Preliminary Inventory of the Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute Collections, circa 1940-1998

Processed by Carola DeRooy.
The Bancroft Library.
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, California, 94720-6000
Phone: (510) 642-6481
Fax: (510) 642-7589
Email: bancref@library.berkeley.edu
URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu
© 2002
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.

Preliminary Inventory of the Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute Collections, circa 1940-1998

Collection number: BANC MSS 99/281 c

The Bancroft Library



University of California, Berkeley

Berkeley, California

Contact Information:

Collection Processed By:
Carola DeRooy
Date Completed
December 1,1999
© 2002 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.

Collection Summary

Collection Title: Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute Collections
Date: circa 1940-1998
Collection Number: BANC MSS 99/281 c
Compiler: Ginger, Ann Fagan
Extent: 183 Cartons, 71 Boxes; 2 Oversize Boxes; 2 Card File Boxes; 1 Oversize B Folder
Repository: The Bancroft Library
Berkeley, California 94720-6000
Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the library's online catalog.

Information for Researchers

Restrictions

Collection is open for research with the following exceptions: Series 1.3, 3.3, 6.2, 6.5, and 9.4 need processing review by Public Services before they can be served to the public; Series 2.2, 4.1, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 7.3, and 9.2 need curatorial review before they can be served to the public. Please see reference desk for an Application for Access to Restricted Material (ARM) form. See on-line catalog record to determine availability.

Publication Rights

Copyright has been not been assigned to The Bancroft Library. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the appropriate curator or the Head of Public Services for forwarding. Permission for publication is given on behalf of The Bancroft Library as the owner of the physical items and the copyright.

Preferred Citation

[Identification of item], Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute Collections, BANC MSS 99/281 c, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

Administrative Information

Acquisition Information

The Meikljohn Civil Liberties Institute Records were given to The Bancroft Library on May 1, 1999 by Ann Fagan Ginger, founder and Executive Director of the Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute and Jim Syfers, representing the Board of Directors of the Meiklejohn Institute.

Organizational Information

The Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute (MCLI) was incorporated as an independent, non-profit organization in 1965 by Ann Fagan Ginger in Berkeley, California. The Institute bears the name of innovative educator and scholar Alexander Meiklejohn, a lifelong champion of civil liberties and social justice. Ginger established the unique center on human rights because she thought that effective, innovative legal research, writing, and courtroom strategies should be shared among all lawyers and clients in the constitutional law fields of civil liberties, due process, and civil rights.
The Institute advocates for human rights and peace law by seeking ways to use the laws established by the United Nations Charter, Nuremberg Principles, the Three Human Rights Treaties ratified by the U.S., along with U.S. and state Constitutions and Bills of Rights.The mission of MCLI includes responding to calls from grassroots activists and providing referrals that help individuals address their grievances and by reporting violations.
Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Library (MCLL) officially incorporated with MCLI in 1965. The library established a unique collection of the best legal "briefs", transcripts, and motions in cases, beginning with those reported in the Civil Liberties Docket since 1955. Soon, requests from lawyers and activists began pouring in, utilizing the library for the best legal points for integration issues in the South and arguments against the Vietnam war and the draft. Unions and the Left sought new information to help end the blacklists and persecutions of Reds and progressives. Expanding to a global perspective in the 1970's and 1980's MCLI's subsequent publications, The Human Rights Docket and Human Rights and Peace Law Docket continued to build substantial holdings in the library, adding topics such as draft law, sex discrimination, anti-nuclear, affirmative action, and immigration case materials.
MCLI is also the official repository for the organizational records of the National Lawyers Guild. Significant documents donated by its members include the Rosenberg, Hollywood Ten, and Smith Act case files. The library's collections including the NLG records were transfered to the Bancroft Library in 1999 . They provide a rich variety of primary source material on civil rights and civil liberties trials (in particular McCarthy era and early 1970's civil rights cases), legal and social justice organizations, labor rights organizations and activists, Vietnam anti-war collections, anti-nuclear and World Peace organizations, and collections concerned with academic freedom.
The Institute offers interships and work-study opportunities to high-school, college, law school and library school students, and significant work for seniors who are concerned about human rights and peace law in the United States.
As an organizer for the right to education, an information clearinghouse on social change, and an advocate of government responsibility, MCLI joins networks and provides speakers. Under the direction of Ann Fagan Ginger and the Board of Directors the Institute continues to publish and distribute the Human Rights and Peace Law Docket, the Human Rights Organizations and Periodicals Directory, Peace Law Packets, and a Newsletter. MCLI's highly regarded Studies in Law and Social Change include Alexander Meiklejohn: Teacher of Freedom, The Cold War Against Labor, and the Ford Hunger March. Meiklejohn's more recent publications include a booklet on the Beijing Women's Conference of 1995 and Ginger's book, Nuclear Weapons are Illegal.
In 1999 the Institute began working with the Center for the Covenant at San Francisco State University and with the India Legal Centre for Human Rights and the Law on common inssues of concern.
The Institute's survival depends on those who share its goals and values.
Portions taken from Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute website at http://www.sfsu.edu/~mclicfc 

Scope and Content

The Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute (MCLI) Collections document twentieth century American legal battles over civil liberties, human rights, labor rights, anti-war, peace law, nuclear proliferation and academic freedom. The collection is built around a core collection of legal case files assembled by the institute since 1965 for legal researchers. The Meiklejohn Institute has documented over 9000 civil liberties cases in a series of published guides: Civil Liberties Docket, Human Rights Docket, Human Rights and Peace Law Docket, and Human Rights Casefinder, 1953-1969, the Warren Court Era. Over 3000 or these cases have corresponding files in the cores collection. Case files may include all or a selection of the following: legal briefs, memorandum, pleadings, court transcripts, case histories, research materials, correspondence, news clippings, pamphlets, and attorney's drafts.
Other papers within the collections include office files of attorneys and organizations in the fields of labor rights, social justice, and world peace. There are extensive files on the Vietnam War resistance, the Free Speech Movement trial, the Peoples Park mass arrests, and the trials of Angela Y. Davis, the Pentagon Papers, and Wounded Knee.

Container List

Box 30, 61-62; Carton 2-31, 46-58, 60-72, 82-88, 91-93, 109-112, 114-128, 130-137, 140, 143, 154, 170-175, 180.

Series 1 : Docket Case Files

Access Information

The Human Rights and Peace Law Docket files need processing review by Public Services before they can be served to the public. Please see reference desk for an Application for Access to Restricted Material (ARM) form.

Scope and Content Note

Arrangement

Divided into 3 subseries: The Civil Liberties Docket, the Human Rights Docket, and The Human Rights and Peace Law Docket.
Each series reflects the classification scheme in the corresponding Docket published by the National Lawyer's Guild or the Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute. The dockets consist of annotated guides to over 9,000 classified civil rights and liberties cases. The Meiklejohn case files contains approximately 3,280 of the docket's listed cases and are classified Constitutional amendments. The classification scheme is outlined in each published docket and is expanded in the later two. Also useful in locating cases is The Human Rights Casefinder, 1953-1969, the Warren Court Era which is indexed by plaintiff, defendant, subject, and by amendment right. Ask for the published dockets at the Bancroft Reference Desk.
In addition to the legal cases, information on amendment issues are listed by subject or as general in the docket's classification numbers. For example, there are materials on the House on Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in the 271 classification, police practices in 304, enforcing integration in 522, and sex discrimination in 578.
Notable case files include: US vs. Dellinger; Communist Party USA vs. SACB; National Lawyers Guild vs. Brownell; US vs. Eugene Dennis et al; US vs. Schneiderman; Lawson and Trumbo vs. US; Krebs vs. Ashbrook; US vs. Hiss; California vs. Jackson, Cluchette, Drumgo; Harry Renton Bridges vs. US; Rosenberg, Sobell vs. US; Heikkila vs. US; California vs. Huey Newton; Brown vs. Board of Education; US vs Vietnam Veterans Against the War; Regents of University of California vs. Bakke.
 

SUBSERIES 1.1: Civil Liberties Docket, 1953-1969

 

I. Freedom Of Expression And Association

Additional Note

(First Amendment Liberties, And Ninth And Fourteenth Amendments)
 

Freedom Of Speech, Press, Assembly

 

Licensing

 

-Of Meetings

Ctn. 114

11. General

 

--Of Parades

 

16. General

 

16.c Brown v Rayfield

 

16.1 Hurwitt v Oakland

 

16.7 Chicago Peace Council v McDonough

 

Administration Restrictions

 

-On Students and Professors

Ctn. 2

24. General (4 folders)

 

24.Ala.1 St. John Dixon v Alabama State Bd of Educ

 

24.Ariz.2 Jones v Bd of Regents (Univ of Arizona)

 

24.Ala.4 Dickerson v Alabama State Bd of Educ

 

24.Cal. General

 

24.Cal. Beecher

 

24.Cal.a Mandel v Municipal Court

 

24.Cal.2 Lessin v UC Regents

 

24.Cal.5 Finot v Pasedena Bd of Educ

 

24.Cal.6 Kline v Myerson

 

24.Cal.7a Aptheker, Stein, Jacobs

 

24.Cal.7b Atthowe v Univ of Calif, Eisen v Univ of Calif

 

24.Cal.8 Stanton v Dumke, State Bd of Trustees (San Jose)

 

24.Cal.15 Athos v Bd of Educ (Fremont)

 

24.Cal.16 Myers v Bd of Educ (Arcata)

 

24.Cal.19 McGlone v Bd of Educ (Mt Diablo)

 

24.Cal.19a Joslyn v Claremont Graduate School

 

24.Cal.20 Perlman v Bd of Trustees (Shasta Joint Jr College Dist)

 

24.Cal.23 Sellers v Bd of Regents (Univ of Calif)

 

24.Cal.25 Scarborough v Bd of Educ (San Francisco)

 

24.Cal.26 Smiley v Thompson (Soquel High School)

 

24.Cal.27 Purcell v Manning [In Cater et al.] (SF State)

 

24.Cal.30 Oloff v East Side Union High School Dist (San Jose)

 

24.Cal.31 Allen v Oakland Unified School Dist

 

24.Cal.33 Modesto v San Jacinto Unified School Dist

 

24.Cal.34 SF State strike arrest cases (clippings)

 

SF State chronology and background (clippings)

 

SF State criminal - students

 

SF Sate criminal - teachers

 

SF State teachers, administrative

 

SF State Administrative, student cases

 

SF State strike

 

California v Stoloff

 

24.Cal.34a Wong v Hayakawa

 

24.Cal.36 Siegel v UC Regents (7 folders)

Ctn. 3

24.Cal.40 California v Queen, Martinet

 

24.Cal.41a Averett v Bd of Educ (Los Angeles)

 

24.Cal.42 California v Mallory, Wilson

 

24.Cal.44 Brennan v Bd of Educ (Nicasio)

 

24.Cal.45 Strickland v San Francisco Bd of Educ

 

24.Cal.46 Rowe v Campbell Union High School Dist

 

24.Cal.49 Smith v Jackson

 

24.Cal.51 Bekiaris v Modesto Bd of Educ

 

24.Cal.52 Sellers v UC Regents

 

24.Cal.53 Compton v McNelis

 

24.Cal.55 Montalvo v Madera Unified School Dist, Bd of Educ

 

24.Cal.56 Poxon v Bd of Educ, San Juan Unified School Dist

 

24.Cal.57 Kurzweil v Dumke et al.

 

24.Cal.58 Ishimatsu v UC Regents

 

24.Cal.59 Wong v UC Regents

 

24.Cal.60 Mitford v Bunzel

 

24.Cal.66 Livermore Valley Joint Unified School Dist (Alameda & Contra Costa Counties) v Feinberg

 

24.Cal.72 So. San Francisco Unifies School Dist v Natwick

 

24.Cal.73 Comings v State Bd of Educ

 

24.Cal.75 McGill v University of San Francisco

 

24.Cal.77 St. Ledger v Deering

 

24.Colo.2 Jones v Hopper

 

24.Conn.2 Roach v Connecticut

 

24.Conn.3 Crossen v Fatsi

 

24.Conn.4 Healy v James

 

24.DC.2 Healey v Keppel

 

24.DC.3 US National Student Assn v Finch

 

24.Fla 2 Demon v Vadakir

 

24.Ida.1 Orwick v State Bd of Educ, Idaho

 

24.Ill.1 Koch v Board of Trustees, Univ of Illinois

 

24.Ill.2 Pickering v Township High School Dist 205, Will Co, Ill.

 

24.Ill.8 Rabinowitz et al. v Board of Junior College Dist No 508

 

24.Ind.1 Bright v Isenbarger

 

24.Ky.2 Attorney General's Opinion (Kentucky)

 

24.Ky.4 Hetrick v Martin

 

24.Me.2 Farrell v Smith et al.

 

24.Mass. Miscellaneous

 

24.Mass.4 Massachusetts v Harvard demonstrators

 

24.Mass.5 Fenton v Boston School Committee

 

24.Mass.7 Mallioux v Kiley

 

24.Mass.8 Hasson v Boothby

 

24.Mich. General

 

24.Mich.a Zarighny v Michigan

 

24.Mich.2 Helmkay v Bd of Educ, City of Flint

 

24.Mich.3 Wolfson v Wayne State University

 

24.Mich.7 Cholmakjian v Board of Trustees, Michigan State Univ

 

24.Mich.8 Vought v Van Buren Public Schools

Ctn. 4

24.NY.5 Egan v Moore et al.

 

24.NY.7 Council v Donovan

 

24.NY.10 Hodes v Garrison

 

24.NY.14 Rosenberg v Allen

 

24.NY.15 Columbia University 1968

 

24.NY.15a Hayes v Hogan (Columbia)

 

24.NY.15b New York v Sargent, Ziegellaub (Columbia)

 

24.NY.15c Halliwell v Criminal Court

 

24.NY.15d Grossner v Brd of Trustees, Columbia Univ

 

24.NY.15g Cole v Brd of Trustees, Columbia University

 

24.NY.16 Trustees of Columbia Univ. v Students for a Democratic Society

 

24.NY.21 Powe et al. v Miles

 

24.NY.22 Zucker v Panitz

 

24.NY.26 Cornell University v Starobin

 

24.NY.27 Overton v Rieger

 

24.NY.28 Caplin v Oak

 

24.NY.29 Presidents Council, Dist 25 v Community School Board

 

24.NY.33 Grafton v Brooklyn Law School (2 folders)

 

24.NY.34 Smirti v Trustees of New York University

 

24.NC UNCC

 

24.NC.2 Casey v Henry

 

24.NC.4 Bateman v Trustees of Beaufort Co. Technical Institute

 

24.Ohio.1 Schwartz et al. v Bd ofTrustees, Ohio State Univ

 

24.Okla.2 Bullock v Kamm

 

24.Okla.3 Norman Gay Alliance for Sexual Freedom v Bd of Regents of Univ of Oklahoma

 

24.Pa. General

 

24.Pa.2 Harris v School Dist of Haverford Township

 

24.Pa.3 Cirker v Yohe

 

24.Pa.4 Lawrence v Carroll (School Dist of Philadelphia)

 

24.Pa.5 Merriken v Cressman

 

24. Tenn.3 Norton v Discipline Committee of East Tenn. State Univ

 

24.Tenn.4 Jackson v Dorrier

 

24.Tenn.5 Caldwell v Craighead

 

24.Tenn.6 Jones v Tennessee Bd of Educ

 

24.Tenn.7 Melton v Young

 

24.Tex.5 Sterzing v Ft Bend Independent School District (2 folders)

Ctn. 5

24.Tex.9 Bd of Regents of the Univ of Texas v New Left Edu Project

 

24.Tex.10 Bayless v Martine

 

24.Tex.11 Sullivan v Houston Independent School District

 

24.Tex.12 Lansdale et al. v Jenkins

 

24.Tex.13 Shanley v Northeast Independent School District

 

24.Tex.15 Wardlaw v Austin Independent School District

 

24.Utah.1 Freeman v Flake et al v Bd of Educ of Hobbs Municipal School District

 

24.Utah.2 Smith v Losee

 

24.Va.2 Sword v Fox

 

24.Wash.3 Belk v Washington University

 

24.WVa.1 Barker v Hardway (Bluefield State College)

 

24.Wisc.2 Lee v Bd of Regents of State Colleges

 

24.Wisc.3 Soglin v Kauffman

 

24.Wisc.4 Breen v Kahl

 

24.Wisc.5 Buck v Carter

 

24.Wisc.6 Straus v Bd of Regents of the Univ of Wisconsin

 

-On Miscellaneous Activities

 

25.15 Sokol v Public Utilities of the State of California

 

25.1ba Huntley v Public Utilities Commission of California

 

25.18 Bagley v Washington Township

 

25.35 Oliver v Southern California Rapid Transit Distric

 

25.36 Friends Meeting v US

 

25.37 111 Wines & Liquors, Murphy's Tavern, Val's Bar v Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control

 

25.38 Kohl v Resor

 

25.46 Doyle v Koelbl

 

25.47 Williams v Regents of UC

 

25.48 Schneider v Laird

 

25.49 Commission for Prisoner Justice & Humanity v Craven

 

25.50 US ex rel Manicone v Curso

 

25.51 Noland v Desobry

 

25.52 Mississippi Gay Alliance v Goudelock

 

25.54 Staats v ACLU

 

25.56 Greer v Spock

 

25.57 Straus v F.C.C.

 

25.58 In the Matter of the Hearing of the Charges Against Joseph Mazzola

 

Economic Restrictions

Ctn. 5

30. Barbour v Sheet Metal Workers Associated Press v US

 

30.1 Independent Productions Corp. v Loew's Incorporated

 

30.7 Young v Motion Picture Assn of America, Inc

 

30.9 Mitchell v International Assn of Machinists

 

30.12 Allure Shoe Corp; Local 885 of Retail, Wholesale, and Dept. Store Union, AFL-CIO

Ctn. 6

30.13 Fort v Civil Service Comm of Alameda County

 

30.15 Weaver v Jordan

 

30.16 NAACP v Overstreet

 

30.17 Smith v SNCC

 

30.18 Hurwitz, Bobker, Braverman v Directors Guild of America

 

30.20 Lenske v US (Portland, Oregon)

 

30.24 Frampton v Davis

 

30.25 Brunnenkant v Richardson

 

30.26 Schott v American Metal Climax, Inc

 

30.29 Cedar-Sinai Medical Center Hearing before NLRB

 

30.30 Linmark Associates v Willingboro

 

35 General

 

Criminal Sanctions

 

-Against Disorderly Conduct and Similar Offenses

Ctn. 112

51.Cal.24 Hoffman v Municipal Court of Oakland

 

51.Cal.26 California v Macias

 

51.Cal.32 English et al. v Ferndon Schools

 

51.Colo.1 Williams v City and Co. of Denver

 

51.Colo.2 City of Denver v Perdew et al

 

51.Conn.3 Turner v LaBelle

 

51.DC.4 Williams v Dist of Columbia

 

51.DC.5 Mailer v US

Ctn. 115

51.Ga.8a Stokley Charmichael, SNCC v Allen et al.

