Jump to Content

Collection Guide
Collection Title:
Collection Number:
Get Items:
John Stalker Longwell papers
WRCA 104  
View entire collection guide What's This?
Search this collection
Collection Details
 
Table of contents What's This?
  • Descriptive Summary
  • Access
  • Publication Rights
  • Preferred Citation
  • Biography
  • Collection Scope and Contents
  • Collection Number
  • Index
  • Title Index
  • Indexing Terms

  • Descriptive Summary

    Title: John Stalker Longwell papers
    Date (inclusive): bulk 1910-1960
    Collection Number: WRCA 104
    Extent: 8 linear feet 17 boxes
    Repository: Rivera Library. Special Collections Department.
    Riverside, CA 92517-5900
    Languages: English.

    Access

    Collection is open for research.

    Publication Rights

    Copyright has not been assigned to the Water Resources Collections and Archives. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Director of Distinctive Collections. Permission for publication is given on behalf of the Water Resources Collections and Archives as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the reader.

    Preferred Citation

    [identification of item], [date if possible]. John Stalker Longwell papers (WRCA 104). Water Resources Collections and Archives. Special Collections & University Archives, University of California, Riverside.

    Biography

    John Stalker Longwell, F. ASCE
    Died March 25, 1960
    John Stalker Longwell, the son of Oliver H. and Mary (Stalker) Longwell, was born in Shenandoah, Iowa, on December 13, 1887. He was graduated from Highland Park College (Des Moines) in 1908 with the degree of Bachelor of Science in engineering, and from Cornell University (Ithaca) in 1910 with a degree in civil engineering.
    Upon his graduation, Mr. Longwell worked on several projects for the United States Reclamation Service, including the construction of the Shoshone Hydroelectric Plant, Wyoming, in 1922. In 1924 he joined the East Bay Municipal Utility District in Oakland, Calif., as Division Engineer on the East Bay Aqueduct. He became Assistant Chief Engineer and Assistant General Manager in 1929, and was Chief Engineer and General Manager of the District from 1934 until his retirement in 1949. From that time until his death, he maintained a consulting office in Oakland. In addition, he served as consultant for many water control organizations, including the San Francisco Bay Area Water Pollution Control Board (1949 to 1958).
    Mr. Longwell was President of the San Francisco Section of the Society in 1952; a member of the AWWA, the East Bay Engineers' Club; and Sigma Xi.
    On July 16, 1917, he was married to Martha Dorothea Ploeger in Salt Lake City, Utah. He is survived by his widow; two sons, John Ploeger and Robert Stalker; a daughter, Barbara Louise (Mrs. David Hurst Thomas); and seven grandchildren.
    Mr. Longwell was elected a Junior of the Society on October 3, 1911; an Associate Member on May 12, 1919; a Member on October 14, 1929; and a Fellow on June 6, 1959. He became a Life Member in 1954.
    Abstract of a memoir prepared by Robert C. Kennedy, F. ASCE.

    Collection Scope and Contents

    This collection consists chiefly of reports, handwritten notes and typewritten correspondence written and gathered by John S. Longwell. Although a few papers are from his early work (1910-1920) with the U. S. Reclamation Service, the main body deals with projects he became involved with as a consulting engineer, from his retirement in 1950 as General Manager and Chief Engineer at the East Bay Municipal Utility District, until his death early in 1960. His principal projects include the American River, Folsom and the Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
    The collection has been organized in a simple manner, being first divided into the various projects and put in order alphabetically by name, with the name usually being designated by locale. Within each project, items are ordered chronologically. Although occasionally an attempt has been made to keep the item in the order that Longwell made use of it, the majority have been cataloged strictly in order of publication or manuscript date.
    An item is the smallest unit of the collection; despite the fact that an item functions as a single unit, it may actually consist anywhere from a single letter to several documents stapled together.
    Because this is a manuscript collection, place of publication has been noted only for those materials actually published.
    Tables, being common to almost every item, have not been specifically listed in the illustration statement, unless their extent warrants specific notice.
    Two indexes, one concentrating on subjects and authors, the other concentrating on titles, complete the key.
    It should also be noted here that whereas the American River Project papers concentrate on the Upper American River, or North Fork, that this section also includes all papers concerning the city and county of Sacramento. Mr. Longwell himself considered Sacramento a separate project, but it was too difficult to differentiate the projects, so that everything on the American River and Sacramento are combined.
    Finally, a folder containing biographical and historical material has been placed at the beginning of the papers. A brief description of the contents is as follows: a short biography, an abstract by R. Kennedy; a biographical statement entitled, Qualification of witness; a 1918 application for admission to the Coast Artillery School; 3 obituaries & 8 letters re the papers.
    Circulating copies in the regular collection exist for the following items: 2.4, 2.5, 2.16, 2.25, 2.27, 2.29, 2.42, 4.10, 7.3, 12.8, 12.12, 19.2, 27, 28.9, 28.10, 28.13, 28.14, 29.2, 29.4, 30, 33.1, 33.3-5, 33.8, 33.10, 33.22, 33.24, 33.44, 33.57.

    Collection Number

    Collection number updated February 2019. Legacy collection number was MS 80/12. This change was part of a project in 2018/2019 to update the collection numbers for collections in the Water Resources Collections and Archives.

