Guide to the Stanford University, Program in Ethics in Society, Honors Theses

Stanford University Archives staff

Stanford University. Libraries. Department of Special Collections and University Archives

Stanford, California

July 2012

Overview

Call Number: SC4-3445

Creator: Stanford University. Program in Ethics in Society.

Title: Stanford University, Program in Ethics in Society, honors theses

Dates: 1992-2008

Physical Description: 1 Linear feet (20 volumes in 2 boxes)

Summary: Honors theses written by undergraduates in the Program in Ethics in Society at Stanford University.

Language(s): The materials are in English.

Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives

Green Library

557 Escondido Mall

Stanford, CA 94305-6064

Email: specialcollections@stanford.edu

Phone: (650) 725-1022

URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc

Administrative Information

Provenance

Theses were transferred to the Stanford University Archives from the Hume Writing Center in 2011.

Information about Access

The collection is open for research use; materials must be requested at least 48 hours in advance of intended use. No photocopies may be made.

Ownership & Copyright

Copyright is retained by the creator for materials they have authored or otherwise produced. Transmission or reproduction of materials requires the written permission of the copyright owner.

Cite As

[Identification of item], Stanford University, Program in Ethics in Society, Honors Theses (SC4-3445). Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif.

Scope and Contents

The collection consists of honors theses written by undergraduates in the Program in Ethics in Society at Stanford University.

Access Terms

Ethics--Study and teaching.

Student papers.

Accession ARCH-2011-152 Theses

Box 1

Bae, Richard, Breaking down trust: managed care's effect on the patient-physician relationship. 1999

Box 1

Barnard, Catherine, Autonomy and disease prevention in population-based genetic screening: a case study. 2004

Box 1

Beerbohm, Eric, Welfare justice: a Rawlsian response to the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996. 1998

Box 1

Friedland, Michelle, Scheduled people and the environment: an adaption of Rawls's Theory of Justice. 1994

Box 1

Gandhi, Nandini, Sorting students by ability in elementary schools: a civic approach. 2001

Box 1

Gordon, Tracy, Toward a "health care ethics": implications of Rawls' "Justice as fairness" and Nozick's modern libertarianism for the design of a just health care system . 1992

Box 1

Johnstone, Mattie, Freedom and responsibility: the right to reproductive autonomy and China's one-child policy. 2001

Box 1

Maddow, Rachel, Identifiable lives: AIDS and the response to dehumanization. 1994

Box 1

Parang, Touraj, Autonomy, Ulysses contracts, and dementia: respecting the autonomy of dementia patients. 1996

Box 1

Rosenbloom, Seth, The legitimacy of South African judical review for social and economic rights. 2004

Box 1

Shapiro, Joseph, The ethics and efficacy of banning human kidney sales. 2003

Box 1

Slattery, Ian, Confronting colorblindness: assessing the morality of "colorblind" racial ideology. 2004

Box 1

Wood, Anne, The ethics of parental control: an inquiry into homeschooling. 2000

Box 2

Shane, Michelle, An inconvenient truth: the situation of children with autism in special education. 2007

Box 2

Wilson, Natausha A., Common schooling in Northern Ireland: a theoretic and pragmatic analysis of multicultural/integrated education. 1998

Box 2

Young, Angie, Providing a justification for parental leave and designing a policy. 1997

Box 2

Yusim, Anna, The limits of responsibility and the inadequacy of desert: a philosophical quest for justice in health care. 1999

Box 2

Richardson, Stewart, Applying the philosophy of John Stuart Mill to the issue of drug prohibition. 1995

Box 2

Yip, Jennifer, Servility and self-respect reconsidered: a case study of Filipina domestic helpers in Hong Kong. 2002

Box 2

Brown, Hunter Osprey, Elimination or preservation: a practical model for intuitive arguments undrelying the philosophy of race. 2008