 

51.Ga.9 Atlanta v Ricks

 

51.Ga.10 Hunter v Allen

 

51.Haw.2 Hawaii v Butler, Sarant

 

51.Ill.6 Terminiello v Chicago

 

51.Ind.1 Indiana v DeFields

 

51.Ken.3 Colton v Kentucky

 

51.La.b Lombard v Louisiana

 

51.La.2b Rev. Cox v Louisiana

 

51.Minn.1 Minnesota v Johnson

 

51.Miss.g Poole v Gov. Barnett

 

51.Miss.2 Mississipi v Stoner

 

51.Miss.4 Guyot v Pierce, Strother v Thompson

 

51. NY.10a New York v Prinz

 

51.NY.12 New York v Martin

 

51.NY.20 New York v Penn

 

51.NY.21 New York v Jones, Liebert

 

51.NY.24 New York v Jones, Weil, Smith

 

51.NY.37 New York v Shapiro

 

51.NY.42 New York v Archer

 

51.Ohio.1 Cleveland v Russell

 

51.Ohio.2 Norwell v Cincinatti

 

51.Pa.1 Chester v Anderson

 

51.Pa.2 Pennsylvania v Dortort

 

51.Tenn.3 Tennessee v Gustafson

 

51.Tenn.8 Tennessee v Tigner

 

51.Va.3 Virginia v Rev. Harris

 

-Against Obscenity

Ctn. 116

52. General

Ctn. 112

52.Cal.4 US v Aday

 

52.Cal.19 California v Thompson

 

52.Cal.27 Miller v California

Ctn. 112

52.Cal.29 Hicks v Miranda

 

-Against Sedition, Anarchy, Syndicalism, and Riots

Box 30

54. General and clippings (3 folders)

Ctn. 6

54. Ex Parte Communications and Administrative Decisions

 

54.a Herndon v Lowry, Sheriff

 

54.b Distortion of history- The Moyer, Haywood Case

 

54.1 US v Powell (2 folders)

Ctn. 112

54.1 US v Powell

Ctn. 6

54.4 Louisiana v Zellner

 

54.6 Georgia v Perdew

 

54.7b Georgia v Wells, Harris

 

54.9 People of New York v Epton (3 folders)

 

54.11 Mississippi v Lewis

Ctn. 112

54.14 California v Harris

 

54.14a Younger v Harris

Ctn. 6

54.20 H. Rap Brown, SNCC v Clark

 

54.20a US v H. Rap Brown

 

54.28 Brooks v Briley (Nashville)

 

54.29 Fernandez v Mackell

 

54.32 US v Dellinger (Chicago 8 Conspiracy) (4 folders)

 

54.34 Brandenberg v People of the State of Ohio

Ctn. 7

54.37 US v Marshall (2 folders)

Ctn. 112

54.38 Carter v US

Ctn. 7

54.39 Hess v Indiana

 

54.40 Rogers v US

Ctn. 112

54.45 US v Giese

 

54.46 Colon v US

 

-Against Picketing, Leafleting, Demonstrating

Box 30

55 General and Selma 1965 (3 folders)

Ctn. 112

55.Ala.8 Forman v Montgomery

 

55.Ala.17 Birdie Mae Davis v Mobile Co. Bd of School Commrs

 

55.Ala.18 Baines v Birmingham

 

55.Ala.19 American Radio Assn. v Mobile Steamship Assn

 

55.Ariz.1 Arizona v Horn

 

55.Cal.6 Montgomery Ward and Co. v CORE

 

55.Cal.6a Barnes v CORE

 

55.Cal.13 Gould v California

 

66.Cal.16 California v Havens

 

55.Cal.19 In re Berry

 

55.Cal.21 Kuszynski v Oakland

 

55.Cal.23 United Farm Workers v Superior Court, Kern County

 

55.Cal.30 Connor v California

 

55.Cal.31 California v Ridenour

 

55.Cal.32a California v Yank, Lustis

 

55.Cal.32b Halvonik v Reagan

Ctn. 7

55.Cal.32 Berkeley, People's Park (2 folders)

Ctn. 112

55.Cal.33 California v Glass, Barkley

 

55.Cal.34 Jelinic v Sun Valley Shopping Center

 

55.Cal.35 Breen v Greyhound

 

55.Cal.36 Barber v Municipal Court

 

55.Cal.37 California v Diablo Canyon Demonstrators

 

55.Colo.1 Perdew et al. v Denver

Ctn. 111

55.Colo. Rocky Flats Action Group v Ofte

 

55.Colo.2 US v Best (Rocky Flats)

Ctn. 111

55.Colo.2a Colorado v Ginsberg (Rocky Flats)

Ctn. 112

55.Conn.a United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers v Baldwin

 

55.DC Code on not harrassing Foreign Representatives

 

55.DC.4 Scott v Dist. of Columbia

 

55.DC.5 Dist. of Columbia v 7 Defendants (White House Sit-in)

 

55.DC.6 Freedom v Dist. of Columbia

 

55.DC.8 Int'l Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers v NLRB

 

55.DC.10 United Steel Workers of America v NLRB

 

55.DC.11 Roberts v Wilson

Ctn. 111

55.DC. Jackalone v Andrus

 

55.DC. Townsend v Carmel

 

55.DC.12 Huff v Sec'y of the Navy

 

55.Fla.1 Young v Davis

 

55.Ga.34 US v Anderson

 

59.31 US v Hensley, Stacy, Turner, Engle

 

59.32 City of Colunmus v Miqdadi

 

55 Ga.39 Kunney v Holt

 

55.Ga.41 Barnum v Chandliss

 

55.Ga.43a Americus v 32 Demonstrators

 

55.Ill. Carey v Brow

 

55.Ill. Citizen's for a Better Environment v Schaumberg

 

55.Ill.a City of Champaign v Campbell

 

55.Ill.8 Chicago v Hendershot

 

55.Ill.10 Sutherland v Illinois

 

55.Ind.2 United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America,CIO v Gates, Governor

Ctn. 111

55.Ky.2 Goldsmith v Sutherland

 

55.Mass.4 LeClair v O'Neil

 

55.Minn.3 Minnesota v Fuchs

 

55.Miss.11 Collins v City of Jackson

 

55.Miss.a Mississippi v Pestana

 

55.Miss.2 Crawford v Mississippi

 

55.Miss.3a Brown v City of Meridian

 

55.Miss.5a Peacock v City of Greenwood

 

55.Miss.7 Cameron v Johnson

 

55.Miss.9a Hartfield v Mississippi

 

55.Miss.27 Johnson v Mississippi

 

55.Mo.3 US v Mechanic

 

55.Mo.5 US v Mitchell

 

55.NH.1 New Hampshire v Harvey

 

55.NJ New Jersey v Schmid

 

55.NJ.a Kovacs v Cooper

 

55.NJ.5 New Jersey v Mears

 

55.NJ.6 New Jersey v Carroll

 

55.NY.3 New York v Donegan

 

55.NY.4 New York v Penn

 

55.NY.4a New York v Galamison

 

55.NY.6 Turner v New York

 

55.NY.16 People of New York v Katz

 

55.NY.19 Street v New York

 

55.NY.25 New York v 381 Disarmament Protestors

 

55.Va.7 Virginia v Berrigan

 

55.NC.5 US v Bradley

Ctn. 111

55.NCc.6 US v Davis

 

55.Ohio.a City of Steubenville v Kilburn

 

55.Ohio.3 Cleveland v Mechanic

 

55.Okla.a Wood v Oklahoma

 

55.Okla.1 Oklahoma v Green

 

55.Okla.2 Anderson et al. v Trimble et al.

 

55.Okla.3 Floyd v US

 

55.Ore.1 Lloyd Corp. v Tanner

 

55.Pa.4 Penn v Haugh

 

55.Pa.5 Grausam v Murphey

 

55.Pa.7 Farber v Rizzo

 

55.SC.6 Abernathy v Conroy

 

55.Tx.2 Flower v US

 

55.US Brown v Glines

 

55.Va.1 Baines v City of Danville

 

55.Wa.2 Spencer v State of Washington

 

-Against and Concerning Minors

Ctn. 111

56. General

 

56.a Gans v Ohio

 

56.1 So. Carolina v Carter

 

56.14 Florence v Myers

 

56.27 Vachon v New Hampshire

 

56.28 Bykofsky v Borough of Middletown

 

-Against Vagrancy and Loitering

Ctn. 111

57. General

 

57. New York City v Young

 

57.8 Zellner v Thetford

 

57.10 Harris v City of Albany

 

57.13 New York v Miller

 

57.14 Hicks v Dist. of Colimbia

 

57.15 City of Flint v Baldwin

 

57.20 Minneapolis v Hadley

 

57.24 Detroit v Wedlow

 

57.25 Hirshhorn v New York

 

57.29 City of Carmel v Parr

 

-Against Tresspassing

Ctn. 116

58.NY.2 New York v Collins

 

58.NY.4 New York v Lawson

 

58.NC.4 Williams v North Carolina

 

58.Ohio.1 Cinnicinnati v Mitchell et al.

 

58.Pa.1 West Chester State College v D'Antonio

 

58.SC.1 Peterson v City of Greenville

 

58.Va.8 Wood v Virginia

 

58.Va.10 Johnson v Virginia

 

58.Va.11 Lusby v Virginia

 

58.Wash.1 Washington v Fox

 

-Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities

Ctn. 116

59. General

 

59.a Cole v Arkansas

 

59.b US v Congress of Industrial Organizations

 

59.e Michigan v Brothman

 

59.8 International Association of Machinists v Street

 

59.22 North Carolina v Crowder, Mallory

 

59.27 Clarksdale, Mississippi v Henry

Ctn. 116

59.30 Alabama vMills

 

59.33 Louisiana v Rev. J.W. Davis

 

59.39 New York v Fawcett

 

59.42 Harvey v Mississippi

 

59.48 City of Newton v Temple

 

59.70 Detroit v Bowden

 

59.75 Kirkland v Wallace

 

59.98 Cleveland v Anderson

 

59.108 Watts v US

 

59.113 Cortez v Schroering

 

59.114 US v Tinjerina

 

59.115 Honey v Goodman

 

59.121 Parker v Morgan

 

59.123 US v Kangas

 

59.124 Local 807 v US

 

59.125 Connell Construction Co. v Plumbing & Steamfitters Local Union 100

 

59.126 Iannelli v US

 

59.127 US v Moore

 

Civil Sanctions

 

-Against Defamation, Libel and Slander

Ctn. 111

61. General (3 folders)

 

61.b Larrick v Gilloon

 

61.c Salzhandler v Caputo

 

61.1 Farmers Educational and Coop Union v WDAY, Inc

 

61.9 New York Times v Sullivan

 

61.186 Pauling v News Syndicate Co., Inc.

 

61.21 Moore v P.W. Publishing Co.

 

61.22 Normile v American Medical Association

 

61.23 Henry v Collins

 

61.27 Smoot v League of Women Voters

 

61.30 Frick v Stevens

 

61.33 Baer v Rosenblatt

 

61.40 Minsky v Stroden

 

61.45 Peet v Tocsin, Inc.

 

61.49 Carroll v Princess Ann Co.

 

61.56 Carey v Hume, Anderson

 

61.57 Bridges v Benson

 

61.58 Shankroff v LaGuardia

 

61.59 Miami Herald v Tornillo

 

61.60 Old Dominion v Austin

 

61.64 Littell v Buckley

 

61.66 Time v Firestone

 

-By Injunction in Labor Disputes

Ctn. 111

62. General

 

-By Injunction in Racial Situations

Ctn. 117

63. Injunctions to Protect Civil Liberties

 

63.2 Alabama v Gray (ex rel Gallion)

 

63.3 Fair Share Organization v Mitnik

 

63.3a Fair Share Organization v Nagdeman and Sons, Inc.

 

63.3b Fair Share Organization v Kroger Co.

 

63.4 Band B Cash Grocery Stores Inc. v Young Adults for Progressive Action

 

63.10 Alabama ex. rel. Flowers v Gray

 

63.11 Town of Clinton v CORE

 

63.15 US v City of Winona, Partridge

 

63.21 San Diego Gas & Electric v CORE

 

63.22a California v Brown

 

63.23 Curtis, Grand v Boeger

 

63.28.b US v Clark

 

63.29 C.O.F.O. v Local Officials (McComb)

 

63.30 NAACP v Safeway Trails, Inc.

 

63.31 Hicks v Knight

 

63.32 Dilworth v Riner

 

63.36 Griffin v Ryan

 

63.37.a Mississippi v Bass, Klein, Wilcox

 

63.43 Tracy v Robbins

 

63.46 NAACP (Chester Branch) v Chester, Pa.

 

63.53 Chinn v Johnson

 

63.56 Baker v Bindner

 

63.89 NAACP v Thompson

 

-Against Miscellaneous Activities

Ctn. 117

64. Laws on Congress' Activities

 

64.13 Chronicle Publishing v Gain

 

64.16 Hornstein v NAACP

 

64.17 Alameda Co. v Regents of the University of California

 

64.18 Gallagher v Mission Tenants Union

 

64.20a Feldman v Los Angeles Free Press

 

64.29 Sutherland v Illinois

 

70. Procedural Pitfalls in Civil Liberties Cases

 

71. Marchel, Sogolofsky v Los Angeles Sheriff's Department

 

71.2 Boryszewski v Brydges

 

72. General

 

73. General

 

73.Fla.1 Eubanks v Florida

 

73.Mich.4 Michigan v Altman

 

73.Mich.5 Michigan v Murray

 

73.Miss. Hancock et al v Mississippi

 

73.Miss.11 Jackson v Sumrall

 

73.Miss.25 Rutledge v Jackson

 

73.Miss.g Lefton v City of Hattiesburg

 

73.Miss.j Mississippi v Hartfield, Anderson (Hattiesburg)

 

73.Va.a Baines v Danville, McGhee v Danville

 

73.NY.2 New York v Hutchinson

 

Freedom Of Religion

 

-In Public Places

Box 62

119.48 Bennett v Secretary of Defense

 

-Conscientious Objection to War

Ctn. 118

120. General (3 folders)

 

120. Naill v Alexander et al.

 

120. Graves v Commissioner of Internal Revenue

 

120. Anthony v Commissioner of Internal Revenue

 

120. Purris v Commissioner of Internal Revenue

 

120. Herby v Commissioner of Internal Revenue

 

120. Miscellaneous (2 folders)

 

121.418 US v Casella

 

121.419 US v Jenkins

 

121.907 US v Efaw

 

122. US v Cool

 

123.90 Serfass v US

 

123.207 Davis v US

 

123.657 US v Armistead

 

123.658 US v Robideau

 

123.808 US v Donahue

 

126. General (non-case) War Crimes in Vietnam

Ctn. 119

126.31 Campen v Nixon

 

127.13 Oestereich v Selective Service System, Wyoming

 

127.22 US v Scouler

 

128. General-Vietnam Day

 

128. General-Pamphlets

 

128. Peace Candidates, incl Scheer Campaign

 

128. My Lai (pre June 1970)

 

128 My Lai (post June 1970)

 

128.1 In re Tax Protestors

 

128.5 Prosecutions of War Resistors

 

128.9 Atlee v Laird

 

128.11 Harper v Commissioner of Internal Revenue

 

128.12 Kent v US (2 folders)

Ctn. 114

128.13 Mitchell v Nixon

 

128.14 US v Simpson

 

129. Miscellaneous- Conscientious Objection to War

 

129. ACLU model memo re qualifications of C.O.s for citizenship

 

130 Denial of Tax Exemptions to Institutions-General

 

Restrictions on Free Exercise

 

In Prisons

Box 62

151.21 Putney v Fowlie

 

Freedom Of Association: Affecting The Organization

 

Organizational Privleges Challenged

Ctn. 119

200.-204. Miscellaneous

 

-As to NLRB Certification

Ctn. 111

203. Civil Liberties and the NLRB., speech

 

203.a Farmer v International Fur & Leather Workers of US & Canada

 

203.b Farmer v United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America (UE), et al.

Ctn. 7

203.c Herzog v American Communications Association

 

203.d National Maritime Union v Herzog et al.

 

203.2 Meat Cutters v NLRB

 

203.3 R. Dennis v US (2 folders)

 

203.5 International Tel & Tel v IBEW Local 134

 

-Privacy in Organizational Work

Ctn. 120

205.19 Briggs v Goodwin

 

Compulsory Registration

Ctn. 7

210 General

 

-Under 1950 Internal Security (McCarran) Act

Ctn. 114

211. McCarran Act and SACB (2 folders)

 

211.a NLG Brief on the Unconstitutionality of the Mundt-Nixon Bill (H.R. 5852)

Ctn. 180

211. US v Communist Party

 

SACB, Kennedy v Lima

Ctn. 7

211.1 Communist Party of the US v SACB (3 folders)

Ctn. 8

211.1 Communist Party of the US v SACB (3 folders)

 

211.1.a Communist Party of the US v US

 

211.2 Jefferson School of Social Sciences v SACB

 

211.3 SACB v Labor Youth League

Ctn. 180

211.3 Extracts of testimony by Labor Youth League witnesses

Ctn. 8

211.9 American Committee for the Protection of the Foreign Born v SACB

 

211.13 Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v SACB (3 ff)

 

211.14 Weinstock v SACB

 

211.16 Katzenbach v W.E.B. DuBois Clubs of America

 

211.16a W.E.B. Du Bois Clubs of America v Clark

 

211.17 Boorda v SACB

 

211.18 Kennedy v Healey

 

-Under 1954 Communist Control Act

Ctn. 8

212 General

 

212.a United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America v Brownell

 

-Under State Laws

Ctn. 8

213 Communist Registration Ordinances

 

213.a Albertson v Millard

 

-Under Foreign Agents Registration Act

Ctn. 8

214 General

 

214.a Rabinowitz, Boudin v Kennedy

 

Listing and Investigating

Ctn. 8

220 General

 

-By Attorney General of the United States

 

221 General

Ctn. 9

221.1 NLG v Brownell

 

221.a Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v McGrath

 

221.7 Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v Attorney General

 

221.8 American Servicemen's Union v Mitchell

 

220 General, misc (3 folders)

 

-By Congressional Committees

Ctn. 9

222.1 Wheeldin v Wheeler

 

222.3 Sloat v Walter

 

222.4 Sloat v Wheeler, Water

 

-By State Authorities

Ctn. 9

223.a Brandhove v Tenney

 

223.3 Elfbrandt v Russell

 

223.5 Black Unity League of Kentucky v Miller

 

Freedom Of Association: Affecting The Members

 

Criminal Penalties for Membership

Ctn. 9

240 General (Smith Act, precursor to Mundt-Nixon Bill, also Ohio Bartunik Bill)

 

-Under the Smith Act: for Conspiracy

Ctn. 9

241 General (Smith Act, misc)

 

241.a Dennis et al., v US (see also 99/280 cz National Lawyers Guild, George Crockett Papers, Smith Act Trial, Wm. Z. Foster et al and 242.9. (3 folders)

Ctn. 180

241.a Smith Act cases (incl US v Dennis) (2 folders)

 

Mr. Isserman's argument in US v Dennis

Ctn. 10

241.a US v Eugene Dennis (4 folders)

 

241.b US v Frankfeld (Baltimore Smith Act case)

 

241.c Flynn v US

Ctn. 10

241.1 Yates et al. v US (6 folders)

Ctn. 170-173

241.1 Yates et al v US, Trial transcripts (bound volumes 1-26)

Ctn. 175

241.1 Yates et al v US, Briefs (4 folders)

Ctn. 180

241.1 Yates et al v US, misc trial documents

Ctn. 10

241.2 Mesarosh v US

 

241.5 US v Huff

 

241.9 US v Brandt

 

-Under Smith Act: for Membership Only

Ctn. 10

242.a US v Richmond, Connelly (Calif Smith Act case)

 

242.1 Lightfoot v US

 

242.2 Scales v US (2 folders)

 

242.3 US v Frankfeld, US v Blumberg

 

242.9 CP, Foster, Hall v McGrath, SACB

Ctn. 120

244.1 US v Archie Brown

 

-Under State Laws

Ctn. 120

245. General (State Communist Registration and Criminal Membership Statutes and Ordinances)

 

245. Ohio Bartunek Bill

 

245. Callahan Bill

 