    Index

    This index includes authors, titles and subjects. All places are in California, unless stated otherwise. The numbers given refer to item number. Note: The titles in this section represent added entries only. For all titles, see the Title Index.
    A & E contract
    38.2 38.2
    Accinelli, Thomas F.
    1 1
    Air Engineering Inc.
    33.48 33.48
    Air valves
    33.47 33.47
    Alameda County
    9.3, 9.3,
    9.4, 9.4,
    9.5, 9.5,
    31.4 31.4
    Alameda County Land Development Commission
    9.5 9.5
    American Geophysical Union
    33.2 33.2
    American Pipe and Construction Co.
    33.7, 33.7,
    33.49 33.49
    American Piper
    33.7 33.7
    American River
    2.8, 2.8,
    2.13 2.13
    Middle Fork
    2.11, 2.11,
    2.18, 2.18,
    2.45 2.45
    North Fork
    2 2
    South Fork
    2.9, 2.9,
    2.18, 2.18,
    2.34, 2.34,
    2.36, 2.36,
    2.37, 2.37,
    2.45, 2.45,
    2.71 2.71
    American River Basin
    2.11, 2.11,
    2.21, 2.21,
    2.27, 2.27,
    2.29, 2.29,
    2.30, 2.30,
    2.32, 2.32,
    2.42, 2.42,
    2.46, 2.46,
    2.53 2.53
    American River Basin investigation, report on development proposed for the California water plan
    2.29 2.29
    American River development: Sacto. - SMUD cooperation
    2.9 2.9
    American River substitute plan
    2.37 2.37
    American River water rights hearing
    2.43, 2.43,
    2.47-64, 2.47-64,
    2.67, 2.67,
    2.72 2.72
    American Society of Civil Engineers
    2.15, 2.15,
    24.1, 24.1,
    33.3 33.3
    American Water Works Association
    14.5, 14.5,
    29.6, 29.6,
    37.3 37.3
    Anderson, Keith A.
    33.2 33.2
    Annex 32
    39.4, 39.4,
    39.6, 39.6,
    39.8 39.8
    Annex 41
    39.3 39.3
    Auburn-Folsom South Unit, CVP
    12.12 12.12
    B. I. F. Pacific, Inc.
    33.46 33.46
    Banks, Harvey O.
    2.30, 2.30,
    2.32, 2.32,
    2.36, 2.36,
    2.63, 2.63,
    2.75 2.75
    Barbarossa, Nicholas L.
    24.1 24.1
    Bechtel Corp.
    2.73, 2.73,
    2.74, 2.74,
    2.77 2.77
    Behavior of Ranney water collectors
    33.3 33.3
    Ben Ali Water Co.
    12.19 12.19
    Bench flume conduit
    2.37 2.37
    Bismarck, N.D.
    20.3 20.3
    Bonner, Frank E.
    2.2, 2.2,
    2.9, 2.9,
    2.11, 2.11,
    2.13, 2.13,
    2.16, 2.16,
    2.18, 2.18,
    2.35, 2.35,
    2.42, 2.42,
    2.70, 2.70,
    2.71 2.71
    Boyle Engineering
    6 6
    Brockway Hot Springs, Lake Tahoe
    3 3
    Builders Iron Foundry SEE B. I. F.
    Calaveras County
    4.10 4.10
    Calaveras County Water District
    4 4
    Calaveras Public Utility District
    4.4, 4.4,
    4.7, 4.7,
    4.8 4.8
    California. Department of Finance
    12.6, 12.6,
    33.20 33.20
    California. Department of Fish and Game
    2.24, 2.24,
    2.52, 2.52,
    2.53, 2.53,
    2.55, 2.55,
    2.67 2.67
    California. Department of Public Health
    4.2 4.2
    Bureau of Sanitary Engineering
    4.1 4.1
    California. Department of Public Works. Division of Water Resources
    30 30
    California. Department of Water Resources
    2.36, 2.36,
    2.41, 2.41,
    2.46, 2.46,
    2.75, 2.75,
    5, 5,
    22.11, 22.11,
    33.51 33.51
    Division of Resources Planning
    41 41
    California. Engineer Department
    34.4 34.4
    California. Laws, statutes, etc.
    2.3, 2.3,
    4.2, 4.2,
    15.10, 15.10,
    22.11 22.11
    California. Public Utilities Commission
    14.2 14.2
    California. State Department of Water Resources
    2.42 2.42
    California. State Engineer
    33.36 33.36
    California. State Water Board
    2.40, 2.40,
    2.41, 2.41,
    2.54, 2.54,
    33.40, 33.40,
    33.41 33.41
    California. State Water Bulletin #21
    2.27 2.27
    California. State Water Resources Board
    2.25, 2.25,
    2.26, 2.26,
    2.29-31, 2.29-31,
    30 30
    California. State Water Rights Board
    2.44, 2.44,
    2.48, 2.48,
    2.49, 2.49,
    2.52, 2.52,
    2.78 2.78
    California Administrative Code
    22.11 22.11
    California Central Valleys Flood Control Association
    30 30
    California Cooperative Snow Surveys Program
    41 41
    California Districts Securities Commission
    9.1 9.1
    California Water and Telephone Company
    15.18 15.18
    California water plan, 1950-
    2.25, 2.25,
    2.29, 2.29,
    2.41, 2.41,
    2.46, 2.46,
    29.3, 29.3,
    30 30
    Carlsbad Municipal Utility District
    6 6
    Carmichael Irrigation District
    12.9 12.9
    Carr, James K.
    2.15, 2.15,
    2.17, 2.17,
    2.18, 2.18,
    2.21, 2.21,
    2.26, 2.26,
    2.28, 2.28,
    2.31, 2.31,
    2.36, 2.36,
    2.40, 2.40,
    2.54 2.54
    Central Valley
    7.2 7.2
    Channels Friction
    24.1 24.1
    Civil defense
    37, 37,
    39 39
    Clark & Heafey
    24 24
    Clay Water District
    2.57, 2.57,
    12.13 12.13
    Climatology Calif.
    10.2, 10.2,
    24.3 24.3
    Coloma
    2.9 2.9
    Colorado
    40 40
    Colorado River
    7.3 7.3
    Colorado River Aqueduct
    28.2, 28.2,
