER, AND SAMUEL B. McLENEGAN, PROPERTY OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF SAN JOSE EAST SIDE DISTRICT VS. SAN JOSE AND SANTA CLARA COUNTY RAILROAD COMPANY AND SAN JOSE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 23, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 411 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION TO ASCERTAIN THE VALUE OF THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF THE CRESCENT CITY RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided December 3, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 412 T. D. JOHNSTON VS. SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 413 GUY B. WILKINSON VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET. AL. Dismissed March 18, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 414 RED LINE TOURIST AGENCY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND UNION TRANSFER COMPANY. Decided August 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 417 475 SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 475 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION OF THE LUMBER RATES OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (COAST LINES); SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES, AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY; NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; AND WESTERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 418 498 G. W. MORDECI, ET. AL, VS. THE MADERA CANAL AND IRRIGATION COMPANY AND C. S. MOSES; Case 498 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE SERVICE, EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES OF MADERA CANAL AND IRRIGATION COMPANY ON THE RAILROAD COMMISSION'S OWN INITIATIVE. Decided April 3, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 419 CERTAIN RESIDENTS OF MENLO PARK AND VICINITY, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO VS. BEAR GULCH WATER COMPANY. Decided October 16, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 422 W. H. FRAZINE, CHAIRMAN OF CITIZENS COMMITTEE VS. THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided August 11, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 423 BALDWIN PARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. BALDWIN PARK DOMESTIC WATER COMPANY, S. M. WALKER, PROPRIETOR. Decided September 24, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 424 MERCHANTS TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT SEWER PIPE COMPANY, PACIFIC SEWER PIPE COMPANY, ST. LEWIS FIRE BRICK AND CLAY COMPANY, INGLEWOOD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (COAST LINE) AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided February 27, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 425 A. M. BUCHANAN VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided October 2, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 426 GRIDLEY WATER USERS ASSOCIATION VS. THE SUTTER BUTTE CANAL COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided July 13, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 431 IN THE MATTER OF AN INVESTIGATION INTO METHODS AND EQUIPMENT OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY IN THE OPERATION OF ITS LINES OF RAILWAY (OUTGROWTH OF THE DISASTEROUS VENICE CAR COLLISION). Decided August 15, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 433 434 441 TUJUNGA VALLEY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION VS. TUJUNGA WATER AND POWER COMPANY; Case 434 NABORU OMURA VS. TUJUNGA WATER AND POWER COMPANY; Case 441 TUJUNGA TERRACE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION VS. THE TUJUNGA WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 434 NABORU OMURA VS. TUJUNGA WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided October 16, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 435 CITY OF EAGLE ROCK VS. EAGLE ROCK WATER COMPANY. Decided December 13, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 436 SCATENA AND COMPANY, ET. AL., VS. THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided March 14, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 437 D. E. SLENACK VS. INGLEWOOD WATER COMPANY. Decided October 26, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 439 440 W. T. INCOT VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 440 W. T. INCOT VS. AMADOR CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 18, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 441 THE TUJUNGA TERRACE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION VS. THE TUJUNGA WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided October 16, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 445 TOWN OF HAYWARD VS. SAN LORENZO WATER COMPANY. Decided July 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 446 H. BROCHMAIR VS. PACIFIC BUILDING COMPANY. Decided March 11, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No 448 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF REDLANDS VS. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, UNION HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, AND SOUTHWESTERN HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 450 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLIANCE BY OIL PIPELINES WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 327 OF THE LAWS OF 1913, DECLARING CERTAIN CORPORATIONS, ASSOCIATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS TO BE COMMON CARRIER AND PUBLIC UTILITIES, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT. Decided January 3, 1914, further decision March 18, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 453 J. P. RAMOS VS. SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY. Decided October 25, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 454 BELVEDERE CIVIC ASSOCIATION VS. FARISS COMPANY. Decided September 19, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 455 B. B. HARLAN, ET. AL., VS. LOS ANGELES AND SAN DIEGO BEACH RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided December 20, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 457 459 RICHMOND W. ARMSTRONG, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; Case 459 LOS ANGELES RATE ASSOCIATION VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 458 CITY OF ONTARIO VS. ONTARIO-UPLAND GAS COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 459 See Case No. 457.
Case No. 460 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN INITIATIVE INTO THE MATTER OF SANITARY DRINKING CUPS ON PASSENGER CARS. Decided: October 8, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 461 SAN MATEO AND BURLINGAME MERCHANT'S ASSOCIATION VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 11, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 462 IN THE MATTER OF THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND PRACTICES OF THE PULLMAN COMPANY. Decided April 25, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 463 J. J. CHAPPELL, ET. AL. VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided February 19, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 464 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE MATTER OF THE CHARGES OF PUBLIC UTILITIES GAS CORPORATIONS FOR NATURAL GAS DELIVERED AT WHOLESALE AT POINTS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF INCORPORATED CITIES AND TOWNS. Decided December 20, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 465 M. FARRELL, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided December 27, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 466 W. S. JENKIN VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided November 7, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 467 793 W. H. DAUM VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Case 793 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COVERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PASSENGER STATION AT LOS ANGELES. Decided May 14, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 470 487 919 JOHN I. BECK VS. HERMOSA BEACH WATER COMPANY; Case 487 FRANCIS S. HALE VS. HERMOSA BEACH WATER COMPANY; Case 919 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF HERMOSA BEACH WATER COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF RULES AND REGULATIONS. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 472 FRANK TURNBULL COMPANY VS. SWEETWATER WATER COMPANY. Decided January 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 473 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION OF THE FAILURE OF THE BRIDGE OF THE NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY ACROSS THE AMERICAN RIVER, OCCURRING SEPTEMBER 9, 1913. Decided September 30, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 475 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE LUMBER RATES OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 476 THOMAS MONAHAN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE, VS. SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY. Decided May 22, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 477 550 THOMAS MONAHAN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 550 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S OWN INVESTIGATION IN THE MATTER OF RATES, SERVICES AND EXTENSIONS OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN ITS SAN JOSE DISTRICT. Decided August 28, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 478 THOMAS MONAHAN, MAYOR OF SAN JOSE VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 480 App. 791 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VS. THE HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY; App. No. 791 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO INCREASE RATES FOR WATER SERVICE. Decided August 14, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 483 THE TOWN OF UKIAH VS. THE SNOW MOUNTAIN WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided February 27, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 484 OAKLAND, ANTIOCH AND EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY VS. NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Dismissed December 20, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 485 580 686 SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND MCCLOUD RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 580 THE MCCORMICK-SAELTZER COMPANY VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 686 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO CLASS RATES OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BETWEEN ALL POINTS BETWEEN SAN FRANCISCO, SAN JOSE AND POINTS NORTH THEREOF TO AND INCLUDING THE OREGON STATE LINE. Decided November 4, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 486 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE MATTER OF THE ESTABLISHING OF A THROUGH ROUTE AND JOINT RATES BETWEEN GLENDALE AND EAGLE ROCK RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE LOS ANGELES RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided February 27, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 487 See Case No. 470.
Case No. 489 GEM CITY PACKING COMPANY VS. SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY. Decided June 22, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 491 FLORANCE LOCKE VS. BOLINAS WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 492 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE SERVICE OF THE NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BETWEEN SAN FRANCISCO AND BELVEDERE. Decided November 14, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 493 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE TIDEWATER SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ESTABLISHING FOR IT THROUGH PASSENGER ROUTES AND FARES IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSCONTINENTAL SCRIP BUREAU LINES, AND TO BE ADMITTED TO A MEMBERSHIP IN SAID TRANSCONTINENTAL SCRIP BUREAU. Dismissed November 21, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 494 ANGEL FERRASCI, ET. AL., VS. EMPIRE WATER COMPANY. Decided March 5, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 495 SALINAS CITY VS. COAST VALLEYS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided October 6, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 497 C. C. WOODWORTH, ET. AL., VS. WESTERN STATES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided March 2, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 498 See Case No. 418
Case No. 499 495 533 CITY OF MONTEREY VS. COAST VALLEY'S GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 495 SALINAS CITY VS. COAST VALLEY'S GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 533 CITY OF MONTEREY VS. COAST VALLEY'S GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 500 App. 950 CITY OF MONTEREY VS. THE MONTEREY COUNTY WATER WORKS; App. No. 950 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE MONTEREY COUNTY WATER WORKS FOR PERMISSION TO INCREASE THE RATES FOR WATER SERVICE IN THE CITY OF MONTEREY AND CERTAIN OTHER PLACES. Decided October 8, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 504 PANNEY AND BOYLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY VS. THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided March 13, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 508 538 967 CALISTOGA ELECTRIC COMPANY VS. NAPA VALLEY ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 538 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION OF THE RATES OF NAPA VALLEY ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 967 CALISTOGA ELECTRIC COMPANY VS. NAPA VALLEY ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided May 21, 1914.