245. Hood v Fingold, Cronin

 

245. California v Steinberg

 

245.a Shaw v Oklahoma

 

245.b Berenson v City of Detroit

 

245.c California v McCormick

 

245.d Shub v Simpson

 

245.e Auerbach v California

 

245.g Coleman, Schusterman v Perdew

 

245.h Hall v City of Birmingham

 

245.i Lancaster v Hammond

 

245.j Thompson v Wallin (2 folders)

 

245.k Trainor v Cannon

 

245.2 Massachusetts v Hood (2 folders)

 

245.3 Massachusetts v Struik

 

245.6 Pennsylvania v Nelson (2 folders)

Ctn. 10

245.6 Pennsylvania v Nelson (2 folders)

 

245.9 Braden v Kentucky

 

245.13 Highlander Folk School v Tennessee ex rel. Stone

 

245.15 Indiana v Levitt

 

245.16a Dombrowski v Louisiana State Police

 

245.16b Dombrowski and Southern Conference Educational Fund v Eastland (see also 245.16c)

 

245.16d Dombrowski v Pfister (2 folders)

 

245.17 Stanford v Texas

 

-Under 1050 Internal Security (McCarran) Act

Ctn. 10

246 McCarran Act (Internal Security Act) material (2 folders)

 

246.1 US v Robel

 

246.2 Bick v Mitchell

 

248 General (Internal Security Act of 1969)

 

Civil Disabilities for Membership: Federal

Ctn. 11

250 General

 

-In Federal Employment

Ctn. 11

251 General

 

251.a Rothrock v Miller

 

251.11 Kutcher v US

 

251.16 In the Matter of Barney Hilburn

 

251.52 Garrott v US

 

251.57 Soltar v Postmaster General of US

 

251.58 Margetich v Civil Service Commission

 

251.62 Cummings v Hampton

 

251.63 Shaw v Hoover

 

251.64 Kruger v Legal Services Corp.

 

-As to Passport Application and Right to Travel

Ctn. 11

252 Right to travel

 

252.20 Robeson v Dulles

 

252.21 Kent v Dulles

 

252.22 Briehl v Dulles

 

252.27 Worthy v Herter

 

252.27a US v Worthy

 

252.34 Aptheker v Secretary of State

 

252.35 Zemel v Rusk, Kennedy

 

252.36 Mc Ewan v Rusk, Kennedy

 

252.52 Reynolds v US

 

252.56 Mayer v Rusk

 

252.58 US v Travis

 

252.59 US v Laub

 

252.62 US v Anton

 

252.67 Lynd v Rusk, Secretary of State

 

252.68 Gregory v Secretary of State

 

252.69 Mitchell v Mandel

 

252.70 Lamont v Rogers

 

-As to Military Acceptability, Discharges

Ctn. 11

253.6 Abramowitz v Bruckner

 

-As to Social Security Benefits

Ctn. 11

255.6 Hiss v Hampton (2 folders)

 

-Through Deportation Proceedings

Ctn. 11

258.0 Harisiades v Shaughnessy (2 folders)

 

258.a In re Sciortino

 

258.b Quattrone v Nicolls

 

258.c In re Tora Upstead Rystead

 

258.d In re Krishna Chandra

 

258.e In re Arpad Stancek

 

258.f US ex rel Schlossberg or Daly v Ault

 

258.g US v Steuben

 

258.i-j US v Mackie, US v MacKay

 

258.k US v Carlisle

Ctn. 12

258.1 Rowoldt v Perfetto

 

258.4 Bonetti v Rogers

 

258.6 Niukkanen v McAlexander

 

258.7 Wolf v Boyd

 

258.9 Gastelum-Quinones v Kennedy

 

258.11 Firestone v Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)

 

258.12 Scythes v Webb

 

258.15 Sherman v Immigration and Naturalization Service (In re Joseph Sherman)

 

258.18 Woodby v INS

 

258.19 Dymytryshyn v Esperdy

 

258.21 INS v Sanders

 

258.22 Massignani v INS

 

-Through Denaturalization and Naturalization Proceedings

Box 62

259 General

Ctn. 12

259 Harry Bridges-Wiretap

 

259.a US v Schneiderman (3 folders)

Ctn. 180

259.a US v Schneiderman (12 folders) Mar. 25-July 18, 1952 (see also 241.1 - Yates v US)

Ctn. 12

259.d In re Myer Klig

 

259.1 Nowak v US

 

259.4 Polites v US

 

259.5 Chaunt v US

 

259.6 US v Richmond

 

259.8 US v Bimba

 

259.54 INS v Nomland

 

259.55 Weitzman v US

 

259.57 In re Liebermann

 

Civil Disabilities for Membership: State, Local and Private

Ctn. 12

260 General (2 folders)

 

260.1 Socialist Workers 1974 National Campaign Committee et al v Jennings

 

-In State, Local, Government Employment

Ctn. 12

261 Loyalty oath

 

261.a-b Parker v LA County, Steiner v LA County

Ctn. 175

261.a Parker v LA County, briefs

Ctn. 12

261.c Local No. 201 American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees v City of Muskegon

 

261.12 Wilson v Los Angeles

 

261.18 Rosenfield v Malcolm

 

261.24 Partlow v LA Civil Service Commission

 

261.25 Vogel v County of Los Angeles

 

-In Teaching

Ctn. 12

262 General

 

262 In re Joyce Adler

 

262.a Dworken v Cleveland Bd of Educ

 

262.c In re Teachers Union, 555 (UPW) v Bd of Educ

 

262.11 Johnson v Bd of Educ of Halifax Co.

 

262.12 Eglash v Detroit Institute of Technology

 

262.13 Johnston v Bd of Educ of the Township of Wayne

 

262.24 Karst v Regents of the University of California (Angela Davis intervenor)

 

262.26 Trister et al. v University of Mississippi

 

-As to State Unemployment Insurance Benefits

Ctn. 12

263.a Dworken v Collopy

 

263.b Ekins v Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

 

263.1 Syrek v Calif. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

 

263.6 Laswell v Industrial Commission of Missouri

 

-As to State License Applications

Ctn. 12

264.1 Torcaso v Watkins

 

-In Proceedings Against Attorneys and Bar Applicants

Ctn. 13

265. State Rules for Admission to the Bar (3 folders)

 

Michael Tigar and the Clerk Appointment

 

Freedom of Advocacy

 

Threats to the Independence of the Bar

 

265.a Memo to NY Comm on Character and Fitness (NY Bar Admissions)

Ctn. 13

265.b Re Leitson and Dean

 

265.h-i In re Sacher and Isserman, Re Isserman

 

265.h-i US v Sacher, Gladstein, Crockett, McCabe, Isserman,

 

265.j Brooks v State Bar of California

 

265.4 In re Schlesinger, Esq.

 

265.20 Schware v New Mexico

 

265.21 Konigsberg v State Bar of California

 

265.23 In re George Anastaplo (2 folders)

 

265.30 In re Terence Hallinan

 

265.36 Cantor v Pennsylvania

 

265.38 Yablonski v United Mine Workers of America

 

-Through Deprivation of Right to Tax Exemption

Ctn. 13

266.1 Speiser v Randall

 

266.5 US v Kaiser

 

-In Private Employment: Teaching

Ctn. 13

267 Miscellaneous

 

267.1 Lynd v Bd of Governors

 

-In Private Employment: Defense Establishment

Ctn. 13

268 Miscellaneous

 

268.1 Parker v Lester

 

268.12 Greene v McElroy

 

268.14 Cafeteria and Restaurant Workers v McElroy

 

268.20 McBride v Roland

 

268.22 Schneider v Smith

 

268.23 Shoultz v Laird

 

-In Private Employment: Other

Ctn. 13

269 Miscellaneous

 

269.a Black v Cutter Labratories

 

269.1 Faulk v Aware, Inc.

 

Trial transcripts in Faulk v Aware

Ctn. 92

Examination of Vincent W. Hartnett v. 1-4, 1958

Ctn. 93

Examination of Vincent W. Hartnett v. 5-6, 1959

 

Cross-examination Hartnett, 1962

 

Examination before trial of Plaintiff, John H. Faulk, 1961

 

Examination before trial of Defendant, L. A. Johnson, 1960 (2 volumes)

 

Examination of Paul R. Milton, 1960 (2 volumes)

Ctn. 13

269.12 Bridgewood v UAW Local 707

 

269.15 ILGWU v Quality Mfg Co.

 

269.16 Linden Lumber Division v NLRB

 

269.17 NRLB v Weingarten

 

269.18 Sakala v Young

Ctn. 14

269.13 Stevens & Co. n NLRB

 

Criminal Penalties for Nondisclosure

Ctn. 14

270 General

 

-Before Congressional Committees

Ctn. 14

271 General, Anti-HUAC

 

In re Allen, Esterman

 

National Committee to Abolish the HUAC (NCAHUAC)

 

No. Calif, East Bay Committee newsletters and notices

 

Meeting notes and memoranda

 

East Bay Community Forum (2 folders)

 

First Amendment and HUAC

Ctn. 14

271. Correspondence

 

Activities by HUAC against teachers (Sloat v Wheeler)

 

US Army

 

Reports, speeches

 

Publications, newsletters, leaflets, pamphlets (4 folders)

 

Clippings (3 folders)

 

Miscellaneous

Ctn. 137

271. Anti-HUAC materials, Committee to Abolish HUAC

 

Abolish HUAC clippings

 

Documentation of the Red Stars in Hollywood, Fagan, M. 1950

 

Red Treason in Hollywood, Fagan, Myron C., 1949

 

"Brief of Alexander Meiklejohn, of Cultural Workers in Motion Pictures and Other Arts, and as Members of the Professions, as Amici Curiae", 1949 US Supreme Court

Ctn. 14

271.a1 Notes on HUAC Hearings in San Francisco, May 1960 and Memoirs of a Picket

 

271.a2 Students for Civil Liberties, UC Berkeley, 1960

 

Bay Area Student Committee for Abolition of HUAC, 1960

 

271.a3 East Bay Community Forum, 1960

 

Documentary film prospectus

Ctn. 15

271.a Josephson v US

 

271.b Eisler v US

 

271.c Lawson v US, Trumbo, v US (Hollywood Ten) (2 ff)

 

271.d Dennis v US

 

271.f Marshall v US

 

271.g US v Fleishman

 

271.h US v Bryan

 

271.i Morford v US

Ctn. 15

271.j In re Leonard Mins

 

271.k HUAC Public Hearing, Lionel Stander, NY, 1953

 

Report on Blacklisting In Movies by Cogley, John 1956

 

271.l US v Kamin

 

271.1 US v Lamont

Ctn. 175

271.11 Sacher v US

Ctn. 15

271.27 Material for Hartman Case

 

271.5 Horace Chandler Davis v US

 

271.7 Barenblatt v US (3 folders)

 

271.9 US v Russell

 

271.10 Deutch v US

 

271.11 Sacher v US

 

271.12 Gojack v US

 

271.14 Watkins v US

 

271.15 Shelton v US

 

271.16 Whitman v U

 

271.23 US v Sullivan

 

271.25 US v Seeger

Ctn. 120

271.27 Hartman vUS

Ctn. 15

271.31 Wilkinson v US

 

271.32 Braden v US

 

271.34 US v Lehrer

 

271.41 US v Rozenkrant(s)z

Ctn. 120

271.43 US v Wheeldin

Ctn. 15

271.49 US v Nixon, Wilson, Allen

Ctn. 16

271.50 Stamler v Willis

 

Stamler and Hall v Willis

Ctn. 16

271.50 Research on HUAC witnesses

 

271.52 Krebs v Ashbrook

(Related case files and briefs in Krebs v Ashbrook, see also BANC MSS 99/280cz National Lawyers Guild, Papers of Jeremiah Gutman)

 

271.53 Davis v Willis

 

271.54 Young v Willis

 

271.56 Sanders v McClellan

 

-Before State Committees

Ctn. 16

272 State Un-American Activities Committees

 

The fight against the Broyles Bills, Indiana, 1953 (compiled by Courtney B. Cazden. 110 pages removed from 3-ring binder)

 

Miscellaneous

 

272.a In re Charles Hendley; Teachers Union of the City of NY v Joint Legis Comm to Investigate the Educational System of NY

 

272.b Jones v Massachusetts

 

272.c New York v Schappes

 

272.d In re Pappas

 

272.e Nelson v Wyman

 

272.1 Sweezy v New Hampshire

 

272.2 Uphaus v Wyman (2 folders)

 

272.7 Scull v Virginia

 

272.9 Gibson v Florida Legislative Investigative Committee

 

272.10 Braden, Southern Conference Educational Fund re Gibson

 

272.11 Graham v FLIC

 

272.12 Jordan v Hutchinson

 

272.13 Committee on Offenses Against the Admin. of Justice v Harris

 

272.14 Fuentes, McRae, Birnbaum v Fishel

 

-Before Legal and Administrative Tribunals

Ctn. 16

273.5 Kentucky v Rhine

 

-For Refusal to Produce Records

Ctn. 16

274.a Green v US

 

274.b US v Field

 

274.c Patterson v US

 

274.e Application of NAACP

 

274.1 Flaxer v US

 

274.3 McPhaul v US

 

Civil Penalties for Nondisclosure

Ctn. 16

280 Miscellaneous

 

-By Teachers

Ctn. 120

281. Academic Freedom

Ctn. 16

281. League of Women Voters, Freedom Agenda material, 1953-56

 

281.a Bradley v New York University

 

281.b Miller v Wheeler

 

281.c Tolman v Underhill

 

281.d Philadelphia Bd of Educ v August

Ctn. 17

281.h Steinmetz v Calif State Bd of Edu (CSEA)

 

281.1 Nostrand v Little

 

281.1a Baggett v Bullitt

 

281.3 Hughes v Bd of Higher Edu of City of NY

 

281.5 Bd of Educ (NYC) v Allen

 

281.5c In re Henry Adler

 

281.15 Cramp v Bd of Pblic Instruction of Orange Co., Florida

 

281.16 Macks v State Bd of Educ of Calif

 

281.18 Bd of Educ, Philadelphia v Solder

 

281.19 Dulgov v Bd of Educ, Tucson

 

281.20 Starbuck v Trustees, Univ of Buffalo

 

281.20a Keyishhian v Bd of Regents of Univ of NY, et al.

 

281.21 Georgia Conference of the American Assoc of Univ Professors v Bd of Regents of the Univ System of Georgia

 

281.23 Whitehill v Elkins

 

281.24 Spangler v Bd of Regents of the Univ of Nebraska

 

281.27 Aronson v Regents of the Univ of Calif

 

281.29 Thalberg v Bd of Trustees, Univ of Illinois, Krehbiel v Bd of Educ, Morgan co., Illinois

 

281.31 Haskett v Washington et al.

 

281.34 Gilmore v Texas

 

281.35 Hartman v Romney

 

281.36 Connell v Higginbotham

 

281.37 MacKay v Rafferty

 

281.38 Grossman v NY City Bd of Education

 

-By Others

Ctn. 17

282.a Gerende v Bd of Supervisors of Elections of Baltimore

 

282.16 In re Walter Marvin, Jr.

 

282.17 Coxe v Osser

 

282.18 In re Josephine Belmont

 

282.19 Driscoll v International Union of Operating Engineers

 

282.20 US v Nixon

 

282.21 Attorney General v Covington & Burling

 

282.22 Oboler v Hampton

 

282.23 Lefkowitz v Cunningham

 

Penalties for False Disclosure

 

-Under Taft-Hartley Oath

Ctn. 17

291. Inland Steel Co. v NLRB and United Steelworkers of America v NLRB

 

291.1 Jencks v US

 

291.2 Gold v US (3 folders)

Ctn. 120

291.3 US v Bryson

Ctn. 18

291.4 Travis v US

 

291.7 Haug et al. V US

 

-On Government Security Questions

Ctn. 17

292.5 Marzani v US

 

-In Miscellaneous Cases

Ctn. 17

293. Memorial for Ethel and Julius Rosenberg

 

293.a US v Hiss, clippings and articles (2 folders)

The Honorable Mr. Nixon and the Alger Hiss Case by Reuben, William

 

293.c Ohio v Hamilton

 

293.e US v Lattimore

 

293.2 Hucks v US (2 folders)

 

293.3 Los Angeles Board of Education v Sloat

Ctn. 120

295.18 Casey v Collectors Publications, Ltd

 

295.26 Mindel v US Civil Service Commission

 

295.35 Stark v Shultz

 

295.37 Weaver v Musick

Ctn. 114

295.100 General- Birth Control and Abortion

 

295.108 California v Belous

 

295.109 Jessin v Shasta Co.

 

295.111 California v Gurner, Maginnis

Ctn. 114

295.115 Doe v Bolton

Ctn. 120

295.118 Alice v State Dep't of Social Welfare

Ctn. 141

295.100 Constitutional Aspects of the Right to Limit Childbearing

Ctn. 120

295.120 Women's Abortion Coalition v Younger

Ctn. 114

295.200 Women-General

 

II. Due Process And Related Rights

Additional Note

(Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eight, And Fouteenth Amendments)
 

Searches and Seizures

 

-By Electronic Eavesdropping

Ctn. 121

301. General

 

301.23 Berger v New York

 

301.27 New York v Siefert, Burkard, Habel

 

301.33 Taglianetti v US

 

301.38 Hoffa et al. v USA, Dranow v US

 

301.39 Hoffa v US

 

301.40 Dellinger v Mitchell

 

301.44 New York v Gibson

 

301.46 Giordano v US

 

301.52 US v Sinclair

 

301.52a US v US Dist. Ct. Eastern Dist. of Michigan, Keith

Ctn. 120

301.53 US v Smith

Ctn. 121

301.54 US v Berrigan et al.

Ctn. 120

301.55 US v Hilliard

Ctn. 121

301.56 US v Jaffe, Donghi

 

301.57 Maryland v Turco

 

301.58 US v John Doe, Idella Marx, Appellant

Ctn. 120

301.59 Russo v Byrne

Ctn. 120

301.59a Ellsberg, Russo v Mitchell (Pentagon Papers Trial)

Ctn. 121

301.60 US v Ayers (Weatherman Case)

 

301.61 US v Whitaker

 

301.62 US v Calandra

 

301.70 Halperin v Kissinger

 

301.76 Berlin Democratic Club v Schlesinger

 

301.84 Chandler v Helms

 

301.85 Goldstein v US

 

301.86 Goldman v US

Ctn. 120

301.87 California v Masio

Ctn. 121

301.88 California v Siegel

 

301.94 US v Cofer

 

-National Security Cases

Ctn. 120

301.540 Forsyth v Kleindienst

 

301.541 Humphrey v US

 

301.544 In re Halkin

 

-In Other Federal Cases

Ctn. 121

302. General

 

302.1 Hinton v Eastland

 

302.15 Lester v US

 

302.27 US v Kahn

 

302.33 US v Robinson

Ctn. 120

302.41 US v Brignoni-Ponce

 

302.41 Bowen v US

Ctn. 122

302.43 US v Peletier

 

-In Other Criminal Cases

Ctn. 122

303.47 Camara v Municipal Court of San Francisco

 

303.67 Cunningham v Heinze

Ctn. 122

303.69 California v Van Meter, Alexander

 

303.86 In re Donaldson

 

303.106 California v Krivda

 

303.135 Buttram, etal. v City of Pomoma

 

-Suits for False Arrest, Police Practices, Police Review Board

Box 62

304. DeLancie v McDonald

Ctn. 18

304. Law and Disorder Reports, 1970-72

 

No. California Police Practices Project

 

Police Misconduct Survey

 

Course Material for Police Misconduct Litigation, 1975

 

Police Misconduct Litigation-Plaintiff's Remedies from American Jurisprudence, vol 15, 1968

 

Assembly Select Committee on the Administration of Justice Hearings, Relations Between the Police and Mexican Americans, 1972

 

Bibliographies: Police Review Board, Prisoner Release

 

Reports (3 folders)

 

Newsletters

 

Catalogs

 

Manuals

 

Academic Papers (2 folders)

Ctn. 19

304. Law Review articles

 

Civil Rights and Civil Wrongs, photojournal, 1964

 

Case studies

 

Lynching Northern Style

 

Exhibit materials on police conduct

 

Clippings

 

Miscellaneous

Ctn. 19

304. Publications

 

Standards Relating to the Urban Police Function, American Bar Association, 1972

 

Police Use of Deadly Force, Catherine H. Milton, 1977

 

Law Enforcement: The Matter of Redress, Institute of Modern Legal Thought, 1969

 

Special Analysis, Crime and Law Enforcement, American Enterprise Instititute, 1965

 

The Police and the Community: The Dynamics of Their Relationship in a Changing Society, Regents of the University of California, 1966

Ctn. 180

304. Hearing- appeal of Officer Douglas L. Butler

Ctn. 19

304. List of successful suits against agents of justice under 42 USCS 1983 since 1950

 

304.Ala General

 

304.Ala.a US ex rel Gassaway v Norville

 

304.Ala.2 Nesmith v Alford

 

304.Ala.3 Zellner v Lingo, Painter

 

304.Ala.9 Houser v Hill

 

304.Ariz.2 Arizona Civil Liberties Union v Garmire

 

304.Ariz.3 Thompson v City of Tucson (4 folders)

 

304.Ark.3 Townsend v Ross

Ctn. 20

304.Ark.4 Russ v Ratliff (same case as NAACP v Levi) (2 folders)

 

304.Cal. General (2 folders)

 

Final Report: Prevention and Control of Crime and Delinquency for State of California

 

304.Cal. Neither Law nor Order, The People's Park and the People's Police

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.a Cohen v Cahill

 

304.Cal.13 White v Bonnanno

 

304.Cal.17 Hinton v Smith

 

304.Cal.18 Morgan v Yuba Co.