    28.15 28.15
    Colorado River Storage Project
    28.14 28.14
    Columbia Steel Co., Pittsburgh
    7 7
    Comparative effect on water rates of the present methods of refunding advances for construction
    14.2 14.2
    Consolidated Western Steel Corp.
    7.1 7.1
    Constant, Paul
    15.19 15.19
    Contra Costa County Water District
    8 8
    Contract NOy 80060
    38.4 38.4
    Cotton, John S.
    2.29 2.29
    Coyote Dam
    33.10, 33.10,
    33.12, 33.12,
    33.16, 33.16,
    33.18, 33.18,
    33.24, 33.24,
    33.43 33.43
    Costs
    33.19 33.19
    Coyote Project
    33.11, 33.11,
    33.20 33.20
    Coyote Reservoir
    33.8, 33.8,
    33.21 33.21
    Coyote Valley SEE Coyote.
    Cunan, L. R.
    9.6 9.6
    Dahl, Arve H.
    39.5, 39.5,
    39.7 39.7
    Dams Calif.
    22.11 22.11
    Dams Laws & legislation
    22.11 22.11
    Davis, E. K.
    2.45 2.45
    Del Este Water Co.
    14.4 14.4
    Desolation Valley
    2.11 2.11
    Downey, Stephen W.
    2.8 2.8
    Dreyer, Walter
    2.41 2.41
    Dry Creek Project
    33.34, 33.34,
    33.41, 33.41,
    33.48, 33.48,
    33.51 33.51
    Charles L. East & Associates
    33.34, 33.34,
    33.36, 33.36,
    33.48, 33.48,
    33.51 33.51
    Fast Bay Council on Surveying and Mapping
    9.6 9.6
    East Bay Municipal Utility District
    4.4, 4.4,
    9, 9,
    22.7 22.7
    Water Resources and Planning Division
    36.4 36.4
    Einstein, Hans Albert
    24.1 24.1
    El Cajon Valley
    15.19 15.19
    El Cerrito Creek
    10 10
    El Dorado County
    2.28, 2.28,
    2.56 2.56
    El Dorado Irrigation District
    11 11
    Elk Grove, Galt and Clay Water Districts
    12.13 12.13
    Elk Grove Irrigation District
    2.57, 2.57,
    12.13 12.13
    Engineering Review Board
    31.4, 31.4,
    31.7 31.7
    Fairbairn, E. A.
    2.65 2.65
    Feather River Project
    4.9, 4.9,
    30 30
    Filters and filtration
    16 16
    Fish Calif.
    2.55, 2.55,
    2.67 2.67
    Fisher, H. Buford
    9.5 9.5
    Fisheries Calif.
    2.53 2.53
    Flood damage Calif.
    24.4 24.4
    Folsom Dam
    12.1, 12.1,
    12.18 12.18
    Folsom North Unit Costs
    12.8 12.8
    Folsom Project SEE Folsom Unit
    Folsom Reservoir Project SEE Folsom Unit
    Folsom Unit, CVP
    2.63, 2.63,
    12 12
    Friedgen, R. D.
    15.16 15.16
    Galt Irrigation District
    2.57, 2.57,
    12.13 12.13
    Generators, portable
    37.8 37.8
    Georgetown Divide Public Utility District
    2.24, 2.24,
    2.35, 2.35,
    2.56, 2.56,
    2.75, 2.75,
    2.78 2.78
    Gerlishe, T. O.
    33.15 33.15
    Greybull Valley Improvement District
    32.2 32.2
    Groundwater
    12.4, 12.4,
    33.3 33.3
    H St. filtration plant
    2.65 2.65
    Hagar, Crosby, Crosby & Vendt
    10 10
    Halcombe, N. M.
    34.2 34.2
    Hamilton Air Force Base
    13 13
    Hastings, J. H.
    12.17 12.17
    Hawthorne, Nev.
    38 38
    Maps
    38.1 38.1
    Helix Irrigation District
    15 15
    Hill, Clair A.
    2.30, 2.30,
    2.50 2.50
    Hill, L. K.
    2.78 2.78
    Hill, Raymond A.
    28.13 28.13
    Holmgren, Richard S.
    28.9 28.9
    Holsinger, Henry H.
    2.67, 2.67,
    2.78 2.78
    Homebuilders Council of California
    14 14
    Howlett, Herbert A.
    33.27 33.27
    Hurlbut, W. W.
    7.3 7.3
    Hydrometry
    19.2 19.2
    Hynes & Bowser
    1 1
    Ice House
    2.34, 2.34,
    2.73, 2.73,
    2.76 2.76
    Idaho
    19 19
    Idaho Society of Engineers
    19.3 19.3
    Indenco Engineers
    13, 13,
    21, 21,
    38.1, 38.1,
    38.4 38.4
    Infiltration
    33.2 33.2
    Irrigation Calif.
    12.15 12.15
    Irrigation Costs
    33.10 33.10
    Irrigation Drainage
    34.1 34.1
    Jaybird afterbay
    Powerhouse
    2.77 2.77
    Tunnel
    2.73, 2.73,
    2.76 2.76
    Jones Fork Diversion Dam
    2.37 2.37
    Junction Dam
    2.18 2.18
    Kazmann, Raphael G.
    33.2, 33.2,
    33.3 33.3
    Kelley, Don W.
    2.53 2.53
    Kirkwood, Robert C.
    31.6, 31.6,
    31.7 31.7
    Kleps, Ralph N., comp.
    15.10 15.10
    Kyburz
    2.1 2.1
    Lafayette
    17 17
    Lake Cascade
    22.6, 22.6,
    22.9, 22.9,
    22.12 22.12
    Lake Tahoe
    3 3
    Lakeside
    15.28 15.28
    La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District
    15 15
    Layton, Raymond E.
    16 16
    R. E. Layton & Associates
    25, 25,
    26 26
    Loon Lake
    2.11, 2.11,
    2.18 2.18
    Lowry, Ralph
    20.2 20.2
    McCaffrey, Jas E.
    2.14, 2.14,
    2.19, 2.19,
    2.54 2.54
    McGrath, Sam
    2.61 2.61
    McNevin, W. D.
    17, 17,
    22.5 22.5
    MacRostie, Wayne
    2.61 2.61
    Mad River
    33.41 33.41
    Marin County Sanitary District No. 2
    18 18
    Marin Municipal Water District
    13.4 13.4
    Marliave, Chester
    2.22 2.22
    Metropolitan Water District
    28.2, 28.2,
    28.15 28.15
    Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Mo.
    15.19 15.19
    Miller, Gordon W.
    33.44, 33.44,