Case No. 509 LENNOX IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION AND LOS ANGELES COUNTY VS. LOS ANGELES RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided April 4, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 510 CHARLES MITCHELL WHITAKER VS. SNOWBALL-SULLIVAN COMPANY AND T. F. O'BRIEN, LITTLEROCK FRUITLAND COMPANY. Decided May 7, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 511 WINFRED F. MARR VS. LOS ANGELES AND ARIZONA LAND COMPANY. Decided April 15, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 512 SWIFT AND WILCOX COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided February 7, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 514 OAKLAND, ANTIOCH AND EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY VS. NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided May 28, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 515 S. O. FESLER, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 516 CITY OF TAFT VS. WESTSIDE GAS COMPANY. Decided May 21, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 522 HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY OF SANTA BARBARA VS. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided February 1, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 523 CITY OF REDLANDS VS. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, UNITED STATES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, SOUTHWESTERN HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY. Decided February 27, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 524 KLEIN-SIMPSON FRUIT COMPANY VS. THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, IN THE MATTER OF RE-ICING REFRIGERATOR CARS. Decided November 27, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 526 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO VS. NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE SACRAMENTO AND WOODLAND RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided April 10, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 528 ELAN DUNLAP VS. DIAMOND RIDGE DITCH COMPANY, T. C. PATTON. Decided February 28, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 529 STATE COMMISSION ON LUNACY VS. THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (COAST LINES). Dismissed April 9, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 530 A. J. GUGHELMETTI, ET. AL., VS. CHILENO VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY. Decided October 3, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 532 BENJAMIN W. FENTON VS. THE WELLS FARGO EXPRESS COMPANY. Dismissed May 1, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 533 CITY OF MONTEREY VS. COAST VALLEY'S GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided January 11, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 534 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN MOTION INTO THE RATES FOR TRANSPORTATION OF FREIGHT BY WATER BETWEEN SAN FRANCISCO, STOCKTON, SACRAMENTO, AND INTERMEDIATE POINTS. Decided September 4, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 535 SARATOGA IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION VS. SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY. Decided June 17, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 536 JOHN WALL, JESSE PARMAN, S. W. MILLER, J. B. ESTES, AND IRA S. COMMON, CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MODOC VS. THE NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 16, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 538 CALISTOGA ELECTRIC COMPANY VS. NAPA VALLEY ELECTRIC COMPANY, AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE RATES OF THE NAPA VALLEY ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC ENERGY. Decided May 21, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 539 RIVERSIDE PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY VS. SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES, AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY; THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY; SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; AND WILLIAM G. HENSHAW, DOING BUSINESS AS A RAILROAD CORPORATION UNDER THE NAME OF THE STYLE OF CRESCENT CITY RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 4, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 540 VALLEJO TRADES AND LABOR COUNCIL VS. VALLEJO ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO. Decided August 12, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 541 GEORGE J. BERKEL VS. LAUREL CANYON LAND COMPANY. Decided September 21, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 544 F. O. SICARD VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided June 7, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 545 ROY A. PRATT, ET. AL., VS. SPRING VALLEY WATER COMPANY. Decided May 21, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 546 UNION HOLLYWOOD WATER COMPANY VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Dismissed January 6, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 547 IN THE MATTER OF THE RATES CHARGED AND SERVICE RENDERED BY H. R. ATWOOD ALSO DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF ENCANTO HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY, FOR WATER SUPPLIED TO HIS CONSUMERS AT ENCANTO, CALIFORNIA. Decided March 28, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 549 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN INITIATIVE INTO THE MATTER OF THE CHARGES FOR NATURAL GAS DELIVERED AT THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF LONG BEACH FOR CONSUMPTION THEREIN. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 550 See Case No. 477.
Case No. 553 J. H. BROCKMAN VS. INGLEWOOD WATER COMPANY. Decided October 14, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 555 E. T. DOWNS VS. CALISTOGA ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided March 31, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 556 See Case No. 357.
Case No. 557 MODESTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 18, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 558 L. E. COLE, ET. AL., VS. SOUTH FEATHER RIVER LAND AND WATER COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 560 IN THE MATTER OF THE RATES OF THE NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILWAY, WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided December 4, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 561 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION ON ITS OWN INITIATIVE INTO THE MATTER OF THE SERVICE OF THE TUJUNGA WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided June 2, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 565 WESTERN STATES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY VS. SIERRA AND SAN FRANCISCO POWER COMPANY. Decided Sept. 1, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 567 BOARD OF TRADE OF SIERRA MADRE, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided December 15, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 568 JAMES M. SHARP VS. SWEETWATER WATER COMPANY. Decided November 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 569 570 G. W. FAUKNER, ET. AL., VS. VENTURA COUNTY POWER COMPANY; Case 570 R. E. BRAKEY, ET. AL., VS. VENTURA COUNTY POWER COMPANY. Decided December 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 571 J. J. GILL VS. SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided June 11, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 574 595 SAN MATEO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; Case 595 CITY OF PALO ALTO AND PALO ALTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 10, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 575 CITY OF NAPA, ET. AL., VS. THEODORE A. BELL AND NAPA CITY WATER COMPANY. Decided May 28, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 576 GOLDEN STATE PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY VS. THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided March 22, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 578 RAMEY, ET. AL., VS. SAN JOAQUIN LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 579 J. D. WARREN, ET. AL., VS. MURPHY WATER, ICE, AND LIGHT COMPANY. Decided June 17, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 580 See Case No. 485 and 868.
Case No. 587 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE MATTER OF THE STOPPING OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY CARS AT LA SURLE. Decided August 1, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 591 596 STEIGER TERRA COTTA AND POTTERY WORKS, ET. AL., VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Case 596 SAME TITLE. Decided April 9, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 592 PACIFIC COAST POTTERY AND TERRA COTTA COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 593 PALO ALTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. PENINSULAR RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided April 20, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 594 CITY OF LOS ANGELES VS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, LOS ANGELES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, AND ECONOMIC GAS COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 595 See Case No. 574.
Case No. 596 See Case No. 591.
Case No. 597 673 W. J. ROGERS AND CENTRAL PACIFIC LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY VS. SACRAMENTO VALLEY WEST SIDE CANAL COMPANY, ET. AL.; Case 673 SACRAMENTO VALLEY REALTY COMPANY, ET. AL., VS. SACRAMENTO VALLEY WEST SIDE CANAL COMPANY AND WILLIAM F. FOWLER, RECEIVER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY WEST SIDE CANAL COMPANY. Decided July 6, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 599 PINNEY AND BOYLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY VS. THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided July 23, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 600 GARNETT A. JOSLIN VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 602 VISALIA COMPANY-OPERATIVE CREAMERY VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY. Dismissed October 6, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 603 REEDLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY VS. L. O. CLOUGH, J. E. ANDERSON, G. E. SCHWEDIN, ANTON HANSON, AND J. W. GALLI. Decided June 26, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 604 CITY OF REDLANDS VS. THE CITRUS BELT GAS COMPANY. Decided November 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 606 BUSINESS MEN'S CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF HEALDSBURG VS. NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided September 15, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 607 CRESCENT CITY LIGHT, WATER AND POWER COMPANY VS. GEORGE W. KELLER AND HOBBS, WALL AND COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 610 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION BY THE RAILROAD COMMISSION UPON ITS OWN INITIATIVE INTO THE FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE UNITED RAILROADS OF SAN FRANCISCO. Decided May 17, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 611 TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO VS. MARIN WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided August 31, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 612 671 LOS MOLINOS CITRUS FARMS COMPANY VS. CONELAND WATER COMPANY; Case 671 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE RATES CHARGED FOR WATER BY CONELAND WATER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No 613 WILLIAM PAXTON MONTAGUE, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided December 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 614 MACEY LEAKE, ET. AL., VS. NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided November 25, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 616 See P.U.C. Map Book Index.
Case No. 617 CITY OF ALAMEDA VS. PEOPLE'S WATER COMPANY. Decided February 21, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 621 CITY OF REDLANDS VS. THE SOUTHWESTERN HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY. Decided July 6, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 623 App. 1341 CITY OF COALINGA VS. PLEASANT VALLEY WATER COMPANY AND COALINGA CONSOLIDATED WATER COMPANY; App. 1341 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PLEASANT VALLEY WATER COMPANY AND COALINGA CONSOLIDATED WATER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO INCREASE RATES FOR WATER FURNISHED TO THE CITY OF COALINGA AND THE INHABITANTS THEREOF. Decided January 13, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 624 CITY OF COALINGA VS. COALINGA GAS AND POWER COMPANY. Decided November 5, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 628 STEIGER TERRA COTTA AND POTTERY WORKS VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided April 9, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 631 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION OF THE WHOLESALE RATES OF THE CUYAMACA WATER COMPANY. Decided August 18, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 632 YOSEMITE VALLEY RAILROAD, REPORT OF ACCIDENT. Decided February 23, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 633 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUGAR COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET. AL. Dismissed June 22, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 634 GRIFFIN AND MILLER, ET. AL., VS. HONEY LAKE VALLEY MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY. Dismissed September 11, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 636 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION OF SWITCHING CHARGES ON CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANIES. Decided November 8, 1920.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 637 ANDREW BEAGLEY, ET. AL., VS. LANKERSHIRE LAND COMPANY. Decided June 4, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 638 R. L. MEADE, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided June 4, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 639 TOWN OF HOLLISTER VS. HOLLISTER WATER COMPANY. Decided June 21, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 641 MT. KONOCTI LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY VS. JAMES A. GUNN, JR. Decided May 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 642 C. H. JONES, ET. AL., VS. NORTHERN WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided December 30, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 648 CITY OF SALINAS VS. COAST VALLEY GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided March 11, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 651 E. D. PORTER, ET. AL., VS. FRESNO CANAL AND IRRIGATION COMPANY. Decided February 3, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 652 E. C. PHOENIX AND FAIR OAKS WATER TAKERS ASSOCIATION VS. AMERICAN IRRIGATION COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided January 8, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 654 750 J. P. MELCHER, ET. AL., VS. MT. WHITNEY POWER AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 750 A. C. ROSENTHAL, ET. AL. VS. MT. WHITNEY POWER AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided April 6, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 660 CITY OF CORONA VS. CORONA HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided September 28, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 661 CITY OF CORONA VS. CORONA CITY WATER COMPANY. Decided January 8, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 662 CITY OF CORONA VS. CITRUS BELT GAS COMPANY AND D. J. DUBKILL, TRUSTEE. Decided December 1, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 664 BALDWIN PARK DOMESTIC WATER COMPANY, S. M. WALKER, PROPRIETOR, VS. UNION TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK OF PASADENA, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF A. W. DICKERSON DECEASED, BALDWIN PARK WATER COMPANY, AND D. J. SHULTES. Decided November 5, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 665 TOWN OF LOS GATOS VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided June 26, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 668 596 672 W. T. OGDEN, ET. AL, VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 596 STEIGER TERRA COTTA AND POTTERY WORKS VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY; Case 672 N. CLARK AND SONS VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided November 13, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 669 CALIFORNIA POTTERY COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 670 BARCLAY MCCOWAN, ET. AL., VS. THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Withdrawn June 9, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 671 See Case No. 612.
Case No. 672 See Case No. 668.