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.23 Whitten, Hanna v US Secret Service

 

304.Cal.28 Smith v Cahill

 

304.Cal.33 Marlow v Coakley

 

304.Cal.34 Figueroa v Mackey

 

304.Cal.35 San Francisco v Kuelz

 

304.Cal.36 Bechtler v City of Hawthorne

 

304.Cal.49 Moore v San Francisco

 

304.Cal.51 Renteria v DiGiorgio Corp.

 

304.Cal.54 Stokes v Cahill

Ctn. 20

304.Cal.60 Linthcome v San Francisco, Roberts

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.62 Smith v Solano Co.

 

304.Cal.63 Stribling v Malliard

 

302.Cal.67 Murray v Madigan

Ctn. 20

304.Cal.67a Kessel v Madigan

 

304.Cal.69 Anderson v Los Angeles

 

304.Cal.70 Konell v Los Ang. Chief of Police; Bass v City of Los Angeles

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.72 Figueroa v Krupp (2 folders)

 

304.Cal.73 Floyd v Los Angeles

Ctn. 20

304.Cal.75 Rodgers v Los Angeles

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.78 Roinson v Los Angeles Police Dept.

Ctn. 20

304.Cal.79a California v O'Brien, Baskett v O'Brien

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.80 Taliaferro v Cahill

 

304.Cal.81 Busse v Palo Alto Red Squad

 

304.Cal.83 Rutherford v James

Ctn. 20

304.Cal.84 Barrio Defense Committee v Younger

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.84 Barrio Defense Committee v Younger

 

304.Cal.85 Wheeler v Gain

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.86 Hoaglen v Tuso

 

304.Cal.87 Larimore v Eterovich

 

304.Cal.88 Andrews v Gunn

 

304.Cal.94 Brodrice v Ramsay

 

304.Cal.95 Herling v Emporium-Capwell Co.

Ctn. 20

304.Cal.100a Shepherd v Superior Court of California

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.102 Beck v Los Angeles

 

304.Cal.104 Loya v INS

 

304.Cal.105 US v Martinez-Fuerte

 

304.Cal.106 Henderson v Kihara

 

304.Cal.106a City of Berkeley v Henderson

 

304.Cal.108 Berkeley Police Assn v City of Berkeley

Ctn. 20

304.Cal.109 California v Miller

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.110 California v Baird

Ctn. 20

304.Cal.111 Perry v Stiltz

Ctn. 134

304.Cal.112 Valdez v County of Riverside

Ctn. 20

304.Conn.1 Harris v Lee

 

304.Conn.2 Smolen v Connecticut

 

304.Conn.3 Burns v DeGrand

 

304.Conn.4 Martin v Consiglio et al.

 

304.Conn.5 Nakonechny v City of West Haven

 

304.Conn.6 Smith v Dilieto et al.

 

304.Conn.7 Carr v Celentano

 

304.Conn.8 Delvecchio v Dana et al.

 

304.Del.1 Fletcher v Peterson

 

304.DC Miscellaneous

 

304.DC.3 Garrett v Berrier

Ctn. 20

304.DC.5 Tatum v Morton

 

304.DC.8 District of Columbia v Carter

 

304.DC.9 Graves v District of Columbia

Ctn. 122

304.DC.12 [no title]

Ctn. 20

304.Fla.2 Gordon v Florida State Trooper

 

304.Ga Miscellaneous

 

304.Ga.4 Terrell v Pritchett

 

304.Ga.7 Scott v Cribb, et al.

 

304.Ga.9 Sims v Adams et al.

 

304.Ga.10 Steele v Brock et al.

 

304.Id.2 Lockard v Baltz & John Doe I-X

 

304.Ill Miscellaneous

 

304.Ill.a Illinois v Ray

 

304.Ill.5 Monroe v Pape

 

304.Ill.7a Duble v Brown, Chicago

 

304.Ill.9 Hardwick v Hurley

 

304.Ill.10 Gonzales v General Investigations, Inc.

 

304.Ill.12 Richichi v City of Chicago

 

304.Ill.17 Gause v Chicago

 

304.Ill.18 Mock v City of Chicago

 

304.Ill.22 Fox v Chicago & Price

 

304.Ill.23 Kincy v Wilson

 

304.Ill.23a Kincy v Land, Pappas et al.

 

304.Ill.24 Kerr v Chicago

 

304.Ill.26 Illinois v Alcantar

 

304.Ill.29 Ries v Daley

 

304.Ill.30 Peck v Daley

Ctn. 20

304.Ill.31 Schnell v Chicago

 

304.Ill.32 Joseph v Rowlen

 

304.Ill.38 Frazier v Guswiler et al.

 

304.Ill.39 Calvin v Conlisk

 

304.Ill.42 Mutic's Estate v Chicago Police

 

304.Ind.2 US v Nipple & Leuth

 

304.Iowa.1 Quad-City Community News Service v Jabens

 

304.La Miscellaneous

 

304.La.a Thomas v Capaci

 

304.La.1 Jones v Teasley

 

304.La.8 Aronson v Giarruso

 

304.Md.3 Lankford v Gelston

 

304.Md.5 Richardson v Snow

 

304.Mass General

 

304.Mass.2 Yaffe v Powers

 

304.Mass.4 US v Chadwick

Ctn. 21

304.Mich General

 

304.Mich Ann Arbor Newsmen and Students v Detroit Police

 

304.Mich.a Fitzpatrick v Hart

 

304.Mich.1 Green v Azzam

 

304.Mich 2 Michigan v Thomas

 

304.Mich.3 Elijah Mohammed v Sommers

 

304.Mich.3a Nation of Islam v Industrial Mutual Assn (IMA)

Ctn. 21

304.Mich.4 Payne v Smith, Merrill

 

304.Mich.5 Stanzione v Hubbard

 

304.Mich.6a Agreement between Michigan Civil Rights Commission and Detroit Police Department

 

304.Mich.7 Walker v Edwards

Ctn. 21

304.Mich.8 Brown v Braver

 

304.Mich. In re petition of Garlene Boone Bernard

 

304.Mich.10 Low v Detroit

 

304.Mich.11 Delude v Koch

 

304.Mich.12 Michigan v August

 

304.Mich.13 Blanding v US

 

304.Mich.15 Rosario v Detroit Police Department

 

304.Mich.16 Leverette v Gilmore

 

304.Mich.17 Wilson v Detroit

 

304.Mich.18 Lockaby v Wayne County

 

304.Mich.19 Clore v City of Detroit

 

304.Mich.20 Aguinaga v Austin

 

304.Mich.23 Buck v Gribbs

 

304.Mich.24 Delude v Raasakka, Porn

 

304.Minn.3 Blake v Cich

 

304.Miss. General

 

304.Miss.1 Pierson v Ray

 

304.Miss.2 US v Partridge

 

304.Miss.5 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v City of Jackson

 

304.Miss.12 Anderson v Noser

 

304.Miss.17 Jackson v Martin

 

304.Miss.26 Burton et al v Williams et al. (3 ff)

 

304.Miss.27 Washington v Noble

 

304.Mo.2 Koen v Long

 

304.Mo.3 Jackson v Miller

 

304.Mo.4 Mattis v Schnarr, Marek

 

304.NJ. General

Box 62

304.NJ Sea Alliance v New Jersey

Ctn. 21

304.NJ.3 Adams v Hughes

 

304.NJ.4 Kidd v Addonizio et al

 

304.NJ.5 Oberbehr v Kauffman

 

304.NJ.6 Smith v Spina

 

304.NJ.6a Smith v Newark

 

304.NJ.7 Anderson v Sills

 

304.NJ.8 Black Panther Party v Police Dep't Of Jersey City

 

304.NJ.9 Lewis v Kugler

 

304.NM.1 Valdez v Black

 

304.NY.12 Re Thomas Gilligan

 

304.NY.22 Locust Club v City of Rochester

 

304.NY.26 NY v Leary

 

304.NY.27 Martinelli v NY

 

304.NY.28 Johnson v New York City

 

304.NY.29 Burmeister v New York City Police Dep't

 

304.NY.31 New York v Dorak

 

304.NY.33 Jaekel v US

 

304.NY.35 Fink v Leary

 

304.NY.36 Handschu v Special Services Division of NY City Police Dept.

 

304.NY.37 Lutz v Sullivan

Ctn. 21

304.NY.39 Baskerville v Oswald

 

304.NY.40 Restivo v Gray

 

304.NY.41 Marhiney v New York

Ctn. 22

304.NC.2 Summers v Horton

 

304.Ohio 3 Gilligan v Morgan

 

304.Ohio.5 Spaeth v Miller

Ctn. 122

304.Ohio.6 Scheuer v Rhodes, Kraus v Rhodes (Kent State)

Ctn. 22

304.Ore.1 Ford v Schrunk

 

304.Ore.2 Dexter v Schrunk (2 folders)

 

304.PA General (Pittsburg v Bryant)

 

304.PA.a Schomer v McKendry

 

304.PA.3 Harrington v Tate

 

304.PA.7 Council of Organizations on Philadelphia Police Accountability and Responsibility v Tate

 

304.PA.8 Freedom Press v Rizzo

 

304.PA.15 Hess v Nober, Doe, and Northampton Township

 

304.PA.16 Rizzo v Goode

 

304.PA.19 Washington v Chester

 

304.RI.1 General Quince v Rhode Island

 

304.Tenn General

 

304.Tenn.2 Gatson v Gibson

 

304.Tex.3 Medrano v Allee

 

304.Tex.5 Little v Schafer

 

304.Tex.7 Whirl v Kern

Ctn. 122

304.Tex.15 Texas Farmers Union v McAllen

Ctn. 22

304.US.12 US v Watson

 

304.VT.1 Aldrich et al. v City of St. Albans et al.

 

304.VA General

 

304.Wash.2 Williams v Clinton

 

304.Wash.5 Fox v Klundt

 

304.Wisc.1 Thorton v Bookmann

 

304.Wisc.2 Mueller v Dyke

 

304.Wisc.3 Mackenzie v O'Neill et al.

Ctn. 22

304.Wisc.5 Sillars v Ryan et al.

 

304.Wisc.6 Davis v Murphy & City of Milwaukee

 

304.Wisc.8 Malone v Emery

 

304.Wisc.9 Mifflin Street Community Coop v Emery

 

304.Wisc.11 Rosenberg v Hebard

 

Indictments/ Informations

 

General

Ctn. 141

310. "Just a Few Easy Questions-A Look at Federal Grand Juries"

Ctn. 134

310.2 California v Hee

 

310.3 Branner v Superior Ct of Calif.

 

-Challenge to Grand Jury Composition

Ctn. 134

311.i California v Superior Court

Ctn. 22

311.3 New York v Shakur (Panther 21)

 

Panther 21 Trial News, Sept. 1970-May 1971

Ctn. 134

311.6 California v Gibson, Justice

 

311.10 California v Bingham et al (San Quentin Six)(3 folders)

 

311.11 California v Peraza, Navarette

 

311.12 California v Castro et al. (2 folders)

 

-Attacks on Character of Evidence

Ctn. 22

312.27 California v Billings and Mooney

Ctn. 122

312.43 Bacon v US

 

312.48 California v Kline

 

312.100.1 Johnson v San Joaquin Co Superior Court

 

312.100.2 California v Persons

 

-Charge of Entrapment

 

313.4 Benson v Pitchess

Ctn. 22

313.101 US v Anderson

 

-Charge of Conspiracy

Ctn. 122

314.8 California v Schnepf

 

314.11 California v Bardacke (Oakland 7)

 

314.13 US v Gwyther, Morgan

 

314.19 California v Zamora

 

-Inspection of Pretrial Statements of Government Witnesses (Jencks Act)

Ctn. 22

315. "Pre-trial Discovery by Defendants in Criminal Cases" by Mitchel J.Ezer

Ctn. 123

315.a Cope v City of Contra Costa

 

-Other Discovery

 

317.1 Riuz v California

 

317.2 California v Cabrellis

 

Double Jeopardy

 

-In State Cases

Ctn. 123

322.16 California v Escobedo

 

322.19 In re Anonymous Prisoner

 

322.25 Breed v Jones

 

Self incrimination: Criminal Sanctions for Exercising Privilege

 

-Before Congressional Committees

Ctn. 123

331.c Fagerhaugh v US

 

-Grants of Immunity, Federal

Ctn. 22

334 General (Grants of Immunity: Federal, in due process)

 

334.b Ullman v US

 

334.4 Piemonte v US

Ctn. 123

334.10 District Court (ND Calif) v Carter, Crawford, Shead

Ctn. 22

334.11 In re Jaques Egan

 

334.12 In re Grand Jury Testimony of Joanne Kinoy

Ctn. 22

334.16 Bauer et al. v McLaren

 

334.18 In re Carol Vericker

 

-Miscellaneous

Ctn. 123

337.1 California v Abrams

 

Self incrimination: Civil sanctions for exercising privilege

 

-Effect on Employment: Public School Teachers

Ctn. 23

342.a Faxon v School Committee of Boston

 

342.1 Slochower v Bd of Higher Educ of the City of New York

 

342.2` In the matter of the appl. of Mary I. Daniman v NY Bd of Educ

 

342.2b Austin v the Bd of Higher Educ of the City of New York

 

342.9 Board of Education v Beilan

 

342.11 Bd of Educ, Philadelphia v Intille

 

-Effect on Employment:Other Public Officers

Ctn. 23

343.2 Hancock v Burns

Ctn. 123

343.3 Nelson v Los Angeles County

Ctn. 23

348.8 In the matter of Boikess v Aspland

 

-Effect on Employment-Private

 

344. Miscellaneous

 

344.12 In re American Federation of Technical Engineers Local 241 and RadioCorporation of America

 

344.13 Zelman v Bethelem Steel Co., United Steelwrks of Am.

 

-Effect on Attorneys

 

345. General (US v The Progressive, Inc.)

 

345.a Sheiner v Florida

 

345.1 Cohen v Hurley

 

Due process

 

-In Arraignment

Ctn. 123

351.b In re Henderson Harris

 

-In Grand Jury Procedures

Ctn. 141

352. Are You Now or Have You Ever... A Look at Federal Grand Juries Investigating Movement Activities and the Political and Legal Responses to Them

Ctn. 123

352.b California v Moschetti, Sismour

 

352.8 In re Grand Jury Witnesses Berg, Craven, Rosenberg

 

-In Obtaining Confessions

Ctn. 141

353. General

Ctn. 23

353.q Anderson v US

Ctn. 123

353.40 California v Stewart

 

353.73 Smart v Wilson

 

353.74 California v Menektos

 

-In Press Releases and Newspaper Coverage

Ctn. 123

354.24 California v Jackson, Cluchette, Drumgo (Soledad Brothers)

Ctn. 124

354.24 People v George Jackson et al.

Ctn. 123

354.25 Pell v Procunier

 

354.32 California v Remiro, Little

 

354.36 People v Pinell

 

-In Admitting Perjured Testimony

Ctn. 23

355.c In the matter of Harry Renton Bridges

 

Bridges, Schmidt, Robertson v US

Ctn. 123

355.c Bridges v US

Ctn. 174

355.c Harry Renton Bridges v US, US Court of Appeals No. 12597, Transcript of trial, 17 volumes

 

Bridges, Misc. related publications, 3 vols. of reports

Ctn. 180

355.c Bridges testimony in the China trade

 

Habaes corpus, misc pamphlets

Ctn. 23

355.4 Rosenberg, Sobell v US, Supreme Court, 1951

 

Transcript of Record v I, part 1-4

 

Transcript of Record v II, part 1-4

 

Rosenberg v US, 1952

 

In the matter of the application of guardianship of Michael Allen Rosenberg

 

Excerpts from the petition of Ethel Rosenberg for Executive Clemency to the President of the United States

 

Rosenberg, Sobell v US

 

Fact sheets, articles, memoranda, opinion excerpts

 

FBI Files obtained under the Freedom of Information Act

 

The Kaufmann Papers, US gov't documents from the FBI

 

concerning the trial judge in the Rosenberg Case

 

Fund for Information and Accountability, Inc.

 

Action re FBI file destruction program

 

355.4 National Committee to Re-open the Rosenberg Case

 

Bay Area Committee to Re-open the Rosenberg Case, 1976-77

 

Re David Greenglass scientific evidence in the Rosenberg case

 

Clippings 1976-83

 

Rosenberg, Sobell v US

 

Committee to Secure Justice for Morton Sobell, 1956-66

 

East Bay Sobell Committee, 1957-58

 

Committee to Free Morton Sobell, 1966-68

 

Sobell v US (3 folders) (See also BANC MSS 99/280 National Lawyers Guild, Papers of Morton Dreyfus)

Ctn. 24

Sobell v US (3 folders)

 

US v Sobell (4 folders)

Ctn. 24

355.4a Meeropol v Nizer, Doubleday Inc., Fawcett Inc.