    33.45, 33.45,
    33.54 33.54
    Milpitas County Water District
    29.5 29.5
    Minidoka Project, Idaho
    19 19
    Costs
    19.1 19.1
    Missouri Diversion Unit
    20 20
    Missouri River Basin Project
    20 20
    Missouri - Souris Basin
    20 20
    Modesto
    34.4 34.4
    Map
    34.4 34.4
    Mokelumne River
    4.4 4.4
    Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
    21 21
    Naval Ammunition Depot, Hawthorne, Nev.
    38 38
    New Hampshire Water Works Assoc. Journal
    33.1 33.1
    Nichols, Paul L.
    33.14, 33.14,
    33.16, 33.16,
    33.21, 33.21,
    33.23, 33.23,
    33.24 33.24
    Nimbus Dam
    12.18 12.18
    North Bay Aqueduct
    33.27 33.27
    North Sacramento
    2.72 2.72
    Norton, A. C.
    4.8 4.8
    Oakdale Map
    34.4 34.4
    Olmstead, Frederick Law
    27 27
    Report on Sacramento parkways, Part II: relative importance and urgency of parkway developments in various localities
    27 27
    Operating and financial statistics: 40 California water utilities
    14.2 14.2
    Orinda Country Club
    22 22
    Owens-Illinois Glass Co., San Francisco
    23 23
    Pacific Coast Aggregates
    24 24
    Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
    2.4 2.4
    Pacific Indemnity Co.
    10.1 10.1
    Panhorst
    10.3 10.3
    Peavine Diversion
    2.18, 2.18,
    2.42 2.42
    Petaluma
    25 25
    Pipes
    33.7, 33.7,
    33.56 33.56
    Costs
    32.5 32.5
    Placer County
    2.58 2.58
    Population Calif.
    2.23, 2.23,
    12.6, 12.6,
    15.5 15.5
    Port Chicago
    8.2 8.2
    Portland, Oregon
    35.1-4 35.1-4
    Bureau of Water Works
    35.4 35.4
    Power Calif.
    2.20, 2.20,
    2.23, 2.23,
    2.47 2.47
    Proposed bond issue for major transmission facilities for the La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District: staff report
    15.15 15.15
    Pumping plants Calif.
    15.25 15.25
    Pumping systems Calif.
    15.26 15.26
    Pyramid Diversion Dam
    2.37 2.37
    Pyramid Peak
    2.1 2.1
    Raasch, D. G.
    15.16, 15.16,
    15.19 15.19
    Ramsey, W. W.
    36.4 36.4
    Ranney Method Water Supplies
    33.1, 33.1,
    33.6, 33.6,
    33.9 33.9
    Recreational use of water areas Calif.
    2.53, 2.53,
    27, 27,
    33.22 33.22
    Redding
    27 27
    Reinke, E. A.
    4.1 4.1
    Report for SMUD: DWR substitute plan (Peavine Div.)
    2.42 2.42
    Report on future water requirements of the City of Sacramento
    2.9 2.9
    Report on the California Water Plan
    2.41 2.41
    Reservoirs Cost
    33.8 33.8
    Reynolds, Robin R.
    2.50 2.50
    Riverton
    2.1 2.1
    Rockbound Reservoir
    2.54 2.54
    Rorabaugh, M. I.
    33.2, 33.2,
    33.6 33.6
    Rothert, Harlow P.
    18 18
    Rothwell, Webber D.
    12.10 12.10
    Rowe, G. Robinson
    10.3 10.3
    Rubicon River Basin
    2.2, 2.2,
    2.18, 2.18,
    2.20, 2.20,
    2.73 2.73
    Russian River
    33 33
    Russian River Aqueduct
    33.44, 33.44,
    33.53-58 33.53-58
    Russian River Dam
    33.12 33.12
    Russian River Water Supply Project
    33.16, 33.16,
    33.28, 33.28,
    33.57 33.57
    Sacramento
    2.9, 2.9,
    2.43, 2.43,
    2.59, 2.59,
    2.64, 2.64,
    2.65, 2.65,
    2.68, 2.68,
    2.72, 2.72,
    2.75, 2.75,
    2.78, 2.78,
    12.18 12.18
    Office of the City Engineer
    2.68 2.68
    Sacramento County
    2.8, 2.8,
    2.38, 2.38,
    2.60, 2.60,
    2.64, 2.64,
    2.72, 2.72,
    12.15, 12.15,
    12.17 12.17
    Agricultural Extension Service
    12.13 12.13
    Board of Supervisors
    12.17 12.17
    Sacramento County Water Agency
    12.8, 12.8,
    12.9 12.9
    Sacramento Municipal Utility District
    2 2
    (About)
    2.14, 2.14,
    2.16, 2.16,
    2.42 2.42
    Board of Engineers
    2.22 2.22
    Sacramento River
    27 27
    Sacramento River and Delta Water Association
    2.61 2.61
    Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    30 30
    Sacramento sewage treatment plant
    2.43 2.43
    San Benito County
    31.4 31.4
    San Diego Aqueduct
    28.6 28.6
    San Diego County
    28.9 28.9
    San Diego County Water Authority
    28 28
    Board of Enginners
    28.13 28.13
    Costs
    28.11 28.11
    San Francisco
    29 29
    Public Utilities Commission
    29.2, 29.2,
    29.5-7 29.5-7
    Water Department
    29 29
    San Francisco Bay Area
    36, 36,
    7.2 7.2
    Bibliography
    36.4 36.4
    Maps
    9.6 9.6
    San Francisco Bay Area Studies
    36 36
    San Jose Water Works
    14.4 14.4
    San Rafael
    13.2 13.2
    Santa Clara-Alameda-San Benito Water Authority
    31.3 31.3
    Santa Clara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
    31 31
    Santa Rosa
    33.18, 33.18,
    33.29, 33.29,
    33.32, 33.32,
    33.44, 33.44,
    33.58, 33.58,
    33.59 33.59
    Maps
    33.59 33.59
    Saunders et al. vs. Armstrong et al.
    10 10
    Sawmill Reservoir
    2.11 2.11
    Scott, Gordon N.