Case No. 673 597 W. J. ROGERS AND THE CENTRAL PACIFIC LAND AND LUMBER COMPANY, VS. THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY WEST SIDE CANAL COMPANY AND WILLIAM F. FOWLER, RECEIVER, OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY WEST SIDE CANAL COMPANY; Case 673 SACRAMENTO VALLEY REALTY COMPANY VS. SACRAMENTO VALLEY WEST SIDE CANAL COMPANY AND WILLIAM F. FOWLER, RECEIVER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY WEST SIDE CANAL COMPANY. Decided February 7, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 675 676 677 711 App. 1625 CITY OF REDDING VS. THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER COMPANY; Case 676 CITY OF REDDING VS. THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER COMPANY; Case 677 CITY OF REDDING VS. THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER COMPANY; Case 711 IN THE MATTER OF THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER COMPANY; and App. 1625 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER COMPANY FOR A GENERAL DETERMINATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF RATES TO BE CHARGED BY IT AND FOR A CONSOLIDATION WITH THIS APPLICATION OF CASES NOS. 675, 676, 677, and 711. Decided September 1, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 679 JOHN PELGANTI, ET. AL., VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided April 27, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 680 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CROSSING AT GRADE OVER THE TRACKS OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE. Decided November 6, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 681 VISALIA BOARD OF TRADE, VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 14, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 683 IN THE MATTER OF THE PRACTICE OF WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND TELEPHONE UTILITIES IN REQUIRING DEPOSITS BEFORE RENDERING SERVICE [complete investigation into the practice of all classes of utilities named with reference to collecting deposits as a condition precedent to receiving service, and also with reference to other service charges and regulations]. Decided November 15, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 684 CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE VS. COAST VALLEYS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided November 16, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 686 580 485 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO CLASS RATES OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BETWEEN ALL POINTS FROM SAN FRANCISCO, SAN JOSE AND POINTS NORTH THEREOF TO AND INCLUDING THE OREGON STATE LINE; Case 580 MCCORMICK-SARLTZER COMPANY, ET. AL., VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AND THE MCCLOUD RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY; and Case 485 SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND MCCLOUD RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided November 4, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 689 DONALD S. GETTINGS, ET. AL., VS. THE WINDSOR WATER COMPANY AND OTTO PACKMAYOR. Decided March 25, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 691 GOLD BANNER VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided February 27, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 692 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE CTIY OF SANTA CRUZ VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided May 11, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 693 DEL PASO HEIGHTS CLUB VS. NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Dismissed November 27, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 694 695 DAIRYMEN COMPANY--OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSOCIATION VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY EXPRESS; and Case 695 SAME TITLE. Decided March 13, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 695 RIVERSIDE CO-OP CREAMERY ASSOCIATION VS. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY. Decided March 13, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 698 JAMES W. FREEMAN, ET. AL., VS. IRWIN HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 699 MRS. ELIZABETH A. BASLER, ET. AL., VS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. Decided February 14, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 700 A. D. STUCKLER, ET. AL., VS. CITY WATER COMPANY OF OCEAN PARK. Decided June 30, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 701 JOHN G. MCCARTHY, ET. AL., VS. SANTA MONICA WATER COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 703 L. SHELLEY, ET. AL. VS. OCEAN PARK WATER COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 705 W. H. FINLEY, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 706 J. L. MUSCH, ET. AL., VS. CRESCENT CITY WHARF AND DOCK COMPANY. Decided December 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 707 MARY CONNOLLY, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided December 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 710 POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE COMPANY VS. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided September 23, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 711 See Case No. 675.
Case No. 712 B. GHEFFELI AND DOMINIC PEISANO VS. MARIN WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided August 3, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 713 EAST BAKERSFIELD IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION VS. BAKERSFIELD WATER COMPANY. Decided March 31, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 715 CITY OF KENNETT VS. KENNETT WATER COMPANY. Decided November 9, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 718 JOHN BELLESHOCK, ET. AL., VS. BEAR GULCH WATER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 720 VEY CRAMER VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided March 5, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 723 MERCHANTS AND MANUFACTURERS TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 725 MARY BELLE HARDISO VS. THE LOS ANGELES GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION. Decided January 8, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 726 CARL F. ROOK VS. SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY. Decided March 11, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 727 CHARLES E. WARREN AND HERBERT PARK VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided February 3, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 728 IN THE MATTER OF RAILROADS CHARGING AND COLLECTING ADDITIONAL TRAIN FARES FROM PASSENGERS BOARDING THE TRAIN AT AGENCY STATION WITHOUT TICKETS WHEN OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE SAME HAS BEEN GIVEN. Decided May 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 731 TOWN OF SAUSALITO VS. MARIN WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 733 HUGHSON TELEPHONE COMPANY VS. THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided February 8, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 734 CITY OF SONOMA VS. SONOMA CITY WATER WORKS, ET. AL. Decided December 15, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 735 H. J. MCCOY, ET. AL., VS. MARIN COUNTY WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided June 14, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 737 GEORGE B. MCGILLIVARY VS. THE CORONA GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY. Decided July 31, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 738 JULIUS HEGMAN COMPANY VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided February 27, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 742 G. SPECIALE VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided July 31, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 743 R. S. HUNT, ET. AL., VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 744 ROCKRIDGE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION VS. SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided July 11, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 748 W. F. WHEELER, ET. AL. VS. THE SIERRA AND SAN FRANCISCO POWER COMPANY. Decided December 30, 1922.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 750 See Case No. 654.
Case No. 754 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE SAN DIEGO ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided May 12, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 755 MERCED RANCH COMPANY VS. CROCKER-HOFFMAN LAND AND WATER COMPANY. Decided May 28, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 756 HARVEY M. CARLTON VS. OCEAN PARK WATER COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 758 759 760 ROSSI AND ANDERSON COMPANY VS. SAN FRANCISCO, NAPA, AND CALISTOGA RAILWAY COMPANY, ET. AL.; Case 759 F. T. MOONEY VS. THE SAN FRANCISCO, NAPA, AND CALISTOGA RAILWAY COMPANY, ET. AL.; and Case 760 A. GOODMAN AND COMPANY VS. THE SAN FRANCISCO, NAPA, AND CALISTOGA RAILWAY COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided June 14, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 762 PHOENIX COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided July 23, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 764 935 A. W. HARWEGE VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; Case 935 MAX ROSENBERG, ET. AL., VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided January 20, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 765 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPRAISAL OF THE VALUE OF THE GLENDALE AND MONTROSE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 771 See P.U.C. Map Book Index.
Case No. 773 See P.U.C. Map Book Index.
Case No. 776 777 778 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN MOTION OF THE RATES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF CONSUMERS WATER COMPANY; Case 777 DOMESTIC WATER COMPANY; Case 778 WESTERN WATER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 779 IN THE MATTER OF THE RATE FOR ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIED BY UNITED LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY TO SAN FRANCISCO, OAKLAND AND SAN JOSE CONSOLIDATED RAILWAY COMPANY AND SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 780 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE STATION FACILITIES OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AT SAN DIEGO. Decided March 1, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No 781 TULARE COUNTY POWER COMPANY VS. THE SAN JOAQUIN LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AT SAN DIEGO. Decided March 1, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No 783 DAVID A. CURRY VS. THE YOSEMITE VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY, THE YOSEMITE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided April 20, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 784 CITY OF LONG BEACH VS. THE SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES AND SALT LAKE RAILWAY COMPANY, SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 785 990 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY.; Case 990 CITY OF RICHMOND VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided May 28, 1918.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 790 LOTTIE B. SMOOT, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided June 4, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 791 SOUTH SANTA ANITA IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, ET. AL., VS. CALIFORNIA-MICHIGAN LAND AND WATER COMPANY. Withdrawn August 19, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 793 See Case No. 467.
Case No. 799 SAN DIEGO CONSOLIDATED BREWING COMPANY, ET. AL., VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided April 7, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 801 PAUL A. TARPEY, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF THE NORTH END STAGE LINE VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided June 17, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 803 L. H. WRIGHT VS. J. B. VAN NUYS, ANNIS H. VAN NUYS SCHWEPPE, AND KATE VAN PAGE. Decided July 8, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 805 CHARLES S. HARDY VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 808 GEORGE E. SMALL, ET. AL., VS. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided July 8, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 814 NEWARK GRAIN COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 26, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 815 HESTER LOSKY, ET. AL., VS. SAN DIEGO CONSOLIDATED GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided April 27, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 817 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION ON ITS OWN MOTION, OF THE RATES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND SERVICE OF MURPHY WATER, ICE AND LIGHT COMPANY. Decided November 30, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 818 CITY OF SAN JOSE VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided November 11, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 820 MAX COHEN AND W. C. HEIN VS. MARIN WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided August 3, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 822 CITY OF LOS BANOS VS. WEST SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY WATER COMPANY. Decided December 22, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 824 J. W. RAY VS. THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided September 25, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 830 SIMON LEVI COMPANY, ET. AL., VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided September 23, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 831 CALIFORNIA RICE MILLS VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided September 28, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 832 NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILWAY COMPANY VS. THE FEATHER RIVER LUMBER COMPANY. Decided November 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 833 BEN NELSON, GEORGE H. WALSH AND R. D. SMITH VS. THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY AND THE ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY. Decided September 24, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 834 GEORGE FINK, ET. AL., VS. SAN JOAQUIN AND KINGS RIVER CANAL AND IRRIGATION COMPANY. Decided December 18, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 838 SAN FRANCISCO ARTICHOKE GROWERS ASSOCIATION VS. OCEAN SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided November 23, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 839 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 840 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY, AND SIERRA AND SAN FRANCISCO POWER COMPANY.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 842 App. 2739 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO VS. THE SPRING VALLEY WATER COMPANY; and App. 2739 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SPRING VALLEY WATER COMPANY AND THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO FOR AN ORDER APPROVING A PROPOSED AGREEMENT AMENDATORY OF THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE SPRING VALLEY WATER COMPANY AND THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UPON THE 17th DAY OF APRIL, 1922, PROVIDING FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AN AQUEDUCT TO BE CONSTRUCTED BETWEEN LIVINGSTON, ALAMEDA COUNTY, AND CRYSTAL SPRINGS RESERVOIR, SAN MATEO COUNTY. Decided August 12, 1921.