 

355.11 US ex.rel. Miller v Pate

Ctn. 123

355.13 In re Application of Paul Kern Imbler

Box 62

355.101 In re Alger Hiss

 

-In Courts Martial, Military Administrative Decisions, Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Ctn. 123

356.301 Marron v Chaffee

 

-In Naturalization Proceedings

 

357.7 Astrup v INS

Ctn. 24

357.9 Petition for Naturalization of Yoa Quinn Lee

Box 62

357.11 Noel v Chapman

 

-In Expatriation, Denaturalization, Deportation

 

358. American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born

Ctn. 24

358. General

 

358.i Barber v Gonzales

 

358.l Trop v Dulles

 

358.n Chandler v US

 

358.o US ex rel Dente v Ault

 

358.p US ex rel Kwong Hai Chew v Colding

 

358.v Hyun v Landon

 

358.8 Kennedy v Mendoza-Martinez

 

358.9 Matles v US

 

358.17 Rusk v Cort

 

358.23 Schneider v Rusk

 

358.25 Giova v Rosenberg

 

358.51 Heikkila v US (3 folders clippings)

 

Heikkila v Barber

Ctn. 123

358.51 Heikkila v Barber (2 folders)

Ctn. 24

358.59 US ex rel Marks v Esperdy

 

358.61 Sherman v Hamilton

 

358.63 Afroyim v Rusk

 

358.68 Chew v Immigration and Naturalization Service

 

358.69 Immigration and Naturalization Service v Stanisic

Ctn. 25

358.70 Grondahl v Brownell

 

358.71 US ex rel Crasov v Foley

 

358.72 Ramirez-Salse v Brownell

 

358.73 Ault v Holmes

 

358.74 Rucker v Saxbe

Ctn. 124

358.76 Shannon vUS

 

-In Loyalty Hearings

Ctn. 25

359. General-Due process in rape cases

 

359.2 Scott v Macy

 

360 General- Marital rape

 

360.1 California v Hunt

Ctn. 124

360.1 California v Garcia

Ctn. 25

360.2 Coker v Georgia

 

-In Bar Proceedings re Lawyers

Ctn. 124

361.a In re Vincent Hallinan

Ctn. 25

361.2 Powell v Commission on Admissions and Grievances

 

361.3 Swanson v Florida Bar et al.

Ctn. 124

361.6 In re Siegel

Ctn. 25

361.9 Taylor v Hayes

 

361.15 Maness v Meyers

 

361.16 Belli v State Bar of California (6 folders)

 

-In Government Employment (including teaching)

Ctn. 25

363. Miscellaneous (Jean Fields Case)

 

363.2 Donald v Federal Aviation Administration

 

363.3 Fair v Kirk

 

363.4 Bueter v Duck

Ctn. 124

363.5 Sherar v Harless

Ctn. 25

363.27 Alpert, Altman et al v City and County of San Francisco

 

363.28 Nader v Bork

 

363.30 Meroze v Bd of Educ of Essex County Vocational School

 

363.32 Ong v Tovey

 

363.33 Passini v Robinson

 

363.34 O'Shea v Blatchford

 

364. General

 

364.1 Aikens v Abel, Barbero v Abel

 

364.2 Millar v Sweno

Ctn. 124

364.3 Irby v District Lodge 720(IAM)

 

Right to counsel /Access to courts

 

-General

Ctn. 26

370. General- Right to Counsel and Appeal (3 folders)

 

-In Federal Cases

 

371. General

 

371.a Del'Marmol v Chappell

 

371.b Neiswenter v Chappell

 

371.5 Jamison v Chappell

 

371.6 Johnson v US

Ctn. 124

371.7 Pate v Wilson

Ctn. 26

371.11 In the matter of Leopold Frankel

 

-In State Cases

Ctn. 124

372.i Riser v Warden, Folsom State Prison

 

372.46 Bowie v Wilson

 

372.69 Gilmore v Lynch, Gilmore v Younger (2 ff)

 

372.87 Re H.T. Harrell

 

372.89 California ex rel Major v Superior Ct of San Francisco

 

372.102 In re Alvarez

 

372.103 In re Jordan

 

372.105 Drumgo v Superier Ct. Of Calif, Marin Co.

 

372.113 California v Tillotson

 

372.144 Fall v Hurley

 

372.145 Calif. v Norris

 

372.149 Faretta v California

 

-Restrictions on Attorneys and Judges

Ctn. 26

373. General- Lawyer Discipline (4 folders)

 

373.b Cammer v US

 

373.2 In re Harriet B. Sawyer

Ctn. 124

373.4 US v Shibley (2 folders)

Ctn. 26

373.8 In re Otto Tucker

 

373.12 Mitchell v US

 

373.20 District of Columbia v Kinoy, Kinoy v Dist of Col.

 

373.27 Re L. Lackey Rowe Jr.

 

373.34 Kentucky State Bar Association v Taylor

 

373.35 Lathrop v Donohue

 

373.36 Schwartz v Defender Association of Philadelphia

 

373.37 Baker v Beto

Ctn. 124

373.42 Consumers Union of US v California State Bar

Ctn. 26

373.43 Kugler v Helfant

 

373.44 Bates v State Bar of Arizona

Ctn. 27

373.45 In the matter of Michael Callan, Harris David, and Gerald Clark

 

373.46 In the matter of Martha Copleman

 

373.47 Turco v Monroe County Bar Association

 

373.48 Moses v Scruggs

 

-Opportunity for Appellate Review/Transcript

Ctn. 124

374.40 In re Vincemt Henderson

 

374.41 Anders v California

 

374.45 Herick v Municipal Ct of Los Angeles

 

374.46 Magezis v Friedman

 

374.50 Colbert v Eyman

 

374.54 People v Murphy

 

-Group Legal Services/ OEO Offices

Ctn. 27

375. General- Legal Services, Legal Aid for the Poor (6 folders)

Ctn. 141

375. Revised Handbook on Prepaid Legal Services, ABA, 1972

 

-Bias and Prejudice of Judges

Ctn. 124

377.30 Fresno Co. v Calif Dept. of Socail Welfare

Ctn. 27

378. General- Judicial Performance

 

378.6 US v Thompson

 

378.7 North v Russell

 

Confrontation

 

-In Criminal Cases

Ctn. 124

381.5 Gray v Wilson

 

Jury trials

 

-General

Ctn. 27

390. General- Jury Service

Ctn. 124

390.4 Safer v Calif. Superior Ct, Ventura Co.

Ctn. 124

390.6 California v Collins

Ctn. 27

390.7 Hudson v Holton

 

-Nature of Jury Trial

 

391. General- Jury Selection

 

391.b Pennsylvania ex. rel. Fletcher v Cavell

 

391.1 Michigan v Hunter

 

391.2 Michigan v Simpson

 

391.10 Illinois v Capoldi

 

391.19 Muniz v NLRB

 

391.20 Costarelli v Massachussetts

Ctn. 28

391.21 Herring v New York

 

391.22 Murphy v Florida

 

391.100 Miscellaneous

 

391.101 Colgrove v Battin

 

391.200 ABA Reports, Management of Jury Systems

 

391.201 Apodoca v Oregon

 

391.202 New Jersey v Ward

 

391.300 Report on Voir Dire

Ctn. 124

391.301 People v Crowe

Ctn. 28

391.302 Massachusetts v Kiernan

 

391.303 Massachusetts v Ladetto

 

391.304 Massachusetts v Ricard

 

391.305 Massachusetts v Martorano

 

391.306 Massachusetts v Subilosky

 

391.307 Massachusetts v Taylor

 

391.308 US v Baker (Wounded Knee Voir Dire)

Ctn. 124

391.309 US v Soliah

Ctn. 28

391.310 US v Lasky

 

-Waiver of Jury

 

392.4 Szulczewski v Jasak

 

-Improper Comment

 

393. Chapman v California

 

393.4 Michigan v Brocato

Ctn. 124

393.5 California v Thompson

Ctn. 28

393.6 New Jersey v LeRoi Jones

 

393.9 Mullaney v Wilbur

 

-Scrupled Jurors

 

394.1 Witherspoon v Illinois

 

394.2 Adderly et al v Wainwright

 

394.3 Hill v Nelson (2 folders)

 

394.4 In re Anderson, In re Satterfield (3 folders)

 

Excessive Bail: Conditions on Release

 

-Amount of Bail Set

Ctn. 124

401.9 Gaar, Treuhaft v Municipal Court (Oakland)

 

401.23a In re Goines, Levine

Ctn. 125

401.29 Brenneman et al. v Madigan (2 folders)

Ctn. 124

401.236 California v Noble

 

-Denial of Bail

Ctn. 125

403.19 In re Huey P. Newton

 

403.24 California v Minzey

 

-Miscellaneous Bail Problems

 

404.6 Gardner v Campbell

 

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

 

-In Criminal Cases

Ctn. 125

411.c California v Wolfe

 

411.d In re Application of Richard Gilcrease for Writ of Habeas Corpus

 

411.33 California v Ketchel, Sears

 

411.38 Jordan v Fitzharris

 

411.49 Wells v Madigan

 

411.51 Lane v Carberry

 

411.55 Boyle v Madigan

 

411.60 In re Geldern

 

411.62 Nolen v Fitzharris (4 folders)

 

411.63 California v Whiteside, Marquez

 

411.64 Howard v Rosendale

 

411.72 Holder v Procunier

 

411.73 In re Ortiz

 

411.84 Walker v Procunier

 

411.85 In re Sangsland

 

411.89 Taylor v Munson et al.

 

411.91 Payne v Whitmore

 

411.92 Burt v Zeimer

 

411.Cal.27 Four Folsom Inmates v Craven

 

411.Cal.28 Vun Cannon v Breed

 

411.Cal.34 Gaulden v Procunier

 

411.Cal.36 Charles v Patterson

 

411.Cal.38 Hilliard v Pope

 

411.Cal.40 Williams v Pope

 

411.Cal.41 O'Neill v Long

 

Due Process/ Equal Protection for the Poor

 

-Social Welfare Programs-Local

Ctn. 91

421.Cal.b Parrish v US Civil Service Commission

 

421.Cal.4 Contra Costa Co. v Calif Socila Welfare Bd, Henderson

 

421.Cal.10 Hercules v Dept of Social Welfare

 

421.Cal.12 Alameda Co. v Espinoza

 

421.Cal.15 Bonner v Montgomery

 

421.Cal.16 Brown v Hannon

 

421.Cal.18 Wheeler v Montgomery

 

421.Cal.19 Marshall v California

 

421.Cal.19a Burns v Montgomery

 

421.Cal.22 Damico v California

 

421.Cal.25 Morris v Williams

 

421.Cal.30 In re Pierce

Ctn. 126

421.Cal.31 Lara v Fair Employment Practices Commission

 

421.Cal.36 McCollough v Terzian

 

421.Cal.37 In re Raynes

 

421.Cal.38 Little, Ochinero v Montgomery

 

421.Cal.39 Ivy v Montgomery

 

421.Cal.41 Jamesv Montgomery

 

421.Cal.43 Ramos v Fare, Montgomery

 

421.Cal.46 Muniz v Montgomery

 

421.Cal.47 Loredo v Sierra View Hospital

 

421.Cal.48 Paulson v Finch

 

421.Cal.49 Lewis v Montgomery

 

421.Cal.50 Cal. Legis.Council for Older Americans v Weinberger

 

421.Cal.51 Committee for Rights of Disabled v Carleson

Ctn. 126

421.Cal.52 Committee for Rights of Disabled v Reagan

 

421.Cal.54 Calif. Welfare Rights v Reagan

 

422.5 Johnson v Arkansas Dept. of Public Welfare

 

422.9 Macias v Finch

 

422.16 Berry v Hardin

 

422.17 Muniz v Cohen

 

422.18 Hernandez v Hardin

 

423.Cal.2 Tyree v Pleasanton Housing Authority

 

423.Cal.4 Western Addition Community Organization v Weaver

 

423.Cal.7 Potrero Hill Community Action Comm. v SF Housing Authority

 

423.Cal.12 Genoeva v Rosales

 

423.Cal.19 Zaragoza v Skyway Realty

 

423.Cal.20 Silas v Smith

 

423.Cal.21 South of Market Residents Assn. v S F Redevelopment Agency

 

423.Cal.22 Simons v Dorchester Hotel

 

423.Cal.24 Mendoza v Gonzales

 

423.Cal.27 Ford v San Francisco Housing Authority

 

423.Cal.28 Mihans v Berkely Municipal Court

 

423.Cal.29 Berkeley Tenants Union v Individual Landlords

 

423.Cal.30 Dionio v Carberry, Bryson v Carberry

 

423.Cal.31 Tenants and Owners in Opposition to Redv. v US Dept HUD

 

424.16 Van Slayke v Williams

 

424.24 McCallop v Unioversal Acceptance Corp

 

424.28 Budget Finance Plan v Franklin

 

424.201 Orr v San Francisco Superior Ct.

 

425.7 Lopez v Daly City Toyota

 

425.101 Nunemaker v Pacific Telephone, Wood v PG & E

Ctn. 141

426. Due Process for Parents and Families (2 folders)

Ctn. 126

427.12 Pettibone v Weinberger

 

427.18 Atwood Aviation v Morley

 

427.19 United Farm Workers Organizing Committ. v Bruno Dispoto Co.

 

427.22 Pitts v Reagan

 

428.1 Robles v Gilroy Unified School District

Ctn. 141

429. Riots - General (2 folders)

 

429. Riots - NYC, Plainfield, Newark, Detroit, Harlem(7 folders)

 

429. Civil Disturbances

 

429. Report of the Nat'l Advisory Comm. on Civil Disorders,1968 (2 ff)

 

429.2 Watts Riots- General and clippings (2 folders)

Ctn. 126

429.2e Brooks, Levine v Los Angeles Superior Court

 

429.4 Watkins v LA Co. Superior Ct.

 

-Due Process for Juveniles

 

430.5 Kent v US

 

Post Conviction Remedies

 

-On Prison Disciplinary Proceedings

Ctn. 127

455.Cal.5 Johnson v Duffy

 

455.Cal.6 Jackson, Drumgo, Cluchette v Younger

 

Sentencing and Clemency Procedures

 

-Sentencing Process

Ctn. 127

461.11 Conway v California Adult Authority

 

461.25 Allen v Younger

 

461.26 California v Griffin

 

461.414 Allen et al v Younger

 

-Applications for and Conditions of Probation

 

462.2 In re Peeler

Ctn. 127

462.3 In re Mannino

 

-Applications for and Conditions of Parole

 

463.6 In re Sturm

 

-Parole and Probation Revocation

 

466.5 California v Delles

 

466.7 In re Spells

 

466.8 In re Eldridge Cleaver

 

-Miscellaneous

 

469. Calif. v Cooper, Terry

 

Miscellaneous Due Process

Ctn. 141

490.13 Commonwealth of Mass. v Sacco,Vanzetti

Ctn. 127

490.26 Calif. v Collins

 

III. Equal Protection

Additional Note

(Fifth, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, Fifteenth, Nineteenth, And Twenty-Fourth Amendments)
 

Elections

 

-General

Ctn. 28

500. 1961 United States Commission on Civil Rights Report, v. 1-5

Ctn. 141

500. To Do Justice, Misc.

Ctn. 128

500. General (3 folders)

 

500. "Congressional Power to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment

 

Against Private Acts" Frantz, Laurent --draft and typeset copy

 

500. State Action

 

-Racial, Language Discrimination

 

501. General

 

501.Ala.31a In re Herndon

 

501.DC.2 Powell v McCormack

 

501.Ind.1 US v Krupa

 

501.Miss.15 US v Mississippi

 

501.Miss.41 Riddell v National Democratic Party, Evers v Waller

Ctn. 128

501.NM.1 Montoya v Bolack

 

501.NY.1 In re Jose Camacho v Inspectors of Election

 

501.NY.1a Camacho v Rogers

 

501.NY.3 In re Application of Cardona

 

501.NC.6 US v Pate

 

501.Tex.a Smith v Allwright

 

-Political Discrimination

 

502. General

 

502. Vietnam Ballot Petition

 

502. Wallace for President (1948)

 

502.Cal.3 Otsuka v Hite

 

502.Cal.5 Westbrook v Mihaly, Adams v Mihaly, Larez v Shannon

 

502.Cal.6 Cleaver v San Francisco

 

502.Cal.7 Calif ex rel Martinez v Lisher

 

502.Ga.a South v Peters

 

502.Ga.1 Bond, M.L. King, Keyes v James Sloppy" Floyd et al

Ctn. 129

502.Ind.1 Whitcomb v Communist Party of Indiana

 

502.Ind.2 Communist Party of Ind. v Whitcomb

 

502.Md.1 Auerbach v Mandel

 

502.Md.2 Maryland People's Party v Mandel

 

502.Mich. Aboliish the Poll Tax

 

502.Minn.1 Mitchell v Donovan

 

502.Miss.3 US v Marshall Co. Bd of Election Commissioners

 

502.Miss.4 Evers v Williams

 

502.NJ.1 Richardson v Caputo

 

502.NY.10 In re Basel

Ctn. 129

502.Ohio.a Hallinan v Brown

 

502.Ohio.1 Washington v Cayahoga Co. Bd of Elections

 

502.Ohio.2 Sweetenham et al. v Gilligan et al.

 

502.Ohio.4 Lehman v Shaker Heights

 

-Urban Discrimination

 

503. General (2 folders)

 

503.Ala.1 Sims v Frink

 

503.Ala.3 Amos v Sims

 

503.Ala.4 Reynolds v Sims

 

503. Colo.2 Lisco v McNichols

 

503.Kan.1 Harris et al v Shanahan

 

503.Ma.1 Maryland Comm. for Fair Representation v Tawes

 

503.Mich.1 Scholle v Hare

 

503.Miss.1 Fortner v Barnett

 

503.Miss.2 Connor v Johnson

 

503.Miss.3 Marshall v Mayor, Bd of Selectmen, City of McComb

 

503.NY.1 WMCA et al v Simon

 

503.NY.3 Honeywood v Rockefeller

 

503.Okla.1 Brown v Election Bd of Oklahoma

 

503.SC.1 McCain v Lybrand

 

-14th Amendment § 2 Enforcement

 

504. General

 

504.1 Denman v McCormack

 

504.2 Lampkin v Hodges

 

-Residence Requirements

 

505.a Hallanan v Mittlbeeler

 

505.b Davis v Union Dist 7, Town of Hempstead

Ctn. 129

505.2 Dreuding v Devlin

 

505.4 Hall v Beals

 

505.5 Harris v Samuels and Tuscaloosa Co. Bd of Registrars

 

505.6 Keane v Mihaly

 

505.7 Dunn et al v Blumstein

 

505.8 Jolicoeur et al v Mihaly

 

505.9 Whitcomb v Affeldt

 

-Miscellaneous Problems

 

506. General

Ctn. 130

506. 3rd Party Federal Matching

 

506.1 Deleware v New York

 

506.2 Kramer v Union Free School District

 

506.6 Sawyer v Healy

 

506.7 Bryant v Blunt

 

506.14 Norvell v New Mexico ex rel Apodaca and Apodaca

 

506.15 Brown v Chote

 

506.16 Assoc. Enterprises v Toltec Watershed Improvement Dist.

 

506.17 Gordon v Lance

 

506.18 Wong v KPIX-TV, KRON-TV, KGO-TV

 

506.19 Oregon v Mitchell

 

506.20 Fields v Askew

 

506.21 Dillenberg v Kramer

 

506.22 Suit to Set Aside the 1972 Presidential Election

 

506.24 Cassidy v Willis

 

506.37 Pipefitters Local Union No. 562 v US

 

506.39 Whitehead v Westbrook

 

506.40 East Parrish School Board v Marshall

Ctn. 130

506.41 Flood v Riggs

 

506.42 Nonnewaug Reg. School Dist.v Scott

 

Jury Selection: Appeals to Prejudice

 

-General

Ctn. 29

510 General- Jury Selection (4 folders)

 

510.1 California v Taylor

 

-Involving Racial, Nationality Discrimination

 

512. Jury Selection: Involving Racial Disccrimination

 

512.Ala General

 

512.Ala.a Alabama v Patterson (Scottsboro case)

 

512.Ala.b Coleman v Alabama

 

512.Ala.3 Seals v Alabama (2 folders)

 

512.Ala.5 Swain v Alabama

 

512.Ala.7 Billingsley v Clayton

 

512.Ala.10 White v Crook (2 folders)

 

512.Ala.11 Mitchell et al v Johnson

 

512.Ala.14 Jones v Wilson

 

512.Ala.15 Bokulich v Alabama (Greene Co.)