    33.58 33.58
    Sedelmeyer, H. A.
    2.11 2.11
    Sewer pipe
    40 40
    Sewerage Calif.
    17 17
    Shaad, Paul
    2.70, 2.70,
    2.71 2.71
    Shelton, M. J.
    15.15 15.15
    Shoshone Project, Wyoming
    32 32
    Sierra Club
    2.24 2.24
    Silitch, Eugene W.
    33.1 33.1
    Silver Creek Project
    2.2, 2.2,
    2.18, 2.18,
    2.20, 2.20,
    2.36 2.36
    Sloan, W. G.
    28.8 28.8
    Sly Park Reservoir
    2.12 2.12
    Smith, Neal D.
    33.31 33.31
    Snow surveys
    41 41
    Sonoma County
    33.11, 33.11,
    33.12, 33.12,
    33.19, 33.19,
    33.30-32, 33.30-32,
    33.59 33.59
    Planning Commission
    33.4 33.4
    Maps
    33.59 33.59
    Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
    33 33
    South Bay Aqueduct
    31.4 31.4
    South San Joaquin Irrigation District
    34 34
    Southern California
    7.3 7.3
    Southern California Water Company
    15.20 15.20
    Southern Pacific Company
    1, 1,
    10 10
    Southern San Joaquin Municipal Utility District
    35.5, 35.5,
    35.6 35.6
    Spencer, C. H.
    2.63 2.63
    Stanislaus River
    9.1 9.1
    Station Creek Diversion Dam
    2.37 2.37
    Steele, I. C.
    2.18, 2.18,
    2.22, 2.22,
    2.42 2.42
    Stewart, J. C.
    32.2 32.2
    Stockton and East San Joaquin Water Conservation District
    2.62 2.62
    Stone & Youngberg
    9.7, 9.7,
    33.8, 33.8,
    33.11, 33.11,
    33.19 33.19
    Streams Percolation
    33.6 33.6
    Substitute plan, American River Basin
    2.42 2.42
    Surface water
    33.9 33.9
    Sweetwater District
    15.18 15.18
    Tax statistics
    12.17 12.17
    Tri-Dam Project
    9.1 9.1
    Trowbridge, C. R.
    32.1, 32.1,
    32.4 32.4
    Tudor Engineering Co.
    4.10 4.10
    Turlock Maps
    34.4 34.4
    Turner, James H.
    29.5, 29.5,
    29.6, 29.6,
    29.8 29.8
    Uhl, William F.
    20.2 20.2
    Ultimate water service by EBMUD in southern Alameda County: outline of report to EBMUD
    9.5 9.5
    Union Valley Dam
    2.11 2.11
    United Concrete Pipe Corp.
    35 35
    U. S. Bureau of Reclamation
    2.63, 2.63,
    2.66, 2.66,
    2.68, 2.68,
    2.78, 2.78,
    12.18, 12.18,
    36 36
    U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs
    28.14 28.14
    U. S. Corps of Engineers. (Army).
    13.3, 13.3,
    33.5, 33.5,
    33.43 33.43
    U. S. Department of the Army. Secretary
    33.5 33.5
    U. S. Federal Civil Defense Administration
    37 37
    Engineering Services Division
    37.5 37.5
    U. S. Federal Power Commission
    2.7, 2.7,
    2.14 2.14
    U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    12.12 12.12
    U. S. Geological Survey
    2.1 2.1
    U. S. National plan for civil defense and defense mobilization
    39.3 39.3
    U. S. National Water Plan
    39.4, 39.4,
    39.6 39.6
    U. S. Naval Ammunition Depot, Hawthorne, Nev.
    38 38
    U. S. Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization
    39.2, 39.2,
    39.3 39.3
    U. S. Public Health Service
    39 39
    Water Supply and Water Pollution Control Program
    39.6, 39.6,
    39.8 39.8
    U. S. Reclamation Service
    19.2, 19.2,
    40 40
    U. S. Weather Bureau
    10.1, 10.1,
    10.2 10.2
    Upper Sunshine Dam, Wyo.
    32.2 32.2
    Vacuum breakers
    33.47 33.47
    Vitrified sewer pipe specifications
    40 40
    Walnut Creek
    17.1 17.1
    Warner, George H.
    2.55 2.55
    Water economics Calif.
    29.4 29.4
    Water main extension rule
    14 14
    Water pipeline Costs
    33.24 33.24
    Water pollution
    37 37
    Water pricing Calif.
    28.12, 28.12,
    29.1, 29.1,
    29.5 29.5
    Water resources Calif.
    7.1 7.1
    Water resources development Calif.
    2.28, 2.28,
    2.29, 2.29,
    2.42, 2.42,
    4.10, 4.10,
    9.7, 9.7,
    12.15 12.15
    Water supply
    33.6 33.6
    Water supply Calif.
    2.20, 2.20,
    2.35, 2.35,
    2.46, 2.46,
    4.2, 4.2,
    7.3, 7.3,
    9.4, 9.4,
    13.4, 13.4,
    22.4, 22.4,
    23, 23,
    28.2, 28.2,
    28.7-10, 28.7-10,
    28.13, 28.13,
    29.6, 29.6,
    29.8 29.8
    Water supply Oregon
    35.4 35.4
    Water supply, Industrial
    33.4 33.4
    Water supply, Industrial Calif.
    23 23
    Water supply problems in southern Alameda County
    9.4 9.4
    Water supply systems Calif.
    15.1, 15.1,
    15.8, 15.8,
    15.15, 15.15,
    33.29, 33.29,
    33.53 33.53
    Map
    15.6 15.6
    Water supply systems Nev.
    38.3, 38.3,
    38.4 38.4
    Water use Calif.
    2.23, 2.23,
    28.2, 28.2,
    28.5 28.5
    Watersheds Hydrology
    2.20 2.20
    Watters, Clarence
    15.22 15.22
    Wehe, Roy A.
    29.4 29.4
    Weinland, H. A.
    33.10 33.10
    Wells
    33.1, 33.1,
    33.2 33.2
    White Rock
    2.7, 2.7,
    2.54 2.54
    Wildlife Calif.
    2.53 2.53
    Wohler Bridge
    33.9, 33.9,
    33.35, 33.35,
    33.58 33.58
    Woodard, Orval L.
    33.31 33.31
    Wright, C. V.
    39.4 39.4
    Youngquist, C. V.
    33.3 33.3