Scope and Content Note
Memoranda
Scope and Content Note
Evidence Collected by C.R.C.
Scope and Content Note
Exhibits
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 843 THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA VS. SAN DIEGO AND SOUTH-WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided december 11, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 844 ALAMEDA IMPROVEMENT CLUB VS. THE SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided December 15, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 845 FEATHER RIVER LUMBER COMPANY VS. NEVADA-CALIFORNIA-OREGON RAILWAY COMPANY. Dismissed May 29, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 849 NORTH PACIFIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided November 12, 1915, later decision September 28, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 850 JAMES MILLS'S SACRAMENTO VALLEY, ORCHARD CITRUS FRUIT COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 851 J. L. MURPHY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 855 STEVENSON WATER USERS ASSOCIATION VS. JAMES J. STEVENSON, A CORPORATION, AND THE EAST SIDE CANAL AND IRRIGATION COMPANY. Decided February 4, 1918.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 858 E. N. SPAFFORD, ET. AL., VS. THE FRESNO CANAL AND IRRIGATION COMPANY AND THE KERMAN WATER COMPANY. Decided April 19, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 863 CITY OF AZUSA VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided April 1, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 864 W. M. ESHELMAN VS. THE TITLE GUARANTEE AND TRUST COMPANY. Decided April 21, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 869 CITY OF BURLINGAME VS. THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 870 CITY OF PITTSBURG VS. THE BLACK POINT WATER COMPANY. Dismissed June 9, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 873 SAMUEL J. MILLER VS. THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Dismissed November 22, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 875 PETER A. LOFGREN VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided February 14, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 876 CALIFORNIA CREAMERIES COMPANY VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided February 8, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 878 THE FRESNO ASSOCIATION VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided November 8, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 879 W. H. EARLY COMPANY VS. THE GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 881 MONTEBELLO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. WHITTIER HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Dismissed February 7, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 884 CITY OF ALHAMBRA VS. THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided February 10, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 887 CLARA S. HOFF, WIFE OF E. G. HOFF, VS. GEORGE S. MONTGOMERY AND CARRIE JUDD MONTGOMERY, HIS WIFE. Decided April 6, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 888 CHARLES D. HAMMOND, ET. AL., VS. THE SANTA BARBARA AND SUBURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided March 11, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 890 CITY OF ROSEVILLE VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided February 21, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 891 892 911 912 CITY OF LOS ANGELES VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD; Case 892 same title; Case 911 same title; Case 912 same title. Decided January 26, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 892 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET. AL. VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided January 26, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 893 KNIERS, ALLAN AND PYLE, ET. AL., VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 21, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 894 THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VS. THE WEST COAST GAS COMPANY. Decided October 4, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 897 J.B. CULPEPPER VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 12, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 898 MRS. JOHN M. CEREMSKI VS. THE BALDWIN PARK DOMESTIC WATER COMPANY, S.M. WALKER, PROPRIETOR. Withdrawn May 12, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 900 GLENVIEW IMPROVEMENT CLUB VS. PEOPLE'S WATER COMPANY. Decided August 13, 1918.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 901 EARLIMART PROGRESSIVE CLUB VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided March 17, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case. No. 903 THE CITY OF RICHMOND VS. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided March 4, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 906 ELIJHA FALK, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF EUREKA, DANIEL HALLERON, G.H. SHULTZ, THOMAS LONGFORD, M. ENGLES AND JOSEPH BREDSTEEN, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUREKA, VS. WESTERN STATES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided November 6, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 908 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN INITIATIVE OF THE RATES AND SERVICES OF BELVEDERE WATER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 909 App. 2410 CITY OF TURLOCK VS. THE YOSEMITE POWER COMPANY; APP. 2410 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE YOSEMITE POWER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER FIXING JUST AND REASONABLE RATES AND REGULATIONS OF ELECTRIC SERVICE. Decided October 3, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 910 COUNTY OF CALAVERAS VS. THE SIERRA RAILWAY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA. Decided June 5, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 911 912 See Case No. 891.
Case No. 917 App. 2171 E.J. GUISLER, ET. AL., VS. CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE AND LIGHT COMPANY; APP. 2171 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE AND LIGHT COMPANY FOR A GENERAL DETERMINATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF RATES TO BE CHARGED BY IT. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 918 FILM EXCHANGE BOARD OF TRADE OF SAN FRANCISCO VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided May 22, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 919 See Case No. 470.
Case No. 920 A.H. GREENSHIELDS, ET. AL., VS. THE LOS ANGELES RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided June 9, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 921 JOHN L. LENNON, ET. AL., VS. BAYSIDE LUMBER COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 923 RICE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA AND PACIFIC RICE GROWERS ASSOCIATION VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided June 16, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 924 D.L. VANDERVOORT, ET. AL., VS. THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 925 WILLIAM INGRAM, ET. AL. VS. THE NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided April 6, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 930 1263 App. 5567 CITY OF SACRAMENTO VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; CASE 1263 CITY OF OAKLAND VS. THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; and APP. 5567 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRICAL ENERGY. Decided March 25, 1924.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 931 1204 App. 5585 THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO VS. THE GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY; CASE 1204 THE CITY OF OAKLAND VS. THE GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY; and APP. 5585 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE OF RATES. Decided January 3, 1923.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 933 P.C. KELLEY VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA, AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, ET. AL. 1ff. F3725:1288. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 934 See Case No. 748. (Exhibits apply to both cases.)
Case No. 935 See Case No. 764.
Case No. 945 FREDERICK CUTTLE, ET. AL., VS. THE HANFORD GAS AND POWER COMPANY. Decided January 11, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 946 THE SIXTEENTH STREET IMPROVEMENT CLUB VS. THE CITY COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided August 10, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 950 See Case No. 500.
Case No. 953 THE MODESTO AND EMPIRE TRACTION COMPANY VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 961 CITY OF SANTA BARBARA VS. SANTA BARBARA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 965 CHARLES KAPPER VS. THE ETNA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. Decided March 8, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 966 CITY OF PORTERVILLE VS. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided November 2, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 967 See Case No. 508.
Case No. 970 971 972 974 980 981 983 THE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO., ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., AND SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD CO.; 971 CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES VS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO., ET. AL.; 972 THE CITY OF PASADENA VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY CO., SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY, AND THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES; 974 THE CITY OF PASADENA VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD CO., ET. AL.; 980 THE CITY OF SAN GABRIEL VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD CO., ET. AL.; 981 CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA VS. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD, ET. AL.; AND 983 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY AND LOS ANGELES AND SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR JOINT TERMINAL FACILITIES IN LOS ANGELES. (1916-1945).
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 973 App. 2453 A.A. MILLER, PETER FARLEY, T.R. GOTH, AND THE FARMER'S SAFETY COMMITTEE, ET. AL., VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; AND APP. 2453 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MONTEREY COUNTY FOR AUTHORITY TO ABANDON A CERTAIN PUBLIC HIGHWAY KNOWN AS ALLISON ROAD NEAR WATSONVILLE JUNCTION IN MONTEREY COUNTY. Decided October 24, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 977 1021 CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES VS. THE MIDLANDS COUNTIES PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION; CASE 1021 CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES VS. THE MIDLANDS COUNTIES PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION. Dismissed September 8, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 984 CITY OF LOS ANGELES VS. THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided December 6, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 985 ELVINA S. BEALE, MARY A. CLEVERDON, MRS. M.H. ROOT, AMY K. NORTON AND MRS. C.E. WILSON VS. SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, RE REDUCTION ASKED FOR SCHOOL CHILDREN'S FARES. Decided November 14, 1916, further decision November 17, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 990 See Case No. 785.
Case No. 997 SWANTON AND SON VS. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided December 21, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 998 F. SLADELMANN VS. THE NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Decided January 11, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 999 F. HAMMOND VS. THE TUJUNGA WATER AND POWER COMPANY. Decided October 23, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1003 BEVERLY HILLS CORPORATION VS. THE BEVERLY HILLS UTILITIES COMPANY. Decided December 11, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1006 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION INTO RATES, RULES, AND PRACTICES OF PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY AND HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES RELATIVE TO PUBLIC TELEPHONES. Decided November 6, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1007 J.C. HARTMAN, ET. AL., VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided January 11, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Correspondence
Scope and Content Note
Exhibits
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1008 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 1021 See Case No. 977.
Case No. 1065 App. 2912 MONTE VISTA VALLEY BOARD OF TRADE, ET. AL., VS. THE WESTERN EMPIRE SUBURBAN FARMS ASSOCIATION; APP. 2912 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE WESTERN EMPIRE SUBURBAN FARMS ASSOCIATION, FOR AUTHORITY TO ADJUST AND INCREASE ITS WATER RATES. Decided January 21, 1918.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1071 PARTIAS COFFEE AND TEA COMPANY VS. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, THE LOS ANGELES TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, GODFREY HOLTERHOFF, F.W. BRAUN, AND W.S. HOOK, JR. Decided November 13, 1917, further decision December 13, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1074 J.C. MCINTIRE, ET. AL. VS. THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. Decided August 21, 1917.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1099 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 1109 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 1135 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 1149 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 1176 1426 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITIES DURING THE EMERGENCY CREATED BY WAR; CASE 1426 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN INITIATIVE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND THE DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSFER OF ELECTRICITY DURING THE PRESENT EMERGENCY CREATED BY THE POWER SHORTAGE. Decided June 22, 1917, with further decisions on March 18, 1918, May 2, 1918, and June 27, 1921.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1177 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN INITIATIVE, INTO THE SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE AND THE ECONOMIES OF OPERATION OF TRANSPORTATION COMPANIES IN CALIFORNIA DURING THE EMERGENCY CREATED BY THE WAR. Decided February 9, 1918.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1204 See Case No. 931.