 

512.Ala.16a Turner and US v Spencer, et al v Curb, McNeir v Agee et al

 

512.Ala.17 Taylor v Alabama

 

512.Ala.27 US v Flowers

 

512.Ark.2 Stewart v Stephans

 

512.Cal. Blackstone Rangers, clippings

 

Oakland 7, clippings

 

512.Cal.a California v Melendez et al (The SleepyLagoonMystery)

 

512.Cal.b California v Gregory, Bradley, Appleman

Ctn. 127

512.Cal.c Calif v Sims

 

512.Cal.3 Del Valle v DeVoto

Ctn. 127

512.Cal.4 California v Craig

 

512.Cal.5 California v Smith

Ctn. 29

512.Cal.6 California v Newton

 

Minimizing Racism in Jury Trials: The Voir Dire conducted by Charles R. Garry in the People of California v Huey P. Newton. Edited by Ann Fagan Ginger

 

Restrictions on defense jury voir dire, Appendix a & b

 

Correspondence, leaflets, misc.

 

Clippings

 

Black Panthers, clippings 1967-68

Ctn. 127

512.Cal.6 Calif.v Huey P. Newton

 

512.Cal.7 People v Rios et al

 

512.Cal.8 Goodlet v Municipal Court of San Francisco

 

512.Cal.9 Zelchower v Younger

 

512.Cal.10 US v Mitchell, McRoy

 

512.Cal.11 Lee v California

Ctn. 29

512.Conn.2 US v Robinson

 

512.Ga.a Georgia v Hunter

 

512.Ga.b Georgia v Hall

 

512.Ga.c Avery v Georgia

 

512.Ga.5 Whitus, Davis, v Georgia

 

512.Ga.13 Mobley v US

 

512.Ga.14 Broadway, US v Culpepper

 

512.Ga.15 Pullum v Greene

 

512.Ga.24 Massey v Smith

 

512.Ill.1 Skolniek v Spolar

 

512.La.2 US ex rel Poret and Labat v Dennis and Walker

 

512.La.3 Labat v Bennett

Ctn. 29

512.La.12 Louisiana v Barksdale

 

512.La.17 Scott v Walker

 

512.La.26 US v McDaniels et al

Ctn. 30

512.Mich.2 Michigan v Mason, Michigan v Rogers

 

512.Mich.3 Michigan v Viera

 

512.Mich.4 Michigan v Hibbitt

 

512.Miss.2 Goldsby v Harpole

 

512.Miss.5 Mississippi v Gordon

 

512.Miss.6 Harper v Mississippi

 

512.Miss.7 Bailey v Wharton

 

512.Miss.8 Bass v Mississippi

 

512.Miss.11 Woodruff v Mississippi

 

512.Miss.22 Watkins v Mississippi

 

512.Miss.23 Davis v US

 

512.Miss.24 Watkins v Greene

 

512.NJ.2 New Jersey v Roberts

 

512.NY.6 Chestnut v New York

 

512.NY.9 New York v Hicks

 

512.NC.2 North Carolina v Covington

 

512.Ohio.1 Ohio v Evans

 

512.PA.3 Pennsylvania v Locke; Penn v Scott & Reid; Penn v Washington

 

512.SD.1 South Dakota v Nini, Concannon, Tiger, Cooper

 

512.SD.2 Us v Bear Runner

 

512.Tex.b Cassell v Texas

 

512.Tex.c Smith v Texas

 

512.Tex.2 Hernendez v Texas

 

512.Tex.4 Brooks v Beto

Ctn. 30

512.US.1 Test v US

Ctn. 127

512.US.4 US v Satcher

Ctn. 30

512.US.5 Ristaino v Ross

 

-Involving Economic Discrimination

 

513.a Illinois re Flanagan v McDonough

 

513.b US v Silverman

Ctn. 127

513.3 Bradley v Judges

Ctn. 30

513.4 Estelle v Williams

 

-Involving Discrimination Against Women

 

515. General

 

515.i Hoyt v Florida

 

515.2 Willis v US

 

515.5 Stubblefield v Tennessee

 

515.25 Edwards v Healy

 

515.27 National Organization for Women v Goodman

 

515.28 Taylor v Louisiana

 

-Involving Other Discrimination

 

516. Jury selections involving other discriminations

 

516.5 Abbott v County of Los Angeles

 

516.6 Perkins v Smith

 

517.2 Ross v US

Ctn. 127

517.3 Nissinoff et al v Donohue et al.

 

517.4 Westbrook v Ward

Ctn. 30

517.5 Mississippi v Wann

 

517.6 Joyce v Mississippi

 

517.7 Colorado in the interest of V.C., a child

Box 62

517.22 General

 

Education

 

-General

Ctn. 30

520. Education, General

Ctn. 140

520. Education, General (5 folders)

Ctn. 130

520. General (5 folders)

 

520. "An Appeal to President John F. Kennedy for National Rededication to the Principles of the Emancipation Proclamation and for an Executive Order Prohibiting Segregation in the US" submitted by Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., 1962.

 

520. Calif. Advisory Committee to US Commission on Civil Rights Meeting Transcript, March 19, 1976.

 

520. Calif. Advisory Comm./ Meeting Transcript Mar. 20, 1976

Ctn. 131

520.Cal. Berkeley School Integration

Ctn. 140

520.1 Busbee v Georgia Conference, Amer Asoc of Univ. Professors

 

-Challenges to Unequal Facilities

 

521. General (4 folders)

Ctn. 132

521.a Sweatt v Painter

 

521.7 Odegaard v DeFunis

 

521.10 Mission Coalition Organization v San Francisco Unif. Schl Dist.

 

521.11 Barsky v Weinberger

 

521.12 Geier v Blanton

 

-Suits to Enforce Integration

Ctn. 140

522. General (2 folders)

Ctn. 132

522. Citizens Advisory Committee on Equal Educational

 

522. General Desegregation-Integration (5 folders)

 

522. General Desegregation-Integration Clippings

 

522. General Desegregation-Integration Cases

 

522. National Congress of Colored Parents and Teachers

 

522. Title IV

 

522. Mass. Act for Elimination of Racial Imbalance in Schools

Ctn. 132

522.Calif. Berkeley Intergroup Seminar

 

522.Calif. Hadsell Report

 

522.Calif. Berkeley PTA

 

522.Calif. Intergroup Education Project, Berkeley (2 folders)

 

522.Calif School Desegregation (2 folders)

 

522.1 School Desegregation Clippings

Ctn. 30

522.Calif. School Integration, Berkeley and Oakland

 

522.Kan.a Brown v Board of Education (Topeka) (2 folders)

 

-Treatment of Minority Groups in School Books

Ctn. 131

525. Bibliographies

 

Housing- Racial, Other Discrimination

 

-General

Ctn. 131

530. General (2 folders)

 

Other Discrimination-Race, Nationality

 

-In Recreation Facilities

Ctn. 133

541.Fla.2 Dresner v City of Talahassee

 

541.ICC.4 Henderson v US

 

541.La.1 Adams v City of New Orleans

 

541.Miss.8 Mississippi v Moses

 

541.Va.2a Henderson v Trailway Bus Co.

 

541.12a Phifer, Shuttlesworth v Moore, Chief of Police

 

542.13 Brown v Gray

 

Other Sex Discrimination

 

-By Financial Institutions

Ctn. 133

551. General

 

551.Ala.2 Sawyer v Mobile

 

551.Cal.4 Teverbaugh v El Rey Trailer Parks, Inc.

Ctn. 133

551.Cal.5 Santa Clara Voiture 365 v American Legion Society

 

551.Cal.10 Morton v Los Altos Country Club

 

551.Cal.12 Rubin v Coast Corinthian Yacht Club

 

551.Fla.10 Twitty v Vogue Theater Corp.

 

551.Ga.12 Shields v Midtown Bowling Lanes

 

551.La.13 US v Slidell Youth Football Association

 

551.Md.3 Williams, Jones v Rescue Fire Co.

 

551.Md.5 Tillman v Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assoc.

 

551.Mich.1 Bishop v Statler Hotel

 

551.Mich.7 Pontiac Comm. Bowling League v Orchard Lanes Bowling Alley

 

551.Miss.13 Palmer v Mayor Thompson

 

551.Pa.2 Sullivan v Schultheis

 

551.Tx.5 Allen v Club Bowlero

 

551.Tex.7 US v Sandy Lake Pool, Inc.

 

551.Va.12 Sullivan v Little Hunting Park, Inc.

 

-In Social Security Benefits

 

552. General

 

552.Fla.6 NAACP v Webb's City, Inc.

 

552.Fla.7 Plummer v Brock

 

552.Fla.11 Bradshaw v Whigam

 

552.Ga.21 US v Kent

 

552.La.9 US v Houston Jordan et al.

 

552.Md.2 US v Hanley

 

552.Miss.5 NAACP v Primos

 

552.Miss.7b US v Spencer et al.

 

552.NY.2 Adickes v S.H. Kress Co.

Ctn. 133

552.NC.22 US v Worrells

 

552.Va.12 Williams v Lewis

 

552.Va.13 Plantiffs v Vonetes dba as Lee House Diner

 

552.Va.18 US v Blue Ridge Grill, Poe, Davis

 

552.Va.19 US v Lumpkin

 

-In Insurance Coverage

 

553. General

 

553.Ala. Washington v Lee

 

553.Cal.2 Cobbs v Rockridge Women's Club

 

553.Cal.5 Butler v Coach Royal Mobile Home Park

 

553.Fla.3 Pinkey v Meloy

 

553.Fla.5 Campbell v Hillcrest Memorial Gardens

 

553.Ga. Miscellaneous

 

553.Ga.2 Heart of Atlanta Motel v US

 

553.Mich.3 Spencer v Flint Memorial Park Associaton

 

553.Minn.1 Ericson v Sunset Memorial Park Assocaition

 

553.NJ. In re Sunshine Park

 

553.NJ.1a Sellers v Triolo

 

553.Ohio.1 Gegner v Graham

 

553.Pa.1 Johnson v Cafaro

 

553.Pa.2 Buefort v Elias

 

553.Pa.4 Moose Lodge No. 107 v Irvis

 

553.SC.1 Thomas v Orangeberg Theaters, Inc.

 

553.Utah.1 Cuevas v Sorales

 

553.Wash.1 In re Jangaba Johnson and Wheeler and the Washington

 

State Board Against Discrimination

 

553.Wisc.1 Pitts, D'Attilio v Eagles and Elks

 

-In Taxation

Ctn. 133

554. General

 

554.Fla.3 Lewter et al. v Lee Memorial Hospital

 

554.Ill.1 Morris v Chicago Hospital Council

 

554.Miss.3 Coleman v Humphreys Co. Memorial Hospital

 

554.NC.1 Simkins and US v Cone Memorial Hospital

 

554.NC.3 Hawkins v N.c. Dental Soc.

 

554.SC.1 Rackley v Bd. of Trustees of Orangeburg Reg Hospital

 

554.Va.1 Wood v Hogan

 

Employment

 

-Racial Discrimination in Hiring or Admission

Ctn. 133

571. General

 

571.10 Owens v Board of Education

 

571.12 US v Board of Education, Greene Co.

 

571.18 Franklin v School Board, Giles Co.

 

571.23 Buford v Morganton Bd of Education

 

571.24 Chambers v Hendersonville City Bd of Education

 

571.27 Missiouri Commiss. on Human Rights v Rives C-2 School Dist.

 

571.53 Rolfe, Peebles v Co. Board of Education, Lincoln Co.,Tn

 

571.72 Porcelli v Titus

 

571.75 Chance v Bd of Examiners

 

571.85 Baker v Columbus Mississippi School District

 

571.86 Hazelwood School v US

 

-Sex Discrimination

Ctn. 135

578. Bibliographies

 

578. Citizens Advisory Council on the Status of Women

 

578. Women's Bureau-US Dept of Labor

 

578. California Labor Code

Ctn. 135

578. Women and Employment (3 folders)

 

578. Women and Employment-ACLU Cases

 

578. Miscellaneous (5 folders)

Ctn. 136

578. Reports of Discrimination and Legal Remedies (2 folders)

 

578. Clippings

 

578. Equal Pay for Equal Work (4 folders)

 

578. Women's History

 

578. Discrimination in Employment (3 folders)

 

578. Discrimination in Education (2 folders)

 

578. Citizen's Advisory Comm. on the Status of Women,Wash. D.C.,

 

578. Women and Credit, Banking, and Mortgages

Ctn. 137

578. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1970-73

 

578. Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) (2 folders)

 

578. International Women's Year, 1975

 

578. Women in Law (2 folders)

 

578. Women in Government and Politics

 

578. Women in the Military and on the Police Force

 

578. Married Women's Choice of Name

 

578. International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women

 

578. McGraw-Hill Guidelines for Equal Trtmnt of Sexes in Publishing

 

578. "Women and the Law" 7th Regional Conference, Univ. of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, 1977 (2 ff)

 

578. Women in Sports

 

578. Pregnancy and Maternity Leave (ACLU Reports)

 

Civil Actions Under § 1983 and Other Civil Rights Laws

Ctn. 30

580. General- Civil Rights Law

 

Correspondence

 

Benjamin Dreyfus, Speech to Philadelphia Chapter of NLG,1963

Ctn. 30

580. Testimony of Berl I. Bernhard before Subcommittee No. 5 of the House Judiciary Committee on pending Civil Rights Legislation, May 16, 1963

Ctn. 31

580. Federal Civil Rights Act 1964

 

Civil Rights Act of 1966, Speeches on legislation

 

Clippings

 

580.b McGee v Williams

 

580.1 Tynes v Gogos

 

580.3 Pettus v Schult

 

580.6 Royal News Co. v Schultz

 

580.6a Royal News Co. v Olson

 

580.7 Council of Federated Organizations v Rainey

 

580.8 In re petition of Aaron Henry et al.

 

580.12 Bryant v Sisco v Donnell

 

580.14 Miller v Hall

 

580.15 Smith v Ladner

 

580.22 White v White Knights of the KKK of Mississippi

 

580.23 Seabrooks v Chicago

 

580.26 Guido v Schenectady

 

580.29 Jones v Hartford

 

580.31 Labor Defense Coalition v Gribbs

 

580.32 West Tennessee ACLU v Memphis

 

580.33 John v Johnson

Ctn. 127

580.37 De La Raza v Regents

Ctn. 31

580.36 Weathers v Ebert

 

580.38 Leeds v Little League, Inc.

 

580.39 Philadelphia Junior Chamber of Commerce v US Jaycees

Ctn. 31

580.40 Dahl v Palo Alto

 

580.42 Feehan v Levine

 

580.43 Teterud v Gillman

 

580.44 Leonard v City of Columbus

 

580.46 Smith v O'Halloren

 

580.47 US v Jefferson Mortgage Co.

 

580.49 Kelly v Johnson

 

580.51 Huffman v Pursue, Ltd.

Ctn. 127

580.52 ILWU, Local 6 v Handyman

Ctn. 31

580.53 Schwenk v Boy Scouts of America

 

580.54 Belcher v Stengel

 

580.55 Weatherford v Bursey

 

580.56 Women' s Defense Committee v Jozwiak

 

580.57 Wiles v Shaw

 

580.58 Mauck v Housden

 

581. Rights of Students and Teachers

Ctn. 127

581.1 Hernandez v Nichols

 

581.3 Murphy V Kerrigan

 

581.4 Zamora v Riles

 

581.5 Ortega v Guadalupe Joint Union School Dist.

 

Criminal Prosecution Under Civil Rights and Other Laws

Ctn. 31

590. Civil Rights Law- Criminal

 

Pamphlets and reports

 

State Action

 

Clippings

 

590.10 US v Rainey, Price

Ctn. 31

590.12 Alabama v Wilkins

 

590.13 US v Guest et al.

 

590.19 Alabama v Coleman

 

590.19b US v Bowers and DeBoxtel

 

590.34 US v Lester, Buccieri

 

590.36 US v Feise

 

590.43 US v Perez

 

590.44 US v Gerena

 

Suits Involving Constitutional Rights of Native American Indians

Ctn. 137

600. Native American Bibliographies, 1970-73

 

600. Native Americans and Poverty

 

600. California Rural Legal Assistance

 

600. Wounded Knee - AIM

 

600. Survival of American Indian Assocaition

 

Miscellaneous

 

Briefs

(Many have no assigned case numbers. Others have case numbers written on them but need to be integrated into existing case folders or have case folders created if the Brief is the only existant document in the case. Check list above or consult case finder for existing case files).

Ctn. 142

Unfiled Briefs- Aliens and Naturalization (2 folders)

 

Unfiled Briefs-Civil Liberties (6 folders)

 

Unfiled Briefs- Miscellaneous (3 folders)

 

Report-Thought Control in the USA, No. 1-6, 1947

Ctn. 143

Unfiled Briefs-Miscellaneous (11 folders)

Ctn. 180

Unnfiled memos and briefs (2 folders)

Box 61

Table of (New) Cases (Incomplete)

 

Vol. 1, No. 1 1956

 

Vol. 2, No. 3 May 1957

 

Vol. 2, No. 4 July 1957

 

Vol. 3, No. 3 April 1958

 

Vol. 4, No. 3 May 1959

 

Vol. 5, No. 2 Feb. 1960

 

Vol. 7, No. 3 May, 1962

 

Vol. 7, No. 4 July, 1962

 

Vol. 8, No. 1 Nov. 1962

 

Vol. 8, No. 3 May 1963

 

Vol. 8, No. 4 Aug. 1963

 

Vol. 9, No. 3 April 1964

 

Vol. 9, No. 4 July 1964

 

Vol. 12, No. 1 Nov. 1966

 

Docket newsletter Feb. 1967

 

SUBSERIES 1.2: Human Rights Docket, 1979-89

 

I. Freedom Of Thought, Expression And Association

Additional Note

(First Amendment Liberties, Ninth And Fourteenth Amendments)
 

Freedom Of Speech, Press, Assembly

 

Licensing

 

-Of Meetings

 

Key to classification of cases and case descriptions

Ctn. 46

11. Ashford v Oakland

 

-Of Peddlars, Literature Tables

 

13. California v Barton and Josselyn

 

13. Unemployed Workers Organizing Committee v Batterton

 

13. Sun Valley v California Tax Reform Association

 

13. Bill Press v Pan-American Properties

 

13. Bill Press v Lucky Stores, Inc.

 

13. ACLU, Nuclear Weapons Lab Conversion Project v UC, Lawrence

 

Livermore Lab

 

13.1 Howe v Univ of Florida et al

 

13.11 Robins v Pruneyard

 

13.12 Rosen v Port of Portland

 

13.13 US Labor Party v Knox

 

-Of Parades

 

16. Beckerman v Tupelo

 

16.11 Smith v Collin

 

16.12 Jewish Defense League v St Louis

 

16.13 Collin v O'Malley

 

16.14 Gay Activist Alliance of New Jersey v D'Arminio

 

16.15 North Shore Right to Life Committee v Manhassett

 

-Of Mass Media

Ctn. 46

17. Freedom of Speech-Mass Media, General

 

17. In re Improvement Leasing

 

17.1 Palmetto v FCC

 

17.4 United Church of Christ v FCC

 

17.7 Red Lion Broadcasting v US FCC, US FCC v Radio and Television News Directors Association

 

17.9 US v FCC

 

17.11 Forcade v Rowley

 

17.12 US FCC v Midwest Video Corp.

 

17.13 Sanders v FCC

 

17.15 US FCC v New Jersey State Lottery Commission

 

17.16 Forcade, Sherrill v Knight

 

17.18 Cosmopolitan Broadcasting Corp. v FCC

 

17.19 NAACP v FCC

 

17.20 Writers Guild of America, West v FCC

 

17.22 Nixon v Warner Communications

 

17.23 Goldblum v NBC

 

17.24 Houchins v KQED

 

17.26 New Solidarity v Rochford

 

-Of Political Ads, TV, Radio

 

18.1 Garabedian v Michaelson

 

Administrative Restrictions

 

-By US Customs

Ctn. 48

21.8 DeVries v Acree

 

21.9 Various Articles of Obscene Merchandise, Long v US

 

-On Government Information and Secrecy

Ctn. 46

22.10 In re How to Read Like Donald Duck

 

-Freedom of Information Act: FBI and Justice Department

 

23.104 Hiss v US

 

23.105 Meeropol v US Dept of Justice

 

23.110 Field Enterprises v FBI

 

-Freedom of Information Act: CIA and State Departments

 

23.201 Bell v US

Ctn. 47

23.203 Halperin v National Security Council

 

23.208 Edwards v CIA

 

23.301 Nixon v Admr of General Services

 

-On Students and Teachers

 

24.Cal.79 Bradfield v UC

 

24.Cal.80 Ofsevit v San Francisco State University

 

24.Cal.81 Calif Federation of Teachers v Eu

 

24.Cal.83 Graves v Lawndale School Dist

 

24.Cal.84 Powers v Bakersfield School Dist

 

24.Cal.85 Terri v Fullerton Community College

 

24.Colo.4 Franklin v Atkins

 

24.Fla.3 Ferrara v Phifer

 

24.Ill.1 Carey v Piphus

 

24.Ia.3 Zoll v Eastern Allmakee Community School Dist

 

24.Ky Allen v Bd of Educ

 

24.Ky.5 Stagnolia v Harlan County Bd Of Educ

 

24.Ky.6 Concerned Parents v Whitley Co.