    Title Index

    Account history of Orinda Country Club, from East Bay Municipal Utility District
    22.7 22.7
    Agreement between Calaveras Public Utility District and East Bay Municipal Utility District, relating to the Mokelumne River
    4.4 4.4
    Agreement between Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Santa Rosa
    33.18, 33.18,
    33.29 33.29
    Agreement for cooperative study with Santa Clara
    31.3 31.3
    Agreement for Longwell to provide consulting services
    33.33 33.33
    Agreement for sale of water between San Francisco and Milpitas County Water District
    29.5 29.5
    Agreement on compensation for Longwell's services
    33.39 33.39
    American River Basin investigation, report on development proposed for the California water plan
    2.29 2.29
    American River development: Sacto. - SMUD cooperation
    2.9 2.9
    American River Project cost estimates
    2.13 2.13
    Analysis of El Cajon Valley Grid conducted on McIlroy network analyzer at Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Missouri
    15.19 15.19
    Analysis of the industrial possibility of Sonoma County, based on the development of an adequate system served by the Russian River
    33.4 33.4
    Annex 41: summary of annexes
    39.3 39.3
    Annex 32: National water plan
    39.4, 39.4,
    39.6, 39.6,
    39.8 39.8
    Annual report, PG & E
    2.4 2.4
    Annual report, Southern California Water Co.
    15.20 15.20
    Annual report and financial statement, La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District
    15.3, 15.3,
    15.11 15.11
    Application for license: Upper American River Project
    2.14 2.14
    Application for preliminary permit for project on the South Fork of the American River
    2.71 2.71
    Application for water supply for resale purposes
    29.8 29.8
    Area, population, and water consumption studies bibliography: supplement
    36.4 36.4
    Assignment for Coyote Valley Project
    33.20 33.20
    Authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to construct, operate, and maintain the Colorado River Storage Project and participating projects: supplemental report to accompany H.R. 3383
    28.14 28.14
    A Base map for the East Bay
    9.6 9.6
    Behavior of Ranney water collectors
    33.3 33.3
    Bid assessments for engineering firms
    2.69 2.69
    Blueprints of Main distribution canal and distribution system
    34.5 34.5
    Briefs and correspondence on the American River water rights hearing
    2.72 2.72
    Calaveras County water development: preliminary report and plan for Calaveras County Water District, San Andreas, California
    4.10 4.10
    Calaveras Public Utility District, Calaveras County: general map of project
    4.8 4.8
    The California water plan for the American River Basin: water supply and summary of works and accomplishments of basic plan
    2.46 2.46
    Centrifugal pipe descriptions, etc.
    33.7 33.7
    Civil defense alert
    37.1 37.1
    Classification of terms used in drainage of irrigated lands
    34.1 34.1
    Climatological data, California
    10.2, 10.2,
    24.3 24.3
    Colorado River: aqueduct news
    28.15 28.15
    Comments on East report
    33.51 33.51
    Comments on reply by Charles East & Associates to State Engineer's letter of June 7, 1956
    33.36 33.36
    Comments on report submitted by Charles L. East & Associates to State Department of Water Resources, dated October 3, 1957, and dealing with proposed Dry Creek Project
    33.51 33.51
    Committee report on a water study in the Elk Grove, Galt and Clay areas in Sacramento County, 1956
    12.13 12.13
    Comparative effect on water rates of the present methods of refunding advances for construction
    14.2 14.2
    Computations and data developed in preparation of Southern Alameda County report
    9.4 9.4
    Computations and supporting data for Board of Engineers' report
    2.20 2.20
    Computations for the engineering study of off-site water supply, Hamilton Air Force Base: supplement
    13.4 13.4
    Contract relating to Sacramento Municipal Utility District Upper American River Project reservoirs
    2.66 2.66
    Contracts, including 3 priority releases and 2 assignments for the appropriation and diversion of the waters of the American River
    2.75 2.75
    Contracts for water service
    12.19 12.19
    Control and use of Russian River water: a report on the financial feasibility of the proposed Coyote Valley Reservoir and utilization of Russian River water in Sonoma County
    33.8 33.8
    Correspondence
    1, 1,
    2.8, 2.8,
    2.24, 2.24,
    2.27, 2.27,
    2.38, 2.38,
    2.39, 2.39,
    2.43, 2.43,
    2.51, 2.51,
    2.54, 2.54,
    2.79, 2.79,
    3, 3,
    4.3, 4.3,
    4.5, 4.5,
    4.9, 4.9,
    7.1, 7.1,
    8.1, 8.1,
    10.4, 10.4,
    12.10, 12.10,
    12.14, 12.14,
    13.1, 13.1,
    14.1, 14.1,
    15.4, 15.4,
    15.9, 15.9,
    15.12, 15.12,
    15.17, 15.17,
    15.21, 15.21,
    15.23, 15.23,
    18, 18,
    20.3, 20.3,
    22.2, 22.2,
    22.10, 22.10,
    23, 23,
    24.2, 24.2,
    28.1, 28.1,
    28.12, 28.12,
    31.2, 31.2,
    31.5, 31.5,
    32.3, 32.3,
    33.13, 33.13,
    33.23, 33.23,
    33.50, 33.50,
    33.38, 33.38,
    35.2, 35.2,
    35.5, 35.5,
    36.1, 36.1,
    37.2, 37.2,
    37.3, 37.3,
    37.4, 37.4,
    37.6, 37.6,
    37.7, 37.7,
    39.1 39.1
    Cost and rate analysis, San Francisco Water Department, for City and County of San Francisco
    29.4 29.4
    Criteria for determining air valve sizes required as vacuum breakers
    33.47 33.47
    Data on peak demands for Folsom North service area
    12.2 12.2
    Decision by California State Water Rights Board on applications 12323, 12624 and 14963 to appropriate waters of the American River
    2.67 2.67
    Decision on major applications to appropriate water from the American River system
    2.78 2.78
    Digest of engineering study of the off-site water supply for Hamilton Air Force Base, Marin County, Calif.
    13.4 13.4
    Distribution system map of La Mesa
    15.6 15.6
    Dry Creek Project as proposed by East & Associates
    33.34 33.34
    Economic report: use of Russian River water for recreation
    33.22 33.22
    Electrical estimate for the proposed water system, Sonoma County Flood Control
    33.15 33.15
    Engineering study for the development of additional water supply for the Naval Ammunition Depot, Hawthorne, Nev.
    38.4 38.4
    Engineering study of the off-site water supply for Hamilton Air Force Base, Marin County, Calif.
    13.4 13.4
    Engineering report to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District
    6 6
    Exhibits for the American River water rights hearing
    2.49, 2.49,
    2.55-64 2.55-64
    Exhibits on the general investigation of the water main extension rule, case no. 5501
    14.2 14.2
    Expense statements
    2.10, 2.10,
    5, 5,
    9.2, 9.2,
    21, 21,
    28.4 28.4
    Folsom Dam diversion facilities
    12.1 12.1
    Folsom North filtration plant: notes and correspondence
    12.3 12.3
    Folsom South Unit, Central Valley Project, California: a report on the feasibility of water supply development
    12.12 12.12
    Future water supply requirements and facilities for La Mesa Irrigation District: supplement to report of December 1, 1953
    15.14 15.14
    General Manager's report to San Diego County Water Authority
    28.8 28.8
    Graphs and tables on San Diego County Water Authority water consumption
    28.5 28.5
    Groundwater elevation
    12.4 12.4
    Harnessing the Upper American River: a talk before the Sacramento Section, American Society of Civil Engineers
    2.15 2.15
    Helix water distribution system chart: profile of lines.
    15.1 15.1
    Hydrometric data and practice on Minidoka Project
    19.3 19.3
    Hydrometry
    19.2 19.2
    Index to sectional maps of La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District map
    15.28 15.28
    The Induced infiltration of river water to wells
    33.2 33.2
    Information on the Upper American River Project of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District
    2.17 2.17
    Investigation and report on the municipal water system for the city of Petaluma, Calif.
    25 25
    Investigation and report on the municipal water system for the city of Redding, Calif.
    26 26
    Lake Cascade spillway modifications
    22.9 22.9
    Laws and standards relating to domestic water supply: excerpts from the California Health and Safety Code, the Water Code, and Standards of minimum requirements, American Water Works Association
    4.2 4.2
    Letter
    to E. A. Fairbairn, March, 1957
    2.65 2.65