Case No. 1225 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 1239 REBECCA M. RUGGLES, ET. AL., VS. O.A. ROBERTSON'S FAIR OAKS WATER SERVICE. Dismissed February 14, 1919.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1240 J.H. STEPHENS VS. O.A. ROBERTSON'S FAIR OAKS WATER SERVICE. Dismissed February 14, 1919.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1241 M.L. MEMMICK VS. O.A. ROBERTSON'S FAIR OAKS WATER SERVICE. Decided February 14, 1919.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1250 H. HANCOCK, C.B. FILLMORE, AND E.F. RANKIN, ET. AL., VS. THE EAST SIDE CANAL COMPANY, ET. AL. Decided June 3, 1919.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1263 See Case No. 930.
Case No. 1278 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 1373 REEDLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY VS. THE SANGER TELEPHONE COMPANY AND THE SETCHEL FRUIT COMPANY. Decided February 5, 1920.
Scope and Content Note
Evidence Collected by C.R.C.
Scope and Content Note
Exhibits
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1374 CITY OF TURLOCK VS. TURLOCK TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE COMPANY. Decided December 19, 1919.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1380 NAVELENCIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. THE REEDLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY. Dismissed May 17, 1920.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1390 AN INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN INITIATIVE INTO THE GAS SERVICE OF THE MIDWAY GAS COMPANY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, LOS ANGELES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, AND SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY. Decided December 19, 1919, further decision February 9, 1920.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1426 See Case No. 1176.
Case No. 1513 1535 1761 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 1851 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION ON ITS OWN INITIATIVE INTO THE ELECTRICAL RATES, SERVICE AND OPERATION OF COAST COUNTIES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided October 27, 1923.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 1989 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 2039 See series entry 19, INVESTIGATION WORKING PAPERS, 1916-1938.
Case No. 2041 See P.U.C. Map Book, and see series entry 19, INVESTIGATION WORKING PAPERS, 1916-1938.
Case No. 2042 See series entry 19, INVESTIGATION WORKING PAPERS, 1916-1938.
Case No. 2043 See series entry 19, INVESTIGATION WORKING PAPERS, 1916-1938.
Case No. 2044 See series entry 19, INVESTIGATION WORKING PAPERS, 1916-1938.
Case No. 2061 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 2124 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 2171 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 2221 See series entry 19, INVESTIGATION WORKING PAPERS, 1916-1938.
Case No. 2330 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 2349 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 2365 See P.U.C. Map Book.
Case No. 2747 LOS ANGELES GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION (exact title not known). Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 3020 See series entry 19, INVESTIGATION WORKING PAPERS, 1916-1938.
Case No. 3152 CITY OF SAN DIEGO VS. THE SAN DIEGO CONSOLIDATED GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided February 4, 1935.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 3154 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN MOTION INTO THE OPERATION OF THE VARIOUS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DOING BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. (INVESTIGATION OF ALL ASPECTS OF SHIPPING BY TRUCK-DUE TO THE INSTABILITY IN THE TRUCKING INDUSTRY CAUSED BY THE DEPRESSION AND THE NEED FOR RIGOROUS SUPERVISION OF WILDCATTERS AND A MORE INTELLIGENT DIVISION OF BUSINESS.) Decided October 10, 1932.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 3310 DISTRIBUTORS PACKING COMPANY, ET. AL., VS. THE McCLOUD RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, ET. AL. (Double deck sheep rates). Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 3424 See series entry 8, SPECIAL STUDIES, 1937-1960, S-11 and S-34.
Case No. 3990 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE COMMISSION'S OWN MOTION INTO THE RATES, RULES, REGULATIONS, CHARGES, CLASSIFICATIONS AND SERVICE, OR ANY OF THEM, OF THE KEYSTONE EXPRESS SYSTEM. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 4692 MERGER OF WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY AND POSTAL TELEGRAPH COMPANY (1943). See series entry 11, SPECIAL STUDIES, 1937-1960, S-373.
Case No. 4924 IN THE MATTER OF THE AMMENDMENT AND REVISION OF THE RULES AND PROCEDURE OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided March 1, 1950.
Scope and Content Note
Case No. 5012 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (1949). See series entry 12, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
Case No. 5736 TWIN LAKES ENTERPRISES (1956). See series entry 12, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
Case No. 5766 SAN JOAQUIN TELEPHONE COMPANY (1956). See series entry 12, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
Case No. 5928 PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY - TO EXTEND SERVICE IN THE VICINITY OF FRESNO (1959). See series entry 7, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
Case No. 5998 STINSON BEACH WATER COMPANY (1958). See series entry 12, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
Case No. 6087 PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY - TO EXTEND SERVICE IN THE VICINITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS (1959). See series entry 7, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
Case No. 6287 PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY (1959). See series entry 7, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
Case No. 6334 See series entry 17, WORKING PAPERS, 1958-1959.
Case No. 6387 PACIFIC WATER COMPANY (1960). See series entry 12, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
Case No. 8176 PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY (1965). See series entry 12, REPORTS ON THE OPERATION OF UTILITIES, 1949-1969.
6. FORMAL APPLICATIONS. 1912-1928.
Scope and Content Note
Reports
Scope and Content Note
Legal Documents
Scope and Content Note
Commissioner's Notes
Scope and Content Note
Memoranda
Scope and Content Note
Evidence Collected by C.R.C.
Scope and Content Note
Correspondence
Scope and Content Note
Transcripts
Scope and Content Note
Exhibits
Scope and Content Note
C.R.C. Engineer's Valuation
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 1 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND PERMISSION TO EXERCISE FRANCHISE RIGHT TO BE SECURED FROM THE CITY OF LINDSAY AND TO ISSUE BONDS HAVING THE FACE VALUE OF $40,000. Decided May 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 2Case No. 407 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH REVISED SYSTEM OF TOLL RATES THROUGH CALIFORNIA; and CASE 407 IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE RATES, CHARGES, RULES AND REGULATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE INTERCHANGE OF TELEPHONE SERVICE OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided March 23, 1912, with further decisions on April 24, 1912, November 14, 1912, December 20, 1913, January 7, 1914 and March 2, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 4 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE RIVERSIDE-REDLANDS INTERURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY. Dismissed April 12, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 5 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE HAWTHORNE ELECTRIC AND WATER COMPANY FOR THE ESTABLISHING OF RATES. Decided December 6, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
Exhibits
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 8 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF MILLER AND LUX INCORPORATED FOR PERMISSION TO CROSS A PUBLIC STREET IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, TO-WIT: KENTUCKY STREET, WITH A SPUR TRACK AT GRADE AND TO CROSS THE TRACK OF A STREET RAILROAD CORPORATION ON SAID KENTUCKY STREET, TO-WIT: THE UNITED RAILROADS COMPANY, WITH A SPUR TRACK AT GRADE. Decided April 26, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 14 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND HOME GAS COMPANY OF PORTERVILLE FOR FIRST: ORDER AUTHORIZING CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY TO PURCHASE HOME GAS COMPANY OF PORTERVILLE; SECOND: ORDER AUTHORIZING HOME GAS COMPANY TO SELL; THIRD: ORDER AUTHORIZING CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY TO ISSUE PREFERRED STOCK AND BONDS. Decided May 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 15 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY IN THE MATTER OF GAS TO BE SUPPLIED IN THE CITY OF EXETER AND IN THE COUNTY OF TULARE; ALSO FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING THE EXERCISE OF FRANCHISE RIGHTS TO BE SECURED FROM THE CITY OF EXETER AND THE COUNTY OF TULARE; ALSO FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS OF THE FACE VALUE OF $75,000. Decided May 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 16 25 28 121 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF THE METROPOLITAN WAREHOUSE COMPANY AND VARIOUS OTHER WAREHOUSE COMPANIES TO INCREASE THEIR RATES FOR STORING AND HANDLING COMMODITIES. Decided June 6, 1912, further decision December 12, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 27 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE HALF MOON BAY LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION OR CERTIFICATE TO OPERATE AND FRANCHISE AS OF APRIL 1, 1912. Decided August 7, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 32 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE MILL VALLEY AND MT. TAMALPAIS SCENIC RAILWAY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO ISSUE 1,500 SHARES OF CAPITOL STOCK. Decided August 23, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 33 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT ITS TRACK AT GRADE ACROSS TWELVE PUBLIC HIGHWAYS ON ITS MARYSVILLE-COLUSA BRANCH. Decided May 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 34 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS BONDS SECURED BY TRUST INDENTURE TO THE AMOUNT OF $4,117,000, AND THE EXCHANGE OF SAID BONDS FOR BONDS ISSUED ON OUTSTANDING, SECURED BY UNDERLYING MORTGAGES UPON THE PROPERTIES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. Decided May 24, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 35 Case 269 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND AUTHORIZATIONS TO EXERCISE RIGHTS OR PRIVILEGES UNDER FRANCHISES OR PERMITS HERETOFORE GRANTED OR HEARAFTER TO BE ACQUIRED IN THE COUNTIES OF SONOMA, SOLANO, NAPA AND MARIN AND THE CITIES OF SANTA ROSA, PETALUMA, SEBASTOPOL, NAPA, VALLEJO, AND OTHER CITIES, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 50-a, 50-b, AND 50-c OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT; CASE NO. 269 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY VS. GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY. Decided June 18, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 37 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SACRAMENTO AND WOODLAND RAILROAD COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT ITS TRACK AT GRADE, OVER THE TRACK OPERATED BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AT MEKON, YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Dismissed May 18, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 39 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE FRUIT GROWERS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT. (INVESTIGATION INTO THE REASONABLENESS OF RATES OF COMMON CARRIERS.) Decided July 11, 1916.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 41 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE QUINCY AND WESTERN RAILWAY TO INCREASE PASSENGER RATES. Decided June 26, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 45 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, GLOBE EXPRESS COMPANY, AND WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY EXPRESS, BY THEIR AGENT, F. G. AURIZ, FOR PERMISSION TO AMEND THE CLASSIFICATION OF FRUIT, GREEN, IN GAUZE, OR CLOTH COVERED BASKETS. Decided May 27, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 46 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE INDIAN VALLEY ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, IN AN ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUE OF STOCKS, AND DISCHARGING AND REFUNDING OF OBLIGATIONS, ETC. Decided August 23, 1912, further decision September 21, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 50 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR A CERTIFICATE THAT THE PRESENT AND FUTURE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRES THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ELECTRIC RAILROAD IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY BETWEEN THE CITY OF RED BLUFF, IN THE COUNTY OF TEHAMA, AND THE TOWN OF DIXON, IN THE COUNTY OF SOLANO. Decided August 8, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 51 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE STOCKTON TERMINAL AND EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING AN ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE FACE VALUE OF $65,000. Decided May 30, 1912, further decisions October 7, 1912, and November 5, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 54 58 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE STOCK OF HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY OF PASADENA; APP. 58 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SELL OR LEASE ITS TELEPHONE EXCHANGE AT PASADENA, CALIFORNIA TO THE HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY OF PASADENA. Decided July 13, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 56 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT ITS TRACK AT GRADE OVER (5) STREETS IN CHICO. Decided May 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 57 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SAN JOSE TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO ISSUE BONDS. Decided October 9, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 58 See App. No. 54.