 

24.Md.1 Maryland Public Interest v Elkins

Ctn. 47

24.Md.2 Ollman v University of Maryland

 

24.Miss.16 Givhan v Western Line

 

24.Mo.6 Ratchford v Gay Lib

 

24.NJ.9 Lipp v Morris

 

24.NY Granville v Thomas

 

24.NY In re Johnson

 

24.NY Perez v Brooklyn College

 

24.NY.37 Selzer v Berkowitz

 

24.NY.30 Kahan v Bd of Higher Education

 

24.NY.39 Maher v Seaford

 

24.Or.4 Lowell School Dist v Kerr

 

24.Or Henthorn v Grand Prarie School Dist

 

24.Pa.11 Brush v Penn State

 

24.Pa.12 In re application of the Trustees of the Univ of Penn

 

24.Pa.13 Nyden v Univ of Pittsburg

 

24.Tex Miller v Jim Ned Independent School Dist

 

24.Tex Dean v Timpson

 

24.Tex.16 Allaire v Rogers

 

24.Tex.17 Jacobs v Marshall

 

24.Tex.18 Sullivan v Univ Interscholastic League

 

24.Tex.19 Raymond v Parr

 

24.Utah Utah v Singer

 

24.5 Danis v Tenafly

 

24.5 Clark v Gladstone

 

24.5 Frasca v Andrews

 

24.5 Iowa v DeVey

Ctn. 47

24.5 Lowman v Davis

 

24.5 Reineke v Cobb Co. School Dist

 

24.5 Summe v Warsaw

 

24.5 Thomas v Bd of Educ

 

24.5 Dunagin v City of Oxford

 

-On Student Newspapers

 

24.500 Campus Comm Inc v Freedman et al

 

24.500 Williams v Spencer

 

24.520 Johnson v Brinson

 

24.521 Pliscou v Holtville Unified School Dist

 

24.528 Gellman v Marcase and Phil High Schl

 

24.530 Gambino v Fairfax County School Bd

 

24.522 Evans v Righetti

 

24.523 Kober v Unified School Dist No. 234

 

24.525 Pickens v Atkinson

 

24.526 Trachtman v Anker

 

24.527 Weaver v School Dist 4J

 

24.529 El Sol v Schilling

 

-On Miscellaneous Activities

 

25.13 Roberts v Vance

 

25.61 Alaska Gay Coalition v Sullivan

 

25.62 Bailey v US Marines

 

25.64 Montagne v McGuire

 

Economic Restrictions

Ctn. 47

30.31 Minneapolis Star & Tribune v Commr of Revenue

 

30.32 Kimble v McDuffy

Ctn. 47

30.34 Griffith v Bell Whitley

 

30.35 Irvington v Kramedjian

 

30.36 Beerbohm v Sonoma Co Library

Ctn. 109

31. Applegate v Brown

 

31. Turner v Gray

 

31.4 Bishop v Suggs

 

Contempt

 

-Of Federal Courts

Ctn. 109

41.a US v Crockett

 

41.15 In re Caldwell

 

41.16 In re Dellinger

 

41.104 Evans v Fromme

 

-Of State Courts

 

42. Segregated Courtrooms

 

42. In the matter of Dellinger

 

42. Glen v Hongisto

 

42.12 Holt, Dawley v Virginia

 

42.16 In re Tobias Simon

 

42.17 Hamilton v ALA

 

42.19 Ungar v Sarafite

 

42.28 N.Y. Co. Lawyers' Assn. v Dacey

 

42.33 In re Kenneth V. Cockrel

 

42.34 Bd of Edu v United Fed. of Teachers

 

42.35 In re Spencer

 

42.35 In re Ravitz

 

42.37 In re Lafferty

Ctn. 109

42.38 Michigan v Porter

 

42.39 Bell v Hongisto

 

42.40 In re Grossman

 

42.41 Gaddis v Wyman

 

42.42 Johnson v Mississippi

 

42.101 Hamilton v Berkeley Municipal Court

 

42.103 Rowe v Mississippi

 

42.104 McLucas et al. v Palmer

 

42.106 Oliver v Postel

 

42.107 Oklahoma Pub. Co. v Dist. Ct. of Oklahoma City

 

Criminal Sanctions

Ctn. 109

50. Vigilante in So. US: Justifiable Civil Disobedience or Privileged Self-Help

 

-Against Disorderly Conduct and Similar Offenses

 

51. General

 

51.Ala.c Montgomery v Davidson

 

51.Cal. California v Feshangi

 

51.Cal.4 Calif. v Meisenbach

 

51.Cal.18 Calif. v Castro

 

51.Cal.19 Pain v San Francisco Municipal Court

 

51.Cal.23 Calif. v Cohen

 

-Against Sedition, Anarchy, Syndicalism, Riots, Bombing

Ctn. 47

54. North Carolina v Wood

 

54. Texas v Hirschi (Moody Park Three)

 

54.43 Alabama v Chambliss

 

54.44 Alabama v Stoner

 

-Against Leafleting,Posting Signs, Picketing, Demonstrating

Ctn. 47

55.06 US v Ebner, et al

 

-Against Trespassing

Ctn. 110

58. General

 

58. San Francisco Sit-ins, 1964

 

58.Cal. Calif. v Ordona

 

58.Cal Calif v Rodriguez

 

58.Cal.8 Calif. v Sims (2 folders)

 

58.Cal.9 In re Nathaniel Burbridge

 

58.Cal.13 Calif. v Green

 

58.Cal.15 Calif. v Minkin

 

58.Cal.22 Calif. v Hutchinson

 

58.Cal.24a Calif. v Heinemann

 

58.Cal.24b USA v Bishop et al

 

58.Cal.28 Parrish v Municipal Court

 

58.Cal.35 Calif v Long

 

58.Cal.36 In re Cox

 

58.Cal.37 In re Wallace

 

58.Cal.40 Calif. v Schwarz

Ctn. 47

58.Cal.39 Calif v Andrew

 

58.Cal.139a California v Acton

 

-Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities

Ctn. 110

58.Fla.4 Adderly v Florida

 

58.Ga.14 Georgia v Rachel

 

58.Mass.2 Doyle v O'Brien

Ctn. 110

58.Mich.3 Folgueras v Hassle

 

58.NH.1 Adams v Sampson

 

58.NH.2 New Hampshire v Wentworth

 

58.Okla. Oklahoma v Bernstein

 

58.Or.1 Oregon v Mouer

 

58.Pa.2 Limerick v 14 Members

 

58.SC.5 So. Carolina v 250 Nuclear Demonstrators

 

58.US.1 US v Hartman

 

58.Vt.1 Vermont Yankee v Vermont Decomissioning Alliance

 

-Against Miscellaneous Criminal Activities

 

59. In re Lowell Eggemeier

 

59.116 Hilliard v Mitchell

 

59.117 US v Hilliard

Ctn. 47

59. US v Ganthier

 

59. US v Metheny

Ctn. 48

59.128 Chavis v North Carolina (Wilmington Ten)

 

59.131 Pelitier v US (2 folders)

 

Civil Sanctions (and Contempt Charges)

Ctn. 48

63. Illinois Migrant Council v Pilliod

 

63.67 Claiborne Hardware v NAACP

 

63.67a Henry v First Natl Bank of Clarksdale

 

Freedom Of Association: Affecting The Organization

 

Organizational Privileges Challenged

 

-Privacy in Organizational Work

Ctn. 48

205.16 In re Search Warrant Wash DC

 

-In Prisons

Ctn. 48

206.01 Carter v Klein

 

206.2 Houchins v Fenton

 

Labor Unions

 

-Right to Organize:Federal Statutes

Ctn. 48

231.1 Eastex v NLRB

 

231.2 Huffstutler v Butz

 

231.4 Beardsley v US Postal Service

 

231.5 Beth Israel Hospital v NLRB

 

Freedom Of Association: Affecting The Members

 

Civil Disabilities for Membership: Federal

 

-Through Deportation Proceedings

Ctn. 48

258. Hill v Richmond

 

258. Ayoub v Hazlett

 

Civil Disabilities for Membership: State, Local, And Private

 

-In State, Local Government Employment

Ctn. 48

261.31 Council 11, AFSCME v Michigan Civil Serv Comm

 

-In Teaching

 

262.29 Reinecke v Hawaii

 

-In Proceedings Against Attorneys and Bar Applicants

 

265.39 Garden State Bar Assn v Middlesex Co

 

265.40 No Carolina State Bar Assn v Paul

 

Criminal Penalties for Nondisclosure

 

-For Refusal to Produce Records

 

274.9 McSurley v McAdams (2 folders)

 

Civil Penalties for Nondisclosure

 

-By Others

Ctn. 48

282. Socialist Workers Party v Hardy

 

Penalties for False Disclosure

 

-In Miscellaneous Cases

 

293. DeFrantz v US Olympic Committee

 

II. Due Process And Related Rights

Additional Note

(Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, And Fourteenth Amendments)
 

Searches and Seizures

Ctn. 48

300 NYCLU & NCBL v NYC Police & FBI

 

-By Electronic Eavesdropping

 

301.5 Fonda v Gray

 

301.5 Weinberg v Mitchell, Hallinan v Mitchell

 

301.5 Kissinger v Halperin

 

301.64 Handschu v Special Services Division

 

-National Security Cases

 

301.514 Jabara v Kelley

 

301.529 Clavir v Levi

 

301.536 US v Gabriner

 

301.537 Kinoy v Mitchell

 

301.538 Moore v Levi

Ctn. 49

301.541 US v Truong (2 folders)

 

301.546 Abramovitz v Ahern

 

301.548 Anderson v Nixon

 

301.549 Birnbaum v US

 

301.550 Lamont v US

 

-In Other Federal Cases

Ctn. 49

302. INS v Hispanics

 

-Civil and Administrative

Ctn. 48

302.306 Rodriguez v Dahlin

 

302.308 LaDuke v Castillo

 

302.309 Cabral-Avila v INS

 

302.311 Marshall v Barlow's

 

302.312 Marshall v CF&I Steel

 

302.313 Ehrlichman v Solomon

 

-Suits for False Arrest, Police Practices, Police Review Boards

 

304. Operation Zebra

 

304.Ala.15 Peck v Kelley

 

304.Ca l. Alvarez, Fiske et al v Gates et al

 

304.Cal. Guyton v Jensen

 

304.Cal. Lyons v Los Angeles

 

304.Cal. Savala v Castillo

 

304.Cal. Smith, Jones, Ramirez, Williams, Ford v City and County of Los Angeles

 

304.Cal.121 Avelar v McDonald

 

304.Cal.122 Pratt v FBI

 

304.Cal.124 California v Rizo

 

304.Conn.9 Turpin v West Haven

 

304.DC.11 Letelier v Dina

 

304.Haw.15 Thompson v Andrus

 

304.Ill.40 Hampton v Hanrahan (3 folders)

 

304.Ill.41 Lenard v Melrose Park

 

304.Mich.28 Bergman v Kelley

Ctn. 48

304.Mich.29 Liuzzo v Kelley (2 folders)

Ctn. 50

304.NJ.11 Vasquez v McNally

 

304.NJ.12 Boyer v Loree

 

304.NJ.13 Lewis v Hyland

 

304.NJ.15 In the matter of LP

 

304.NY Handschu v Special Services Division

 

304.NY.42 MM v Anker

 

304.NY.43 Duverney v Prajka

 

304.NY.44 Rose v Koch

 

304.NY.45 Schmidt v Curasi

 

304.NY.46 Scott v Maloney

 

304.Ohio.6 Krause v Rhodes (Kent State)

 

304.Ohio.7 Furlan v US

 

304.Pa US v Philadelphia

 

304.Pa Pennsylvania v Porter et al

 

304.Pa.21 Swietlowich v Bristol

 

304.Pa.23 Wilkinson v District Attorney

 

304.Pa.24 Sherard v Woodruff

 

304.Pa.25 Jones v Lambert

 

304.Pa.27 Smith v Connor

 

304.PR.1 Torres v Puerto Rico (2 folders)

 

304.Tex Cervantez v Whitfield

 

304.Tex.9 Bezan v Wilson

 

304.Tex.11 Ramirez v Byrd

 

304.Tex.12 Salazar v Ramirez

 

304.Tex.13 Sanchez v Renya

 

304.Tex.14 Moreno v Park

Ctn. 50

304.Tex.16 Rocha v Gossett

 

304.Tex.17 Cana v Colbath

 

304.Tex.18 Pena v Colwell

 

304.US Margolis v Knight

 

304.US.26 Walker v US

 

304.Utah.1 GM Leasing v US

 

304.Va.3 Norton v US

 

304.Wash.6 Maltos v Kespohl

 

304.Wisc.12 Davis v Murphy

 

304.Wisc.13 Blair v Baumgartner

 

304.Wisc.14 Vietnam Veterans v Saye

 

-Police Line-up, Identification Procedures

 

305.8 Moore v Wisconsin

 

305.9 Ohio v Moody

 

Indictments/ Informations

 

-Charge of Conspiracy

Ctn. 50

314.22 Us v Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) (21 folders)

Ctn. 51

314.22 Us v Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) (10 folders)

 

Defense of Self

Ctn. 51

325.8 Washington v Wanrow

 

Self-Incrimination: Criminal Sanctions For Exercising Privilege

 

-Before Grand Juries,Courts, and Tribunals

Ctn. 51

333. In re McCracken

 

333.36 In re Cueto

 

333.37 In re Guerrero

 

-Grants of Immunity: Federal

Ctn. 51

334.20 US v Beradelli

 

334.21 US v Morales

 

-Grants of Immunity: State

 

335.17 Rysdale v Superior Court

 

Self-Incrimination: Civil Sanctions For Exercising Privilege

 

-Effect on Army Discharges

Ctn. 51

341 Natl Assn of Concerned Veterans v Secy of Defense

 

341 Giles v Secy of the Army

 

-Effect on Attorneys

 

345.5 In re Mann

 

Due Process

 

-In Grand Jury Procedures

Ctn. 51

352.11 In re Custodian of Records

 

-In Obtaining Confessions

 

353.97 California v Pettingill

 

353.99 New York v Colon

 

-In Press Releases and Newspaper Coverage

 

354.44 In re Illinois News Broadcasters

 

354.46 In re Wilson

 

353.100 Watson v Maryland

 

354.41 American Republican, Inc. v Wall

 

-Perjured Evidence

 

355. US v Hanigan (2 folders)

 

355.14 In re Hiss

 

355.15 New York v Knapp

 

-Inadmissable Evidence

Ctn. 51

355.201 US v Bazzand

 

355.202 California v Haslouer

 

355.203 Illinois v Baptist

 

355.205 Milburn v Arkansas

 

355.206 Garcia v Curry

 

355.207 California v Anderson

 

355.16 New Jersey v Carter

 

355.17 Tibbs v Florida

 

-Exculpatory Evidence

 

355.301 Massachusetts v Ellison

 

355.302 In re Reilly

 

355.303 New Jersey v Merritt

 

355.304 California v Lee

 

355.305 Jones v Jago

 

-In Courts Martial, Military Administrative Decisions, Habaes Corpus Proceedings

 

356.88 Elliot v Wilcox

 

356.89 Trueblood v Alexander

 

356.90a Huff v Alexander

 

356.91 Tigue v Swain

 

-In Expatriation, Denaturalization, Deportation, Relocation Proceedings

 

358 English v Vician

 

358 Gonzalez v INS

 

358 In re Monserate

Ctn. 51

358 In re Marroquin

 

358 Mashi v INS

 

358.77 Chang-Salazar v US

 

358.78 Chinese American Civic Council v Atty General

 

358.79 Fulgencio v INS

 

358.80 Hoonsilapa v INS

 

358.81 Lopez-Telles v INS

 

358.82 Martinez de Mendoza v INS

 

358.83 Medina v Castillo

 

358.84 Pechter v Lyons

Ctn. 52

358.85 Navia-Duran v INS

 

358.86 US v Pereira

 

358.87 Jean-Batiste v INS

 

358.89 Munoz v Bell

 

-In Rape Cases

 

359.1 New York v Yanik

 

-In Bar Proceedings re Lawyers

 

361.17 Turco v Monroe County Bar Assn

 

-In Gov't Empolyment inclu Teaching

 

363.35 Cain v Whitehead

 

363.36 Covino v Governing Bd of Contra Costa

 

363.39 Roberts v Jackson Civil Service Bd

 

-In Misc. Administrative Proceedings

 

364.4 Butz v Economou

 

Speedy and Public Trial

Ctn. 52

365.27 Detroit Free Press v Macomb Circuit Judge

 

365.29 US v Warren (2 folders)

 

Right to Counsel/ Access to Courts, Agencies

 

-In Federal Cases

Ctn. 52

371.109 Caston v Sears Roebuck

 

-Before Administrative Boards

 

372.33 New York v Baker

 

372.152 California v Spain (San Quentin Six)

 

372.153 Brown v Multnomah

 

372.154 California v Alexander

 

372.155 California v Perez

 

372.157 Ferrel v Superior Court

 

372.159 Trice v States

 

372.160 California v Rodriguez

 

-Restrictions on Attorneys and Judges

 

373. Judicial Inquiry v Jordan

 

373. Rapp, Gilman v Comm on Prof Ethics and Conduct

 

373.49 Nathan v Berlin

 

373.50 In re Bonin

 

373.51 Comden v Superior Court

 

373.52 Contra Costa Public Defender v Murphy

 

373.53 Michigan v Stiegler

 

373.54 Ohralik v Ohio State Bar Assn

 

373.55 In re Primus

 

373.56 Person v Assn of the Bar of NY City

Ctn. 52

373.57 In re Rohan

 

373.58 Serko v Assn of the Customs Bar

 

373.500 People v King (Darrel)

 

-Bias and Prejudice of Judges

 

378.9 In re Barbara Phillips

 

Jury Trials

 

-Size of Jury

Ctn. 52

391.103 Ballew v Georgia

 

391.104 Columbus v Davis

 

-Waiver of Jury, Right to

 

392.8 Bernstein v Universal Pictures

 

392.9 Gonzales v Nork

 

392.10 Drone v Hutton

 

392.11 Ohio v Ruppert

 

392.12 Pitt v Barnes

 

392.13 Regional Center of Orange v King

 

392.14 In re Thomas

 

-Improper Comment

 

393.11 New York v Ellis

 

393.12 California v Dagino

 

393.13 California v Litteral

 

393.14 US V Morris

 

393.16 US v Henderson

 

-Scrupled Jurors

 

394. Grigsby v Mabry

Ctn. 52

394. Hovila v Estelle

 

394.5 California v Henderson (2 folders)

Ctn. 53

394.7 California v Sand (2 folders)

 

394.8 Shippy v Estelle

 

-Jury Tampering

 

395 US v Leroy

 

395 Simants v Nebraska

 

395 US v Bettis

 

395.1 California v Honeycutt

 

395.2 Hawkins v US

 

Excessive Bail

 

-Conditions Imposed

Ctn. 53

402.12 South Dakota v Means

 

-Denial of Bail

 

403.25 US v Truong

 

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

 

-In criminal sentencing, punishment

Ctn. 91

411.93 California v Burt

 

411.95 Boyle v Madigan

 

411.100 Burt v California (4 folders)

 

-In rendition, extradition

Ctn. 180

412.8 In the matter of the removal of Marilyn C. Williams

Ctn. 91

412.20 Cluros v Little

 

-In civil cases

 

413.11 Bradley v Doherty

 

413.13 La Deaux v Jett

Ctn. 91

413.14 Hudson v Ramsey

 

-Capital Punishment

 

414.13 People v Crosier

Ctn. 53

414.25 California v Allen

 

-In Women's Cases

Ctn. 91

415.1 Scott v Mountanos

 

415.2 Dawson v Carberry

 

415.3 Collins v Whitmore

Ctn. 53

415.5 Chesimard v Mulcahy

 

Post Conviction Remedies

 

-On Prison Disciplinary Proceedings

Ctn. 53

455.12 Pratt v Rees

 

Sentencing and Clemency Procedures

 

-Sentencing Process

Ctn. 53

461.33 US v Denson

 

III. Equal Protection

Additional Note

(Fifth, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, Fifteenth, Nineteenth, Twenty-Fourth And Twenty-Sixth Amendments)
 

Jury Selection: Appeals To Prejudice

 

-Involving Racial, Nationality Discrimination

Ctn. 53

512.Cal.14 California v Johnson

 

512.Ga.27 Mann v Cox

 

512.Ga.28 Brown v Culpepper

 

512.Tex.8 Caballero v Prater

 

512.Tex.9 Ciudadanos Unidos v Hildago Co.