    to Clair A. Hill, May 31, 1956
    2.30 2.30
    to Clair A. Hill, November 30, 1956
    2.50 2.50
    to Robert Kirkwood, February, 1960
    31.6 31.6
    to Raymond E. Layton, June 9, 1958
    16 16
    to W. D. McNevin, February 22, 1955
    22.5 22.5
    to G. W. Miller, March 26, 1957
    33.45 33.45
    to G. W. Miller, October 7, 1958
    33.54 33.54
    to Mr. Panhorst, February-March, 1950
    10.3 10.3
    to M. J. Shelton, August 7, 1953
    15.7 15.7
    to J. C. Stewart on Upper Sunshine damsite for Greybull Valley Improvement District, Basin, Wyoming, August 23, 1921
    32.2 32.2
    to United Concrete Pipe Corp., November 15, 1951
    35.3 35.3
    from Arve H. Dahl, November 25, 1958
    39.5 39.5
    from E. K. Davis, November 23, 1956
    2.45 2.45
    Local climatological data
    10.1 10.1
    Lock joint concrete pipe: estimated cost of manufacture and placing
    32.5 32.5
    Main South Side Canal concrete lining: comparative unit costs
    19.1 19.1
    Map of Modesto, Turlock, Oakdale and South San Joaquin Irrigation Districts
    34.4 34.4
    Map of the La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District
    15.27 15.27
    Memorandum on co-ordination of Sacramento Municipal Utility District power operations with Sacramento water needs
    2.9 2.9
    Miscellany on proposed and existing San Diego facilities
    28.6 28.6
    Municipal Utility District Act
    2.3 2.3
    Municipal Water District act of 1911
    15.10 15.10
    The National plan for civil defense and defense mobilization
    39.2 39.2
    News clippings
    2.6, 2.6,
    15.29, 15.29,
    28.3, 28.3,
    31.8, 31.8,
    33.12 33.12
    The North Bay Aqueduct
    33.27 33.27
    Notes on field trip in connection with UARP, June 20-21, 1956
    2.53 2.53
    Notes on inspection trip with Clarence Watters
    15.22 15.22
    Notes on study pertaining to the elimination of the existing P-1 pumping plant of the Helix zone
    15.25 15.25
    Notes on the determination of sizes and time of flow of the main and branch canals in the distribution system.
    34.2 34.2
    Notes
    2.73, 2.73,
    4.6, 4.6,
    8.2, 8.2,
    11, 11,
    12.5, 12.5,
    12.11, 12.11,
    13.2, 13.2,
    15.5, 15.5,
    15.13, 15.13,
    20.1, 20.1,
    22.1, 22.1,
    22.3, 22.3,
    22.8, 22.8,
    24.5, 24.5,
    31.1, 31.1,
    33.25, 33.25,
    33.26, 33.26,
    33.37, 33.37,
    33.52, 33.52,
    35.1 35.1
    and correspondence on southern Alameda County report
    9.3 9.3
    and correspondence on Russian River Aqueduct pipeline repairs
    33.55 33.55
    and letter of October 8, 1916
    34.3 34.3
    and map on San Rafael fire protection
    13.2 13.2
    chiefly on hydraulic studies
    10.5 10.5
    correspondence and map on sewer system for Lafayette, Calif., property of W. D. McNevin
    17.1 17.1
    map, expense statements and Indenco credit rating reports
    38.1 38.1
    on exhibits of water main extension rules
    14.3 14.3
    on Ice House Project
    2.76 2.76
    on Lake Cascade, etc.
    22.6 22.6
    on meetings with Neal D. Smith and Orval L. Woodard, Santa Rosa, November 23, 1956
    33.31 33.31
    on Portland, Oregon
    35.4 35.4
    on SMUD: South Fork American River conduit, etc.
    2.37 2.37
    on San Diego County Water Authority and Metropolitan Water District
    28.2 28.2
    on the Folsom East service area, Sacramento County, Calif.
    12.16 12.16
    on Wohler Intake
    33.35 33.35
    Official statement of the Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in connection with the sale of. 1955 Coyote Valley Dam bonds
    33.19 33.19
    Official statement of the Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in connection with the sale of. 1955 water transmission system bonds, Series A
    33.30 33.30
    On-site water system: pilot study
    13.3 13.3
    Onion Creek alternative
    2.70 2.70
    Operating and financial statistics: 40 California water utilities
    14.2 14.2
    Operating contract relating to Folsom and Nimbus Dams and their related works and to diversions of water by the City of Sacramento: regional office draft
    12.18 12.18
    Operation and repair of water facilities in civil defense emergencies
    37.5 37.5
    Orinda Country Club, Lake Cascade: proposed lowering of spillway crest map
    22.12 22.12
    Outline of proposed direct presentation by SMUD: applications 12323, 12624 and 14963
    2.47 2.47
    Outline of San Francisco Bay Area Studies
    36.2 36.2
    Outline of testimony before State Water Rights Board
    2.44 2.44
    Photos, with notes on portable generators
    37.8 37.8
    Place of Ranney collectors in the water supply industry
    33.1 33.1
    A Plan for developing an alternate water supply for the Georgetown Divide Public Utility District
    2.35 2.35
    Plans and specifications for the pipeline,. pumping plant house and terminal reservoir for 1955 Russian River water transmission system, Aqueduct no.1
    33.53 33.53
    Plates on future power needs of Sacramento Municipal Utility District
    2.23 2.23
    The Policy of the City, and County of San Francisco relative to the California water plan
    29.3 29.3
    Population studies for Folsom North Unit
    12.6 12.6
    Port Chicago quadrangle map
    8.2 8.2
    Preliminary layout of ultimate power development, Loon Lake to Sawmill Reservoir
    2.11 2.11
    Preliminary outline of study on plan for development of Folsom East service area
    12.16 12.16
    Preliminary statement to Board of Directors, Helix Irrigation District. in La Mesa, August 12, 1958
    15.24 15.24
    Preparation for hearing before State Water Board
    33.40 33.40
    Preview of the California water plan
    2.25 2.25
    Profile plan of proposed development: Middle Fork of American River, Calif.
    2.11 2.11
    Progress report: financing the Coyote Valley Project and a diversion and transmission system for Sonoma County
    33.11 33.11
    Progress statement on use in Santa Clara, Alameda and San Benito Counties that may be obtainable from the South Bay Aqueduct of the state
    31.4 31.4
    Proposed addenda to agreement between Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Santa Rosa, dated June 8, 1956
    33.32 33.32
    Proposed bond issue for major transmission facilities for the La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District: staff report
    15.15 15.15
    Proposed changes in water transmission system, Russian River Aqueduct no. 1
    33.44 33.44
    Proposed list of exhibits, American River hearing before the State Water Rights Board
    2.48 2.48
    Proposed operation of Coyote Valley Reservoir
    33.21 33.21
    Proposed water main extension regulations
    14.3 14.3
    Proposed water transmission lines map
    33.17 33.17
    Public hearings on Dry Creek and the Mad River applications
    33.41 33.41
    Publications and articles on pipes, with regard to aqueduct repairs
    33.56 33.56
    Qualification of witness, John S. Longwell
    33.40 33.40
    Qualifications of witnesses: American River hearing before the Water Rights Board, State of California
    2.52 2.52
    Rate schedules for water service
    29.1 29.1
    Relation of Upper American River Project, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, to El Dorado County water development, presented to Board of Supervisors, El Dorado County
    2.28 2.28
    Report, SMUD
    2.5 2.5
    Report, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
    29.2 29.2
    Report for S M.U D.: D. W. R. substitute plan (Peavine diversion)
    2.42 2.42
    Report for SMUD on Rubicon-Silver Creek Project
    2.2 2.2
    Report for SMUD on Upper American River Project
    2.16 2.16
    Report of water right applications affecting fisheries, wildlife, and recreational resources of the American River Basin
    2.53 2.53
    Report on advisibility of establishing parkways along Sacramento River and its tributaries consistent with Chapter 1422, Statutes of 1945
    27 27
    Report on cathodic protection investigation for the Russian River Aqueduct no. 1, from Wohler Bridge to the City of Santa Rosa
    33.58 33.58
    Report on Dry Creek Project, applications 12917-12918
    33.48 33.48
    Report on engineering and economic feasibility for Russian River Project, Petaluma Aqueduct
    33.57 33.57
    Report on feasibility of Feather River Project and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta diversion projects proposed as features of the California water plan
    30 30
    Report on flood conditions along El Cerrito Creek near Southern Pacific crossing as of January 16 and 17, 1950
    10.7 10.7
    Report on future water requirements of the City of Sacramento