App. No. 59 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SACRAMENTO AND WOODLAND RAILROAD COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT ITS TRACKS AT GRADE OVER THE TRACKS OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, IN THE CITY OF WOODLAND, YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided July 6, 1912, further decision November 10, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 62 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED, FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE IN RATES FOR ELECTRIC POWER IN THE UNINCORPORATED TOWNS OF ANDREW AND COLLINGWOOD, SHASTA COUNTY, AND IN THE INCORPORATED TERRITORY SURROUNDING THE INCORPORATED TOWNS OF KENNETT, REDDING, RED BLUFF, AND CORNING. Decided July 13, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 64 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION FOR CERTIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINES IN THE COUNTIES OF PLUMAS, BUTTE, AND SUTTER. Decided July 3, 1912, further decision October 8, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 65 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY - MARYSVILLE AND COLUSA BRANCH: FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS. Decided July 13, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 69 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT A LINE TO TRANSMIT AND DISTRIBUTE ELECTRICITY FROM BEAR RIVER IN PLACER COUNTY, THROUGH THE COUNTIES OF PLACER, SUTTER, NEVADA, YOLO, AND SOLANO, TO A POINT OPPOSITE CROCKETT IN THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided July 3, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 72 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NORTHERN WAREHOUSE COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE INCREASE OF STORAGE AND LOADING CHARGES. Decided May 28, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 74 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE LOMPOC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO SELL ITS ELECTRIC LIGHTING PLANT AND SYSTEM AT LOMPOC. Decided August 7, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 75 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSION OF DATE AUGUST 13, 1912, WHEREIN THE SAID COMPANY WAS GRANTED PERMISSION TO SELL AND ISSUE 30,000 SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK AND 7,500 SHARES OF STOCK. Decided August 13, 1912, further decisions September 27, 1912 and December 30, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 81 104Case No. 268 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SAN JOAQUIN LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR EXTENSION OF ITS TRANSMISSION LINES IN THE COUNTIES OF TULARE, KERN, AND KINGS, ETC.; APP. 104 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF TULARE COUNTY POWER COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY IN THE COUNTY OF TULARE AND CITIES OF LINDSAY, EXETER, AND TULARE; and CASE 268 MT. WHITNEY POWER AND ELECTRIC COMPANY VS. THE TULARE COUNTY POWER COMPANY AND THE SAN JOAQUIN LIGHT AND AND POWER COMPANY. Decided July 11, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 82 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE OCEAN SHORE RAILROAD FOR AUTHORITY TO ISSUE FIRST MORTGAGE BONDS ON FACE VALUE OF $700,000. Decided April 1, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 83 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SNOW MOUNTAIN WATER AND POWER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CHARGE RATES DIFFERENT FROM THE RATES SPECIFIED IN SCHEDULE FILED WITH SAID RAILROAD COMMISSION. Decided October 18, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 84 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT ITS RAILROAD AT GRADE OVER THE RAILROAD OPERATED BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AT AND NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF M AND FRONT STREET, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided June 17, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 85 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE LINDSAY HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO RAISE ITS EXISTING SUBURBAN RATE OF $18.00 PER ANNUM to $30.00 PER ANNUM. Decided July 13, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 86 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF BAKERSFIELD WATER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO ISSUE BONDS OF THE PAR VALUE OF $50,000 AND EXECUTE A FIRST MORTGAGE TO SECURE THE SAME. Decided June 20, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 87 88 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UTILITY COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF BONDS; APP. 88 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE LAKE HEMET WATER COMPANY, ET. AL. FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING SALE OF PROPERTY AND FRANCHISES AND CAPITAL STOCK UNDER SECTION 51-A AND 51-B OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT. Decided November 13, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 89 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE RAYMOND TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO RAISE TELEPHONE RATES FOR TELEPHONE SERVICES ON THE LINES OF SAID COMPANY BETWEEN RAYMOND AND THE PINES VIA COARSE GOLD AND FRESNO FLATS, IN MADERA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided December 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 97 IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY, AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA TRACTION COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT THEIR JOINT TRACK AT GRADE ON X STREET, BETWEEN EIGHTH STREET AND THIRTY-FIRST STREET, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided June 12, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 100 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH THE BROWN NEWS COMPANY. Denied June 17, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 104 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE TULARE COUNTY POWER COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY IN THE COUNTY OF TULARE AND THE CITIES OF LINDSAY, EXETER AND TULARE, ETC. Decided July 11, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 109 129 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PEOPLE'S WATER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUE OF NOTE AND ISSUE AND PLEDGE OF BONDS AS COLLATERAL SECURITY THEREFOR; APP. 129 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PEOPLE'S WATER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF NOTES AND ISSUE AND PLEDGE OF BONDS AS COLLATERAL SECURITY THEREFOR. Decided July 20, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 110 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY OF COVINA FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SELLING OF 369 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AS PER SECTION 52-B OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided September 17, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 111 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF POMONA VALLEY TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH UNION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTION THAT SUITABLE CONNECTIONS BE MADE BETWEEN THE TELEPHONE LINES OF THE SAID POMONA VALLEY TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH UNION AND THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSFERRING TOLL MESSAGES AND THAT TOLL SERVICE BE GIVEN ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CERTAIN PROPOSED AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF THE GOOD WILL AND BUSINESS OF THE PACIFIC COMPANY TO THE POMONA COMPANY. Decided July 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 112 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO CANCEL ITEMS 11 AND 12, PAGE 3, TARIFF 291(c) C.R.C. 33, NAMING RATES ON VARIOUS COMMODITIES BETWEEN BENICIA MAIL DOCK AND SACRAMENTO. Decided September 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 118 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JAMES H. MURRAY AND ED FLETCHER FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING AND PERMITTING AN INCREASE IN THE RENTALS, TOLLS, AND CHARGES FOR WATER FURNISHED BY THEM AND SERVICE RENDERED BY THEM IN FURNISHING WATER IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided July 1, 1913, further decision June 26, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
Evidence Collected by C.R.C.
Scope and Content Note
Exhibits:
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 122 See App. No. 16.
App. No. 123 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ROSEVILLE HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO RAISE THEIR RENTAL CHARGE ON FARMERS' LINES FROM 25¢ PER MONTH TO 50¢ PER MONTH. Decided December 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 125 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SCHWARTZ BROTHERS, W. R. CROCE AND COMPANY, AND VARIOUS OTHER COFFEE IMPORTERS AND BROKERS FOR A REHEARING AS TO THE PORTION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION MAKING ITS FORMER ORDER AS TO RATES AND CHARGES FOR STORING COFFEE RETROACTIVE. Decided July 1, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 126 130 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SANTA MARIA GAS AND POWER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE FACE VALUE OF $50,000; APP. 130 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SANTA MARIA GAS AND POWER COMPANY FOR PRELIMINARY ORDER FOR EXERCISE OF RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE UNDER FRANCHISES TO BE SECURED. Decided July 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 129 See App. No. 109.
App. No. 130 See App. No. 126.