 

512.Wash.12 Washington v Gladstone

 

-Involving Other Discrimination

Ctn. 53

516.7 Connecticut v Pastor

 

516.8 New Jersey v Porro

 

Education

 

-Suits to Enforce Integration

Ctn. 53

522.Tex.29a Doe v Plyer

 

-Treatment of Minority Groups in School Books

 

525. In re Baum

 

525. Loewen v Turnipseed

Ctn. 60

-Suits against Special Admissions Programs, Affirmative Action

 

527. Legislative Plans

 

Employment, clippings (2 folders)

Ctn. 61

527. American Assn. for AA 4th Annual Conference, Apr. 1978

 

Education

 

Asian Americans

 

LSAT

 

LSAT challenges

 

AA in the 1980's

Ctn. 63

527. Rupert v Arizona Bd of Regents

 

Minorities and Medicine in the USA, 1975

 

A collection of articles compiled by Eric S. Goldman for an Amicus Curiae Brief for the NLG in Bakke v Regents (2 ff)

 

Goldman Research Materials

 

Minorities Admissions to Med. and Law Schl (7 folders)

 

Female Admissions

 

MCAT/GPA Criteria

 

Recuritment of Minorities

Ctn. 63

527 Need for Black doctors in communities (2 folders)

 

Bibliographic material, 1973-77

 

USC School of Medicine, Manpower Comm.

 

UC- AA Action Report, 1975

 

Publications

 

Law School Admissions Study, MALDEF, 1980

 

Affirmative Action in Crisis: A Handbook for Activists, NLG & NCBL, 1977

 

Minority Student Opportunities in US Medical Schools 1975-76, AAMC, 1975

 

Toward a Diversified Legal Profession, David White, ed.

 

deFunis v Odegaard: Race, Merit, and the Fourteenth Amendment, Ivor Kraft, 1976.

Ctn. 611

527.3-(6) Regents of the Univ. of Calif. v Alan Bakke

United States Supreme Court No. 76-811 (3 folders)

 

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to Supreme Court of Calif Opposition to Certiorari

 

Syllabus and Opinion on Certiorari to Sup. Court of Calif

 

Application for stay pending review on Certiorari

 

Reply to response to application for stay

 

Briefs

Ctn. 61

527.3 Reply

 

For petitioner

 

Supplemental

 

The US as Amicus Curiae

 

For Respondent

 

Testimony, Oct. 12, 1977

 

Amici Curiae in support of UC Regents (6 folders)

Ctn. 62

527.3 Amici Curiae in support of Bakke (2 folders)

 

Alan Bakke v Regents of the University of California, Supreme Court of the State of California S.F. 23311(3 ff)

 

Petition for rehearing

 

Answer for petition for rehearing

 

Order denying rehearing

 

Briefs

 

Opening

 

Reply to Appeal

 

Opening as to Cross-Appeal

 

Judge Tobriners Dissent

 

Amici Curiae

 

527.3 Alan Bakke v Regents of the University of California

Superior Court Yolo County No. 31287

 

List of Documents Filed

 

Petitioner's Reply Memorandum

 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the Law

 

Defendants Interrogatories

 

Answer

 

Declaration of George H. Lowrey, M.D.

 

Cross Complaint for Declaratory Relief

 

Notice of Intended Decision and Addendum

 

Memo in Opposition to Proposed Judgement

 

Judgement

 

Notice of Appeal

 

Misc. Documents

 

Memos and supporting documents

Ctn. 63

527.3 Overturn Bakke Decision Movement materials

 

Affirmative Action Crisis

 

Bakke Symposium, Bakke documents available

 

Admissions policies and racial preferences in higher education

 

Articles on the Bakke Case

Ctn. 64

Toward an Understanding of Bakke, US Comm on Civil Rights,1979

 

Clippings (2 folders)

 

527.5 McDonald v Santa Fe Trail Trans. Co.

Ctn. 30

527.6 Bakke v Regents of the University of California (deposition of George H. Lowrey) 1974

Ctn. 64

527.7 DeRonde v Bd of Regents of Univ of Calif (2 folders)

 

577.1 Weber v Kaiser (12 folders)

 

577.5 Cramer v Virginia

 

Employment

 

-Pregnancy and Child Care

Ctn. 53

578.701 Burwell v Eastern Airlines

 

578.702 DeLaurier v San Diego

 

578.707 Brunswick School Bd v Califano

 

-Procedural Problems

 

579.2 Lynn v Western Gillette

 

Misc Actions Under §1983, Other Civil Rights Laws

Ctn. 53

580 Scott v Hart

 

Criminal Prosecution Under Civil Rights and Other Laws

Ctn. 64

590. Greene v Memphis

Ctn. 53

590.46 US v Gray III, Felt, Miller

 

IV. Social And Economic Rights

Additional Note

(Commerce Power; Due Process, Equal Protection, Privileges & Immunities Of Fifth, Fourteenth Amendments; Ninth, Twenty-Fourth Amendments)
 

Social Security

 

Social Insurance

 

-Social Security: Administration

Ctn. 53

613. Califano v Yamasaki

 

613. Sanchez v Califano

 

613.2 Ferguson v Mathews

 

613.3 Blankenship v Secy HEW

 

613.4 Branch, Biggins v Weinberger

 

-Veterans Adminstration Benefits

 

614. Natl Veterans Task Force on Agent Orange v Cleland

 

614. Whitz v Cleland

 

614. Jaffee v US

 

614. In re Agent Orange

 

-Unemployment Compensation

 

615. Indiana Employment Security Bd v AUW

 

615.1 Glick v Unemployment Insurance

Ctn. 54

615.2 Idaho Dept of Employment v Smith

 

615.3 Gonzales v Texas

 

615.4 UAW v Taylor (2 ff)

 

615.5 NY Telephone Co v NY State Dept of Labor

 

-Pensions, Trust Funds

 

617. Bucyrus-Erie v Dept of Industry

 

617. Connecticut v Pervel

Ctn. 54

617. Fritz v US Railroad Retirement Board

 

617. Johns v Retirement Fund Trust

 

617. Kirschner v US

 

617.1 International Brotherhood of Teamsters v Daniel

 

617.4 Robinson v United Mine Workers

 

617.5 Golemme v Bd of Trustees

 

617.6 Wilson v Bd of Trustees

 

617.11 Shannon v US Civil Service Commn

 

617.12 Hood v. US Civil Service Commn

 

617.13 Harrison v Crowell

 

617.15 Ball v United Mine Workers

 

617.16 Hensley v United Mine Workers

 

617.17 Carpenters and Millwrights v Gardineer

 

Adequate Standard Of Living

 

Food

Ctn. 54

620. Wimbley v Bergland

 

-Food Stamps

 

621. Antone v Bergland

 

621.1 Aiken v Obledo

 

621.2 Long v San Francisco

 

621.3 Meza v Bergland

 

-School Lunches

 

622.1 Poe v Riles

 

-General Assistance

 

623. Harris v Rosario

Ctn. 54

623. LA County Welfare Rights Org. v LA County

 

623.1 Quern v Jordan

 

623.3 Isabell v Sonoma County

 

623.4 Harrington v Obledo

 

-Assistance to Elderly

 

624. O'Bannon v Town Court Nursing Center

 

624. Bumpus v Clark (5 ff)

 

624.1 Grieg v Olivarez

 

Housing

 

-Public Housing-Federal

Ctn. 54

631. Lancaster v Scranton

 

631.1 Cole v Harris

 

-Publicly-Assisted Housing

 

632.1 Housing Authority v Saylors

 

632.7 Coos Bay v HUD

 

-Zoning and Planning

 

633. Caputo v Chester

 

633. Glenview v Franklin

 

633. So Burlington County NAACP v Mt. Laurel

Ctn. 55

633. Urban League v Mahwah

 

-Private Housing-Conditions

 

635. Lipkin v Willard

 

635. Malone v Potter

 

635.1 Dohrmann v Berkeley

 

-Private Housing-Rent Control

Ctn. 55

636. Helmsley v Fort Lee

 

636. M & D Properties v Hankins

 

636. Rue-Ell Enterprises v Berkeley

 

636. Park West Village Tenants Assn v New York City

 

-Evictions

 

637. Hudson View v Weiss

 

637. Rivcom v Rangel

 

-Miscellaneous.

 

638. California v Som

 

638. Furey v Sacramento

 

638. Trentacost v Brussel

 

638.1 Blount v Harris

 

638.2 Meehan v Natl Assn of Realtors

 

Social Services

 

-Governmental

Ctn. 55

641.1 Amador Valley Joint Union HS Dist v California (2 ff)

 

641.2 San Francisco v Tinney

 

641.5 Robinson v Texarkana

 

645. Cleveland v Cleveland Electric

 

-Public Utilities

 

645. Smerechniak v Long Is. Lighting Co, Nassau Co

 

645. Detroit Edison v Detroit

 

645.1 PG&E v California State Bd of Equalization

 

645.2 Women Organized for Employment v Prudential

 

Medical Health Care

 

Government Programs

 

-Federal-Administration

Ctn. 55

662. Aguinaga v Castro County Hospital District

 

-State-Eligibility

 

663. Fabula v Buck

 

-State-Administration

 

664. ACLU, Aliens Health (non-case)

 

664.3 New York v Women's Christian Assn

 

664.6 Boone v Page

 

-Workers Compensation Act

 

665.4 Ohio v Castle & Cook

Ctn. 122

665.5 Martinez v Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory

 

Quality Of Life

 

Environmental Protection

 

-Preservation of Natural Resources

Ctn. 122

671. Citizens for a Better Environment v Costle

 

671 Nat'l Audubon Society v LA Dep't of Water

 

671 Virginia Surface Mining v Andrus

 

-Water Rights-Quality

 

672 Illinois v Milwaukee

 

672. US v Occidental Petroleum Co.

 

672. US v Philadelphia

 

-Air Pollution

Ctn. 56

673. US v Dusek

 

673. ILWU, Local 35 v Bd of Sup. v San Bernadino Co.

Ctn. 56

673. Mountain States Legal Foundation v Costle

 

673. McCoy-Elkhorn Coal Corp. v US EPA

 

673. US v N.L. Industries

 

673. US v Vertac Chemical

 

673. US v Tennoco Chemicals, Inc.

 

-Noise Pollution

 

674. Natl Business Aircraft Assn v Santa Monica

 

674.1 Britt v Superior Court

 

-Nuclear Hazards

 

675. McSwiggin v Regents

 

675. Roberts v Nunamaker v US

 

675. Honicker v Hendrie

 

675. Allen et al. v US

 

675. USA v Reilly Tar and Chemical Corp.

 

675. PG & E v State Energy Resources, Conser. & Develop.

 

675. New York v Occidental Petroleum Corp.

 

675. Hodder v NRC

 

675. Pacific Legal Foundation v California

 

675.b Good Fund, Ltd. v Church

 

675.1 Duke Power Co. v Carolina

 

675.3 Long Island Lighting Co. v Lloyd Harbor

 

675.4 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League v Costle

 

675.5 Lawler v PG & E

 

-War Hazards

 

676. Nevin v US Army

Ctn. 56

676.1 Aluli v Brown

 

676.2 Catholic Action of Hawaii v Brown

 

Industrial Hygiene

 

-Federal Standards-OSHA

Ctn. 56

681. Chamber of Commerce v OSHA

 

681. Gott v Cleland

 

681. Natl Congress of Hispanic Americans v Marshall

 

681. Industrial Union Dept v American Petroleum Inst

 

681. Whirpool v Marshall

 

681.1 Marshall v Daniel Construction

 

681.2 AFL-CIO v Marshall

 

681.3 Morris v Pittsburgh-Corning

 

681.4 Bentley v Califano

 

681.5 Gomez v Cloverleaf Fruit Farm

 

681.6 In re Transportation of Workers

 

-State Standards

 

682. Salwasser v Municipal Court Fresno

 

682. Wilkins v West Point Pepperell

 

Consumer Protection

Ctn. 56

690. EBMUD Ratepayers Assn. v EBMUD

 

-Quality of Goods

 

691. California Women's Health Network v Rominger

 

691. Nickell v Condo-Mobile, Inc.

 

691. Rush v Savchuk

 

691. World-Wide Volkswagen v Woodson

 

691.1 GTE Sylvania v Consumers Union

Ctn. 56

691.2 Indiana v Ford Motor Co.

 

-Nature of Advertising

 

692. Consolidated Edison of NY v Public Serv Comm of NY

 

692. Rochester Gas & Electric Co. v Public Service Commission

 

-Pricing Practices

 

693. American Optometric Assn. v FTC

 

693.1 Consumers Union v American Bar Assn

 

695.1 NBC v Niemi (3 ff)

 

Employment

 

Full Employment

 

-Runaway Shops

Ctn. 56

702. NLRB v Murray Production, Inc.

 

702. Williams v US Steel

 

-Miscellaneous

 

709. California Agrarian Action v UC Regents

 

Fair Labor Standards

 

-Wages

Ctn. 56

711. AFL-CIO v Kahn

 

711. Calif Trucking Assn. v Industrial Welfare Comm.

 

Labor Union Members

 

-Union Democracy

Ctn. 56

733. Boswell v IBEW

 

733. Ostrowski v Utility Workers

 

733. Kennedy v Metropolitan

 

733. McDonald v Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders Union

 

733.2 Newman v Commun Workers of Amer AFL-CIO

 

Education

 

Right to Education

 

-Quality Education

Ctn. 56

751. Debra P. v Turlington

 

751. Donohue v Copiague Union Free School

 

-Funding forEducation

 

752. Binet Montessori v SF USD

 

752. Doe v Indiana Bd of Education

 

V. National, International, And Citizenship Rights

Additional Note

(Commerce Power; Due Process, Citizenship, Privileges & Immunities Of Fifth, Fourteenth Amendments; Treaties)
 

Freedom of Movement

 

-Employment Opportunities

Ctn. 56

802 In re Actors' Equity

 

-Educational Opportunities

 

803 Valadez v Askew

 

-Taxation of Commuters

 

804 Sears v County of Los Angeles

 

-Other Rights

Ctn. 57

805 Agee v Secretary of State

 

805.2 Aznavorian v Califano

 

Indian Treaty Rights

 

-Under US Treaties

Ctn. 57

811. Mashpee Tribe v New Seabury Corp

 

811. Oglala Sioux Tribe v US

 

811. US v Michigan

 

811. US v Sioux Nation

Ctn. 57

811. Western Shoshone v US

 

811. Wilson v Omaha

 

811.1 Six Nations Confederacy v Andrus

 

-On Reservations

 

812. Andrus v Glover

 

812. Central Machinery Co v Arizona State Comm

 

812. Creek Nation v US

 

812. Livingston v Ewing

 

812. Lummi v Hallauer

 

812. Washington v US

 

812. White Mountain Apache v Bracker

 

-Miscellaneous

 

819. Oglala v Andrus

 

Native Rights

 

-In Hawaii

Ctn. 57

821.2 US v Kainoa

 

821.3 US v Kauhane

 

821.4 US v Foster

 

-In Alaska

 

822. Eluska v Andrus

 

Rights of Puerto Ricans

 

-In 50 States

Ctn. 57

831.1 Cordero v Levi

 

-In Puerto Rico

 

832. Rosata & Soto v US

 

832.2 US v Union National de Trabajadores

 

Right to Political Asysum

Ctn. 57

850. US v Berster

 

850. Sannon v US

 

850. Haitian Refugee Center v Bell (2 folders)

 

858. National Council of Churches v Egan

 

858.75 Pierre v US

 

Extradition Rights

Ctn. 57

860. US v Ziad Abu Eain (2 folders)

 

Repatrition Rights

Ctn. 58

870.1 Nggguyen Da Yen v Kissinger

 

VI. Procedural & Litigation Problems

 

Litigation Problems

 

In Collecting Attorney's Fees

 

-State Attorney's Fee Cases

Ctn. 58

1014.7 Serrano v Priest (2 folders)

 

Recovery of Money Damages

 

-Assessing Damages

Box 62

1021.1 US v Olin Corp.

 

SUBSERIES 1.3: Human Rights And Peace Law Docket 1945-1995

Access Information

Need processing review by Public Services.
Ctn. 65

Introductory materials and key to case numbers

 

Case Summaries (2 folders)

 

Table of Cases

 

Subject Index

 

Geographical Case Index

 

References to US Constitutions, Statutes, Regulations, Administrative Agencies,

 

Executive Orders, State Laws

 

References to Countries, Regions, Constitutions, Statutes

 

References to Treaties, Protocals, Conventions, International Agencies

 

Case Files

Ctn. 84

PL-1 through PL-8

Ctn. 85

PL-9 through PL-19

Ctn. 86

PL-19 through PL-43

Ctn. 87

PL-43 through PL-76

Ctn. 88

PL-77 through PL-127

Ctn. 82

PL-130 through PL-172