    2.9 2.9
    Report on future water supply requirements and facilities for the La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District
    15.8 15.8
    Report on Missouri Diversion Unit, Missouri River Basin Project
    20.2 20.2
    Report on pipe line construction of South San Joaquin Municipal Utility District, Units 1 and 2
    35.6 35.6
    Report on preliminary engineering investigations concerning flooding of gravel pits of Pacific Coast Aggregates, Inc. on January 12, 1952 and allowed damage to adjacent lands
    24.4 24.4
    Report on Sacramento parkways, Part II: relative importance and urgency of parkway developments in various localities
    27 27
    Report on sewerage system
    17.2 17.2
    Report on substitute plan, American River Basin
    2.42 2.42
    Report on the California water plan
    2.41 2.41
    Report on the feasibility of supplying irrigation water to the Santa Rosa plain from the proposed Russian River - Coyote Dam Project
    33.10 33.10
    Report on the operations and management of the Calaveras Public Utility District for the two-year period ended June 30, 1951
    4.7 4.7
    Report on the probable extent. of authority area, the amount and source of additional water supply required, and the system required to efficiently deliver authority water to the agencies comprising that area
    28.9 28.9
    Report on Upper American River Project
    2.22 2.22
    Reports on leakage allowance
    33.49 33.49
    Reports on rules governing drainage bridges and on Burley transmission line
    19.2 19.2
    Resolution No. 285 re American River Basin investigation
    2.32 2.32
    Review of Bulletin no. 21, a publication of the State Water Rights Board, State of California, entitled "American River Basin investigation, report on development proposed for the California water plan"
    2.29 2.29
    Review of data submitted with letter of August 27, 1956, from the State Director of Water Resources, to Mr. James K. Karr sic, Assistant General Manager, SMUD
    2.36 2.36
    Review of layout for pumping system to the Aldwych and Fletcher Hills tanks of the Helix District
    15.26 15.26
    Review of November 24, 1958 draft, addressed to A. H. Dahl
    39.7 39.7
    Review of proposed irrigation developments in southern Sacramento County, California
    12.15 12.15
    Review of proposed revised water main extension rules submitted by California Water Service Co., San Jose Water Works and Del Este Water Co., October, 1959
    14.4 14.4
    Review of proposed rules for main extensions as prepared by Committee of California Section, American Water Works Association
    14.5 14.5
    Review of "Report on hydrogeological survey. Wohler Bridge site"
    33.9 33.9
    Review of water supply problems for Orinda Country Club
    22.4 22.4
    Review of water supply requirements and available sources of supply for the San Francisco Bay region and Central Valley
    7.2 7.2
    Reviews of reports on the Stanislaus River
    9.1 9.1
    Revision of report on water for southern Alameda County, prepared by Alameda County Land Development Committee
    9.5 9.5
    River channel roughness
    24.1 24.1
    River filtration as a source of ground water supply
    33.3 33.3
    Rubicon-Silver Creek Project: supplement to report of July 24, 1950
    2.21 2.21
    Rules and regulations governing water service to customers
    29.7 29.7
    Rules and regulations pertaining to supervision of dams in California
    22.11 22.11
    Russian River, California: Letter from.
    33.5 33.5
    Russian River Project: Coyote Dam
    33.43 33.43
    Russian River Project: Coyote Valley Dam, and diversion and transmission systems
    33.16, 33.16,
    33.24 33.24
    Russian River Project: proposed water supply, diversion and transmission facilities
    33.28 33.28
    Russian River Project, Zone no. 5
    33.14 33.14
    Sacramento County tax statistics; a compilation of tax rates
    12.17 12.17
    Sacramento Municipal Utility District: invitation, instructions to bidders, bid and contract forms, specifications, and drawings: turbines, governors, shut-off valves and appurtenant equipment for Jaybird powerhouse, Upper American River Project
    2.77 2.77
    Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Upper American River Project, preliminary design report for first stage construction
    2.74 2.74
    Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Upper American River Project, supplemental memoranda and reports
    2.18 2.18
    Sacramento sewage treatment plant
    2.43 2.43
    San Francisco Bay Area Studies work program schedule
    36.3 36.3
    San Francisco water and power systems: general map
    29.6 29.6
    San Francisco's water supply
    29.6 29.6
    Santa Rosa, Calif. map
    33.59 33.59
    Saunders et al. vs. Armstrong et al.
    10.6 10.6
    Schedule regarding project scope and report
    38.2 38.2
    Sonoma County Map
    33.59 33.59
    Staff report: proposed bond issue for major transmission facilities for the La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District
    15.15 15.15
    Standard surface water intakes by Ranney method pamphlet
    33.9 33.9
    Statement before the State Water Resources Board
    2.26, 2.26,
    2.31, 2.31,
    2.40 2.40
    Statement of J. S. Longwell, taken in the presence of C. R. Trowbridge, at Powell, Wyoming
    32.1, 32.1,
    32.4 32.4
    Statement of Sacramento Municipal Utility District before the sub-committee on public works regarding SMUD's proposed Upper American River Project as part of a co-ordinated development of the American River Basin
    2.21 2.21
    Statement on State Water Resources Board Bulletin No. 3, "Report on the California water plan", before the Department of Water Resources and the State Water Board
    2.41 2.41
    Statements
    31.7 31.7
    Stream-bed percolation in development of water supplies
    33.6 33.6
    Studies and computations for the board of engineer's report on water supply for San Diego County Water Authority
    28.7 28.7
    Study no. 1
    15.16 15.16
    Substitute plan, American River Basin
    2.42 2.42
    Summary of costs
    33.42 33.42
    Summary of operation study of Sly Park Reservoir
    2.12 2.12
    Summary of work handled to date in connection with the water supply project for the Naval Ammunition Depot at Hawthorne, Nevada
    38.3 38.3
    Tables and graphs on costs and finance of San Diego County Water Authority
    28.11 28.11
    Topographical maps of Riverton, Kyburz and Pyramid Peak, Calif.
    2.1 2.1
    Ultimate water service by EBMUD in southern Alameda County: outline of report to EBMUD
    9.5 9.5
    Upper American River capacity variation
    2.71 2.71
    Upper American River Project summary statement
    2.19 2.19
    Upper American River Project: Union Valley Dam
    2.11 2.11
    Various plates, chiefly relating to Colorado, on double drum radial gate hoists, turnout gate, headgate, flumes, etc.
    40 40
    Vitrified sewer pipe specifications
    40 40
    Water conditions in California as of April 1, 1960
    41 41
    Water development project for the East Bay Area bonds (general obligations), $25,000,000 Series A: official statement of the East Bay Municipal Utility District
    9.7 9.7
    Water permit procedures, State Department of Public Health
    4.1 4.1
    Water requirements and costs for Folsom North service area A-1, Sacramento County
    12.7, 12.7,
    12.8 12.8
    Water requirements and costs for Folsom North service area A-2, Sacramento County
    12.9 12.9
    The Water story of the Sweetwater District
    15.18 15.18
    Water supply for probable future developments in the San Diego County Water Authority
    28.10, 28.10,
    28.13 28.13
    A Water supply for Sacramento from the American River: discussion of a possible contract with the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation
    2.68 2.68
    Water supply, Portland, Oregon map and statistical data
    35.4 35.4
    Water supply problems in southern Alameda County, California
    9.4 9.4
    Water supply requirements and sources of supply in Southern California
    7.3 7.3
    Water supply study
    38.4 38.4
    Water use tables
    15.2 15.2
    Water works manual: chapter 6
    37.5 37.5

    Indexing Terms

    The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the library's online public access catalog.

    Subjects

    San Diego County Water Authority
    Central Valley Project (Calif.). American River Division
    La Mesa, Lemon Grove and Spring Valley Irrigation District
    Santa Clara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
    Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District