App. No. 133 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SARATOGA TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO INCREASE RATES. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 135 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY, FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT ITS TRACK AT GRADE OVER THE TRACKS OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY ON NINTH STREET, IN THE CITY OF CHICO, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided July 20, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 137 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE WESTERN TELEGRAPH COMPANY TO FILE A CHANGE OF RATES IN THE PLACE AND STEAD OF ITEM NUMBER 8 OF SCHEDULE OF RATES FILED WITH SAID COMMISSION BY THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY ON APRIL 18, 1912. Decided August 24, 1912, further decision October 3, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 140 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF WESTERN STATES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE FACE VALUE OF $600,000. Decided September 20, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 144 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF BIG FOUR ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING APPLICANT TO ISSUE 100,000 SHARES AT THE PAR VALUE OF $100,000. Decided September 12, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 145 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY FOR A CERTIFICATE THAT THE PRESENT AND FUTURE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY, REQUIRE AND WILL REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXTENSION OF ITS TRANSMISSION LINE TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided July 13, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 146 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SACRAMENTO AND WOODLAND RAILROAD COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SPUR TRACK AT GRADE ACROSS MARIN STREET IN THE CITY OF WOODLAND, YOLO COUNTY. Decided July 13, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 147 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE MT. KONOCTI LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AFFECTING TOWNS IN LAKE COUNTY. Decided August 23, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 148 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF E.H. ROLLINS AND SONS, ANGLO CALIFORNIA TRUST COMPANY AND UNITED RAILROADS OF SAN FRANCISCO FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CAR EQUIPMENT TRUST. Decided September 7, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 151 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF COALINGA CONSOLIDATED WATER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO ISSUE BONDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. Decided August 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 154 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE LOS GATOS ICE, GAS, AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO SELL ITS ENTIRE PROPERTY WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, TO THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Decided August 23, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 156 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO ISSUE $500,000 FAIR VALUE OF FIVE YEAR 6% DEBENTURE NOTES. Decided August 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 159 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE UNION HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CORPORATION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE USE OF A PART OF THE CORPORATION'S BONDS NOW IN ITS TREASURY FOR PURPOSES AS APPLIED FOR IN THIS APPLICATION. Decided May 6, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 160 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SANTA BARBARA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO THE EXTENT OF $5,000. Decided September 7, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 163 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SAN DIEGO, RIVERSIDE AND LOS ANGELES RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS. Decided November 9, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 165 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND AUTHORIZATION TO EXERCISE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES UNDER FRANCHISE HEREAFTER TO BE ACQUIRED IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND THE CITIES OF VERNON AND COMPTON. Decided August 13, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 166 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE HALF MOON BAY LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO INCREASE CAPITALIZATION. Decided October 3, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 169 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MOUNTAIN WATER COMPANY FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SELL AND LEASE PROPERTY WITHIN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO. Decided September 12, 1912, further decision October 28, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 170 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE EMPIRE WATER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUES OF BONDS, AND IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF EMPIRE WATER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT A HYDRO-ELECTRIC PLANT NEAR COYOTE CREEK, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided October 2, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 171 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF E.W. CROSKY, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF REEDLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY, FOR PERMISSION TO ADJUST TELEPHONE RATES. Decided December 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 172 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO EXERCISE THE FRANCHISES HERETOFORE ACQUIRED BY IT AUTHORIZING THE DISTRIBUTION OF GAS IN THE CITY OF PORTERVILLE, THE CITY OF LINDSAY, AND THE COUNTY OF TULARE, ALL IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Decided August 2, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 173 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, THE CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA, AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A CERTAIN CONTRACT RELATING TO THE JOINT USE OF A LINE OF RAILROADS BETWEEN MOJAVE, IN KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND BAKERSFIELD, IN THE SAME COUNTY, AND FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE USE AND OPERATION OF SAID LINE OF RAILROAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUCH CONTRACT. Decided August 27, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 181 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN SIERRAS COMPANY, AN ELECTRICAL CORPORATION, FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY IN THE MATTER OF FRANCHISES GRANTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 135 OF THE COUNTY OF INYO. Decided September 16, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 183 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC LIGHT AND POWER CORPORATION FOR PERMISSION TO PURCHASE THE TANGIBLE PROPERTIES OF GLENDALE LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, TO SELL SAID PROPERTY TO PACIFIC LIGHT AND POWER CORPORATION. Decided October 9, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 184 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF EEL RIVER AND SOUTHERN TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FERNDALE, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE FILING, PUBLICATION AND APPLICATION OF CERTAIN TELEPHONE RATES IN LIEU OF THE RATES FILED WITH THE RAILROAD COMMISSION ON APRIL 10, 1912, AND THE SUPPLEMENTS THERETO FILED ON MAY 21, 1912, AND JUNE 20, 1912. Decided December 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 185 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO ESTABLISH ALL RATES ON LIVESTOCK ON A THIRTY-SIX FOOT CAR BASIS WITH PERCENTAGE SCALE FOR LONGER AND SHORTER CARS, IN LIEU OF PRESENT THIRTY FOOD CAR BASIS AND PERCENTAGE SCALE FOR LONGER CARS, AS NOW SHOWN IN SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, GENERAL FREIGHT DEPARTMENT TARIFF NUMBER 188-E, C.R.C. 1214. Decided September 20, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 187 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE BURBANK ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY AND G.H. DEACON FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING EXERCISE OF FRANCHISE RIGHTS, CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND ISSUE STOCK. Decided February 11, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 189 228 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF DOMESTIC WATER COMPANY OF SANTA MARIA FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUE OF STOCK AND BONDS; App. 228 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SANTA MARIA WATER WORKS FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF THE WHOLE OF ITS PLANT AND SYSTEM TO DOMESTIC WATER COMPANY OF SANTA MARIA. Decided February 11, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 195 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF FERNLEY AND LASSEN RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION AT GRADE OF ELEVEN CROSSINGS OVER PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, LASSEN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided August 27, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 196 See P.U.C. Map Book.
App. No. 197 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SANTA ROSA WATER WORKS, FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO BORROW AND TO SECURE SAME BY DEED OF TRUST, ETC. Decided September 12, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 198 See P.U.C. Map Book.
App. No. 200 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF T.G. SCHMEISER, ET. AL., FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ABANDONMENT OF PORTIONS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TRACKS IN THE TOWN OF DAVISVILLE, YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided September 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 202 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF MIDWAY GAS COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND AUTHORIZATIONS TO EXERCISE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES UNDER FRANCHISES HERETOFORE GRANTED. Decided February 20, 1913, further decision April 25, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 203 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC TARIFF BUREAU, F.W. GOMPH, AGENT, DATED JULY 22, 1912, MINIMUM CHARGE FOR ANY SINGLE LESS CARLOAD SHIPMENT OF EXPLOSIVES, AS DESCRIBED UNDER THAT HEAD IN CURRENT EXCEPTION SHEET, DOUBLE FIRST CLASS RATE FOR 100 LBS., BUT NOT LESS THAN $1.00. Decided September 25, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 204 213 216 231 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE FACE VALUE OF $68,000, STOCK OF PAR VALUE OF $36,200, AND FOR CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS OF THIS COMMISSION'S ORDER HERETOFORE MADE IN APPLICATION NO. 1, NO. 14, AND NO. 15; APP. 213 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND OF CONSOLIDATED HEAT, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY OF CONSOLIDATED HEAT, LIGHT, AND POWER COMPANY TO MAKE A STOCK AND BOND ISSUE: APP. 216 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING A STOCK AND BOND ISSUE TO FINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINES; APP. 231 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY TO ISSUE PREFERRED STOCK OF THE VALUE OF $30,000, 300 SHARES PAR VALUE $100.00 EACH. Decided October 3, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 205 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VALLEJO AND NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT ITS MAIN LINE TRACKS AT GRADE ACROSS CERTAIN STREETS AND HIGHWAYS IN THE TOWNS OF SUISUN, FAIRFIELD, AND VACAVILLE, SOLANO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; ALSO ACROSS CERTAIN INTERVENING PUBLIC HIGHWAYS IN SAID COUNTY BETWEEN SAID TOWNS. Decided August 29, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 206 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT A WYE TRACK AT GRADE ACROSS BIDWELL STREET, CITY OF FOLSOM, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided August 27, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 210 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR AN ORDER OF THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING IT TO ISSUE, SELL AND DELIVER, TO THE AMOUNT OF $5,000,000 ITS BONDS KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS GENERAL AND REFUNDING MORTGAGE SOLD BONDS (SERIES A, BEARING 5% INTEREST PER ANNUM, DUE JANUARY 1, 1942). WHICH BONDS ARE TO BE ISSUED UNDER AND SECURED BY ITS GENERAL AND REFUNDING MORTGAGE, DATED DECEMBER 1, 1911, EXECUTED BY SAID PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, TO BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, AND FRANK B. ANDERSON, INDIVIDUAL TRUSTEE. Decided September 14, 1914, further decision April 7, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 213 See App. No. 204.
App. No. 214 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VALLEJO AND NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT ITS TRACK AT GRADE IN M STREET AND ACROSS SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, AND SEVENTH STREETS, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA; ALSO TO CROSS AT GRADE TRACKS OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY RAILWAY TO THE INTERSECTION OF M STREET WITH THIRD AND SEVENTH STREET IN SAID CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA. Decided September 10, 1912, further decision January 15, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 216 See App. No. 204.
App. No. 218 IN THE MATTER OF THE ARROWHEAD RESERVOIR AND POWER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF $4,000,000 WORTH OF BONDS. Decided February 4, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 219 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO ISSUE ITS REFUNDING MORTGAGE DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 1911, TO THE AMOUNT OF $5,285,000 FACE VALUE. Decided October 16, 1912, further decision November 2, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 227 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER UNION FOR AUTHORITY TO RECEIVE PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION FROM CARRIERS IN EXCHANGE FOR ADVERTISING SPACE. Decided October 8, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 228 See App. No. 189.
App. No. 231 See App. No. 204.
App. No. 233 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE COLLINS COMMERCIAL COMPANY FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY. Decided September 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 235 See P.U.C. Map Book.
App. No. 236 IN THE MATTER OF WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY FOR CONSTRUCTION AND RELIEF CONCERNING THE SHIPMENT OF SPIRITOUS LIQUORS TO AND DELIVERY THEREOF IN THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS. Dismissed January 15, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 237 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY AND OF NORTH SACRAMENTO LIGHT AND WATER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OF THE NORTH SACRAMENTO LIGHT AND WATER COMPANY TO GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY. Decided October 14, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 239 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SUTTERBUTTE CANAL COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO ISSUE AND DELIVER CERTAIN OF ITS BONDS, AND RATIFYING AND APPROVING CERTAIN ACTS AND THINGS ON THE PART OF SAID CORPORATION HERETOFORE DONE AND PERFORMED. Decided October 23, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 240 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO DISCONTINUE ALL IRREGULAR AND DISCRIMINATORY EXCHANGE RATES AND TO APPLY TO ALL SUBSCRIBERS THE STANDARD RATES IN EFFECT AT ITS VARIOUS EXCHANGES. Dismissed January 15, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 246 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NORTHERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS. Decided November 18, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 247 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF MILLER AND LUX INCORPORATED AND WEST SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY WATER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY AND ISSUE OF CAPITOL STOCK. Decided December 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 248 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SANTA BARBARA AND SUBURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT FOR A CERTIFICATE THAT THE PRESENT AND FUTURE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW STREET RAILROAD IN SANTA BARBARA AND A CERTIFICATE THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION OF A STREET RAILROAD UNDER A CERTAIN FRANCHISE GRANTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA TO R.H. GAUD. Decided October 29, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 249 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF R.H. GAUD AND THE SANTA BARBARA AND SUBURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND TRANSFER OF A FRANCHISE FOR A STREET RAILWAY IN THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA. Decided December 29, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 252 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO INCREASE PASSENGER FARE BETWEEN SAN FRANCISCO AND BROADWAY WHARF, OAKLAND. Decided January 10, 1913, further decision April 24, 1913. (Deals in part with the danger of automobile fires on ferryboats.)
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 258 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF J.H. EVANS FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE. Dismissed January 15, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 262 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF TUJUNGA WATER AND POWER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE FACE VALUE OF $300,000. Decided April 7, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 264 See P.U.C. Map Book.
App. No. 268 See P.U.C. Map Book.
App. No. 271 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF F.W. GOMPH, AGENT FOR CARRIERS, FOR PERMISSION TO ADVANCE THE ESTIMATED WEIGHT ON MINERAL ORE IN PACIFIC FREIGHT TARIFF BUREAU CIRCULAR 3-C C.R.C. 66. Decided November 18, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 273 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CALIFORNIA - MICHIGAN LAND AND WATER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO EXERCISE FRANCHISE, AND FOR EXTENSIONS. Decided January 15, 1913, further decision January 23, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 274 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF L.W. WARMOTH TO SELL AND THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY TO PURCHASE A TELEPHONE SYSTEM. Decided December 6, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 275 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING A CHANGE IN THE LOCATION OF A CROSSING AT GRADE OF A PUBLIC HIGHWAY KNOWN AS SLOUGH ROAD OVER THE TRACK OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY IN SISKIYOU COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided December 20, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 277 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF W.L. CHILDERS FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING HIM TO LEASE THE CRESCENT CITY WATER WORKS AND GIVEN AN OPTION THEREIN TO PURCHASE TO JAMES H. OWEN, AND BY THE LATTER ASSIGN THE SAME TO THE MOUNTAIN POWER COMPANY. Decided June 30, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 278 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SAN JOAQUIN LIGHT AND POWER CORPORATION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS. Decided November 26, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 281 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE ALL THE ISSUE CAPITAL STOCK AND BONDS OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY, AND UPON THE ACQUISITION OF SAID STOCK AND BONDS TO ACQUIRE ALL THE PROPERTY OF THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY, AND OF THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SELL ITS PROPERTY TO THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY WHEN THE COMPANY SHALL HAVE ACQUIRED ALL THE STOCK AND BONDS OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY, INTERVENTION OF THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA. Decided February 7, 1913, further decision April 3, 1918.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 283 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE UNITED RAILROADS OF SAN FRANCISCO FOR PERMISSION TO ISSUE AND SELL TWO MILLION THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS, SIX PERCENT FIVE-YEAR NOTES, THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF WHICH ARE TO BE APPLIED TOWARD PAYMENT AND DISCHARGE OF THREE MILLION DOLLARS OF THE 6% BONDS OF THE MARKET STREET CABLE RAILWAY COMPANY AND THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS OF THE 6% BONDS OF THE CLIFF HOUSE RAILWAY COMPANY, BOTH BOND ISSUES MATURING JANUARY 1, 1913. Decided February 4, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 284 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE MARKET STREET RAILWAY COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO ISSUE 2,150 FIVE PERCENT GOLD BONDS, AND DEPOSIT THE SAME AS COLLATERAL TO SECURE 2,350 SIX PERCENT GOLD NOTES OF UNITED RAILROADS OF SAN FRANCISCO. Decided February 4, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 286 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTH-WESTERN HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY OF REDLANDS TO RAISE TELEPHONE CHARGES. Decided December 30, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 287 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE MT. WHITNEY POWER AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING AN ISSUE OF $250,000.00 OF BONDS. Decided November 18, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 288 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE LITTLE ROCK POWER AND WATER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION AUTHORIZING IT TO ISSUE STOCKS AND BONDS. Dismissed February 3, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 290 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CITY OF TURLOCK, STANISLAUS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT A PUBLIC HIGHWAY AT GRADE ACROSS THE TRACK OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ON JULIAN STREET, CITY OF TURLOCK, STANISLAUS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided November 29, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 291 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CARRIERS PARTIES TO PACIFIC FREIGHT TARIFF BUREAU EXCEPTION SHEET 1-C, C.R.C. NO. 70, OF F.W. GOMPH, AGENT, FOR PERMISSION TO ALTER CLASSIFICATION SO AS TO INCREASE RATES AND CHARGES. Decided May 6, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 296 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE OAKLAND, ANTIOCH AND EASTERN RAILWAY FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT SUBGRADE CROSSINGS UNDER THE TRACKS OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, NEAR McAVOY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided December 13, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 297 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE FRESNO CITY WATER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING AN ISSUE OF $150,000 OF BONDS. Decided November 4, 1912.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 301 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DIVISIONS OF JOINT RATES ESTABLISHED BY THE COMMISSION IN ITS DECISION IN APPLICATION 301, CASE 359, CASE 379, AND CASE 380, SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (COAST DIVISION), AND SIERRA RAILWAY OF CALIFORNIA. Decided January 30, 1914, further decision September 4, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 303 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ANTELOPE CREEK AND RED BLUFF WATER COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF NOTES. Decided January 8, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 304 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE WESTERN STATES GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE FACE VALUE OF $397,000. Decided January 10, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 306 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ANGEL'S FLIGHT RAILWAY COMPANY TO ISSUE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF $100,000. Decided April 25, 1913, further decisions October 2, 1913, and December 20, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 309 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE FREEPORT TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO MAKE AN INCREASE IN RATES FOR LOCAL SWITCHES FOR SUBSCRIBERS. Decided April 23, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 311 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF FARMERS WAREHOUSE COMPANY TO ISSUE 665 SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AT PAR. Decided January 30, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 312 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SWEETWATER WATER COMPANY TO INCREASE RENTALS, TOLLS, AND CHARGES FOR WATER IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CITY OF NATIONAL CITY. Decided date unknown.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 321 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF W.W. WILCOX, DAN JOHNSON AND O.L. EMERY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THEM TO SELL A CERTAIN WATER SYSTEM NEAR COTTON, CALIFORNIA, TO THE CLARA VISTA WATER COMPANY; PERMITTING SAID CORPORATION TO PURCHASE SAID WATER SYSTEM; PERMITTING $29,700 PAR VALUE OF ITS CAPITAL STOCK AND TO CREATE AND ISSUE $60,000 PAR VALUE IN CORPORATE BONDS, TO BE SECURED BY A DEED OF TRUST AND PERMITTING IT TO PAY FOR SAID WATER SYSTEM $29,700 PAR VALUE OF ITS CORPORATE STOCK AND $60,000 PAR VALUE OF ITS CORPORATE BONDS. Decided April 19, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 324Cases 347 348 352 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAYS FOR AN ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION TO INCREASE THE INDIVIDUAL MONTHLY COMMUNTATION FARES BETWEEN SAN LEANDRO AND HAYWARD AND BETWEEN SAN LEANDRO AND SAN LORENZO, AS SHOWN IN ITEMS 123 AND 125, LOCAL PASSENGER TARIFF NO. 1, C.R.C., NO. 3, BY LIMITING THE FARES TO SAN LEANDRO, DAVIS STREET; ALSO APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO CHANGE ITEM NO. 22 IN SAME TARIFF TO READ SAN LEANDRO (WESTERN LIMITS) INSTEAD OF SAN LEANDRO AND MAKING FARES READ SAME AS OAKLAND (EASTERN LIMITS), AND THUS INCREASING CERTAIN ONE-WAY FARES AND ESTABLISHING SAN LEANDRO (DAVIS STREET AS THE END OF THE ZONE) INSTEAD OF SAN LEANDRO; CASE 347 HERMAN G. WALKER VS. SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY; CASE 348 HAYWARD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VS. THE SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY; AND CASE 352 JAMES MATHESON VS. THE SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY. Decided March 24, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 327 See P.U.C. Map Book.
App. No. 336 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE STOCKTON TERMINAL AND EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE FACE VALUE OF $378,000. Decided March 20, 1913, with further decisions on November 5, 1913, February 19, 1914, and July 28, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 337 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PALERMO LAND AND WATER COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO MAKE INCREASE IN CHARGES FOR WATER SUPPLIED FOR DOMESTIC PURPOSES, IRRIGATIONS AND OTHER LEASES IN AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE TOWN OF PALERMO, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Decided December 31, 1913, further decision September 23, 1915.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 339 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF TERRA BELLA CITY WATER COMPANY TO PURCHASE AND OF TERRA BELLA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO SELL THE WATER PLANT AND SYSTEM OF TERRA BELLA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND THE TERRA BELLA CITY WATER COMPANY TO ISSUE 150 SHARES OF ITS CAPITAL STOCK TO SAID TERRA BELLA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY IN PAYMENT THEREFOR. Decided April 25, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 344 378 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SAN DIEGO CONSOLIDATED GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUE OF BONDS. Decided March 8, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 347 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR EXERCISE OF RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES UNDER FRANCHISE HERETOFORE GRANTED TO SAID COMPANY IN THE CITY OF STOCKTON; AND FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF LINES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE IN THAT PORTION OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SURROUNDING THE CITY OF STOCKTON AND LYING WITHIN THE CONSTANT DISTANCE OF TWO MILES FROM THE CITY LIMITS THEREOF. Decided August 15, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 349 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO ISSUE REFUNDING MORTGAGE FIFTY YEAR GOLD BONDS UNDER ITS MORTGAGE DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 1911 of $7,034,000. Decided April 8, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 350 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING IT TO ISSUE, SELL AND DELIVER TO THE AMOUNT OF $2,500,000 ITS BOND BEARING INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 5% PER ANNUM DUE NOVEMBER 1, 1939, WHICH BONDS ARE TO BE ISSUED UNDER AND SECURED BY TRUST INDENTURE DATED NOVEMBER 1, 1909, EXECUTED BY SAID SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TO HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, TRUSTEES. Decided June 20, 1913, with further decisions August 25, 1913, January 24, 1914, August 12, 1914, August 15, 1914, and September 15, 1914.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 352 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT A PUBLIC HIGHWAY AT GRADE ACROSS THE TRACKS OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY NEAR THE CITY OF PALO ALTO. Decided July 23, 1913.
Scope and Content Note
App. No. 357 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO ISSUE ITS FIRST MORTGAGE 5% SINKING FUND FORTY YEAR GOLD BONDS TO AN AMOUNT OF THE FACE VALUE OF PRINCIPAL OF SUCH BONDS SUFFICIENT AT THE PRICE AT WHICH SAID BONDS MAY BE SOLD, TO NET $3,971,731.00. Decided March 11, 1913, further decisions May 2, 1913, September 3, 1913, December 30, 1913, May 22, 1914, and December 22, 1914.
Scope and Content Note